Targetable BRAF and RAF1 Alterations in Advanced Pediatric Cancers.

RAF family protein kinases signal through the MAPK pathway to orchestrate cellular proliferation, survival, and transformation. Identifying BRAF alterations in pediatric cancers is critically important as therapeutic agents targeting BRAF or MEK may be incorporated into the clinical management of these patients. In this study, we performed comprehensive genomic profiling on 3,633 pediatric cancer samples and identified a cohort of 221 (6.1%) cases with known or novel alterations in BRAF or RAF1 detected in extracranial solid tumors, brain tumors, or hematological malignancies. Eighty percent (176/221) of these tumors had a known-activating short variant (98, 55.7%), fusion (72, 40.9%), or insertion/deletion (6, 3.4%). Among BRAF altered cancers, the most common tumor types were brain tumors (74.4%), solid tumors (10.8%), hematological malignancies (9.1%), sarcomas (3.4%), and extracranial embryonal tumors (2.3%). RAF1 fusions containing intact RAF1 kinase domain (encoded by exons 10-17) were identified in seven tumors, including two novel fusions TMF1-RAF1 and SOX6-RAF1. Additionally, we highlight a subset of patients with brain tumor with positive clinical response to BRAF inhibitors, demonstrating the rationale for incorporating precision medicine into pediatric oncology. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Precision medicine has not yet gained a strong foothold in pediatric cancers. This study describes the landscape of BRAF and RAF1 genomic alterations across a diverse spectrum of pediatric cancers, primarily brain tumors, but also encompassing melanoma, sarcoma, several types of hematologic malignancy, and others. Given the availability of multiple U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved BRAF inhibitors, identification of these alterations may assist with treatment decision making, as described here in three cases of pediatric cancer.

ALK Fusions in a Wide Variety of Tumor Types Respond to Anti-ALK Targeted Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Genomic fusions of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) are a well-established therapy target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From a survey of 114,200 clinical cases, we determined the prevalence of ALK rearrangements (rALK) in non-NSCLC tumors and report their responsiveness to therapies targeting ALK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comprehensive genomic profiling of 114,200 relapsed and metastatic malignancies, including both solid tumors and hematolymphoid cancers, was performed using a hybrid-capture, adaptor ligation-based next-generation sequencing assay. RESULTS: Of 114,200 clinical samples, 21,522 (18.8%) were NSCLC and 92,678 (81.2%) were other tumor types. Of the 876 (0.8%) cases with ALK fusions (fALK) or rALK, 675 (77.1%) were NSCLC and 201 (22.9%) were other tumor types. ALK fusions were significantly more frequent in NSCLC (3.1%) than non-NSCLC (0.2%; p < .0001). Patients with non-NSCLC tumors harboring fALK were significantly younger (p < .0001) and more often female (p < .0001) than patients with fALK-positive NSCLC. EML4 was more often the fusion partner in NSCLC (83.5%) versus non-NSCLC tumors (30.9%; p < .0001). CONCLUSION: ALK rearrangements can be identified in a wide variety of epithelial and mesenchymal malignancies beyond NSCLC. Anti-ALK therapies can be effective in non-NSCLC tumors driven by fALK, and further study of therapies targeting ALK in clinical trials involving a wider variety of cancer types appears warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Rearrangements involving the ALK gene have been detected in dozens of cancer types using next-generation sequencing. Patients whose tumors harbor ALK rearrangements or fusions respond to treatment with crizotinib and alectinib, including tumors not normally associated with ALK mutations, such as non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis or renal cell carcinoma. Comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing can detect targetable ALK fusions irrespective of tumor type or fusions partner.

Tumor-specific HSP90 inhibition as a therapeutic approach in JAK-mutant acute lymphoblastic leukemias.

The development of the dual Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) has led to studies of ruxolitinib in other clinical contexts, including JAK-mutated acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, the limited ability of JAK inhibition to induce molecular or clinicopathological responses in MPNs suggests a need for development of better therapies for JAK kinase-dependent malignancies. Here, we demonstrate that heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibition using a purine-scaffold HSP90 inhibitor in early clinical development is an effective therapeutic approach in JAK-dependent ALL and can overcome persistence to JAK-inhibitor therapy in ALL cells.

Comprehensive characterization of RAS mutations in colon and rectal cancers in old and young patients.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly appreciated as a heterogeneous disease, with factors such as microsatellite instability (MSI), cancer subsite within the colon versus rectum, and age of diagnosis associated with specific disease course and therapeutic response. Activating oncogenic mutations in KRAS and NRAS are common in CRC, driving tumor progression and influencing efficacy of both cytotoxic and targeted therapies. The RAS mutational spectrum differs substantially between tumors arising from distinct tissues. Structure-function analysis of relatively common somatic RAS mutations in G12, Q61, and other codons is characterized by differing potency and modes of action. Here we show the mutational profile of KRAS, NRAS, and the less common HRAS in 13,336 CRC tumors, comparing the frequency of specific mutations based on age of diagnosis, MSI status, and colon versus rectum subsite. We identify mutation hotspots, and unexpected differences in mutation spectrum, based on these clinical parameters.

ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and active in patients with solid, malignant tumors: results of a phase I trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of the oral, selective epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 in patients with solid malignant tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open, phase I, escalating multiple-dose tolerability and pharmacokinetic trial. ZD1839 was administered once daily for 14 consecutive days followed by 14 days off treatment. Dose escalation started at 50 mg/d and continued to 925 mg or until consistent dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were entered at eight dose levels. The most frequent dose-related grade 1 and 2 adverse events were an acne-like (or folliculitis) rash, nausea, and diarrhea. Three of nine patients treated at 700 mg/d developed DLT (reversible grade 3 diarrhea); grade 3 and 4 events were uncommon. Exposure to ZD1839 was dose proportional, and the mean terminal half-life was 48 hours (range, 37 to 65). Four of 16 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had objective partial responses observed from ZD1839 300 to 700 mg/d. Overall, 16 patients remained on study for > or = 3 months, with seven of these patients (five with NSCLC, including three of the patients with partial response) remaining on study for > or = 6 months. CONCLUSION: ZD1839 was well tolerated, with DLT observed at a dose well above that at which antitumor activity was seen. Pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed that ZD1839 was suitable for administration as a once-daily oral tablet formulation. Phase II monotherapy and phase III combination trials in NSCLC are being conducted to investigate further the efficacy, tolerability, and optimal daily dose of ZD1839.

Symptom and quality of life benefit of afatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients previously treated with erlotinib or gefitinib: results of a randomized phase IIb/III trial (LUX-Lung 1).

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported symptom and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) benefit of afatinib, a novel, irreversible, ErbB Family Blocker, was investigated in a double-blind, randomized, phase IIb/III trial (LUX-Lung 1). METHODS: Five hundred and eighty-five patients with lung adenocarcinoma (stage IIIb/IV), who had progressed after chemotherapy (1-2 lines) and at least 12 weeks of erlotinib or gefitinib, were randomized (2:1) to receive either afatinib plus best supportive care (BSC) or placebo plus BSC. Symptom and HRQoL benefit were measured using the lung cancer-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (QLQ-C30/LC13) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Non-small-cell lung cancer-related symptoms (cough, dyspnea, and pain) were prespecified using three preplanned analyses (percentage of patients improved/worsened/stable, change in scores over time, and time to deterioration of scores). RESULTS: Compared with patients on placebo, a significantly higher proportion of afatinib-treated patients showed an improvement in cough (p < 0.0001), dyspnea (p = 0.006), and pain (p < 0.0001). Afatinib also significantly improved the mean scores over time for cough (p < 0.0001), dyspnea (p = 0.0161), and pain (p = 0.0056); significantly delayed the time to deterioration for cough (p < 0.001); and showed a trend in delaying dyspnea (p = 0.170) and pain (p = 0.287). Consistent with the adverse-event profile of afatinib, a significantly (p < 0.05) higher proportion of afatinib-treated patients showed worsening of diarrhea, sore mouth, dysphagia, and appetite scores. However, compared with placebo, afatinib significantly (p < 0.05) improved QoL assessed with the EQ-5D questionnaire and global health status/QoL, physical functioning, and fatigue, which were assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires. CONCLUSION: In the LUX-Lung 1 trial, the addition of afatinib to BSC significantly improved non-small-cell lung cancer-related symptoms (cough, dyspnea, and pain), fatigue, physical functioning, and HRQoL and significantly delayed time to deterioration of cough.

Ambulatory electronic medical record payback analysis 7 years after implementation in a tertiary care county medical system.

Electronic medical records (EMRs) are gaining increasing prominence in healthcare, however still have low market penetration. EMR implementation cost is a primary perceived barrier. Here we present a payback analysis on an outpatient EMR implementation, showing capital expense recovery (net of operating costs) at 6 years and now generating $6 million yearly in direct savings for our healthcare system.