ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: On January 30, COVID-19 was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern-a week after Singapore's first imported case and 5 days before local transmission. The National University Hospital (NUH) is Singapore's third largest hospital with 1200 beds, heavy clinical workloads, and major roles in research and teaching. MAIN BODY: With memories of SARS still vivid, there was an urgent requirement for the NUH Division of Infectious Diseases to adapt-undergoing major reorganization to face rapidly changing priorities while ensuring usual essential services and standards. Leveraging on individual strengths, our division mobilized to meet the demands of COVID-19 while engaging in high-level coordination, strategy, and advocacy. We present our experience of the 60 days since the nation's first case. During this time, our hospital has managed 3030 suspect cases, including 1300 inpatients, 37 confirmed cases, and overseen 4384 samples tested for COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Complex hospital adaptations were supported by an unprecedented number of workflows and coordination channels essential to safe and effective operations. The actions we describe, aligned with international recommendations and emerging evidence-based best practices, may serve as a framework for other divisions and institutions facing the spread of COVID-19 globally.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Hospitals, University , Organizational Innovation , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Public Health , Academic Medical Centers , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapore/epidemiology , WorkloadABSTRACT
We are on the cusp of the fourth Industrial Revolution which promises to revolutionize the way we live and work. Throughout history, as society and technology progress, so too have our workplace safety and health (WSH) strategies in regard to better knowledge and enhanced regulation. In this paper, we argue for a new WSH 4.0 strategy which requires us to adopt an adaptive and highly responsive approach to promote Total Worker Health in the face of rapid technological advancements and changes in employment relationships. To do so, we propose a multi-pronged strategy comprising (i) adaptive WSH solutions in regard to surveillance, risk assessment, and control measures leveraging on new technologies; (ii) effective multi-stakeholder dialogues for collaborative and sustainable solutions; (iii) an anticipatory WSH governance framework based upon shared values and cooperative responsibility; and (iv) professional development among WSH practitioners. This new WSH 4.0 strategy will enable WSH professionals to remain effective in this coming Industrial Revolution.
Subject(s)
Industrial Development , Occupational Health , Occupational Medicine/methods , Artificial Intelligence/trends , Employment/trends , Humans , Occupational Medicine/organization & administration , Stakeholder Participation , Technology/trends , Work-Life BalanceABSTRACT
Healthcare workers are recommended to get vaccinated against measles and varicella. This study aims to describe the implementation process of a measles and varicella vaccination program and report on the reduction in the number of susceptible healthcare workers exposed to measles, varicella, and disseminated herpes zoster at a tertiary hospital. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) model was used to describe the vaccination program implemented from October 2015 to September 2018. The number of exposed, reviewed, and susceptible healthcare workers during contact tracing for exposure to (a) measles and (b) varicella and disseminated herpes zoster in 2016, 2017, and 2018 is reported. A total of 6770 (95%) out of 7083 healthcare workers completed their immunization review by 2018. In 2016, 20 (10%) out of 198 healthcare workers exposed to measles were considered susceptible. In 2018, no one was found susceptible out of the 51 staff members exposed to measles (p < 0.01). For exposure to varicella and disseminated herpes zoster, seven (5%) out of 154 exposed healthcare workers were susceptible in 2016. In comparison, only two (1%) out of 377 exposed healthcare workers in 2018 were susceptible (p < 0.01). The vaccination program effectively reduced number of healthcare workers susceptible to measles, varicella, and disseminated zoster.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: This study evaluates the effectiveness of a hospital-based return to work (RTW) programme in facilitating injured workers to RTW earlier through personalised case management. Factors associated with programme effectiveness are also examined. Method: This was a quasi-experimental study comparing 81 participants who underwent conventional treatment before the RTW programme with 108 participants who directly received the RTW intervention. Analyses included time to RTW and the factors associated with dropout. Stratified analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to mitigate potential selection bias from the additional recruitment process for the intervention group. Results: Participants in the intervention group returned to work 59.5 days earlier, with 84% able to RTW 6 months post injury compared with the control (63%; P<0.01). Stratified analysis found the intervention to be associated with better RTW outcomes among males, younger workers, non-residents, blue-collared workers, workers from the construction, marine, manufacturing and metalworking industries, and workers having lower Work Ability score (WAS), while light-duty provision was a possible confounder. The better outcomes in the intervention group were also independent of company size and injury severity. After adjusting for the above factors, the intervention group had 2.2 times higher odds of RTW at 6 months (95% confidence interval 0.84–5.90). Lower WAS and longer delay in initial RTW assessment were associated with delayed RTW within the intervention group. Migrant workers experienced higher dropout rates, thus being identified as a vulnerable group. Conclusion: The RTW coordination model of care is effective in facilitating RTW, with early programme referral being an important facilitator and WAS as a useful screening tool for delayed RTW.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Public , Occupational Injuries , Return to Work , Humans , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Singapore , Male , Adult , Occupational Injuries/rehabilitation , Female , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Case Management/organization & administration , Time Factors , Logistic ModelsABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Healthcare workers all over the world were prioritized for vaccination against COVID-19 in view of the high-risk nature of their job scopes when vaccines were first available in late 2020. Vaccine hesitancy was an important problem to tackle in order to achieve a high vaccination rate, especially for vaccines that were developed using mRNA technology. We aimed to use the '3Cs' model to address vaccine hesitancy to ensure maximal uptake of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine among healthcare workers in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. METHODS: Various measures were used to reduce the confidence, complacency, and convenience barriers. The staff vaccination clinic was on-site and centralized, with appointments given in advance to ensure vaccine availability and to reduce wait time, providing convenience to staff. Direct and repeated communications with the staff via multiple channels were used to address vaccine safety and efficacy so as to promote confidence in the vaccines and overcome complacency barriers. To further encourage staff to get vaccinated, staff were allowed time off for vaccination when at work. Staff with a high risk of exposure to COVID-19 or those caring for immunocompromised patients were prioritized to take the vaccines first. The collection of data on adverse events was via on-site monitoring and consultation at Occupational Health Clinic (OHC). RESULTS: Nearly 80% of staff had completed vaccination when the vaccination exercise ended at the end of March 2021. With the loosening of the contraindications to vaccination over time, staff vaccination rates reached 89.3% in early July and nearly 99.9% by the end of the year. No major or serious vaccine-related medication or administration errors were reported. No staff had anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: By using the '3Cs' model to plan out the vaccination exercise, it is possible to achieve a high vaccination rate coupled with effective and customized communications. This multi-disciplinary team approach can be adapted to guide vaccination efforts in various settings in future pandemics.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Occupational Health Services , Vaccines , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , Tertiary Care Centers , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Singapore/epidemiology , VaccinationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Vaccination remains a key strategy to living endemically with COVID-19. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was first granted interim authorisation for use in Singapore in December 2020. With overseas studies published about the safety and side effect profiles of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines focusing mainly on non-Asian populations, we described the side effects of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination experienced by the healthcare workers (HCWs) in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Occupational Health Clinic (OHC) at the National University Hospital in Singapore, which monitored staff for any adverse effects within 30 minutes post vaccination on-site and any adverse effects after that. A cross-sectional study among the vaccinated HCWs was conducted using an online survey, which established basic demographics, histories of allergies or atopic disorders, and adverse events encountered after dose 1 and dose 2 of vaccination. RESULTS: No anaphylaxis was reported. Most common symptom was giddiness (32.7%) experienced by HCWs within 30 minutes. Adverse events attended post-vaccination by OHC were generally mild and self-limiting. From the survey, odds of experiencing an adverse event after dose 2 was significantly higher than after the first dose, especially for fever/chills (odds ratio [OR] 22.5). Fever/chills, injection site reactions, headache, aches and pains, and feeling unwell were significantly more common in HCWs below 60 years compared to those ≥60 years. An allergy to food (adjusted OR 2.7) and a history of eczema/sensitive skin (adjusted OR 2.6) were associated with a skin reaction not at injection site. CONCLUSION: The side effects experienced after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are generally self-limiting and mild, with no anaphylaxis reported.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapore/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers , VaccinationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Burnout has adverse implications in healthcare settings, compromising patient care. Allied health professionals (AHPs) are defined as individuals who work collaboratively to deliver routine and essential healthcare services, excluding physicians and nurses. There is a lack of studies on burnout among AHPs in Singapore. This study explored factors associated with a self-reported burnout level and barriers to seeking psychological help among AHPs in Singapore. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample of AHPs in a tertiary hospital from October to December 2019. We emailed a four-component survey to 1127 eligible participants. The survey comprised four components: (1) sociodemographic characteristics, (2) Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-HSS), (3) Areas of Worklife Survey, and (4) Perceived Barriers to Psychological Treatment (PBPT). We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with burnout. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. RESULTS: In total, 328 participants completed the questionnaire. The self-reported burnout level (emotional exhaustion>27 and/or depersonalization>10) was 67.4%. The majority of the respondents were female (83.9%), Singaporean (73.5%), aged 40 years and below (84.2%), and Chinese ethnicity (79.9%). In the multiple logistic regression model, high burnout level was negatively associated with being in the age groups of 31 to 40 (AOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.93) and 40 years and older (AOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10-0.87) and a low self-reported workload (AOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23-0.52). High burnout level was positively associated with a work experience of three to five years (AOR 5.27, 95% CI 1.44-20.93) and more than five years (AOR 4.24; 95% CI 1.16-16.79. One hundred and ninety participants completed the PBPT component. The most frequently cited barriers to seeking psychological help by participants with burnout (n = 130) were 'negative evaluation of therapy' and 'time constraints.' CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a high self-reported burnout level and identifies its associated factors among AHPs in a tertiary hospital. The findings revealed the urgency of addressing burnout in AHPs and the need for effective interventions to reduce burnout. Concurrently, proper consideration of the barriers to seeking help is warranted to improve AHPs' mental well-being.
Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel/psychology , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Adult , Burnout, Professional/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Odds Ratio , Self Report , Singapore , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Workload , Young AdultABSTRACT
With coronavirus disease 2019 declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020, occupational health services in a tertiary hospital in Singapore stepped up via a three-pronged approach, namely, protection of individual staff, protection of staff workforce, and prevention of nosocomial spread so as to support business continuity plans. Despite the multiple new challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, the hospital's occupational health services were able to adapt and keep all employees and patients safe with strong support from senior management and close collaboration with various departments.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Occupational Health Services/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Cross Infection/virology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapore/epidemiologySubject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers , COVID-19 Testing , Singapore/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Health PersonnelSubject(s)
COVID-19 Serological Testing/instrumentation , COVID-19/diagnosis , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Serological Testing/economics , COVID-19 Serological Testing/standards , Humans , Singapore/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Driver fatigue is one of the biggest health and safety concerns within the road transport sector. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of fatigue among taxi drivers in Singapore, to better understand the general working and health conditions of this group of people and to determine the risk factors associated with fatigued driving. METHODS: A total of 340 taxi drivers were randomly selected for participation in this self-administered questionnaire survey, with height and weight measurements. The response rate was 68.2%. The survey consisted of four main categories: personal particulars; social habits; work patterns and sleep profile; and Epworth Sleepiness Scale, which was used to estimate the level of daytime sleepiness and fatigue. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals associated with the risk factors related to fatigue among the taxi drivers. RESULTS: A high proportion of the taxi drivers were obese and had self-reported hypertension, diabetes mellitus and high cholesterol. Driver fatigue was associated with very poor/poor self-rating of the quality of sleep, having an additional part-time job, drinking three or more caffeinated drinks daily, and driving more than 10 hours a day. CONCLUSION: We hope that the findings of the present study will improve the awareness regarding the work and health conditions of taxi drivers, and contribute toward the effort to achieve a healthier workforce. A lower prevalence of fatigued driving will lead to lower risks of road traffic accidents, decreased economic loss, increased productivity, and safer roads for all.