Association of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with bone mineral density in post-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels between women with post-menopausal osteopenia or osteoporosis to those with normal bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: We used Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus to conduct a systematic search for relevant publications published before June 19, 2022, only in English language. We reported standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Because a significant level of heterogeneity was found, we used the random-effects model to calculate pooled effects. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for quality assessment. RESULTS: Overall, eight articles were included in the analysis. Post-menopausal women with osteoporosis had elevated levels of NLR compared to those without osteoporosis (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.18 to 1.88, p = 0.017, I2 = 98%). In addition, there was no difference between post-menopausal women with osteopenia and those without osteopenia in neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI=-0.08 to 1.25, p = 0.085, I2 = 96.8%). However, there was no difference between post-menopausal women with osteoporosis and those with osteopenia in NLR levels (SMD = 0.75, 95% CI=-0.01 to 1.51, p = 0.05, I2 = 97.5%, random-effect model). CONCLUSION: The results of this study point to NLR as a potential biomarker that may be easily introduced into clinical settings to help predict and prevent post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Unexpected positive culture (UPC) in adults revision spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, risk factors, and management.

BACKGROUND: Without clear signs of infection, spinal implant failure is attributed to mechanical overloads and aseptic loosening. However, how low-grade infections contribute to seemingly aseptic implant failure is unclear. PURPOSE: The systematic review examined unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) in revision spine surgery regarding prevalence, isolated pathogens, risk factors, and strategies to reduce infection among asymptomatic patients undergoing revision spine surgery. METHODS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines and searched four main databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science) comprehensively until January 2023 for articles reporting UPC after presumed aseptic adult revision spine surgery. The UPC rates were pooled, and risk factors were compared with the culture-negative control group and represented as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD). RESULTS: Fifteen studies of 1057 individuals were included in two groups: culture-positive or UPCs (n = 317) and culture-negative or control (n = 740). The overall UPC prevalence was 33.2% (317/1057, range: 0 to 53%, 95% CI = 30.2%-36.4%), and Cutibacterium acnes (43.0%, 95% CI = 37.4%-48.8%), Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), (39.5%, 95% CI = 33.2%-46.2%), and Staphylococcus species in general (49.5%, 95%CI = 43.7%-55.4%) were reported the most common isolated microbes. 16.1% of the UPCs were polymicrobial. Risk factors associated with UPC rates were female sex (OR = 2.62, 95%CI = 1.76-3.90, P < 0.001), screw loosening (OR = 4.43, 95%CI = 1.31-15.02, P = 0.02), number of operated levels (MD = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.33-1.22, P = 0.0007), and shorter time since index surgery (MD = - 8.57 months, 95%CI = - 14.76, -2.39, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients undergoing spine revision surgery revealed UPC in this study. Each UPC pathogen interpretation and antibiotic use decision should be interpreted case by case. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown promising results as a diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the utility of NLR in the diagnosis of PJI. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception up to 2022 and evaluated the quality of the included literature. RESULTS: Based on the 12 eligible studies, NLR levels were significantly higher in patients who had PJI compared to those who had aseptic loosening (standard mean difference (SMD) = 1.05, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.71 to 1.40, P < .001). In the subgroup analysis according to type of PJI, NLR levels were significantly higher in patients who had either acute (SMD = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.05 to 2.03, P < .001) or chronic PJI (SMD = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.61, P < .001), compared to those who had aseptic loosening. According to type of arthroplasty, NLR levels were significantly higher in patients who had either total knee arthroplasty (SMD = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.48 to 2.13, P < .001) or total hip arthroplasty (SMD = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.54 to 1.98, P < .001) compared to aseptic loosening. The pooled sensitivity of the 12 studies was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.79), and the pooled specificity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.78). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of NLR were 2.94 (95% CI = 2.44 to 3.54), 0.35 (95% CI = 0.27 to 0.46), and 8.26 (95% CI = 5.42 to 12.58), respectively. CONCLUSION: In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that NLR is a reliable marker in the diagnosis of PJI.

Osteomalacia Prevalence, Biochemical Profile, and Histology in Patients with Low-Energy Hip Fractures Over the Age of 45.

Our objective was to determine the prevalence of osteomalacia in low-energy hip fracture patients over the age of 45, based on biochemical and histological measures. This cross-sectional study included 72 patients over 45 with low-energy mechanism hip fractures. Samples of fasting venous blood were taken for hemograms and serum biochemistry analyses. Bicortical biopsies of the iliac crest were obtained, processed, and evaluated by an expert pathologist for osteomalacia. Biochemical osteomalacia (b-OM) is defined according to a distinct criterion. A low level of serum calcium, phosphorus, albumin, and 25OHD was found in 43.1, 16.7, 73.6, and 59.7% of patients, respectively. 50.0% of patients had high serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. b-OM was found in 30 (41.7%), and no significant association was found with PTH, Cr, Alb, age, sex, fracture type, side of the trauma, and season were not associated with osteomalacia. Osteomalacia was diagnosed on histopathological analysis in 19/72 (26.7%), and 54/72 (75.0%) of all cases fulfilled b-OM criteria. In the histologic evaluation, osteoid seam width, osteoid surface, and osteoid volume were 28.5 µm, 25.6, and 12.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the biochemical test for detecting osteomalacia were 73.6, 64.2, 42.4, 87.2, and 66.7%, respectively. Up to 30% of elderly patients with low-energy hip fractures are affected by osteomalacia. A biochemical screening along with a bone biopsy and histopathologic evaluation may be logical in a high-risk population for osteomalacia diagnosis.

Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy Provides Superior Function to Trochanter Slide Osteotomy in THA for Patients With Unilateral Crowe Type IV Dysplasia at a Minimum of 3 Years.

BACKGROUND: Performing THA in patients with high-riding developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with serious complications and technical challenges. Various methods of shortening osteotomy are available to facilitate femoral head reduction during THA in patients with high-riding hips; subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy and trochanteric slide osteotomy plus proximal shortening are the most common techniques. However, which approach is superior remains a topic of controversy. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there any difference in clinical outcomes (defined as the Harris Hip Score [HHS] and residual limb length discrepancy) at a minimum of 3 years between subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy and trochanteric slide osteotomy in patients with Crowe Type IV DDH who underwent THA? (2) Is there any difference in the risk or type of complications between the two approaches? METHODS: We performed a retrospective, comparative study of two groups (subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy versus trochanteric slide osteotomy) matched for sex and preoperative HHS at a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Between 2010 and 2018, we performed 67 THAs in patients with unilateral Crowe Type IV DDH. During that time, we generally used a trochanteric slide osteotomy for THA in all patients with Crowe Type IV hips and performed subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy when a conical stem was not available. A total of 42% (28) had THA with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy, and 58% (39) had THA with trochanteric slide osteotomy. Of those, 89% (25) and 74% (29), respectively, were accounted for with complete datasets for possible matching at a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Patients were matched for gender and preoperative HSS (within 10 points), leaving 22 patients in each group (79% of the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy group and 56% of the trochanteric slide osteotomy group) for evaluation and analysis. Age (42 versus 46 years), gender (female: 73% versus 73%), preoperative HSS (40 versus 40), and preoperative leg length discrepancy (5.9 versus 5.3 cm) were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). The trochanteric slide osteotomy group exclusively received Cone Wagner (Zimmer) implants (100%), while Corail (DePuy Synthes) implants (77%) were the most commonly used in the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy group. HHS at a minimum of 3 years as well as the presence or absence of a limp and Trendelenburg sign, functional leg length discrepancy, nonunion, nerve palsy, and other surgical complications were recorded and compared between the groups based on data drawn from a longitudinally maintained institutional database. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 73 months, improvement in HHS was greater in the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy group than in the trochanteric slide osteotomy group (48 ± 4 points versus 36 ± 11 points, mean difference 12 points [95% CI 7 to 17 points]; p < 0.001). Although the preoperative leg length discrepancy was similar between the groups, there was a greater postoperative improvement in the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy group (44 ± 8 mm and 38 ± 8 mm in the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy and trochanteric slide osteotomy groups, respectively; p = 0.02). The risk of nonunion was higher with a trochanteric slide osteotomy than with a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (23% [5 of 22] versus 0% [0 of 22]; p = 0.048). Other complications, including intraoperative periprosthetic fractures, nerve palsy, heterotopic ossification, revision surgery, and dislocation, did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with Crowe Type IV hips undergoing THA, surgeons might consider subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy rather than trochanteric slide osteotomy to minimize the risk of nonunion and achieve superior hip function. Better correction of leg length discrepancy may also be possible with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. The long-term survivorship of hips after these two techniques, as well as the influence of the specific anatomy of the proximal femur on the choice of technique, remain to be explored in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Early versus late physiotherapy following arthroscopic repair of small and medium size rotator cuff tear: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: We compared early and late physiotherapy for patients with small and medium size rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic repair. METHODS: A single-centre, single-blinded, prospective parallel RCT was performed with two arms: early physiotherapy (start within the first week) versus late physiotherapy (start 4 weeks after surgery). Patients with small- to medium-sized isolated full-thickness superior rotator cuff tears were included and followed for 12 months. The primary outcome measures were shoulder function and range of motion (ROM) measured by the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at three months, six months, and 12 months. The other outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) pain and the rotator cuff ultrasound (US) evaluation by the Sugaya classification. RESULTS: In three and six month follow-ups, CMS was significantly superior in the intervention group compared to controls (P < 0.05). However, only at the three month follow-up between-group difference met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (MCID = 10.4) (59.8 vs. 48.9). The intervention group experienced less pain than controls in the first six months (P < 0.001), and only the three month follow-up was clinically meaningful based on MCID (MCID = 1.4). Moreover, in the first six months, the shoulder ROM favoured the intervention group (P < 0.05). US grading of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus was similar between groups (P = 0.07). One retear occurred in the intervention group and another in the controls, detected by examination and US evaluation. CONCLUSION: Following the arthroscopic repair of a small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tear, early physiotherapy showed promising results for pain, function, and range of motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I therapeutic.

Intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for displaced extraarticular proximal tibia fractures: a prospective comparative cohort study.

PURPOSE: The treatment of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures is challenging. As the optimal fixation technique is still debated, the purpose of this study was to compare minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation. METHODS: A prospective matched comparative study was conducted on patients with displaced extraarticular proximal tibia fractures treated with MIPO (n = 29) versus IMN (n = 30) fixation. Outcomes collected were the Johner-Wruhs grading, range of motion (ROM), union rate, time to union, malunion, coronal and sagittal alignment, and post-operative complications. RESULTS: Union rates were similar between the MIPO and IMN groups (93% vs. 97%, P = 1.0). The IMN group had an earlier time to union (15 vs. 18 weeks, P < 0.001) and superior functional outcomes at one year (effective Johner-Wruhs score: 80% vs. 55%, P = 0.04). There was a significantly higher incidence of anterior knee pain in the IMN group (23% vs. 0%, P = 0.02) and there was a trend for more infections in the MIPO group (21% vs. 13%, P = 0.73). CONCLUSION: IMN fixation of extraarticular proximal tibia fractures was associated with a shorter union time and better functional scores compared to MIPO.

Catastrophic skin necrosis after total knee arthroplasty: a case report and review of the literature.

Introduction and importance: There have been few cases of post total knee arthroplasty (TKA) skin necrosis reported. Here, the authors present our patient with skin necrosis post TKA on account of its extreme rarity, considerable risk factors, and importance of its treatment. Case: This is a cautionary report on the rule of including previous single longitudinal incision in surgical approach. The authors included previous medial incision in ours and performed arthroplasty through medial parapatellar incisions. After noticing skin necrosis in front of patella, reoperation including flap and skin graft was done, leading to complete recovery. Clinical discussion: While skin necrosis post TKA is not common, it can be present in high-risk patients who should be considered for a decrease in their risk factors. Preoperatively, underlying diseases should be under control. Intraoperation risk factors, in particular incision selection, and considerations about lateral retinacular release are important. Conclusion: A balance must be achieved between the ability to expose the knee through a prior incision and avoiding extensive undermining of the subcutaneous flaps in patients with previous knee surgery. It may be a better approach to ignore medial incisions and use the classic midline incision.

Effect of Ondansetron on Postoperative Pain and Vomiting after Acute Appendicitis Surgery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Common postoperative complications following surgery, particularly acute appendicitis surgery, include postoperative pain and vomiting, which can cause discomfort and delay recovery time. Methods: A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted with 80 cases of acute appendicitis of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II and aged 18-60 y/o scheduled for appendectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A received 4 mg of ondansetron IV (2 ml) and group B received 2 ml of normal slain IV (placebo). Pain according to VAS, nausea and vomiting according to clinical symptoms, shivering and sedation according to the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale (BSAS), and the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery were evaluated and compared between the groups. Results: There was a significant decline in the severity of pain only at 2 hours after surgery between the ondansetron and control groups (5.3 ± 1.0 vs. 6.0 ± 1.0; p=0.01), not showing a difference between the groups at 6, 12, and 24 hours after appendectomy. Postoperative nausea and vomiting at 2 (5% vs. 25%; p=0.03) and 6 (7.5% vs. 27.5%; p=0.04) hours after appendectomy in the ondansetron group. At different times, the ondansetron and control groups did not differ in terms of pethidine consumption or sedation. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study found that ondansetron was effective in reducing postoperative vomiting after acute appendicitis surgery. However, it did not show a clinically significant effect on postoperative pain. This trial is registered with IRCT20230722058883N1.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Persian version of the Hospital for Special Surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Postoperative Satisfaction Survey.

PURPOSE: With over 140 million speakers spread across Iran, Afghanistan, and Tajikistan, Persian, also known as Farsi, is a pluri-centric language. The purpose of this study is to perform cross-cultural adaptation and examine the validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the Hospital for Special Surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Post-Operative Satisfaction Survey (HSS ACL-SS). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 102 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) patients were asked to complete the Persian version of the HSS ACL-SS, Tegner scale, Lysholm score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, the Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Internal consistency was calculated via Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Validity was assessed with the correlations of Spearman's rho. 18 patients were included in the test-retest reliability assessment. The floor and ceiling effects of the examined content validity of HSS ACL-SS. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed at 0.959, showing outstanding internal consistency. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) demonstrated excellent results (0.986, P-value < 0.001). Insignificant ceiling effects (2.9%) and floor effects (3.9%) were detected. The Persian version of the HSS ACL-SS score significantly correlated with the SANE (r = 0.730, p < 0.001), Lysholm score (r = 0.622, p < 0.001), and CKRS (r = 0.741, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The overall performance of the Persian HSS ACL-SS was more than excellent in terms of reliability and validity. To conclude, Persian HSS ACL-SS may be used to assist patients in having a better perception of post-operative satisfaction.

Shoulder Arthroplasty After Previous Nonarthroplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Many patients who undergo shoulder arthroplasty (SA) have had at least 1 nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery before the surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of previous shoulder surgery on the outcome of SA. A systematic review was conducted to compare functional outcomes and complications between SA patients with and without prior non-SA surgery on the ipsilateral shoulder. METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science comprehensively from inception to January 2023. Based on 9,279 records reviewed, 26 comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis consisting of 5,431 shoulders with prior nonarthroplasty procedures (cases) and 55,144 shoulders without previous surgery (controls). Variables such as functional scores, complications, and range of motion were compared between cases and controls using Review Manager Software. In addition, subgroup analysis was conducted based on prior surgery type (rotator cuff repair [RCR], open reduction and internal fixation [ORIF], soft tissue repairs, and not specified) and type of SA (hemiarthroplasty, anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [RTSA]). The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs). RESULTS: Except for a higher rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who had undergone previous arthroscopic surgery (OR, 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-4.01; p < 0.01), a higher rate of complications was only observed in patients with previous ORIF. These complications included aseptic loosening (OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 2.14-5.50; p < 0.01), shoulder dislocation (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.05-4.84; p = 0.04), overall complication (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.38-6.55; p < 0.01), and revision (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.28-4.97; p = 0.01). Patients with a history of previous surgery demonstrated inferior functional outcomes in comparison with the control group, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (SMD, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.27; p < 0.01; I2 = 36%), Constant-Murley score (SMD, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.24; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), abduction (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.08; p = 0.01; I2 = 54%), and flexion (SMD, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.21; p < 0.01; I2 = 40%). Subgroup analysis by previous type of surgery was not possible regarding functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients who have had prior fracture surgery are at a higher risk of complications, reoperations, and revisions after SA than controls. The normal shoulder anatomy may be disrupted by prior surgery, which makes arthroplasty technically challenging, particularly when it comes to soft tissue balance. On the other hand, RCR before SA did not negatively affect clinical outcomes after RTSA and did not have a higher rate of overall complications (except PJI). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Treatment Studies). See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Rate and Risk Factors for Contralateral Slippage in Adolescents Treated for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Comprehensive Analysis of 3,528 Cases.

BACKGROUND: After a unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), the contralateral hip is at risk for a subsequent SCFE. However, further information with regard to risk factors involved in the development of contralateral SCFE must be investigated. The purpose of this study was to report the rate and risk factors for subsequent contralateral SCFE in adolescents treated for unilateral SCFE by exploring a mix of known and potential risk factors. METHODS: A case-control study utilizing aggregated multi-institutional electronic medical record data between January 2003 and March 2023 was conducted. Patients <18 years of age diagnosed with SCFE who underwent surgical management were included. Variables associated with contralateral SCFE were identified using multivariable logistic regression models that adjusted for patient characteristics and time of the surgical procedure, providing adjusted odds ratios (ORs). The false discovery rate was accounted for via the Benjamini-Hochberg method. RESULTS: In this study, 15.3% of patients developed contralateral SCFE at a mean (and standard error) of 296.53 ± 17.23 days and a median of 190 days following the initial SCFE. Increased thyrotropin (OR, 1.43 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04 to 1.97]; p = 0.022), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.22 to 2.49]; p = 0.005), severe obesity (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.56 to 2.57]; p < 0.001), history of human growth hormone use (OR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.10 to 3.38]; p = 0.032), low vitamin D (OR, 5.75 [95% CI, 2.23 to 13.83]; p < 0.001), younger age in boys (under 12 years of age: OR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.37 to 2.43]; p < 0.001) and in girls (under 11 years of age: OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.02]; p = 0.026), and tobacco exposure (OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.49 to 3.87]; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with increased odds of developing contralateral SCFE. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study on this topic, we identified the rate, odds, and risk factors associated with development of contralateral SCFE. We found younger age, hypothyroidism, severe obesity, low vitamin D, diabetes mellitus, and a history of human growth hormone use to be independent risk factors. Our findings can aid clinical decision-making in at-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Proximal femoral varus osteotomy for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: Do age and lateral pillar classifications influence short-to-mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Proximal femoral varus osteotomy (FVO) is one of the most used treatment methods with acceptable outcomes for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD). We aimed to investigate the influence of age at disease onset and the Lateral Pillar classification on clinical and radiological outcomes of FVO surgery LCPD patients between 6-12years of age. HYPOTHESIS: Proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up, regardless of preoperative age and Herring type. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients with LCPD (Herring groups B, B/C, and C) who underwent FVO were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated radiological [center-edge angle, extrusion index, epiphyseal index, acetabular index, articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD)] and clinical [hip abduction range of motion (ROM), Trendelenburg sign, pain, and Harris hip score (HHS)] outcomes with a follow-up of 37.3±10.5months (range: 24-180months). Finally, the overall treatment outcome was assessed using the Stulberg classification. RESULTS: The ROC curve analysis did not reveal any significant relationship between age and clinical or radiological outcomes, and there was no predictable age cut-off for surgical outcomes (p=0.13). No significant difference was found in Stulberg classification at the follow-up between patients with type B, B/C, and C of the lateral pillar (p>0.05). DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrated that open-wedge proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up. Each sample of our study was very small and a lot of variables were measured, making this result not adequately strong enough to draw a robust conclusion. However, FVO surgery remains a possible suggestion for patients in the early fragmentation phase, and age and lateral pillar type may not be limiting factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; therapeutic retrospective cohort.

Efficacy of trigger point dry needling on pain and function of the hip joint: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the evidence for the impact of dry needling (DN) on hip pain and function. METHODS: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically through June 2022 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the impact of DN on hip pain and function. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used to assess risk of bias. Descriptive analysis was conducted to explain the outcomes and adverse events of DN in hip joint diseases. Meta-analysis was not feasible due to significant heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of seven eligible studies (including 273 patients) were included out of 2152 screened records. Five studies were in participants with hip osteoarthritis (OA; n = 3), greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS; n = 1) or piriformis syndrome (n = 1); the other two studies were conducted in healthy athletes (n = 2). Two articles assessed changes in participants' short-term visual analog scale (VAS) scores (<1 week), one of which showed that DN significantly reduced pain (P < 0.05). One-week VAS scores were analyzed in three studies, all of which demonstrated reduced scores following DN (P < 0.05). Hip range of motion (ROM) and muscle force were also improved following DN. No serious side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: DN may be safe and effective at relieving hip pain and improving hip function. DN performs significantly better than several different types of control intervention (including sham DN, no treatment, corticosteroid injections and laser). Strong evidence (high degree of certainty around the results) is lacking, and future studies should ideally use longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes. REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022297845 (PROSPERO).

Does Using Highly Porous Tantalum in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Studies suggest tantalum (Ta) implants may have inherent antibacterial properties. However, there is no consensus regarding the effectiveness of Ta in preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Methods: We searched 5 main databases for articles reporting the rate of PJI following rTHA using Ta implants from inception to February 2022. The PJI rates of the Ta group were meta-analyzed, compared with the control group, and represented as relative risks (RRs) in forest plots. Results: We identified 67 eligible studies (28,414 joints) for assessing the prevalence of PJI following rTHA using Ta implants. Among these studies, only 9 compared the Ta implant group with a control group. The overall PJI rate following rTHA using Ta implants was 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2%-3.8%), while it was 5.7% (95% CI = 4.1%-7.8%) if only septic revisions were considered. Comparing the Ta and control groups showed a significantly lower PJI rate following all-cause rTHA with an RR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.65-0.98, P < .05). There was a trend toward lower reinfection rates in the Ta group after rTHA in septic cases, although the difference was not statistically significant (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.44-1.29, P = .30). Conclusions: Ta implants are associated with a lower PJI rate following all-cause rTHA but not after septic causes. Despite positive results, the clinical significance of Ta still remains unclear since the PJI rate was only reduced by 20%. Level of Evidence: IV.

Joint replacement and human immunodeficiency virus.

The incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected cases that need total joint replacement (TJR) is generally rising. On the other hand, modern management of HIV-infected cases has enabled them to achieve longevity while increasing the need for arthroplasty procedures due to the augmented dege-nerative joint disease and fragility fractures, and the risk of osteonecrosis. Although initial investigations on joint replacement in HIV-infected cases showed a high risk of complications, the recent ones reported acceptable outcomes. It is a matter of debate whether HIV-infected cases are at advanced risk for adverse TJR consequences; however, the weak immune profile has been associated with an increased probability of complications. Likewise, surgeons and physicians should be aware of the complication rate after TJR in HIV-infected cases and include an honest discussion of the probable unwelcoming complication with their patients contemplating TJR. Therefore, a fundamental review and understanding of the interaction of HIV and arthroplasty are critical.

Low-Level Laser and Light Therapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcomes: A Three-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: We examined the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and Bioptron light therapy on pain and function following primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A single-center, single-surgeon, prospective randomized clinical trial was performed with 3 groups of 15 patients: LLLT (804 nm), light (Bioptron; Bioptron AG, Wollerau, Switzerland), and controls. Range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale pain, opiate consumption (oxycodone in milligrams), knee swelling, and the Knee Society Score (KSS) were assessed before the surgery and on postoperative day 2, postoperative day 3, month 3, and month 12 after the operation. Results: The preoperative scores were similar between groups. A higher ROM was observed with the LLLT group at all follow-ups except at the 12-month follow-up (3-month ROM: 116.8° vs 104.0° vs 92.3°; P < .001). The knee swelling at 3 months was similar between the LLLT and light groups (2.1 cm), which was lower than that in controls (2.1 cm, P < .001). Furthermore, visual analog scale pain decreased more in the LLLT group than in other groups (8.5 vs 7.2 vs 6.0 points) at 3 months (P = .04) but was similar at 12 months (P > .05). Also, the LLLT group consumed fewer opiate painkillers during the first month (48.3 vs 60.3 mg of oxycodone, P = .02). In the LLLT group, the KSS at 3 and 12 months and the KSS function score at 3 months exceeded minimally clinically important differences (P < .05). Conclusions: In the early stages of recovery after total knee arthroplasty, LLLT and Bioptron light therapy could be helpful to control immediate and acute knee pain and swelling, reduce the need for opioids, improve ROM and functional scores, and improve recovery. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic level I.

Return to work following primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly common in younger patients, who are more likely to be working preoperatively. There is a need for an updated review of the literature regarding the rate and time to return to work (RTW), which is important when counseling patients, and also from an economic standpoint. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed on January 20, 2022, and studies reporting the rate and/or time to RTW after THA were included. Two authors independently selected relevant papers. RTW was extracted and analyzed using fixed-effects or random-effects models where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 48 studies were included in the final analysis. We found that 70.7% of patients were working after primary THA. Among patients who were working before surgery, this rate increases to 87.9%, while 28.1% of patients who were not working preoperatively started working after surgery. Younger patients were more likely to RTW, while patients with a physically demanding job were less likely to RTW. Minimally invasive techniques were reported to yield a higher rate of RTW and an earlier time to RTW. CONCLUSION: We found that the majority of patients return to work after THA, and some patients are able to start working after surgery. Compared to previous reviews, patients seem to have a higher rate and earlier RTW. The overall trend of the literature suggests that patients are returning to work earlier and at a higher rate compared to previous reviews.

Management of a floating shoulder accompanied by a scapular surgical neck fracture: a case report and review of the literature.

In this article, we want to present a floating shoulder case accompanied by a scapular surgical neck fracture and review the literature about its diagnosis and management. Case Presentation: Our patient was a 40-year-old man who suffered a severe left shoulder injury as a result of a car-to-pedestrian accident. Computed tomography scan revealed a scapular surgical neck and body fracture, a spinal pillar fracture, and a dislocation of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. The medial-lateral displacement and glenopolar angle were 21.65 mm and 19.8°, respectively. There was a 37° angular displacement and a greater than 100% translational displacement.Initially, the AC joint dislocation was approached via a superior incision on the clavicle and reduced with a single hook plate. A Judet approach was then used to expose the scapula fractures. The scapular surgical neck was fixed with a reconstruction plate. The spinal pillar was stabilized with two reconstruction plates following reduction.Following a year of follow-up, the patient's shoulder range of motion was acceptable, and an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 88 was achieved. Discussion and Conclusion: Floating shoulder management is still controversial. Floating shoulders are often treated surgically due to their consequent instability and potential risk of nonunion and malunion. As shown in this article, the indications for operating on isolated scapula fractures may also apply to floating shoulders. A well-planned approach to fractures is also imperative, and the AC joint should always be a priority.

Comparison of low-dose (162 mg) and high-dose (650 mg) Aspirin prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Since Aspirin's adverse effects are dose-dependent, and evidence supporting the use of low-dose (LD) Aspirin in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is weak, the authors do not know what the minimal effective dosage of Aspirin is to prevent VTE. This study aimed to compare the rates of 90-day symptomatic VTE following THA and total knee arthroplasty in healthy patients taking LD Aspirin vs. high-dose (HD) Aspirin for 6 weeks postoperatively. Materials and methods: A prospective cohort of patients with THA and total knee arthroplasty was conducted at two tertiary centres. Symptomatic VTE within 90 days of index arthroplasty was the primary outcome; gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and mortality were secondary outcomes. Results: The final analysis included 312 consecutive patients: 158 in the LD group and 154 in the HD group. Two groups were similar regarding preoperative data, including sex, age, BMI, smoking, diabetes mellitus, Hgb and platelet count, and type of surgery. The LD group had one deep vein thrombosis (0.6%), and the HD group had two (1.3%) (P=0.62). Neither group had PTE. Therefore, VTE rates are the same as deep vein thrombosis rates and similar between the groups (0.6% vs. 1.3%, P=0.62)Regarding GIB due to anticoagulant therapy, no patient in the LD group reported GIB, whereas two (1.3%) patients in the HD group reported GIB within 90 days of arthroplasty. GIB rates did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.24). Considering VTE + GIB combined, the HD groups showed a higher rate of complications (N=4, 2.6%) than the LD groups (N=1, 0.6%) but not statistically significant (P=0.21). Conclusions: Prophylactic administration of Aspirin with low doses (81 mg BID) and high doses (325 mg BID) for six weeks is equally effective at reducing VTE in total joint arthroplasty patients and had similar adverse effects. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II.