Clinical management of patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk in specialised centers and in general practice. Analysis from an Italian Survey Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hypertension control remains poorly achieved worldwide, despite the use of modern diagnostic tools and advanced therapeutic strategies. We aimed to evaluate the preferences expressed by either specialised physicians (SPs) or general practitioners (GPs) for the clinical management of hypertension and high cardiovascular risk in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A predefined questionnaire was anonymously administered to a large community sample of physicians, stratified according to clinical expertise. From a total of 64 questions, 557 physicians (478 male, mean age 54.2 ± 7.1 years, average age of medical activity 28.0 ± 8.1 years), including 261 (46.9%) SPs and 296 (53.1%) GPs, provided 9564 answers to the survey questionnaire. Involved clinicians spent the majority of their time and practice for hypertension management and control. SPs aimed to achieve the recommended BP targets (<140/90 mmHg), whereas GPs tended to achieve more rigorous BP goals (<130/80 mmHg); nonetheless, they both reported a very high rate of BP control (about 70%). Concomitant presence of diabetes, organ damage, as well as comorbidities, was reported to be relatively frequent (26-50%), mostly by SPs. ESH/ESC 2007 risk score stratification was preferred by SPs compared to GPs, who favored a comprehensive clinical evaluation. ACE inhibitors or ARBs were considered the best pharmacological option to start antihypertensive treatment, thus adding diuretics or calcium-channel blockers, if needed. CONCLUSIONS: This predefined analysis of a survey questionnaire showed relatively different opinions with respect to recommended BP targets and distributions of cardiovascular risk profile, and similar diagnostic and therapeutic choices between GPs and SPs.

Home infusion program with enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease: The experience of a large Italian collaborative group.

Fabry disease (FD) [OMIM 301500] is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme alpha-galactosidase A, resulting in progressive multisystem accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3). Although the introduction of Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) resulted in a variety of clinical benefits, life-long intravenous (IV) treatment with ERT with an every other week schedule, may interfere with daily life activities and impact on QoL. We report here a multicentric, observational, longitudinal data analysis on a large cohort of 85 Italian FD patients (45 males, 40 females) from 11 out of 20 Italian regions, who received a cumulative number of 4269 home infusions of agalsidase alfa. For the whole cohort, the average duration of home therapy was 1 year and 11 months (range 3 months-4 years and 6 months), and during this period, compliance to treatment (number of infusions performed vs scheduled) reached 100%. The EQ-5 VAS scale was administered to patients to evaluate the self-reported QoL, 58% of patients showing an increase of EQ-5 VAS score at follow up compared to baseline (home treatment start) or remaining stable. A mild increase of average disease severity, measured through Mainz Severity Score Index (MSSI), was found during hospital treatment (p < 0,007), while it remained stable between the first home therapy infusion and last follow up. Interestingly, 4 out of 7 (57%) patients, showing an improvement in FD-related clinical status after starting home therapy, had previously a sub-optimal compliance to treatment during the period of hospital treatment management. Only 4 adverse non serious reactions (0,093%) were reported totally in 2 patients during home treatment. We conclude that home infusions in eligible patients with FD are safe, contribute to improve treatment compliance and therapeutic clinical outcomes, and may have a positive impact on self-perceived QoL.

Growth factors in preeclampsia: a vascular disease model. A failed vasodilation and angiogenic challenge from pregnancy onwards?

Preeclampsia is the major cause of maternofetal and neonatal morbi-mortality including intrauterine growth retardation, miscarriages and stillbirths. Inadequate vascular dilation and angiogenesis represent the crucial underlying defect of gravidic hypertension, denoting a failed response to the vasodilatory and pro-angiogenic challenge imposed by pregnancy, especially if multifetal. A similar pathogenesis appears involved in gestational diabetes. In this review we aimed to provide a hint on understanding the deeply involved angiogenic disorders which eventually culminate in utero-placental failure. The key players in these complex processes may be found in an intricate network of growth factors (GFs) and GF inhibitors, controlled by several vascular risk factors modulated by environment and genes, which eventually impact on early and late cardiovascular outcomes of mother and fetus.

Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-1: a new cardiovascular disease treatment option?

The Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) system is dynamic and complex, involving many binding proteins, binding-protein-related proteases, and receptors. It has emerged in time as a powerful defence to life processes of many cytotypes, tissues and systems. Mainly in body metabolism, diabetes and cardiovascular system, but also in brain and kidney, IGF-1 plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis, increasing progenitor cell potential, and improving physiologic performance both in rest and stress conditions. Its vasculoprotective and insulin sensitizing ability exerts a protective role on flow-metabolism coupling and organs function. Therapeutical human use of recombinant human IGF-1 (rhIGF-1) has been widely applied only in Laron syndrome, while being verified in many randomized controlled trials to improve glycemic control in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and proposed in neurological disease such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer disease. Sparse evidence exists moreover about rhIGF-1 use in insulin resistance, burns, catabolic and post-surgery states, acute and chronic renal failure, amyotrophic lateral and multiple sclerosis, brain injury, and immunoincompetence. Along with these data, results are available on cardiovascular benefit of administration of other growth factors, such as erythropoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor, or on cardiovascular side effects of growth factor antagonists such as trastuzumab in cancer therapy. We intended therefore to summarize in this review available human and animals evidence about rhIGF-1 effects on different systems with insights on rhIGF-1 cardiovascular effects. In view of its ability to improve flow-metabolism coupling, IGF-1 could indeed represent a new cardiovascular disease treatment option for many cardiac disorders such as ischemic heart disease and heart failure.