Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Chem Inf Model ; 64(15): 6041-6052, 2024 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39074869

ABSTRACT

Structural disorder in proteins is central to cellular signaling, where conformational plasticity equips molecules to promiscuously interact with different partners. By engaging with multiple binding partners via the rearrangement of its three helices, the nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) of the CBP/p300 transcription factor is a paradigmatic example of promiscuity. Recently, molecular simulations and experiments revealed that, through the establishment of long-range electrostatic interactions, intended as salt-bridges formed between the post-translationally inserted phosphate and positively charged residues in helix H3 of NCBD, phosphorylation triggers NCBD compaction, lowering its affinity for binding partners. By means of extensive molecular simulations, we here investigated the effect of short-range electrostatics on the conformational ensemble of NCBD, by monitoring the interactions between a phosphorylated serine and conserved positively charged residues within the NCBD phospho-motif. We found that empowering proximal electrostatic interactions, as opposed to long-range electrostatics, can reshape the NCBD ensemble rescuing the binding competency of phosphorylated NCBD. Given the conservation of positive charges in phospho-motifs, proximal electrostatic interactions might dampen the effects of phosphorylation and act as a relay to regulate phosphorylated intrinsically disordered proteins, ultimately tuning the binding affinity for different cellular partners.


Subject(s)
Protein Binding , Static Electricity , Phosphorylation , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/chemistry , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/metabolism , Amino Acid Motifs , p300-CBP Transcription Factors/chemistry , p300-CBP Transcription Factors/metabolism , Protein Conformation , Humans
2.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 1445, 2024 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365983

ABSTRACT

More than 1600 human transcription factors orchestrate the transcriptional machinery to control gene expression and cell fate. Their function is conveyed through intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) containing activation or repression domains but lacking quantitative structural ensemble models prevents their mechanistic decoding. Here we integrate single-molecule FRET and NMR spectroscopy with molecular simulations showing that DNA binding can lead to complex changes in the IDR ensemble and accessibility. The C-terminal IDR of pioneer factor Sox2 is highly disordered but its conformational dynamics are guided by weak and dynamic charge interactions with the folded DNA binding domain. Both DNA and nucleosome binding induce major rearrangements in the IDR ensemble without affecting DNA binding affinity. Remarkably, interdomain interactions are redistributed in complex with DNA leading to variable exposure of two activation domains critical for transcription. Charged intramolecular interactions allowing for dynamic redistributions may be common in transcription factors and necessary for sensitive tuning of structural ensembles.


Subject(s)
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , SOXB1 Transcription Factors , Humans , Intrinsically Disordered Proteins/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Protein Conformation , Protein Domains , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/chemistry , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/chemistry , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/genetics
3.
J Phys Chem B ; 126(40): 7833-7846, 2022 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36125334

ABSTRACT

We simulated the dynamics of a set of peptides characterized by ensembles rich in PPII-helical content, to assess the ability of the most recent Kirkwood-Buff force field (KBFF20) to sample this conformational peculiarity. KBFF has been previously shown to capably reproduce experimental dimensions of disordered proteins, while being limited in confidently sampling structured proteins. Further development of the force field bridged this gap. It is however still unknown what are the main differences between KBFF and AMBER/CHARMM force fields. A direct comparison is now possible as both AMBER/CHARMM force fields have been used to sample peptides rich in PPII-helical content. We found that KBFF20 samples' PPII-helical content qualitatively matches both AMBER and CHARMM force fields, with the main difference being the KBFF ability to populate the αR region of the Ramachandran plot in the set of simulated peptides. Overall, KBFF20 is a well-balanced force field, able to sample the dynamics of both structured and unstructured proteins.


Subject(s)
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Molecular Conformation , Peptides/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL