Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: risk factor analysis.

Point prevalence surveys are useful in detecting changes in the pattern of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI). In 2004 the Hospital Infection Society was asked to conduct a third national prevalence survey, which included England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. A similar but not identical survey was carried out in Scotland. Data were collected on standardised forms using Centres for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. This report considers associations with a wide range of risk factors for all HCAI and for four main categories. The overall prevalence rate of HCAI was 7.6% and increased significantly with age. All risk factors considered were associated with highly significantly increased risk of HCAI, except recent peripheral IV catheter and other bladder instrumentation use. Primary bloodstream infection (PBSI) was associated with antibiotic, central intravenous catheter and parenteral nutrition use. Pneumonia was associated with antibiotic, central catheter, parenteral nutrition use, mechanical ventilation and current peripheral catheter use. Surgical site infection was associated with recent surgery, antibiotic and central catheter use, mechanical ventilation and parenteral nutrition. Urinary instrumentation and antibiotic use were associated with urinary tract infection. Patients under a critical care medicine consultant had the highest prevalence of HCAI (23.2%). This report highlights those areas requiring attention to prevent HCAI, i.e. device-related infections such as PBSI (e.g. central catheters) and pneumonia (e.g. mechanical ventilation) and should influence protocols for future prevalence surveys of HCAI, e.g. the recording of risk factors at the time of assessment only is sufficient.

Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: overview of the results.

A survey of adult patients was conducted in February 2006 to May 2006 in acute hospitals across England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland to estimate the prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). A total of 75 694 patients were surveyed; 5743 of these had HCAIs, giving a prevalence of 7.59% (95% confidence interval: 7.40-7.78). HCAI prevalence in England was 8.19%, in Wales 6.35%, in Northern Ireland 5.43% and in the Republic of Ireland 4.89%. The most common HCAI system infections were gastrointestinal (20.6% of all HCAI), urinary tract (19.9%), surgical site (14.5%), pneumonia (14.1%), skin and soft tissue (10.4%) and primary bloodstream (7.0%). Prevalence of MRSA was 1.15% with MRSA being the causative organism in 15.8% of all system infections. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile was 1.21%. This was the largest HCAI prevalence survey ever performed in the four countries. The methodology and organisation used is a template for future HCAI surveillance initiatives, nationally, locally or at unit level. Information obtained from this survey will contribute to the prioritisation of resources and help to inform Departments of Health, hospitals and other relevant bodies in the continuing effort to reduce HCAI.

Hospital infection society prevalence survey of Healthcare Associated Infection 2006: comparison of results between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

As part of the Third Healthcare Associated Infection (HCAI) Prevalence Survey of the United Kingdom and Ireland, HCAI point prevalence surveys were carried out in Northern Ireland (NI) and the Republic of Ireland (RoI). Here we explore the potential benefits of comparing results from two countries with different healthcare systems, which employed similar methodologies and identical HCAI definitions. Forty-four acute adult hospitals in the RoI and 15 in NI participated with a total of 11 185 patients surveyed (NI 3644 patients and RoI 7541). The overall HCAI prevalence was 5.4 and 4.9 in NI and the RoI, respectively. There was no significant difference in prevalence rates of HCAI, device-related HCAI or HCAI associated with bloodstream infection but there was a difference in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-related HCAI (P = 0.02) between the two countries. There were significantly more urinary tract infections and Clostridium difficile infections recorded in NI (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). HCAIs were more prevalent in patients aged >65 years and in the intensive care unit in both countries. HCAIs were also more prevalent if patients were mechanically ventilated, had had recent non-implant surgery (RoI) or had more recorded HCAI risk factors. This is the first time that HCAI prevalence rates have been directly compared between NI and the RoI. By closely examining similarities and differences between HCAI prevalence rates in both countries it is hoped that this will influence healthcare planning and at the same time reassure the public that HCAI is important and that measures are being taken to combat it.

Clinician-led surgical site infection surveillance of orthopaedic procedures: a UK multi-centre pilot study.

The UK Department of Health established the Healthcare-associated Infection (HAI) Surveillance Steering Group in 2000 to develop a strategy for implementing a national programme for HAI surveillance in National Health Service trusts. A subgroup of this committee examined the surveillance of surgical site infections following orthopaedic surgery. This group oversaw a pilot scheme that was set up in 12 hospitals around the UK to explore the feasibility of implementing a system of surveillance that engaged clinical staff in its operation, provided a process for continuous data collection and could be maintained as part of routine hospital operation over time. A minimum data set was established by the subgroup, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions of infection were used. By March 2003, the surveillance had been undertaken continuously in 11 sites for one to two years, depending on the date of implementation. Only one hospital had ceased data collection. The information was collected mainly by clinical staff, with support and co-ordination usually provided by infection control teams. Data on more than 5400 procedures were available for analysis for four core procedures: arthroplasty of the hip and knee; hemi-arthroplasty of the hip; and internal fixation of trochanteric fractures of the femur. The data set permitted the calculation of risk-adjusted rates, allowing comparisons between hospitals and within a hospital over time. The methodology enhanced clinical ownership of the surveillance process, re-inforced infection control as the responsibility of all staff, and provided timely feedback and local data analysis. The use of CDC definitions permitted international comparisons of the data.

Automated entry of hospital infection surveillance data.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of an automated data entry system employing optical scanning technology and to provide an analysis of its costs as compared to manual data entry. DESIGN: The accuracy and cost of automated data entry of 100 surgical-wound infection surveillance questionnaires was compared to manual entry. SETTING: The Surgical Directorate, The Royal Hospitals, Belfast, Northern Ireland. RESULTS: The use of optical scanning technology greatly improved the speed and accuracy of data entry. The time spent by the keyboard operator on data entry was reduced substantially. For each surgical-wound infection questionnaire automatically processed, there was a saving in clerical time equivalent to $0.63. The automated data entry process resulted in a 22-fold productivity increase compared to manual data entry with validation. After validation, an error rate of < 0.2 errors per 1,000 responses was detected in automatically entered data compared to a rate of 12.4 errors per 1,000 responses for manually entered data. The automated system, including validation, provided a seven-fold productivity increase compared to "quick-and-dirty" manual data entry without validation. CONCLUSION: Hospital information technology systems may achieve total integration of data management, but realistically this would appear to be very much in the future. Until then, in view of the accuracy and substantial savings in time and money, we recommend the use of automated data entry technology. This system would be especially useful where data are transported from outlying hospitals to a central receiving center for collation and analysis.

Sterilization and disinfection in general practice within university health services.

A postal questionnaire on 'sterilization and disinfection' was sent to all 144 nurse members of the British Association of Health Services in Higher Education (BAHSHE). Forty-nine (34%) completed valid questionnaires were returned. Despite the majority of practices performing minor surgical procedures such as cervical cytology (N= 40, 82%), ear syringing (N= 44, 90%) and wound dressing (N= 49, 100%), only 11 (22%) had access to a sterile supply department (SSD), and the definitions of sterilization and disinfection were only identified by 23 (52%) and 14 (32%) of the respondents, respectively. Forty-one (84%) respondents had a benchtop sterilizer (30 had a benchtop sterilizer, 11 a vacuum sterilizer and two had both), although there was considerable confusion on their appropriate use and maintenance. Just over half had written procedures for sterilizer use, no practice changed the sterilizer water on a daily basis as recommended by the Medical Devices Agency (MDA), few kept a sterilizer logbook and even fewer had read the MDA Device Bulletin on benchtop sterilizers. The majority of respondents voiced an interest in attending a workshop on sterilization and disinfection. We conclude that despite the location of the general practices within an academic environment, the concept of infection control is clearly not understood by university health service staff. As the implications of a failure to implement proper infection control procedures are potentially serious, the need for adequate education and training of staff is of critical importance.

Sterilization and disinfection in general practice in Northern Ireland.

In view of the recent trend towards more minor surgery being carried out in general practice we decided to conduct a postal survey to assess the level of knowledge of sterilization and disinfection and the use of benchtop sterilizers in general practice in Northern Ireland. The survey, of all 366 practices in the Province, was carried out in January/March 1998. One hundred and eleven (30%) completed questionnaires were returned. All practices performed at least one of a range of procedures requiring sterilization or disinfection, e.g., minor surgery 95%, cervical smear taking 98%, syringing of ears 98%. Only 76% of practices had a benchtop sterilizer and 39% did not have access to a sterile supply department (SSD); 32% of the latter had no desire to utilize such a service. Only 25% and 34% correctly identified the Medical Devices Agency (MDA) definitions of sterilization and disinfection respectively. The MDA Device Bulletin on benchtop sterilizers had been read by only 26% of respondents. There was an 86% interest in attending a workshop on sterilization and disinfection. The concepts and practice of sterilization and disinfection appear not to be clearly understood. We conclude that resources must be identified to provide appropriate education in this important area for primary care staff.

Prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections in Argentina; comparison with England, Wales, Northern Ireland and South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence surveillance methodology is the systematic observation of the occurrence and distribution of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) so that appropriate actions can be taken. AIM: The objectives of a prevalence survey with an international validated methodology were to determine the prevalence of HCAIs for the first time in Argentina, and to provide data which could be used for international benchmarking. METHODS: In 2008, an HCAI prevalence survey was carried out in 39 hospitals in seven of 23 provinces in Argentina, with methodology identical to that employed by the Hospital Infection Society in the third prevalence survey of HCAIs in acute hospitals in the British Isles. Data collected were processed and analysed at the Northern Ireland Healthcare-Associated Infection Surveillance Centre at Belfast. FINDINGS: A total of 4249 patients were surveyed; 480 of these had at least one HCAI, resulting in a prevalence of 11.3% of patients. Male prevalence was 13.6% and female 9.0%. The most common HCAIs were pneumonia (3.3%), urinary tract infection (3.1%), surgical site infection (2.9%), primary bloodstream infection (1.5%), and soft tissue infections (1.2%). Among the 1027 patients who underwent surgery, the prevalence of surgical site infection was 10.2%. The prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was 1.1%, accounting for 10.0% of all HCAI isolates. The results for Argentina show higher HCAI rates compared with corresponding findings for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and South Africa. CONCLUSION: This survey will contribute to the prioritization of resources and help to inform Departments of Health and hospitals in the continuing effort to reduce HCAIs.

Four country healthcare-associated infection prevalence survey: pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infections.

In 2006, the Hospital Infection Society was funded by the respective health services in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland to conduct a prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI). Here, we report the prevalence of pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infection other than pneumonia (LRTIOP) in these four countries. The prevalence of all HCAIs was 7.59% (5743 out of 75 694). Nine hundred (15.7%) of these infections were pneumonia, and 402 (7.0%) were LRTIOP. The prevalence of both infections was higher for males than for females, and increased threefold from those aged <35 to those aged >85 years (P<0.001). At the time of the survey or in the preceding seven days, 23.7% and 18.2% of patients with pneumonia and LRTIOP, respectively, were mechanically ventilated compared to 5.2% of patients in the whole study population. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the cause of pneumonia and LRTIOP in 7.6% and 18.1% of patients, respectively (P<0.001). More patients with LRTIOP (4.2%) had concurrent diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile compared to patients with pneumonia (2.4%), but this did not reach statistical significance. Other HCAIs were present in 137 (15.2%) of patients with pneumonia and 66 (16.4%) of those with LRTIOP. The results suggest that reducing instrumentation, such as mechanical ventilation where possible, should help reduce infection. The higher prevalence of MRSA as a cause of LRTIOP suggests a lack of specificity in identifying the microbial cause and the association with C. difficile emphasises the need for better use of antibiotics.