Lack of efficacy of atenolol for the prevention of neurally mediated syncope in a highly symptomatic population: a prospective, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of atenolol for the long-term management of patients with vasovagal syncope. The primary hypothesis was that atenolol is not superior to placebo for the treatment of vasovagal syncope. BACKGROUND: There is no definitive well-controlled analysis of the efficacy of beta-adrenergic blocking agents in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope were included (at least two episodes in the last year). A baseline tilt test was performed. Twenty patients (40%) had a positive tilt test. Intravenous atenolol prevented a second positive tilt in five patients. The patients were randomized to receive either atenolol or a placebo (26 patients atenolol 50 mg/day, 24 patients placebo). The follow-up procedure lasted one year. The primary end point of the study was the time to first recurrence of syncope. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the group treated with atenolol had a similar number of patients with recurrent syncopal episodes as the placebo group. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial estimates of time to first syncopal recurrence showed that the probability of remaining free of syncope drops similarly in both groups and that there was no statistical difference between both curves (patients treated with atenolol vs. the placebo) with a log-rank test p value of 0.4517. CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence of neurocardiogenic syncope in highly symptomatic patients treated with atenolol is similar to that of patients treated with placebo.

[Evaluation of biochemical markers of myocardial lesion after radiofrequency ablation. Value of troponin I]. / Evaluación de marcadores de lesión miocárdica tras la ablación con radiofrecuencia. Utilidad de la troponina I.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Radiofrequency catheter ablation is the curative treatment of choice for many cardiac arrhythmias. After radiofrequency ablation there is always a localized endomyocardial necrosis, which is necessary to eliminate the arrhythmia. The volume of the necrosis may be evaluated by the rise of several biochemical markers, classically CK and CK-MB. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these markers are not optimal and are probably less than ideal for this purpose. Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) is a newly available biochemical marker available, with a high cardiac specificity. We designed this study in order to determine the value of serum levels of several cardiac markers in patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation and to establish the utility of cTnI. METHODS: We analyzed the data from 51 patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation and from 16 control patients. In respect to the ablation target, we included in the study 14 left accessory pathways, 7 right accessory pathways, 12 atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia, 5 ventricular tachycardia and 13 atrial flutter or fibrillation. The levels of CK, CK-MB, cTnI, and myoglobin were compared with clinical findings, ST-T wave abnormalities and the presence of arrhythmias after ablation. To evaluate the diagnostic capability for each biochemical marker we used the ROC curves. RESULTS: A pathological value of cTnI was found in 47 out of 51 (92%) patients in the ablation group. CK-MB had a lower sensitivity (63%). The sensitivity for the other biochemical markers ranged from 30% for CK to 67% for Myoglobin. The area under the ROC curve for cTnI was 0.9375, significantly superior to the other biochemical markers (0.86, 0.76, 0.75 for MB, Myoglobin, CK respectively) (p < 0.05). The lowest cTnI released was found in patients after nodal reentry tachycardia ablation and the highest after atrial flutter ablation. cTnI increased above normal values in 4 patients in the control group (patients who underwent an electrophysiological study without catheter ablation). We found a moderate level of correlation between the number of radiofrequency pulses and cardiac cTnI release (r = 0.69; p < 0.0001). The correlation was different in each target, ranging between r = 0.25 (p = NS, 0.43) for atrial flutter and fibrillation to r = 0.99 (p < 0.0001) for ventricular tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: cTnI had the greatest sensitivity (92%) for detecting minor myocardial damage. Thus, we can conclude that the serum level of cTnI detects the minor myocardial damage produced by radiofrequency ablation.