ABSTRACT
Introduction: The efficacy of selenium supplementation was elusive for polycystic ovary syndrome. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of selenium supplementation for polycystic ovary syndrome. Methods: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, Cochrane library database, CNKI, Chongqing VIP database and Wanfang databases have been searched through July 2022 and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effect of selenium supplementation versus placebo in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Results: Five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo group for polycystic ovary syndrome, selenium supplementation was associated with significantly reduced total testosterone (SMD=-0.42; 95% CI=-0.78 to -0.06; p = 0.02) and cholesterol (SMD=-0.71; 95% CI=-1.41 to -0.02; p = 0.04), but revealed no remarkable influence on SHBG (SMD=-0.52; 95% CI=-1.29 to 0.25; p = 0.19), triglyceride (SMD=-1.45; 95% CI=-3.62 to 0.73; p = 0.19), LDL (SMD=-0.17; 95% CI=-0.72 to 0.37; p = 0.53), FPG (SMD=-0.95; 95% CI=-3.72 to 1.82; p = 0.50) or HOMA-IR (SMD=-0.51; 95% CI=-3.79 to 2.77; p = 0.76). Conclusions: Selenium supplementation may be able to improve the metabolic response for polycystic ovary syndrome, and this finding should be interpreted with caution.
Subject(s)
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Selenium , Female , Humans , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Selenium/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Testosterone/therapeutic use , Dietary SupplementsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Malignant cerebral infarction often occurs in patients with massive cerebral infarction. Monitoring brain edema is therefore helpful to make correct clinical decisions. Our previous studies have confirmed that cerebral electrical impedance (CEI) can sensitively reflect the brain edema after stroke. METHODS: The CEI was measured consecutively by a noninvasive brain edema monitor in 69 patients with massive hemispheric cerebral infarction (MHCI). The results of the CEI were converted into the perturbation index (PI). The characteristics of dynamic changes of the CEI after MHCI were analyzed. Receiver-operating characteristics analysis was used to calculate predictive values for PI and other known parameters including NIHSS score and infarct volume. RESULTS: (1) The overall rate of positive CEI was 88.4% (61/69) in all patients with MHCI. (2) The PI on the infarct side increased significantly within 24 h after stroke onset and reached a peak level 3-5 days after stroke onset (p < 0.01). (3) Age, NIHSS score at admission, infarct volume, and the PI at 24 h after stroke onset were significantly different between the malignant and nonmalignant groups. The best predictor of a malignant MHCI was the PI at 24 h after stroke onset with a cut-off value of 10.02 (90.9% sensitivity, 87.2% specificity, 76.9% positive predictive value, 95.3% negative predictive value). CONCLUSIONS: The noninvasive CEI can sensitively reflect the brain edema in patients with MHCI. Monitoring the CEI may help to predict malignant MHCI and guide treatment decisions.