FOLFOX4 versus sequential dose-dense FOLFOX7 followed by FOLFIRI in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MIROX): a pragmatic approach to chemotherapy timing with perioperative or postoperative chemotherapy from an open-label, randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) chemotherapy is the current standard in patients with resectable metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to determine whether a sequential chemotherapy with dose-dense oxaliplatin (FOLFOX7) and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) is superior to FOLFOX4. The chemotherapy timing was not imposed, and was perioperative or postoperative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, phase III trial, patients with resectable or resected metastases were randomly assigned either to 12 cycles of FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2)) or 6 cycles of FOLFOX7 (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)) followed by 6 cycles of FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m(2)). Randomization was done centrally, with stratification by chemotherapy timing, type of local treatment (surgery versus radiofrequency ablation with/without surgery), and Fong's prognostic score. The primary end point was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: A total of 284 patients were randomized, 142 in each treatment group. Chemotherapy was perioperative in 168 (59.2%) patients and postoperative in 116 (40.8%) patients. Perioperative chemotherapy was preferentially proposed for synchronous metastases, whereas postoperative chemotherapy was more frequently used for metachronous metastases. Two-year DFS was 48.5% in the FOLFOX4 group and 50.0% in the FOLFOX7-FOLFIRI group. In the multivariable analysis, more than one metastasis [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15] and synchronous metastases (HR = 1.63) were independent prognostic factors for shorter DFS. Five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 69.5% with FOLFOX4 versus 66.6% with FOLFOX7-FOLFIRI. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOX7-FOLFIRI is not superior to FOLFOX4 in patients with resectable metastatic CRC. Five-year OS rates observed in both groups are the highest ever reported in this setting, possibly reflecting the pragmatic approach to chemotherapy timing. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT00268398.

Panitumumab combined with irinotecan for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy: a GERCOR efficacy, tolerance, and translational molecular study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combination of panitumumab and irinotecan in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy (oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidines-irinotecan and bevacizumab). PATIENTS AND METHODS: KRAS status was first determined locally but subsequent validation of KRAS status and additional screenings (rare KRAS, NRAS, BRAF mutations and EGFR copy number) were centrally assessed. Patients received panitumumab (6 mg/kg) and irinotecan (180 mg/m²) every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-five eligible patients were analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) was 29.2% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 18.2-40.3]. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 5.5 and 9.7 months, respectively. Most frequent grade 3/4 toxic effects were skin 32.3%, diarrhea 15.4% and neutropenia 12.3%. Tissue samples were available for 60 patients. For the confirmed KRAS wild-type population codon 12 or 13 mutation (n = 54), ORR was 35.2% (95% CI 22.4.1-47.9). Thirteen patients had a NRAS, a BRAF or a rare KRAS mutation, and no tumor response was observed in this subgroup when compared with 46.3% (95% CI 31.1-61.6) ORR in the subgroup of 41 patients with no identified mutation. CONCLUSION: Panitumumab and irinotecan is an active third-line regimen in a well-defined population based on biomarkers. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00655499.

Efficacy of FOLFIRI-3 (irinotecan D1,D3 combined with LV5-FU) or other irinotecan-based regimens in oxaliplatin-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer in the GERCOR OPTIMOX1 study.

BACKGROUND: Second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy is commonly used in metastatic colorectal cancers after first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. No standard schedule of irinotecan has been established in this situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients included in the OPTIMOX1 phase III study received first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX). No second line was defined in the protocol, but data concerning second line were prospectively registered. Inclusion criterion was patients receiving an irinotecan-based second-line chemotherapy. Second-line progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response were evaluated according to type of irinotecan-based regimen administered. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients received irinotecan-based chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy: FOLFIRI-3 [n = 109, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 3 combined with leucovorin (LV) 400 mg/m(2) day 1 and 46-h continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2000 mg/m(2)], FOLFIRI-1 (n = 112, irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) day 1 combined with LV 400 mg/m(2) day 1, 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 46-h continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2)) and other various irinotecan-based regimens (n = 121). Median second-line PFS was 3.0 months (FOLFIRI-3: 3.7 months; FOLFIRI-1: 3.0 months; other regimens: 2.3 months). In multivariate analysis, FOLFIRI-3 regimen (relative risk 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.68, P = 0.0003) and lactate deshydrogenase level at inclusion (P = 0.0006) in OPTIMOX1 were associated with a longer second-line PFS. CONCLUSION: In unselected patients pretreated with oxaliplatin, PFS in second line appeared to be improved by FOLFIRI-3 regimen.

High-dose intensity oxaliplatin added to the simplified bimonthly leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (FOLFOX 7).

This phase II study examined a regimen (FOLFOX7) of leucovorin (LV), high-dose intensity oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. 48 patients were enrolled - 36 refractory and 12 resistant to prior therapy with LV-5-FU. Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) was infused with LV (400 mg/m2) over 2 h on day 1, followed by bolus 400 mg/m2 and a 46-h infusion (2400 g/m2) of 5-FU, every 2 weeks. Patients who responded or were stable received eight cycles. Patients were evaluated every 2 months. 20 patients (42%) had partial responses (95% confidence interval (CI): 28-56%), 19 (40%) had stable disease and 9 (19%) progressed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months and median survival 16.1 months. Toxic effects of National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3/4 were: peripheral neuropathy 15%, nausea 8%, diarrhoea 11%, neutropenia 9%, thrombocytopenia 11%. Overall, 38% of patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities, and 64% received 90% or more of the scheduled oxaliplatin dose intensity during the first four cycles. FOLFOX7 was highly active, with good tolerability, in pretreated patients resistant to LV-5-FU [corrected].

Optimisation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination chemotherapy with a new schedule of hydroxyurea, leucovorin, 5-FU and cisplatin (HLFP regimen) for metastatic oesophageal cancer.

To improve the efficacy and tolerance of the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination in metastatic esophageal cancer, we designed a new therapeutic schedule, the HLFP regimen. 42 patients with metastatic oesophageal adenocarcinoma (n=10) or squamous cell carcinoma (n=32) were prospectively enrolled in the study. All had bidimensionally measurable disease. The HLFP regimen consisted of twice-monthly oral administration of hydroxyurea 1 g/m(2) on days 0, 1 and 2; a 2-h infusion of leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) and a bolus of 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) followed by a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2; and, every two cycles, 80 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 3. Relief of dysphagia and other symptoms were monitored, together with body weight changes. Major objective responses were observed in 24 patients (57%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 42-72%), including four complete responses (10%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 8 and 12.7 months, respectively. Weight gain was observed in 48% of patients, and dysphagia improved in 76%. Grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 40% of patients, with grade 4 neutropenia in 12% and grade 3 thrombocytopenia, vomiting and diarrhoea in 7-9% of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. These results suggest that the HLFP regimen is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy for metastatic oesophageal carcinoma.

CPT-11 (irinotecan) addition to bimonthly, high-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. GERCOR.

CPT-11 (irinotecan) has shown activity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer resistant to leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study, the simplified bimonthly LV-5-FU regimen was combined with CPT-11 (FOLFIRI) as third-line therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Continuous infusion of 5-FU was administered with disposable pumps as outpatient therapy. FOLFIRI consisted of CPT-11 180 mg/m2 as a 90-min infusion day 1; LV 400 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion during CPT-11, immediately followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 and 46-h continuous infusion of 2.4-3 g/m2 every 2 weeks. Among the 33 patients treated, 2 had partial responses for an overall response rate of 6%; 20 patients were stabilised (61%) and 11 had disease progression (33%). From the start of FOLFIRI, median progression-free survival was 18 weeks and median survival was 43 weeks. For the 242 cycles analysed, NCI-CTC toxicities grade 3-4 per patient were nausea 15%, diarrhoea 12% and neutropenia 15%. Overall, 10 patients (30%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. 7 patients (21%) had grade 2 alopecia. FOLFIRI generated activity and acceptable toxicity, in heavily pretreated patients, with limited diarrhoea, mostly asymptomatic neutropenia and manageable nausea and relatively uncommon alopecia. This regimen is suitable for studies in chemotherapy-naïve patients.

A risk-benefit assessment of amifostine in cytoprotection.

Recent advances in chemotherapy have focused on the benefit of high dose regimens, increasing the dose intensity of conventional chemotherapy and using intensified chemotherapy with or without autologous bone marrow rescue. Dose intensity usually increases objective response rates of antineoplastic drugs and might, in some circumstances, improves survival. However, unacceptable acute and/or cumulative toxicity often impairs the proper management of patients, leading to dose reduction or treatment delay, thus reducing the efficacy and potentially the quality of life of patients. Therefore, considerable efforts have been made to manage, to prevent, and to delay many acute and cumulative treatment-related toxicities. Amifostine (WR-2721 ) is a multiorgan cytoprotector which has demonstrated cytoprotective effects, in vitro and in vivo, against the most common cytotoxic drug-related toxicities and against radiation-induced adverse effects in healthy tissues. In vitro and in vivo, cytoprotection was observed in several organs including kidney, haematopoietic stem cells, myocardial cells, neural cells, and mucosa, without detectable protection of malignant cells. In addition, in preclinical studies, amifostine appeared to be able to reduce the risk of radiation-induced secondary neoplasms. Phase I studies showed that nausea/vomiting and hypotension are the dose-limiting toxicities of amifostine and these may be controlled by reducing the duration of injection of amifostine. Phase II and randomised studies have confirmed the efficacy of amifostine in protecting against radiotherapy-induced mucositis, cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, cyclophosphamide-induced neutropenia and carboplatin-induced thrombocytopenia. Importantly, the cytoprotection of healthy tissues occurred without any significant deleterious effect on response rate, time to progression, and survival of patients receiving amifostine. However, in addition to the potential quality of life benefit, the most important question of whether the use of a cytoprotective agent might translate into the possibility of maintaining the dose intensity of anticancer therapies has still to be answered. The real benefit of amifostine in the overall management of patients with cancer requires additional studies to determine whether this chemoprotective approach can be of benefit to patients by increasing response rate, time to progression, and long term survival in patients receiving the more recent combination therapies involving new drugs such as the taxanes and oxaliplatin.

[Comparative trial of oral granisetron and intravenous ondansetron in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Study Group of Granisetron]. / Etude comparative du granisétron per os et de l'ondansétron IV chez des patients recevant une chimiothérapie pour un cancer du sein.

This multicentric randomized trial compared two strategies in the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. The antiemetic efficacy and side effects of oral granisetron, followed by metoclopramide, were compared to those of intravenous (IV) ondansetron followed by oral ondansetron. 198 chemonaive patients with breast cancer, treated with a moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive either oral granisetron 1 mg twice a day on day 1, followed by metoclopramide, 60 mg on day 2 and 3, or ondansetron, 8 mg IV on day 1, followed by ondansetron 8 mg tablet twice a day on day 2 and 3. Both treatments have shown similar control of acute emesis: complete response was achieved in 71% of granisetron group and 66% of ondansetron, and total response in respectively 49% and 53%. However, granisetron plus metoclopramide showed a trend towards better efficacy than oral ondansetron in the prevention of delayed emesis. Furthermore, during the overall study period (day 1 to 5), the percentage of complete responses in the group receiving oral granisetron followed by oral metoclopramide was significantly higher than in the group receiving ondansetron (53% versus 37%; p = 0.022). In conclusion, oral granisetron has shown similar efficacy as IV ondansetron in the prevention of acute emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Oral granisetron followed by metoclopramide seems more efficient than IV plus oral ondansetron in the prevention of delayed emesis.

[Oral granisetron solution as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced emesis in children: double-blind study of 2 doses]. / Granisétron en solution buvable dans la prévention des vomissements chimio-induits de l'enfant: comparaison en double aveugle de deux posologies.

This multicentric double-blind, dose-ranging study was to compare efficacy and safety of two oral doses of granisetron solution in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis in children with malignant diseases : 294 children, aged 1 to 16, treated with a moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive oral granisetron either 20 microg/kg (n = 143) or 40 microg/kg (n = 151) before and 6 to 12 hours after the start of chemotherapy. Fifty-one percent of patients treated with 20 microg/kg bd of oral granisetron solution achieved a complete response (no vomiting, no worse than mild nausea, no rescue therapy and no withdrawal during the specified period) and 59% achieved a major response (no more than one episode of vomiting, no worse than mild nausea, no rescue therapy and no withdrawal during the specified period). There was no difference between the two oral doses of granisetron. Treatment was rated as good or very good by investigators in 70% of cases. In conclusion, oral granisetron suspension either at 20 microg/kg bd or at 40 microg/kg bd showed good efficacy and safety in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis in children with malignant diseases. Oral granisetron solution can be used as prophylaxis of emesis in children receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

[Aspirin against cancer]. / L'aspirine contre le cancer.

PURPOSE: That aspirin as an anti-aggregative and anti-inflammatory compound might prevent tumor spread is an old concept that is still not of clinical relevance. To date, aspirin has been shown in several epidemiologic studies to be linked with a reduction of colorectal cancer incidence, as well as the incidence of lung and breast cancer. In this issue, we have summarized the mechanisms that support this hypothesis, and we have analysed the main clinical studies. RESULTS: Only case-control studies and most of the prospective cohort studies showed a reduction of colorectal cancer incidence in regular aspirin users. Nevertheless, the minimum effective doses of aspirin and the duration of therapy remain unclear. To date, only one prospective randomized trial has evaluated the influence of aspirin in the prevention of colorectal cancer. Despite the inclusion of 22,000 subjects and a five-year follow-up, aspirin failed to show any protection. The mechanism of the potential role of aspirin in preventing cancer, primarily supposed to rely on the antiprostaglandin effect, is now under debate. Few studies have evaluated the prevention of other cancers, such as breast or lung cancers, by aspirin. Data remain too sparse to allow any conclusion. CONCLUSION: The role of aspirin in the prevention of colorectal cancer still needs further studies, such as a prospective randomized study, which should be conducted in a high-risk population.

[Long term survival in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with leucovorin and 5-fluoro-uracil chemotherapy]. / Survie à long terme des cancers colorectaux métastatiques sous chimiothérapie par 5-fluoro-uracile.

PURPOSE: Median survival in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluoro-uracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV) is between 12 and 18 months. The aim of this study was to evaluate long term survival in this disease. METHODS: We report here, retrospectively, the survival of 445 patients who entered in first-line prospective studies with LV-5FU-based regimen chemotherapy, between 1985 and 1995. RESULTS: Median survival was 18 months. The 3, 5 and 10 year survival were respectively 17.9%, 4.5% and 2.4%. Seventy-five patients survived more than 3 years, among them, 10 achieved a complete and 34 a partial response, 12 had curative liver or lung surgery. Fifteen patients lived more than 5 years, 2 achieved a complete and 7 a partial response. Seven had curative surgery. Eleven patients were still alive in 2002, among them 7 in complete remission at 5 years, including 3 who did not have surgery. CONCLUSION: This study shows that some patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can achieve long survival, especially when secondary curative surgery can be performed. However, 1% of the patients can be cured with LV-5FU chemotherapy alone. These results will be probably improve with the use of the new drugs: oxaliplatin and irinotecan.

[Bimonthly 5-fluorouracil in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Study of 50 patients]. / 5-fluorouracile bimensuel en traitement du cancer colorectal métastasé chez le sujet âgé. Etude de 50 patients.

PURPOSE: Recent advances in the management of colorectal cancer have improved the quality of life and the survival of patients treated with chemotherapy. In order to define the contribution of chemotherapy in elderly patients, we studied the tolerance and the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients aged over 75 years received, as outpatient therapy, a bimonthly 48 h leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen. Evaluation was assessed every six cycles (i.e., three months). RESULTS: Fifty patients were studied: 28 males and 22 females, aged between 75 to 87 years, 37 with colon cancer and 13 with rectal cancer. Among 45 patients capable of being evaluated, the response rate was 44%, with six complete responses (13%) and 14 partial responses (31%). Eighteen patients had stable disease (40%) and seven patients progressive disease (16%). Median progression-free survival was 8.8 months and median survival 16.4 months. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 20% of the patients. Performance status improved in 56% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The bimonthly regimen is well tolerated in elderly patients and appears to prolong survival as well in younger patients.

Association of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and paraneoplastic encephalitis - a clinico-pathological study.

A 57 year-old woman developed acute limbic encephalitis and brainstem dysfunction. Anti-HU antibodies were repeatedly detected in serum and CSF. Postmortem examination showed necrotic and hemorrhagic lesions in the temporal lobes characteristic of herpes simplex virus encephalitis, which was confirmed by immunocytochemistry, and Purkinje cell loss with proliferation of Bergman glia and myelin loss in the external aspect of the dentate nuclei characteristic of paraneoplastic encephalitis. PCR-assay performed on temporal tissue extracts was positive for HSV-1. There was no identifiable neoplasm. This unusual association raises the possibility of a link between the two diseases.

Phase II Study of Biweekly Pemetrexed Plus Irinotecan as Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Background. This open-label, single-arm, two-stage, Phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of bi-weekly pemetrexed combined with irinotecan, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), after first-line chemotherapy using FOLFOX regimen. Patients and methods. Patients received pemetrexed 400 mg/m(2) as a 10-minute intravenous infusion (with vitamin supplementation) followed by irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) as a 90-minute infusion on day 1 of a 14-day cycle, for a maximum of 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR; H(0) /= 20%, alpha = 0.05, power = 90%). Secondary endpoints were duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities. Results. Partial response was observed in six out of 44 patients enrolled in the study (RR = 13.6%). The median PFS and OS were 4.0 and 13.9 months, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were fatigue: 20.5% of patients, neutropenia: 18.6%, diarrhea: 13.6%, elevated transaminases: 9.5%, anemia: 9.3%, and vomiting: 6.8%. Conclusion. Pemetrexed plus irinotecan administered every two weeks is an active and well-tolerated regimen in mCRC patients pretreated with FOLFOX regimen. However, this regimen does not seem to provide clinically relevant advantage over historical data of a classical FOLFIRI regimen.