Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Cytotherapy ; 21(11): 1095-1111, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711733

ABSTRACT

Pluripotent stem cells offer the potential for an unlimited source for cell therapy products. However, there is concern regarding the tumorigenicity of these products in humans, mainly due to the possible unintended contamination of undifferentiated cells or transformed cells. Because of the complex nature of these new therapies and the lack of a globally accepted consensus on the strategy for tumorigenicity evaluation, a case-by-case approach is recommended for the risk assessment of each cell therapy product. In general, therapeutic products need to be qualified using available technologies, which ideally should be fully validated. In such circumstances, the developers of cell therapy products may have conducted various tumorigenicity tests and consulted with regulators in respective countries. Here, we critically review currently available in vivo and in vitro testing methods for tumorigenicity evaluation against expectations in international regulatory guidelines. We discuss the value of those approaches, in particular the limitations of in vivo methods, and comment on challenges and future directions. In addition, we note the need for an internationally harmonized procedure for tumorigenicity assessment of cell therapy products from both regulatory and technological perspectives.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenesis/pathology , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/adverse effects , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Animals , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/methods , Consensus , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Mutagenicity Tests/methods , Mutagenicity Tests/standards , Pluripotent Stem Cells/physiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards
2.
J Endocrinol ; 181(2): 263-70, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15128274

ABSTRACT

Aurora/Ipl1-related kinases are a conserved family of proteins that have multiple functions during mitotic progression. High levels of Aurora kinases are characteristic of rapidly dividing cells and tumours. Aurora B encodes a protein that associates with condensing chromatin, concentrates at centromeres, and then relocates onto the central spindle at anaphase. In this study the expression and the localisation of Aurora B throughout germinal epithelial progression in normal testis and its neoplastic counterpart were analysed. Immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR analysis of mouse germinal epithelium cells showed the presence of Aurora B in spermatogonia and occasionally in spermatocytes. Western blot analysis revealed the typical Aurora B isoform ( approximately 41 kDa) in the same cellular types. A similar distribution was observed in human testis by immunohistochemistry. Moreover, the distribution and the expression of Aurora B were investigated in neoplasms derived from germ cells. Surgical samples of seminomas were analysed, and a high percentage of Aurora B positive cells (51%) was detected; the expression of Aurora B was significantly related to the MIB-1 proliferation marker (R=0.816). The data presented here demonstrate that Aurora B expression occurs in spermatogonial division. Furthermore, our results indicate that the expression of Aurora B is a consistent feature of human seminomas.


Subject(s)
Isoenzymes/analysis , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/analysis , Seminoma/enzymology , Spermatozoa/enzymology , Testicular Neoplasms/enzymology , Testis/enzymology , Animals , Aurora Kinase B , Aurora Kinases , Biomarkers/analysis , Cell Division , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Isoenzymes/genetics , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred Strains , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Spermatocytes/enzymology , Spermatogonia/enzymology
3.
Oncogene ; 31(11): 1366-75, 2012 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21804609

ABSTRACT

Chk1 is a key regulator of DNA damage checkpoint responses and genome stability in eukaryotes. To better understand how checkpoint proficiency relates to cancer development, we investigated the effects of genetic ablation of Chk1 in the mouse skin on tumors induced by chemical carcinogens. We found that homozygous deletion of Chk1 immediately before carcinogen exposure strongly suppressed benign tumor (papilloma) formation, and that the few, small lesions that formed in the ablated skin always retained Chk1 expression. Remarkably, Chk1 deletion rapidly triggered spontaneous cell proliferation, γ-H2AX staining and apoptosis within the hair follicle, a principal site of origin for carcinogen-induced tumors. At later times, the ablated skin was progressively repopulated by non-recombined Chk1-expressing cells and ultimately normal sensitivity to tumor induction was restored when carcinogen treatment was delayed. In marked contrast, papillomas formed normally in Chk1 hemizygous skin but showed an increased propensity to progress to carcinoma. Thus, complete loss of Chk1 is incompatible with epithelial tumorigenesis, whereas partial loss of function (haploinsufficiency) fosters benign malignant tumor progression.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , Papilloma/chemically induced , Protein Kinases/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/chemically induced , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Animals , Apoptosis , Carcinogens , Checkpoint Kinase 1 , DNA Damage , Disease Progression , Gene Deletion , Genomic Instability , Mice , Mice, Knockout
4.
Oncogene ; 31(9): 1086-94, 2012 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21765472

ABSTRACT

Here, we show that activation of the checkpoint effector kinase Chk1 in response to irradiation-induced DNA damage is minimal in G1, maximal during S-phase and diminishes as cells enter G2. In addition, formation of irradiation-induced replication protein A (RPA)-coated single-stranded DNA (RPA-ssDNA), a structure required for ATM and Rad3-related (ATR)-Chk1 activation, occurs in a broadly similar pattern. Cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) activity is thought to promote RPA-ssDNA formation by stimulating DNA strand resection at double-strand breaks (DSBs), providing one possible mechanism of imposing cell cycle dependence on DNA damage signaling. However, it has recently been shown that Chk1 itself is also subject to Cdk-mediated phosphorylation at serines 286 and 301 (S286 and 301). We show that Chk1 S301 phosphorylation increases as cells progress through S and G2 and that both Cdk1 and Cdk2 are likely to contribute to this modification in vivo. We also find that substitution of S286 and S301 with non-phosphorylatable alanine residues strongly attenuates DNA damage-induced Chk1 activation and G2 checkpoint proficiency, but does not eliminate the underlying cell cycle dependence of Chk1 regulation. Taken together, these data indicate that Cdk activity regulates multiple steps in the DNA damage response pathway including full activation of Chk1 and checkpoint proficiency.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Checkpoints , Cyclin-Dependent Kinases/metabolism , DNA Damage/radiation effects , Protein Kinases/metabolism , CDC2 Protein Kinase/metabolism , Cell Cycle Checkpoints/genetics , Cell Cycle Checkpoints/radiation effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Checkpoint Kinase 1 , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2/metabolism , Enzyme Activation , Humans , Models, Biological , Phosphorylation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL