Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with High-Bolus Dose Tirofiban: The FASTER (Favorite Approach to Safe and Effective Treatment for Early Reperfusion) Multicenter Registry.

Objectives: To investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary interventions (pPCI). Background: Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) use during pPCI has declined over years, mainly for the increased hemorrhagic risk associated to their use and for the availability of potent, fast-acting oral antiplatelet drugs. However, several pharmacodynamic studies showed suboptimal platelet inhibition with P2Y12-blockers, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor. Methods: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing pPCI were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter registry conducted in high-volume centers in Italy. All patients received intraprocedural tirofiban. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of in-hospital bleedings according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. In-hospital major adverse coronary events (MACE, defined as death, reinfarction, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization), final TIMI flow, myocardial blush grade, and ST-segment resolution were also evaluated. Results: A total of 472 patients (mean age 61 ± 11 years, 83% males) were enrolled in 16 Italian centers from October 2015 to June 2018. Mean basal thrombus grade score was 3.47 ± 1.25. PCI was performed by transradial approach in 88% of patients. We observed a very low rate of 30 days BARC bleedings (2.1%) and MACE (0.8%). Complete (>70%) ST-segment resolution was observed in 67% of patients. Conclusions: In the FASTER registry, the use of tirofiban during primary PCI, performed with a transradial approach in most cases, in patients with high thrombus burden was associated with high rates of complete ST-segment resolution and low rates of in-hospital bleeding and MACE.

Follow-up strategies and individual risk profile after percutaneous coronary intervention: The prospective post percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary consensus document (MCD) provided a follow-up strategy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on individual risk profiles: A, high; B, intermediate; and C, low. AIM: To assess patterns of follow-up after PCI and to evaluate the potential reduction of cardiologic examinations with the application of the MCD. METHODS: The post-PCI registry was carried out at 31 Italian Hospitals and included consecutive patients undergoing PCI. We collected cardiologic consults (CC), noninvasive stress tests (ST), and echocardiograms (EC) actually performed at 12 months and we compared them with the expected by the MCD. RESULTS: We included 1,113 patients (58% with acute coronary syndrome) that underwent 1,567 CC, 398 ST, and 612 EC. The performed CC and ST were significantly lower compared to the expected, respectively [1.6 (95% CI, 1.5-1.7) vs. 1.9 (95% CI, 1.8-2.0), and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.4-0.5) vs. 0.61 (95% CI, 0.6-0.7), p < .001]; the performed EC were significantly higher [0.6 (95% CI, 0.6-0.7) vs. 0.3 (95% CI, 0.3-0.37), p < .001]. Patients at moderate low risk had an excess of noninvasive tests whereas patients at higher risk received less examinations than the expected. The individual risk profile was an independent predictor of increased number of cardiac examination in patients at intermediate and low risk [profile B, OR 2.56 (95%CI 1.38-4.75); profile C, OR 27.00 (95%CI 8.13-89.62), p < .001]. CONCLUSION: In real world patients undergoing PCI, the intensity of follow-up at 12 months appeared not based on individual risk profile, with a higher numbers of examinations, particularly EC, performed in low risk subjects.

Lack of implementation of guidelines recommendations for coronary revascularization in stable patients with complex disease is associated with high rates of incomplete revascularization : Analysis from the Apache study.

The objective of this study is to evaluate completeness of coronary revascularization in patients with complex stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but a surgical revascularization indicated according to 2018 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The optimal mode of revascularization for SCAD should take into account clinical, anatomic, and procedural characteristics-including anticipated completeness of revascularization-and modality of treatment should be discussed by a Heart Team. Among patients enrolled in the APpropriAteness of percutaneous Coronary interventions in patients with ischemic heart disease study, we identified patients with complex SCAD. Rates of ad-hoc PCI and documented heart team discussion were reported stratified by guideline recommended mode of revascularization. Completeness of revascularization was assessed by an angiographic core laboratory using residual SS (rSS) ≤ 8 and SYNTAX Revascularization Index (SRI) ≥ 70%. Among 336 PCI patients with SCAD, 182 (54.2%) had complex coronary disease and 152 underwent ad-hoc PCI (83.5%). Patients for whom surgery was the recommended revascularization option (9.3%) had a significantly and substantial higher rate of incomplete revascularization than patients for whom either mode of revascularization or PCI was recommended (61.3% vs 23.6% with rSS > 8, p < 0.001 and 77.4% vs 44.6% with SRI < 70%, p < 0.001). Patients with complex SCAD receiving percutaneous myocardial revascularization when surgery was recommended have substantially incomplete myocardial revascularization. These data support multidisciplinary decision-making in these patients and suggest considering anticipated completeness when deciding mode of coronary revascularization.

A multidisciplinary consensus document on follow-up strategies for patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

The number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is increasing worldwide. Follow-up strategies after PCI are extremely heterogeneous and can greatly affect the cost of medical care. Of note, clinical evaluations and non-invasive exams are often performed to low risk patients. In the present consensus document, practical advises are provided with respect to a tailored follow-up strategy on the basis of patients' risk profile. Three strategies follow-up have been defined and types and timing of clinical and instrumental evaluations are reported. Clinical and interventional cardiologists, cardiac rehabilitators, and general practitioners, who are in charge to manage post-PCI patients, equally contributed to the creation of the present document.

CT angiography prior to endovascular procedures: can artificial intelligence improve reporting?

CT angiography prior to endovascular aortic surgery is the standard non-invasive imaging method for evaluation of aortic dimensions and access sites. A detailed report is crucial to a proper planning. We assessed Artificial Intelligence (AI)-algorithm accuracy to measure vessels diameters at CT prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). CT scans of 50 patients were included. Two Radiologists with experience in vascular imaging together manually assessed diameters at nine landmark positions according to the American Heart Association guidelines: 450 values were obtained. We implemented TOST (Two One-Sided Test) to determine whether the measurements were equivalent to the values obtained from the AI algorithm. When the equivalence bound was a range of ± 2 mm the test showed equivalence for every point; if the range was equal to ± 1 mm the two measurements were not equivalent in 6 points out of 9 (p-value > 0.05), close to the aortic valve. The time for automatic evaluation (average 1 min 47 s) was significantly lower compared with manual measurements (5 min 41 s) (p < 0.01). In conclusion, our results indicate that AI-algorithms can measure aortic diameters at CT prior to endovascular surgery with high accuracy. AI-assisted reporting promises high efficiency, reduced inter-reader variabilities and time saving. In order to perform optimal TAVI procedure planning aortic root analysis could be improved, including annulus dimensions.

Achievement of target LDL-cholesterol level in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The JET-LDL registry.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), current guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level < 1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL). METHODS: The JET-LDL is a multicenter, observational, prospective registry created to investigate levels of LDL-C in consecutive patients with ACS undergoing PCI at 35 Italian hospitals, and to report their lipid lowering therapies (LLT). Follow-up was planned at 1 and 3 months. LDL-C reduction >50% from baseline or level < 55 mg/dL at 1-month was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 1095 patients were included: median age was 67 (58-75); 33.7% were already on LLT. Baseline LDL-C levels was 105 (76.5-137) mg/dL. At hospital discharge all patients were on LLT: 98.1% received statins (as mono or combination therapy), ezetimibe and PCSK9i were used in 60.1% and 8.5% of cases, respectively. Primary endpoint was achieved in 62% (95% CI 58-65) of cases. At 1-month LDL-C levels dropped to 53 (38-70) mg/dL (p < 0.001 vs baseline) and it was <55 mg/dL in 53% (95% CI 49-57) of patients; however, PCSK9i were added to 7 further cases. At 3-months 58% (95% CI 55-62) of patients achieved the target level, but PCSK9i was added to only 11 new patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world registry of ACS patients undergoing PCI, recommend LDL-C levels were obtained in 62% of patients, but PCSK9i prescription was limited to 10% of cases. As LLT pattern appeared mainly improved at hospital discharge, an early and strong treatment should be considered.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Achievement and Self-Reported Medication Adherence: Insights from the JET-LDL Registry.

In patients with recent acute coronary syndromes (ACS), current guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level <55 mg/100 ml. Despite the widespread use of different potent lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), this goal is not always achieved, often owing to less medication adherence. In this prespecified subanalysis of the JET-Low Density Lipoprotein (JET-LDL) registry, we sought to evaluate the relation between LDL-C targets achievement and LLT adherence in a cohort of patients hospitalized for ACS. The patients' self-reported medication adherence was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) at 3-month follow-up. Depending on the score obtained, the population was divided into 2 groups: high adherence (HA, MMAS ≥6) versus low adherence (LA, MMAS <6). The occurrence of the primary end point (LDL-C reduction >50% from baseline or level <55 mg/100 ml at 1 month) was compared in the 2 groups. A total of 963 patients were included in the present analysis; in 277 cases (28.7%), an MMAS score <6 was reported (LA group), whereas in the remaining 686 (71.3%), the score obtained was ≥6 (HA group). No difference between the 2 groups was observed regarding LDL-C levels at admission and LLT prescribed at discharge. At 1 month, the primary end point occurred in 62.5% of cases, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (LA 60% vs HA 65%, p = 0.034). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, LA was identified as an independent predictor of not achieving the primary end point (odds ratio 0.48, 0.39 to 0.85, p = 0.006). In conclusion, in a real-world cohort of patients with ACS, less medication adherence to LLT was a common event (28.7%), negatively affecting LDL-C goal achievement.

Paclitaxel versus sirolimus eluting stents in diabetic patients: does stent type and/or stent diameter matter?: long-term clinical outcome of 2,429-patient multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) are more effective in reducing restenosis than bare-metal stents. Less certain is the relative performance of the two widely used DES-sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES)-in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: We studied the long-term effectiveness and safety of SES versus PES in diabetic patients, overall and grouped by the size of the stent placed in the native-stented vessel. METHODS: Data were obtained from an observational, multicenter registry of 2,429 consecutive patients with DM who underwent PCI between August 2003 and August 2009 with SES (n = 1,370) or PES (n = 1,059). Data were analyzed separately for patients with small stents (<3.0 mm, n = 1,274) vs. only large (≥3.0 mm, n = 1,155). RESULTS: At Cox-adjusted analysis of the overall cohort, there was no significant difference between SES and PES with regard to death/myocardial infarction (D/MI) (P = 0.6) or target lesion revascularization (TLR) (P = 0.3) either in "small-stent" (D/MI, P = 0.8; TLR, P = 0.2) or "large stent" group (D/MI, P = 0.8; TLR, P = 0.4) throughout 1 to 5-year follow-up. These results were confirmed by sensitivity, propensity-score matched analysis (717 matched pairs) that failed to find differences in the safety and efficacy between SES and PES. CONCLUSIONS: In this large observational study, PES and SES were equally safe and efficacious in diabetic patients undergoing PCI in clinical practice, regardless of the stent size.

Atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease: (un)solved therapeutic dilemma?

Concomitant presence of atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention is a frequent occurrence. The choice of optimal antithrombotic therapy, in this context, is still challenging. To offer the best protection both in terms of stroke and stent thrombosis, triple therapy with oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy would be required. Several drug combinations have been tested in recent years, including direct oral anticoagulants, with the aim of balancing ischemic and bleeding risk. Both pharmacokinetic aspects of the molecules and patient's characteristics should be analyzed in choosing oral anticoagulation. Then, as suggested by guidelines, triple therapy should start with a seven-day duration and the aim to prolong to thirty days in high thrombotic risk patients. Dual therapy should follow to reach twelve months after coronary intervention. Even not fully discussed by the guidelines, in order to balance ischemic and bleeding risk it should also be considered: 1) integrated assessment of coronary artery disease and procedural complexity of coronary intervention; 2) appropriateness to maintain the anticoagulant drug dosage indicated in technical data sheet; the lack of data on the suspension of antiplatelet drugs one year after percutaneous intervention; 3) the possibility of combination therapy with ticagrelor; and 4) the need to treat the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during acute coronary syndrome. With data provided clinician should pursue a therapy as personalized as possible, both in terms of drug choice and treatment duration, in order to balance ischemic and bleeding risk.

Assessing the role of eptifibatide in patients with diffuse coronary disease undergoing drug-eluting stenting: the INtegrilin plus STenting to Avoid myocardial Necrosis Trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antiplatelet regimen in elective patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) is uncertain. We aimed to assess the impact of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb/IIIa) inhibition with eptifibatide in clinically stable subjects with diffuse coronary lesions. METHODS: Patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing PCI by means of implantation of >33 mm of drug-eluting stent were single-blindedly randomized to heparin plus eptifibatide versus heparin alone. The primary end point was the rate of abnormal post-PCI creatine kinase-MB mass values. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (ie, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization) and MACE plus bailout GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor use. RESULTS: The study was stopped for slow enrollment and funding issues after including a total of 91 patients: 44 were randomized to heparin plus eptifibatide, and 47, to heparin alone. Analysis for the primary end point showed a trend toward lower rates of abnormal post-PCI creatine kinase-MB mass values in the heparin-plus-eptifibatide group (18 [41%]) versus the heparin-alone group (26 [55%], relative risk 0.74 [95% CI 0.48-1.15], P = .169). Similar nonstatistically significant trends were found for rates of MACE, their components, or MACE plus bailout GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors (all P > .05). Notably, heparin plus eptifibatide proved remarkably safe because major bleedings or minor bleeding was uncommon and nonsignificantly different in both groups (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Given its lack of statistical power, the INSTANT study cannot definitively provide evidence against or in favor of routine eptifibatide administration in stable patients undergoing implantation of multiple drug-eluting stent for diffuse coronary disease. However, the favorable trend evident for the primary end point warrants further larger randomized studies.

Prognostic implications of early and long-term bleeding events in patients on one-year dual antiplatelet therapy following drug-eluting stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding has emerged as a predictor of early and late mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions. However, the prevalence and predictors of long-term bleeding events in patients on prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has been poorly explored. METHODS: A total of 1,437 patients undergoing DES implantation discharged on DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for 1 year were studied. Patients were followed for up to 4 years (34.3 ± 14.4 months) and the prevalence and predictors of in-hospital and long-term thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding events evaluated. The impact of bleeding events on major adverse cardiac events (MACE), overall death, and stent thrombosis (ST) was also assessed. RESULTS: The incidences of 30 days major and minor bleeding were 1.3 and 3.3%, respectively. The incidences of 1-year major and minor bleeding were 3.0 and 5.6%, respectively. The incidences of major and minor bleeding up to 4-year follow-up were 3.6 and 6.9%, respectively. At multivariable analysis, 1-year major bleeding was positively predicted by use of oral anticoagulants at hospital discharge [odds ratio (OR) = 13.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0-59.2, P = 0.001], anemia at admission (OR = 6.7, 95% CI = 2.7-16.5, P < 0.001) and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.1-6.5, P = 0.03) and negatively predicted by male gender (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.16-0.97, P = 0.042). Overall, major bleeding at 1 year and at long-term follow-up was associated with an increased risk of MACE, cardiac death and ST. Patients who had any bleeding event were more likely to prematurely discontinue antiplatelet therapy (50% vs. 9.6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In DES-treated patients on prolonged DAPT, major bleeding occurring at 1 year and up to 4 years following DES implantation in patients on prolonged DAPT is associated with poor long-term prognosis.

Active fixation of bipolar left ventricular lead through a persistent left superior vena cava.

A left superior vena cava persistence was found in a 61 year-old patient affected by dilated and hypokinetic cardiopathy with severe dysfunction of the left ventricle (left ventricular ejection fraction of 32%) and valvular disease. After a negative coronary angiography, he was implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation function device (CRT-D). The present case describes the successful implantation of a biventricular defibrillator in this challenging congenital abnormality of cardiac venous system.

Unexplained hypoxemia in COPD with cardiac shunt.

In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), hypoxemia is associated with multiple underlying mechanisms, of which one of the most significant is ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch, which is correctable with supplemental oxygen (O2) therapy. Hypoxemia that is refractory to very high concentration of inspired O2 can be indicative of cardiac defect with shunt, e.g., a patent foramen ovale (PFO) with right-to-left (R-T-L) shunt. In hypoxemic COPD patients, the diagnosis of a PFO requires a heightened sense of clinical suspicion along with careful assessment of other underlying possibilities. Platypnea-orthodeoxia and a non-response to the hyperoxia test, while not diagnostic, increase suspicion. A correct diagnosis of interatrial bypass needs to be confirmed with transthoracic echocardiogram and contrast transesophageal echocardiography. Presently, no data are available supporting the effectiveness of PFO closure in COPD patients to relieve symptoms and correct hypoxemia. We report a case of hypoxemic COPD with platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome due to PFO. The decision of its closure with device after echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular function has completely corrected refractory hypoxemia with improvement of SpO2 and functional capacity. Thus, in selected COPD with refractory hypoxemia, closure of PFO should be considered as novel therapeutic target with improvement of quality of life and less likelihood of hospitalization.

Acute Coronary Syndromes and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Results From an Observational Multicenter Registry During the Second Pandemic Spread in Lombardy.

Background: COVID-19 had an adverse impact on the management and outcome of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but most available data refer to March-April 2020. Aim: This study aims to investigate the clinical characteristics, time of treatment, and clinical outcome of patients at hospitals serving as macro-hubs during the second pandemic wave of SARS-CoV-2 (November 2020-January 2021). Methods and Results: Nine out of thirteen "macro-hubs" agreed to participate in the registry with a total of 941 patients included. The median age was 67 years (IQR 58-77) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was the clinical presentation in 54% of cases. Almost all patients (97%) underwent coronary angiography, with more than 60% of patients transported to a macro-hub by the Emergency Medical Service (EMS). In the whole population of STEMI patients, the median time from symptom onset to First Medical Contact (FMC) was 64 min (IQR 30-180). The median time from FMC to CathLab was 69 min (IQR 39-105). A total of 59 patients (6.3%) presented a concomitant confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and pneumonia was present in 42.4% of these cases. No significant differences were found between STEMI patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection in treatment time intervals. Patients with concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infection had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those without (16.9% vs. 3.6%, P < 0.0001). However, post-discharge mortality was similar to 6-month mortality (4.2% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.98). In the multivariate analysis, SARS-CoV-2 infection did not show an independent association with in-hospital mortality, whereas pneumonia had higher mortality (OR 5.65, P = 0.05). Conclusion: During the second wave of SARS-CoV-2 infection, almost all patients with ACS received coronary angiography for STEMI with an acceptable time delay. Patients with concomitant infection presented a lower in-hospital survival with no difference in post-discharge mortality; infection by itself was not an independent predictor of mortality but pneumonia was.

Importance and limits of pre-hospital electrocardiogram in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to present data on the effects of pre-hospital electrocardiogram (PH-ECG) on the outcome of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) included in a registry undertaken in the Italian region of Lombardy. Pre-hospital 12-lead electrocardiogram is recommended by current guidelines in order to achieve faster times to reperfusion in patients with STEMI. METHODS: The registry includes 3901 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI over an 18-month period. RESULTS: Mean age was 63 ± 12 years. Admission through the emergency medical system (EMS) occurred in 1603 patients (40%): they were older, more frequently had previous MI, TIMI flow = 0 at entry and were more frequently in Killip class >1 than patients who were not admitted through the EMS. Among the patients admitted through the EMS, PH-ECG was obtained in 475 patients (12%). These patients had less frequently an anterior MI, but more frequently had absence of TIMI flow at entry than patients whose ECG was not teletransmitted. Moreover, they had a significantly shorter first medical contact-to-balloon time and a trend toward a lower 30-day death rate (5.3% vs 7.9 %, p = 0.06). However, only patients in Killip class 2-3 had a significantly lower mortality when the diagnostic ECG was transmitted, whereas no difference was found in Killip class 1 or Killip class 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this registry, PH-ECG significantly decreased first medical contact-to-balloon time. Attempts to achieve faster reperfusion times should be undertaken, as this may result in improved outcome, particularly in patients with mild to moderate symptoms of heart failure.

Impact of primary PCI volume on hospital mortality in STEMI patients: does time-to-presentation matter?

The exact relationship between primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume and mortality remains unclear. No data are available on how this relationship could be affected by time-to-presentation. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of hospital primary PCI volume on in-hospital mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients depending on time-to-presentation. The impact of primary PCI volume on in-hospital mortality was investigated in a prospective registry of the Lombardy region in Northern Italy, deriving data on mortality rates and number of primary PCIs from a cohort of 2,558 patients. We also explored this relationship at different times-to-presentation (≤90 min, >90 min-180 min, >180 min) and risk profiles assessed with the TIMI Risk Index. A strong inverse relationship was found between primary PCI hospital volume and risk-adjusted mortality (r = -0.9; P < 0.001). High primary PCI volumes best predicted the improvement of survival when the time-to-presentation was ≤90 min (area under the curve = 0.73, P < 0.0001). At this time, the best primary PCI threshold to provide benefit was >66 primary PCIs/year (OR = 0.21 [95% CI 0.10-0.47], P < 0.001) and those with high TIMI Risk Index achieved the greatest benefit (P < 0.001). At >90 min-180 min, the model was less significant (P = 0.02) with a higher threshold of procedures (>145 primary PCIs/year) required to provide benefits. The model was not predictive of survival for time-to-presentation >180 min (P = 0.30). The reduction of mortality of STEMI patients treated at high-volume primary PCI centers is time-dependent and affected by risk profile. The greatest benefit was observed in high-risk patients presenting within 90 min from symptoms onset.

Gender Differences after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Insights from the Italian Clinical Service Project.

BACKGROUND: TAVR is a safe alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR); however, sex-related differences are still debated. This research aimed to examine gender differences in a real-world transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) cohort. METHODS: All-comer aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing TAVR with a Medtronic valve across 19 Italian sites were prospectively included in the Italian Clinical Service Project (NCT01007474) between 2007 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 1-year mortality. We also investigated 3-year mortality, and ischemic and hemorrhagic endpoints, and we performed a propensity score matching to assemble patients with similar baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Out of 3821 patients, 2149 (56.2%) women were enrolled. Compared with men, women were older (83 ± 6 vs. 81 ± 6 years, p < 0.001), more likely to present severe renal impairment (GFR ≤ 30 mL/min, 26.3% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001) but had less previous cardiovascular events (all p < 0.001), with a higher mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (7.8% ± 7.1% vs. 7.2 ± 7.5, p < 0.001) and a greater mean aortic gradient (52.4 ± 15.3 vs. 47.3 ± 12.8 mmHg, p < 0.001). Transfemoral TAVR was performed more frequently in women (87.2% vs. 82.1%, p < 0.001), with a higher rate of major vascular complications and life-threatening bleeding (3.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.012 and 2.5% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.024). One-year mortality differed between female and male (11.5% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.002), and this difference persisted after adjustment for significant confounding variables (Adj.HR1yr 1.47, 95%IC 1.18-1.82, p < 0.001). Three-year mortality was also significantly lower in women compared with men (19.8% vs. 24.9%, p < 0.001) even after adjustment for age, STS score, eGFR, diabetes and severe COPD (Adj.HR3yr 1.42, 95%IC 1.21-1.68, p < 0.001). These results were confirmed in 689 pairs after propensity score matching. CONCLUSION: Despite higher rates of peri-procedural complications, women presented better survival than men. This better adaptive response to TAVR may be driven by sex-specific factors.

Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus-eluting stents have been reported to be effective in the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Still, it has not been fully clarified which strategy would provide the best results with true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CACTUS trial (Coronary bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-eluting stents) is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing 2 different techniques of stenting, with mandatory final kissing-balloon inflation, in true bifurcations: (1) elective "crush" stenting and (2) stenting of only the main branch, with provisional side-branch T-stenting. From August 2004 to June 2007, 350 patients were enrolled in 12 European centers. The primary angiographic end point was the in-segment restenosis rate, and the primary clinical end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization) at 6 months. At 6 months, angiographic restenosis rates were not different between the crush group (4.6% and 13.2% in the main branch and side branch, respectively) and the provisional stenting group (6.7% and 14.7% in the main branch and side branch, respectively; P=NS). Additional stenting on the side branch in the provisional stenting group was required in 31% of lesions. Rates of major adverse cardiac events were also similar in the 2 groups (15.8% in the crush group versus 15% in the provisional stenting group, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: In most bifurcations with a significant stenosis in both branches, a provisional strategy of stenting the main branch only is effective, with the need to implant a second stent on the side branch occurring in approximately one third of cases. The implantation of 2 stents does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events at 6 months.

Combination of Double Chimney Technique and Prosthesis Post-Dilation After Valve-in-Valve Implantation.

Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an effective treatment for aortic bioprosthetic valve degeneration. ViV-TAVI could lead to coronary occlusion. We describe the case of a patient treated with double chimney technique to protect coronary ostia followed by post-dilation for high residual transvalvular gradient using "three-kissing balloon" approach. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).