Diagnostic pathway of the biopsy-naïve patient suspected for prostate cancer: Real-life scenario when multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging is not centralized.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the pathway including multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) versus the one without mpMRI in detection of prostate cancer (PCa) when mpMRI is not centralized. MATERIALS: January 2019-March 2020: prospective data collection of trans-perineal prostate biopsies. Group A: biopsy-naïve patients who underwent mpMRI (at any institution) versus Group B: patients who did not. Within Group A, patients were stratified into those with negative mpMRI (mpMRI-, PIRADS v2.1=1-3, with PSA density <0.15 if PIRADS 3) who underwent standard biopsy (SB), versus those with positive mpMRI (mpMRI+, when PIRADS 3-5, with PSA density>0.15 if PIRADS 3) who underwent cognitive fusion biopsy. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty one biopsies were analyzed. 153 patients underwent mpMRI (Group A). 98 mpMRI+ underwent fusion biopsy; 55 mpMRI- underwent SB. 128 Group B patients underwent SB. Overall PCa detection rate was 52.3% vs. 48.4% (Group A vs. B, P=0.5). Non-clinically-significant PCa was detected in 7.8 vs. 13.3% (Group A vs. B, P=0.1). Among the 98 mpMRI+ Group A patients only 2 had non clinically-significant disease. In 55 mpMRI- patients who underwent SB, 10 (18.2%) had clinically-significant PCa. Prostate volume predicted detection of PCa. In Group B, age and PSA predicted PCa. Sensitivity of mpMRI was 75.0% for all PCa, 85.3% for clinically-significant PCa. CONCLUSION: Higher detection of PCa and lower detection of non-clinically-significant PCa favored mpMRI pathway. A consistent number of clinically-significant PCa was diagnosed after a mpMRI-. Thus, in real-life scenario, mpMRI- does not obviate indication to biopsy when mpMRI is not centralized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Intraoperative limphonodal mapping in gastric, pulmonary and large bowel tumors. The sentinel limphonode technique]. / Mappatura linfonodale intraoperatoria in tumori gastrici, polmonari e del grosso intestino. La tecnica del linfonodo sentinella.

The concept of the sentinel lymphatic node was introduced by Cabanas in 1977, but it has proved to be successful for the treatment of the melanoma and breast cancer only since the 90s. Many studies have recently extended this technique to other neoplasias. This study deals with 36 patients who were to undergo surgery for 14 gastric adenocarcinomas, 11 of the colon and 11 pulmonary. Once the neoplastic mass was detected, 2 to 5 ml of a vital dye (Blu Patent) were injected in the serosa along the perimeter of the tumor by means of several 0.5 ml injections. A lymphatic node was diagnosed in 22 patients, respectively 10 gastric neoplasias, 6 pulmonary, 6 of the colon. In 14 cases the lymphatic node was found to be negative, in 8 cases positive. In the remaining 14 patients the lymphatic node was not detected. Although data do not always agree, the sentinel lymphatic node technique seems to have been successful for this kind of tumors. For this reason we have carried out this study and published our first data.

DNA mismatch repair protein expression and microsatellite instability in primary mucosal melanomas of the head and neck.

AIMS: To examine the expression of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in seven primary mucosal melanomas of the head and neck (MMHN). METHODS AND RESULTS: Haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis for routine diagnostic markers and for MMR proteins were performed. Six cases were examined for MSI. Four cases were monomorphous and three cases were pleomorphic type MMHN. Melanocytic markers were positive in all cases. Immunoreactivity for MMR proteins was weak in normal epithelium. The neoplastic tissue in six cases showed positivity for all MMR proteins with different percentages. One case showed weak positivity for hMSH2 and hMSH6 and no immunoreactivity for hMLH1 or hPMS2. Staining intensity was higher in tumour cells than in matched normal mucosa in three cases for hMSH2 and hMLH1 and in two cases for hPMS2. None of the examined cases showed MSI. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 proteins was up-regulated in three cases, whereas in two cases that of hPMS2 was increased. hMSH6 expression was comparable to that of normal cells in all cases. The percentage of positive neoplastic cells and the intensity of staining seemed to be greater in pleomorphic melanomas. Six cases were MMR-proficient and microsatellite stable.