Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 90(1): 105-111, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30684600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and jumbo forceps polypectomy (JFP) have been shown to be effective for removing diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) (≤5 mm). However, no study has compared complete resection rates between CSP and JFP for DCPs. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of JFP with CSP for the removal of DCPs. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial from 2 tertiary-care referral centers. A total of 1003 patients were screened, and 169 patients with 196 DCPs were enrolled. The main outcome was complete polyp resection rate. RESULTS: Of 196 diminutive polyps, 177 (90.3%) were adenomatous polyps. The overall complete resection rate was 92.1% (163/177). The complete resection rate was not significantly different between JFP and CSP groups (92.0% vs 92.2%; P = .947). JFP achieved complete resection rates comparable with CSP for polyps >3 mm (90.3% vs 89.8%; P = .928). Polypectomy procedure time, tissue retrieval rate, and rate of postpolypectomy adverse events were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both JFP and CSP achieved complete resection rates of >90% for DCPs. Thus, JFP may be considered for polypectomy of DCPs. (International clinical trial registry number: KCT0002805.).


Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyps/surgery , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/instrumentation , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adenomatous Polyps/pathology , Aged , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Intestinal Polyps/pathology , Intestinal Polyps/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Surgical Instruments , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL