Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 72
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Health Rep ; 32(6): 14-28, 2021 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34142787

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to measure cancer incidence and mortality rates of Registered First Nations people in Ontario and compare them with those of other people in Ontario from 1991 to 2010. DATA AND METHODS: The federal Indian Register, the Ontario Cancer Registry and the Registered Persons Database were linked to develop a cohort of First Nations people diagnosed with cancer in Ontario. Sex-and site-specific age-standardized cancer incidence and mortality rates, and selected trends over time, were calculated. Rate ratios (RRs) were used to compare rates in First Nations peoples with those of other people in Ontario. RESULTS: The First Nations cohort comprised 194,392 people, with 6,859 cancer diagnoses. First Nations people had higher rates for certain cancers than others in Ontario: lung (males RR 1.19; females RR 1.47), colorectal (males RR 1.36; females RR 1.34) and kidney (males RR1.95; females RR 2.23). While lung cancer rates rose in First Nations females (annual percent change [APC] +2.67), they fell at a similar rate (APC -2.28) in males. Cervical cancer rates fell (APC -9.53) and approached the rate among other females in Ontario. Kidney cancer rates increased in First Nations people. DISCUSSION: First Nations people in Ontario have higher incidence and mortality for certain cancers compared with other people in Ontario. However, the declines in cervical cancer rates in First Nations females and lung cancer rates in First Nations males illustrate the likely impact of Pap test uptake and smoking cessation programs. Community-led efforts to develop culturally appropriate prevention and screening programs are essential to further reduce cancer rates in First Nations people.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Canada , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mass Screening , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ontario/epidemiology
2.
J Community Health ; 44(4): 675-683, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30976965

ABSTRACT

Evidence of the dangers of indoor tanning and its popularity, including among youth, led the Government of Ontario to pass the Skin Cancer Prevention Act (Tanning Beds) (SCPA) in 2014. This legislation includes prohibiting the sale of indoor tanning services to individuals under 18, requiring warning signs be posted, and other safety regulations. We collected information from Ontario Public Health Units to conduct a process evaluation of the SCPA to: understand legislation implementation; assess available evidence about compliance, inspection, and enforcement; and, note barriers and facilitators related to inspection and enforcement. Data was collected March-April 2018. All 36 Ontario Public Health Units were invited to participate in an online questionnaire about the SCPA. Questions covered complaints, inspection, and enforcement, and used both close- and open-ended questions. Participants from 20 Public Health Units responded to the questionnaire; a response rate of 56%. These agencies reported 485 facilities offer indoor tanning. Since 2014, there have been 242 infractions by tanning facility owner/operators related to the SCPA, with most being uncovered during non-mandatory routine inspections (n = 234, 97%), rather than mandatory complaint-based inspections (n = 8, 3%). Most infractions were related to warning signs (n = 201, 83%). No charges were issued for any infractions. Instead, providing education (n = 90, 62%) and issuing warnings (n = 33, 23%) were the most common enforcement strategies. SCPA amendments are needed, including mandatory, routinely scheduled inspections. In addition to providing education, fines may improve compliance. More resources are required for inspection and enforcement of the SCPA.


Subject(s)
Public Health , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Sunbathing , Humans , Ontario , Process Assessment, Health Care , Sunbathing/legislation & jurisprudence , Sunbathing/standards , Sunbathing/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
CMAJ ; 190(11): E320-E326, 2018 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29555862

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Métis people are 1 of 3 Aboriginal groups recognized by the Canadian constitution. We estimated site-specific incidence rates and survival for the most common cancers among Métis adults in Canada and compared these with rates among non-Aboriginal adults in Canada. METHODS: We examined responses to the 1991 long-form census, including self-reported Métis ancestry linked to national mortality and cancer databases for followup from 1992 to 2009. We estimated age-standardized incidence rates and 5-year relative survival. We determined relative risk (RR) of cancer among Métis and non-Aboriginal adults using Poisson regression, and estimated excess mortality rate ratios using ethnicity-specific life tables. RESULTS: For all cancers and both sexes combined, cancer incidence was similar for Métis and non-Aboriginal adults. However, incidence was significantly higher among Métis adults than among non-Aboriginal adults for the following cancers: female breast (RR 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.37), lung (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.52), liver (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.30-3.38), larynx (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.03-2.48), gallbladder (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.12-4.96) and cervix (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.23-2.76). Métis people had poorer survival for prostate cancer (excess mortality rate ratio 2.60, 95% CI 1.52-4.46). INTERPRETATION: We found higher incidence for several cancers and poorer survival after prostate cancer among Métis adults. Several of these disparities may be related to lifestyle factors (including tobacco use, obesity and lack of cancer screening), providing evidence to support development of public health policy and health care to address cancer burden in the Métis people of Canada.


Subject(s)
American Indian or Alaska Native/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada/epidemiology , Censuses , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis
4.
Popul Health Metr ; 15(1): 24, 2017 07 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28673318

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cause-specific (CS) and net survival in a relative survival framework (RS) are two of the most common methods for estimating cancer survival. In this paper, we assess the differences in results produced by two permutations of cause-specific and relative survival applied to estimating cancer survival and disparities in cancer survival, using data from First Nations and non-Aboriginal populations in Canada. METHODS: Subjects were members of the 1991 Canadian Census Mortality Cohort, a population-based cohort of adult respondents to the 1991 Long Form Census who have been followed up for incident cancers and death through linkage to administrative databases. We compared four methods: relative survival analyses with ethnicity-specific life tables (RS-ELT); relative survival with general population life tables (RS-GLT); cause-specific survival with a broad definition of cancer death (CS-Broad); and cause-specific survival with a narrow definition of cause of death (CS-Narrow) and applied these to the nine most common cancers among First Nations. RESULTS: Apart from breast and prostate cancers, RS-ELT, RS-GLT, and CS-Broad tended to produce similar estimates of age-standardized five-year survival, whereas CS-Narrow yielded higher estimates of survival. CS-Narrow estimates were particularly unlike those based on the other methods for cancers of the digestive and respiratory tracts. Estimates of disparities in survival were generally comparable across the four methods except for breast and prostate cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer surveillance efforts in sub-populations defined by race, ethnicity, geography, socioeconomic status, or similar factors are necessary for identifying disparities and monitoring progress toward reducing them. In the absence of routine monitoring of cancer survival and cancer survival disparities in these populations, estimates generated by different methods will inevitably be compared over time and across populations. In this study, we demonstrate that caution should be exercised in making these comparisons, particularly in interpreting cause-specific survival rates with an unknown or narrow definition of cancer death and in estimates of breast and prostate cancer survival and/or disparities in survival generated by different methods.


Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Life Tables , Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Analysis , Adult , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Censuses , Cohort Studies , Ethnicity , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/ethnology , Racial Groups , Residence Characteristics , Social Class , Socioeconomic Factors
5.
Carcinogenesis ; 37(1): 30-8, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26521212

ABSTRACT

Factors known to affect melanoma survival include age at presentation, sex and tumor characteristics. Polymorphisms also appear to modulate survival following diagnosis. Result from other studies suggest that vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms (SNPs) impact survival in patients with glioma, renal cell carcinoma, lung, breast, prostate and other cancers; however, a comprehensive study of VDR polymorphisms and melanoma-specific survival is lacking. We aimed to investigate whether VDR genetic variation influences survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma. The analysis involved 3566 incident single and multiple primary melanoma cases enrolled in the international population-based Genes, Environment, and Melanoma Study. Melanoma-specific survival outcomes were calculated for each of 38 VDR SNPs using a competing risk analysis after adjustment for covariates. There were 254 (7.1%) deaths due to melanoma during the median 7.6 years follow-up period. VDR SNPs rs7299460, rs3782905, rs2239182, rs12370156, rs2238140, rs7305032, rs1544410 (BsmI) and rs731236 (TaqI) each had a statistically significant (trend P values < 0.05) association with melanoma-specific survival in multivariate analysis. One functional SNP (rs2239182) remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing using the Monte Carlo method. None of the SNPs associated with survival were significantly associated with Breslow thickness, ulceration or mitosis. These results suggest that the VDR gene may influence survival from melanoma, although the mechanism by which VDR exerts its effect does not seem driven by tumor aggressiveness. Further investigations are needed to confirm our results and to understand the relationship between VDR and survival in the combined context of tumor and host characteristics.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/genetics , Receptors, Calcitriol/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Australia/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Genotype , Haplotypes , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Melanoma/mortality , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Proportional Hazards Models , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , United States/epidemiology
6.
Int J Cancer ; 136(3): 639-45, 2015 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24923728

ABSTRACT

We aimed to compare cancer survival in Ontario First Nations people to that in other Ontarians for five major cancer types: colorectal, lung, cervix, breast and prostate. A list of registered or "Status" Indians in Ontario was used to create a cohort of over 140,000 Ontario First Nations people. Cancers diagnosed in cohort members between 1968 and 2001 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry, with follow-up for death until December 31st, 2007. Flexible parametric modeling of the hazard function was used to compare the survival experience of the cohort to that of other Ontarians. We considered changes in survival from the first half of the time period (1968-1991) to the second half (1992-2001). For other Ontarians, survival had improved over time for every cancer site. For the First Nations cohort, survival improved only for breast and prostate cancers; it either declined or remained unchanged for the other cancers. For cancers diagnosed in 1992 or later, all-cause and cause-specific survival was significantly poorer for First Nations people diagnosed with breast, prostate, cervical, colorectal (male and female) and male lung cancers as compared to their non-First Nations peers. For female lung cancer, First Nations women appeared to have poorer survival; however, the result was not statistically significant. Ontario's First Nations population experiences poorer cancer survival when compared to other Ontarians and strategies to reduce these inequalities must be developed and implemented.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ontario/epidemiology , Time Factors
7.
Health Rep ; 26(4): 3-9, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25875157

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that colorectal cancer incidence increased disproportionately among the Aboriginal population of Ontario relative to the general population. Using an ecological approach, this study examined colorectal cancer incidence for the 1998-to-2009 period among Aboriginal people living in Ontario. DATA AND METHODS: Based on their postal code when they were diagnosed, cases of colorectal cancer identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry were assigned to census geographic areas with high (33% or more) or low percentages of Aboriginal identity residents, using the Postal Code Conversion File Plus (PCCF+). To account for potential misclassification by the PCCF+, Indian reserves for which assignment through postal codes is likely to be accurate were identified. Age-standardized incidence rates and rate ratios were calculated to compare colorectal cancer incidence in high-Aboriginal identity areas or on Indian reserves with incidence in low-Aboriginal identity areas. RESULTS: Colorectal cancer incidence was significantly higher for residents of high- versus low-Aboriginal identity areas in Ontario (rate ratio for men = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.26-1.63; rate ratio for women = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.23-1.63), a disparity that persisted by age group. When the Aboriginal sample was limited to residents of Indian reserves, the difference was statistically significant only for men and for people aged 50 to 74. INTERPRETATION: The incidence of colorectal cancer differs across areas of Ontario with high and low percentages of Aboriginal identity residents.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors
8.
Healthc Q ; 17 Spec No: 10-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25562128

ABSTRACT

The focus of Cancer Care Ontario (CCO)'s renewed prevention strategy is to provide evidence-based support and policy advice for risk factor reduction and cancer prevention. As cancer shares several key modifiable risk factors with other major chronic diseases, CCO's prevention efforts also benefit the goals of chronic disease prevention. CCO's ability to successfully provide policy advice is dependent on timing and the ability to respond to current and emerging policy and legislative issues.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Humans , Ontario , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Risk Reduction Behavior , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Smoking Prevention
9.
Healthc Q ; 17 Spec No: 33-40, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25562132

ABSTRACT

Cancer incidence is increasing more rapidly and cancer survival is worse among Ontario's First Nations, Inuit and Métis (FNIM) populations than among other Ontarians. Cancer Care Ontario's Aboriginal Cancer Strategy II aims to reduce this health inequity and to improve the cancer journey and experience for FNIM people in Ontario. This comprehensive, multi-faceted strategy was developed and is being implemented with and for Aboriginal Peoples in Ontario in a way that honours the Aboriginal Path of Well-being.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Indians, North American , Inuit , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Humans , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Inuit/statistics & numerical data , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Ontario/epidemiology , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data
10.
Cancer Causes Control ; 25(10): 1271-81, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25034462

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Kidney cancer is one of the fastest rising cancers worldwide. We aimed to examine the trends in incidence, mortality, and survival for this cancer in Canada. METHODS: Incidence data for kidney cancer for 1986-2010 were from the Canadian Cancer Registry and the National Cancer Incidence Reporting System. These data were only available up to 2007 for the province of Quebec and consequently for the same year nationally, for Canada. Mortality data for 1986-2009 were from the Canadian Vital Statistics Death Database. Changes in age-standardized rates were analyzed by Joinpoint regression. Incidence rates were projected to 2025 using a Nordpred age-period-cohort model. Five-year relative survival ratios (RSR) were analyzed for 2004-2008 and earlier periods. RESULTS: Between 1986 and 2007, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) per 100,000 rose from 13.4 to 17.9 in males and 7.7 to 10.3 in females. Annual increases in ASIR were greatest for age groups <65 years (males) and ≥65 years (females). The ASIRs increased significantly over time in both sexes for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but not for other kidney cancer types. RCC rates are projected to increase until at least 2025. Mortality rates decreased only slightly in each sex since 1986 (0.4%/year in males; 0.8%/year in females). The 5-year RSR for kidney cancer was 68% but differed largely by morphology and age, and has increased slightly over time. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of kidney cancer in Canada has risen since at least 1986, led largely by RCC. Increasing detection of incidental tumors, and growing obesity and hypertension rates are possible factors associated with this increase. Greater prevention of modifiable risk factors for kidney cancer is needed.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Quebec/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Survival Rate , Young Adult
11.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 24(7): 1341-6, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25054446

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Identify patterns in cervical cancer incidence in Ontario according to neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics over time and by morphologic type. METHODS: Incident cases of cervical cancer diagnosed from 1991 to 2009 were obtained from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Population data and data on neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics were obtained from the Canadian Census. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each sociodemographic characteristic, stratified by morphologic type (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma) and time period of diagnosis. RESULTS: Incidence was 51% higher in the poorest neighborhoods compared with the richest (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.42-1.61) and 7% higher in rural areas compared with urban (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13). Incidence of squamous cell carcinoma was significantly higher in the poorest neighborhoods compared with the richest (RR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.61-1.88), a trend observed for all time periods, and in rural areas compared with urban (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18). For adenocarcinoma, ASIRs in the earlier time period (1991-1998) were higher in the poorest neighborhoods compared with richest (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.57), whereas for the more recent time period (1999-2009), ASIRs were lower for women living in the poorest neighborhoods compared with the richest (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified significantly higher incidence of cervical cancer in low-income neighborhoods in Ontario. The association was especially pronounced for squamous cell carcinoma and varied by time period for adenocarcinoma. Improvements to screening and prevention efforts against oncogenic human papillomavirus strains would increase the detection of cervical cancer, adenocarcinoma especially, and may further reduce cervical cancer incidence.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Ontario/epidemiology , Registries , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
12.
Int J Cancer ; 130(2): 405-18, 2012 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21365644

ABSTRACT

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene has been associated with cancer risk, but only a few polymorphisms have been studied in relation to melanoma risk and the results have been inconsistent. We examined 38 VDR gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a large international multicenter population-based case-control study of melanoma. Buccal DNAs were obtained from 1,207 people with incident multiple primary melanoma and 2,469 with incident single primary melanoma. SNPs with known or suspected impact on VDR activity, haplotype tagging SNPs with ≥ 10% minor allele frequency in Caucasians, and SNPs reported as significant in other association studies were examined. Logistic regression was used to calculate the relative risks conferred by the individual SNP. Eight of 38 SNPs in the promoter, coding, and 3' gene regions were individually significantly associated with multiple primary melanoma after adjusting for covariates. The estimated increase in risk for individuals who were homozygous for the minor allele ranged from 25 to 33% for six polymorphisms: rs10875712 (odds ratios [OR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.62), rs4760674 (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67), rs7139166 (OR 1.26; 95%CI, 1.02-1.56), rs4516035 (OR 1.25; 95%CI, 1.01-1.55), rs11168287 (OR 1.27; 95%CI, 1.03-1.57) and rs1544410 (OR 1.30; 95%CI, 1.04-1.63); for two polymorphisms, homozygous carriers had a decreased risk: rs7305032 (OR 0.81; 95%CI 0.65-1.02) and rs7965281 (OR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.62-0.99). We recognize the potential false positive findings because of multiple comparisons; however, the eight significant SNPs in our study outnumbered the two significant tests expected to occur by chance. The VDR may play a role in melanomagenesis.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/genetics , Receptors, Calcitriol/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Melanoma/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology
13.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 26(10): 723-7, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23061066

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Esophageal adenocarcinoma has one of the fastest rising incidence rates and one of the lowest survival rates of any cancer type in the Western world. However, in many countries, trends in esophageal cancer differ according to tumour morphology and anatomical location. In Canada, incidence and survival trends for esophageal cancer subtypes are poorly known. METHODS: Cancer incidence and mortality rates were obtained from the Canadian Cancer Registry, the National Cancer Incidence Reporting System and the Canadian Vital Statistics Death databases for the period from 1986 to 2006. Observed trends (annual per cent change) and five-year relative survival ratios were estimated separately for esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and according to location (upper, middle, or lower one-third of the esophagus). Incidence rates were projected up to the year 2026. RESULTS: Annual age-standardized incidence rates for esophageal cancer in 2004 to 2006 were 6.1 and 1.7 per 100,000 for males and females, respectively. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence rose by 3.9% (males) and 3.6% (females) per year for the period 1986 to 2006, with the steepest increase in the lower one-third of the esophagus (4.8% and 5.0% per year among males and females, respectively). In contrast, squamous cell carcinoma incidence declined by 3.3% (males) and 3.2% (females) per year since the early 1990s. The five-year relative survival ratio for esophageal cancer was 13% between 2004 and 2006, approximately a 3% increase since the period from 1992 to 1994. Projected incidence rates showed increases of 40% to 50% for esophageal adenocarcinoma and decreases of 30% for squamous cell carcinoma by 2026. DISCUSSION: Although esophageal cancer is rare in Canada, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has doubled in the past 20 years, which may reflect the increasing prevalence of obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Declines in squamous cell carcinoma may be the result of the decreases in the prevalence of smoking in Canada. Given the low survival rates and the potential for further increases in incidence, esophageal adenocarcinoma warrants close attention.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Canada/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
14.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 65(5 Suppl 1): S38-49, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22018066

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Invasive melanoma of the skin is the third most common cancer diagnosed among adolescents and young adults (aged 15-39 years) in the United States. Understanding the burden of melanoma in this age group is important to identifying areas for etiologic research and in developing effective prevention approaches aimed at reducing melanoma risk. METHODS: Melanoma incidence data reported from 38 National Program of Cancer Registries and/or Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results statewide cancer registries covering nearly 67.2% of the US population were used to estimate age-adjusted incidence rates for persons 15-39 years of age. Incidence rate ratios were calculated to compare rates between demographic groups. RESULTS: Melanoma incidence was higher among females (age-adjusted incidence rates = 9.74; 95% confidence interval 9.62-9.86) compared with males (age-adjusted incidence rates = 5.77; 95% confidence interval 5.68-5.86), increased with age, and was higher in non-Hispanic white compared with Hispanic white and black, American Indians/Alaskan Natives, and Asian and Pacific Islanders populations. Melanoma incidence rates increased with year of diagnosis in females but not males. The majority of melanomas were diagnosed on the trunk in all racial and ethnic groups among males but only in non-Hispanic whites among females. Most melanomas were diagnosed at localized stage, and among those melanomas with known histology, the majority were superficial spreading. LIMITATIONS: Accuracy of melanoma cases reporting was limited because of some incompleteness (delayed reporting) or nonspecific reporting including large proportion of unspecified histology. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in incidence rates by anatomic site, histology, and stage among adolescents and young adults by race, ethnicity, and sex suggest that both host characteristics and behaviors influence risk. These data suggest areas for etiologic research around gene-environment interactions and the need for targeted cancer control activities specific to adolescents and young adult populations.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Melanoma/etiology , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/prevention & control , Registries , Risk Factors , SEER Program , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
15.
Environ Health ; 10 Suppl 1: S9, 2011 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21489219

ABSTRACT

Studies of occupational exposures have made major contributions to our understanding of human carcinogenesis. About one third of the factors identified as definite or probable human carcinogens were first investigated in the workplace and these exposures exact a considerable toll on working populations. There are many additional workplace exposures that are suspect carcinogens that require further evaluation to ensure a safe work environment. Information from occupational investigations is also relevant to the general population because many occupational exposures can be found outside the workplace. Much of our understanding about occupational cancer has been obtained from studies largely composed of white men in developed countries. The movement of industry from developed to developing countries underscores the need for future investigations to include more diverse populations.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens, Environmental/toxicity , Developed Countries , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure , Biomedical Research , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology
16.
Cancer Causes Control ; 21(12): 2137-47, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20721616

ABSTRACT

We investigated whether MC1R genotype modifies the effect of sun exposure on melanoma risk in 1,018 cases with multiple melanomas (MPM) and 1,875 controls with one melanoma (SPM). There was some suggestion that MC1R genotype modified the effect of beach and water activities on MPM risk: ORs were 1.94 (95% CI 1.40-2.70) for any activities for no R variants and 1.39 (95% CI 1.05-1.84) with R variants (R151C, R160W, D294H, and D84E) (p for interaction 0.08). MC1R modification of sun exposure effects appeared most evident for MPM of the head and neck: for early life ambient UV, the OR was 4.23 (95% CI 1.76-10.20) with no R and 1.04 (95% CI 0.40-2.68) with R (p for interaction = 0.01; p for three-way interaction = 0.01). Phenotype modified the effect of sun exposure and MPM in a similar manner. We conclude that MC1R and pigmentary phenotype may modify the effects of sun exposure on melanoma risk on more continuously sun-exposed skin. Possible explanations include that risk may saturate with higher sun sensitivity for melanomas on continuously sun-exposed sites but continue to increase as sun exposure increases with lower sun sensitivity, or that sun-sensitive people adapt their behavior by increasing sun protection when exposed.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Melanoma/etiology , Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 1/genetics , Sunlight/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Susceptibility , Female , Genotype , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Middle Aged , Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 1/physiology , Risk Factors , Young Adult
17.
Can J Public Health ; 101(4): I14-8, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21033540

ABSTRACT

Childhood sun exposure is a particularly important determinant of skin cancer, yet little data are available for children. This paper describes sun behaviour among Canadian children for the summer of 2006. As part of the Second National Sun Survey (NSS2), 1,437 parents reported on the time spent in the sun, and the frequency of sun protection behaviours and sunburning for one of their children aged 1 to 12 years. Analysis was carried out using complex survey procedures in SAS and STATA. The majority of children (94%) spend at least 30 minutes in the sun on a typical summer day; however, regular sun protection is only commonly reported for young children (1 to 5 years) and involves covering their heads and wearing sunscreen (85%). The frequency of other protective behaviours is much lower, and sun protection decreases with age. Older children are also twice as likely to spend extended time in the sun and to get a sunburn. Among older children, boys are more likely to cover their heads and girls are more likely to wear sunscreen. Regular sun protection among Canadian children is low, given their sun exposure. Heavy reliance on sunscreen is consistent with previous reports and indicates that other measures, such as seeking shade and wearing protective clothing, need to be promoted. Riskier sun behaviour among older children may reflect decreased parental control, as well as changing attitudes and peer pressure, and highlights the importance of adult role models and targeted interventions for this age group.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Health Behavior , Health Surveys , Sunburn/prevention & control , Sunlight/adverse effects , Canada , Child , Child, Preschool , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Protective Clothing/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Sunburn/epidemiology , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use
18.
Can J Public Health ; 101(4): I19-22, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21033541

ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to describe summer work-related sun behaviours among Canadian outdoor workers. Information on time in the sun and sun protection practices at work during the summer of 2006 were collected from 1,337 outdoor workers aged 16-64 years as part of the Second National Sun Survey. Proportions (and 95% confidence intervals) were estimated using procedures appropriate for complex survey designs. Twenty-six percent of all Canadians, 39% of males and 33% of those aged 16-24 years work outdoors during the summer. Although 41% spend four or more hours daily in the sun at work, just over half always or often protect themselves by covering their heads (58%), wearing protective clothing (56%) or wearing sunglasses (54%), and only 29% use sunscreen. Males and those aged 16-24 spend the most work time in the sun but are the least likely to use protection. The prevalence of outdoor work and sun behaviours varies among regions. Study findings confirm the need for strategies to reduce time in the sun and increase the use of sun protection among outdoor workers. In order to be effective, these strategies must include both enhanced workplace policies and practice, and increased individual use of sun protection.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Sunburn/epidemiology , Sunlight/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Protective Clothing/statistics & numerical data , Sunburn/prevention & control , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use
19.
Can J Public Health ; 101(4): I10-3, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21033539

ABSTRACT

The Second National Sun Survey (NSS2) was carried out in 2006 to estimate ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure, sun protection and related knowledge, attitudes and beliefs among Canadians. This paper provides a detailed overview of NSS2 methods and discusses the strengths and limitations of the survey. The NSS2 consists of two questionnaires administered to two samples of adults (age 16+ years). The base sample provides in-depth information on UVR exposure, protective behaviours, tanning, and knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about sun safety for adults, as well as some sun behaviour information for a sample of their children aged 1-12 years. The shorter comparison sample facilitates direct comparison with the 1996 first national sun survey. Data were collected using computer-assisted telephone interviewing, and sample weights were computed for all respondents for estimation and analysis of both adult and child data. Base sample interviews were completed for 7,121 adults, of whom 1,437 reported on the sun behaviour of one of their children, and the comparison sample yielded 2,115 interviews. Response rates were 63% for both surveys. The NSS2 provides in-depth and up-to-date UVR exposure information among Canadians. The results of this survey will aid health promotion experts and policy-makers in developing effective programs to minimize UVR exposure. A public use data file and training in statistical analysis of the NSS2 has been made available to data analysts from across Canada. Key strengths and limitations identified in this survey will inform the development and implementation of future sun surveys.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure , Health Surveys , Sunlight/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Attitude to Health , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Radiometry , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control
20.
Can J Public Health ; 101(1): 101-5, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20364549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the distribution of stage at breast cancer diagnosis between First Nations (FN) and non-FN women, and to investigate factors associated with later diagnosis in FN women. METHODS: A case-case design was employed to compare FN women (N = 287) to a frequency-matched random sample of women (N = 671) from the general population diagnosed with breast cancer in the Ontario Cancer Registry. Women were matched (2:1) on period of diagnosis (1995-1999, 2000-2004), age at diagnosis (< 50 vs. > or = 50), and Regional Cancer Centre (RCC). Stage and data relevant to the determinants of stage were collected from medical charts at the RCCs. The association between stage (stage II + vs. I) and FN status was modeled using logistic regression analyses; for FN women, the association between risk factors and stage was examined. RESULTS: FN women (66%) were diagnosed with a later stage significantly more often than non-FN women (56%). FN women with a non-screened cancer (OR 5.03, 95% CI 2.48-10.21) and those who were overweight or obese (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.27-6.98 and OR 4.46, 95% CI 1.95-10.21, respectively) were significantly more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage. Having a comorbidity reduced the odds of a later stage (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.96) in FN women. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the need for FN women, in particular those who are not accessing the health care system, to participate in breast screening programs aimed at detecting breast cancers earlier with a better prognosis. These findings suggest that the cancer care system in Ontario should better target this population through increasing awareness and access to screening.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/physiopathology , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Obesity , Odds Ratio , Ontario/epidemiology , Overweight , Registries , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL