Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
BMC Bioinformatics ; 23(1): 470, 2022 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36348299

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The expression changes of some proteins are associated with cancer progression, and can be used as biomarkers in cancer diagnosis. Automated systems have been frequently applied in the large-scale detection of protein biomarkers and have provided a valuable complement for wet-laboratory experiments. For example, our previous work used an immunohistochemical image-based machine learning classifier of protein subcellular locations to screen biomarker proteins that change locations in colon cancer tissues. The tool could recognize the location of biomarkers but did not consider the effect of protein expression level changes on the screening process. RESULTS: In this study, we built an automated classification model that recognizes protein expression levels in immunohistochemical images, and used the protein expression levels in combination with subcellular locations to screen cancer biomarkers. To minimize the effect of non-informative sections on the immunohistochemical images, we employed the representative image patches as input and applied a Wasserstein distance method to determine the number of patches. For the patches and the whole images, we compared the ability of color features, characteristic curve features, and deep convolutional neural network features to distinguish different levels of protein expression and employed deep learning and conventional classification models. Experimental results showed that the best classifier can achieve an accuracy of 73.72% and an F1-score of 0.6343. In the screening of protein biomarkers, the detection accuracy improved from 63.64 to 95.45% upon the incorporation of the protein expression changes. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning can distinguish different protein expression levels and speed up their annotation in the future. Combining information on the expression patterns and subcellular locations of protein can improve the accuracy of automatic cancer biomarker screening. This work could be useful in discovering new cancer biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and research.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Neoplasms , Immunohistochemistry , Neural Networks, Computer , Machine Learning , Proteins , Neoplasms/diagnosis
2.
Med Biol Eng Comput ; 62(4): 1105-1119, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150111

ABSTRACT

Knowledge of protein expression in mammalian brains at regional and cellular levels can facilitate understanding of protein functions and associated diseases. As the mouse brain is a typical mammalian brain considering cell type and structure, several studies have been conducted to analyze protein expression in mouse brains. However, labeling protein expression using biotechnology is costly and time-consuming. Therefore, automated models that can accurately recognize protein expression are needed. Here, we constructed machine learning models to automatically annotate the protein expression intensity and cellular location in different mouse brain regions from immunofluorescence images. The brain regions and sub-regions were segmented through learning image features using an autoencoder and then performing K-means clustering and registration to align with the anatomical references. The protein expression intensities for those segmented structures were computed on the basis of the statistics of the image pixels, and patch-based weakly supervised methods and multi-instance learning were used to classify the cellular locations. Results demonstrated that the models achieved high accuracy in the expression intensity estimation, and the F1 score of the cellular location prediction was 74.5%. This work established an automated pipeline for analyzing mouse brain images and provided a foundation for further study of protein expression and functions.


Subject(s)
Brain , Machine Learning , Animals , Mice , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Mammals
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL