Direct association between pharyngeal viral secretion and host cytokine response in severe pandemic influenza.

BACKGROUND: Severe disease caused by 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1virus is characterized by the presence of hypercytokinemia. The origin of the exacerbated cytokine response is unclear. As observed previously, uncontrolled influenza virus replication could strongly influence cytokine production. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between host cytokine responses and viral levels in pandemic influenza critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty three patients admitted to the ICU with primary viral pneumonia were included in this study. A quantitative PCR based method targeting the M1 influenza gene was developed to quantify pharyngeal viral load. In addition, by using a multiplex based assay, we systematically evaluated host cytokine responses to the viral infection at admission to the ICU. Correlation studies between cytokine levels and viral load were done by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Fifteen patients needed of intubation and ventilation, while eight did not need of mechanical ventilation during ICU hospitalization. Viral load in pharyngeal swabs was 300 fold higher in the group of patients with the worst respiratory condition at admission to the ICU. Pharyngeal viral load directly correlated with plasma levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-12p70, IFN-γ, the chemotactic factors MIP-1ß, GM-CSF, the angiogenic mediator VEGF and also of the immuno-modulatory cytokine IL-1ra (p < 0.05). Correlation studies demonstrated also the existence of a significant positive association between the levels of these mediators, evidencing that they are simultaneously regulated in response to the virus. CONCLUSIONS: Severe respiratory disease caused by the 2009 pandemic influenza virus is characterized by the existence of a direct association between viral replication and host cytokine response, revealing a potential pathogenic link with the severe disease caused by other influenza subtypes such as H5N1.

Host adaptive immunity deficiency in severe pandemic influenza.

INTRODUCTION: Pandemic A/H1N1/2009 influenza causes severe lower respiratory complications in rare cases. The association between host immune responses and clinical outcome in severe cases is unknown. METHODS: We utilized gene expression, cytokine profiles and generation of antibody responses following hospitalization in 19 critically ill patients with primary pandemic A/H1N1/2009 influenza pneumonia for identifying host immune responses associated with clinical outcome. Ingenuity pathway analysis 8.5 (IPA) (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA) was used to select, annotate and visualize genes by function and pathway (gene ontology). IPA analysis identified those canonical pathways differentially expressed (P < 0.05) between comparison groups. Hierarchical clustering of those genes differentially expressed between groups by IPA analysis was performed using BRB-Array Tools v.3.8.1. RESULTS: The majority of patients were characterized by the presence of comorbidities and the absence of immunosuppressive conditions. pH1N1 specific antibody production was observed around day 9 from disease onset and defined an early period of innate immune response and a late period of adaptive immune response to the virus. The most severe patients (n = 12) showed persistence of viral secretion. Seven of the most severe patients died. During the late phase, the most severe patient group had impaired expression of a number of genes participating in adaptive immune responses when compared to less severe patients. These genes were involved in antigen presentation, B-cell development, T-helper cell differentiation, CD28, granzyme B signaling, apoptosis and protein ubiquitination. Patients with the poorest outcomes were characterized by proinflammatory hypercytokinemia, along with elevated levels of immunosuppressory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-1ra) in serum. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an impaired development of adaptive immunity in the most severe cases of pandemic influenza, leading to an unremitting cycle of viral replication and innate cytokine-chemokine release. Interruption of this deleterious cycle may improve disease outcome.

Longitudinal Voice Outcomes After Voice Therapy in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term effectiveness of voice therapy in vocal outcomes of patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) and vocal productions of patients with long-standing treatment-naïve UVFP treated with voice therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: A voice therapy protocol was applied individually in three stages. Fifteen sessions were scheduled twice a week in 70 patients with UVFP. Forty-seven patients were treated within a year of the diagnosis (group 1). The remaining patients had delayed therapy (at least 1 year after diagnosis) (group 2). Multidisciplinary assessment included nasofibroscopy, videostroboscopy, acoustic and aerodynamic parameters, and perception of voice impairment measures. A subgroup of the 70 patients (n = 32) was reassessed after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Our voice therapy protocol significantly improved voice productions and perception of voice impairment in group 1 (P < 0.0001). Patients in group 2 experienced less hoarseness and had improved perception of voice impairment (P = 0.007). The improvement was long lasting and persisted at 1 year of follow-up in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Voice therapy is effective in patients with UVFP and its benefits are sustained over time. Early referral for voice therapy seems to be associated with greater benefit, but quality of life also improves for patients despite delayed treatment.

Quality of life and voice assessment in patients with early-stage glottic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of life (QOL) and voice handicap in a sample of disease-free patients who had been treated at our center with radiotherapy (RT) or surgery for early glottic cancer. METHODS: QOL and voice handicap were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30-questions (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35-questions (QLQ-H&N35) and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). RESULTS: Ninety-one patients completed the questionnaires. Fifty-nine patients (65%) were treated with RT and 32 (35%) with surgery. QOL scores for the sample recorded, moderate limitations in 6 areas, and more than moderate limitations (>30 of 100) in 2 areas. Significant differences were found in emotional functioning (88.5 vs 76.6) and social contact (4.6 vs 12.1) on the EORTC questionnaires and on the VHI (6.1 vs 12.8), which favored the RT group. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study, voice quality, emotional functioning, and social contact were better in the RT group.

Effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B in patients admitted to the ICU on renal replacement therapy.

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in ICU patients with and without renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: Observational, retrospective, comparative and multicenter study conducted in critically ill patients treated with L-AmB for 3 or more days, divided into two cohorts depending on the use of RRT before or within the first 48 hours after starting L-AmB. Clinical and microbiological response at the end of treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 158 patients met the inclusion criteria, 36 (22.8%) of which required RRT during the ICU stay. Patients with RRT as compared with those without RRT showed a higher APACHE II score on admission (21.4 vs 18.4, P = 0.041), greater systemic response against infection (P = 0.047) and higher need of supportive techniques (P = 0.002). In both groups, main reasons for the use of L-AmB were broad spectrum and hemodynamic instability. A higher daily dose of L-AmB was used in the RRT group (4.30 vs 3.84 mg/kg, P = 0.030) without differences in the total cumulative dose or treatment duration. There were no differences in the clinical response (61.1% vs 56.6%, P = 0.953) or microbiological eradication rate (74.1% vs 64.6%, P = 0.382). In patients with proven invasive fungal infection, satisfactory clinical response was obtained in 74.1% and microbiological eradication 85.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study sample is small, this study shows that L-AmB is effective in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU requiring RRT.

Impact of liposomal amphotericin B on renal function in critically ill patients with renal function impairment

Objetivo: Evaluar la tolerabilidad de anfotericina B liposomal (L-AmB) en pacientes críticos con concentraciones elevadas de creatinina sérica (Cr) (> 1,5 mg/dL) al inicio del tratamiento con L-AmB. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, multicéntrico y comparativo de dos cohortes de pacientes críticos tratados con L-AmB durante tres o más días, que se diferenciaban según el nivel de creatinina al inicio del tratamiento. Se estableció como punto de corte un valor de Cr de 1,5 mg/dL. Se excluyeron los pacientes con técnicas de depuración extrarrenal antes o 48 horas después del inicio de L-AmB. La variable principal fue la diferencia entre el valor de creatinina al final comparado con el inicio de tratamiento con L-AmB. Otros parámetros secundarios fueron: abandonos relacionados con el tratamiento, necesidad de técnicas de depuración extrarrenal (TDE) y acontecimientos adversos graves (AAG) relacionados con el tratamiento. Se recogieron datos demográficos, enfermedad subyacente, motivo de prescripción, factores concomitantes de riesgo de nefrotoxicidad y estado vital al alta de UCI y del hospital. Resultados: Se reclutaron 122 pacientes en 26 UCI (Cr > 1,5 g/dL, n= 16; Cr normal, n= 106). Los motivos principales por los que se indicó L-AmB en ambos grupos fueron el amplio espectro y la presencia de inestabilidad hemodinámica. Se administró como tratamiento de 1ª línea en el 68,8% de los pacientes con Cr elevada y en el 52,8% con Cr normal. La puntuación APACHE II al ingreso en UCI fue 25 en pacientes con Cr elevada y 17 en aquellos con Cr normal (p< 0,001). La duración del tratamiento con L-AmB fue 16 y 12 días en pacientes con Cr elevada y normal y una dosis media de 3,5 vs 3,9 mg/kg/día. El uso concomitante de otros fármacos nefrotóxicos, la tasa de mortalidad, y la estancia en UCI y hospitalaria fueron similares en ambas cohortes. En los pacientes con función renal alterada al inicio de L-AmB se observó una reducción absoluta de Cf-Ci de 1,08 mg/dl (P<0,001). La Cr bajó a valores normales en el 50% de los pacientes, descendió pero sin llegar a valores normales en el 37,5% y sólo se elevó en 1 (6,25%) paciente. En ningún paciente se suspendió L-AmB por nefrotoxicidad ni se precisaron técnicas de depuración extrarrenal. No se reportaron AAG relacionados con el tratamiento. Conclusiones: El tratamiento con L-AmB en pacientes críticos con función renal deteriorada tuvo un impacto mínimo en la función renal. L-AmB puede utilizarse para el tratamiento de infecciones fúngicas en pacientes críticos independientemente de la función renal al inicio del tratamiento(AU)

Objetive: To assess the tolerability of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in critically ill patients with elevated serum creatinine concentrations (Cr) (> 1.5 mg/dL) at starting L-AmB therapy. Methods: Retrospective, multicenter, comparative study of two cohorts of critically ill patients treated with L-AmB during 3 or more days, the difference between them was the level of Cr at the beginning of treatment. A cutoff value of Cr of 1.5 mg/dL was established. Patients undergoing extrarenal depuration procedures before or 48 hours after starting L-AmB were excluded. The primary endpoint was the difference between Cr values at the end of treatment as compared with Cr at starting L-AmB. Secondary endpoints were treatment-related withdrawals, need of extrarenal depuration techniques, and treatment-related severe adverse events. Demographic data, underlying illness, indication of L-AmB therapy, concomitant risk factors of nephrotoxicity, and vital status at ICU and hospital discharge were recorded. Results: A total of 122 patients admitted to 26 ICUs (16 with Cr > 1.5 g/dL; 106 with normal Cr levels) were recruited. Main reasons for the use of L-AmB in both groups were the broad spectrum of the drug and the presence of hemodynamic instability. L-AmB was administered as first-line treatment in 68.8% of patients with elevated Cr and in 52.8% with normal Cr. The APACHE II score on ICU admission was 25 in patients with elevated Cr and 17 in those with normal Cr values (p < 0.001). Duration of treatment with L-AmB was 16 and 12 days in patients with elevate and normal Cr values, respectively, with a mean dose of 3.5 vs 3.9 mg/kg/day. The use of concomitant nephrotoxic drugs, mortality rate, and ICU and hospital length of stay were similar in both cohorts. In patients with renal function impairment at the initiation of L-AmB treatment, an absolute decrease of Cf-Ci of 1.08 mg/dL was observed (P < 0.001). A decrease of Cr levels to normal limits was observed in 50% of the patients; in 37.5% of patients there was a decrease but normal levels were not achieved, whereas a Cr increased occurred in only one (6.25%) patient. None of the patients required withdrawal of L-AmB or use of extrarenal depuration procedures. Treatment-related severe adverse events were not reported. Conclusions: In critically ill patients with impaired renal function, the impact of L-AmB on renal function was minimal. L-AmB can be used for the treatment of fungal infections in critically ill patients independently of renal function at the initiation of treatmen(AU)