[A case of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) diagnosed by re-biopsy of the enlarged primary tumor during chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma].

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is an extremely rare form of gastric neoplasm, and its prognosis is often poor. This is a case report wherein the primary site increased during chemotherapy against gastric adenocarcinoma and was diagnosed with gastric MiNEN after total gastrectomy. A 71-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma complicated with liver and para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Chemotherapy with S-1, oxaliplatin, and trastuzumab was initiated. Although the size of metastatic lesions was reduced after six courses of treatment, a part of the primary site of gastric tumor rapidly. Pathological rebiopsy of the primary site suggested a neuroendocrine carcinoma, and he was finally diagnosed with gastric MiNEN after total gastrectomy. Thus, second-line chemotherapy was then initiated showing good response. We herein report a case of MiNEN with a rare diagnostic process.

Factors, Including Clinical Trial Eligibility, Associated with Induction of Third-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Third-line chemotherapy has been suggested to improve survival in patients with gastric cancer. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the induction of third-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, focusing on patient eligibility for clinical trial. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 335 patients treated for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer between April 2009 and May 2020. The patients were grouped into those that met the key eligibility criteria for clinical trial (136 patients, 40.6%) and those that did not (199 patients, 59.4%) before receiving first-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) was 16.8 months (95% CI: 14.0-19.6) and 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.8-11.0) in the eligible and ineligible group, respectively. Multivariate analyses to identify the risk factors associated with the induction of third-line chemotherapy revealed ineligibility of clinical trial (OR 1.95; 95% CI: 1.15-3.31), number of metastatic sites (OR 1.99; 95% CI: 1.23-3.22), low albumin concentration (OR 2.24; 95% CI: 1.14-4.38), and a lack of complete or partial response to first-line treatment (OR 1.85; 95% CI: 1.05-3.26). Indeed, in responders to first-line treatment for ineligible patients, the median OS was 17.7 months (95% CI: 10.6-27.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outcomes were different for those eligible for clinical trials and those who were not. However, this study suggested that patients who responded to first-line treatment have more favorable prognosis when treated with salvage chemotherapy, even if they were deemed ineligible for clinical trials.

The Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in Gastric Cancer with Severe Peritoneal Metastasis.

(1) Background: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy is established as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). While mFOLFOX6 is commonly used for AGC with severe peritoneal metastasis, the efficacy of nivolumab combined with it remains uncertain. We evaluated the outcomes of nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6 for AGC with severe peritoneal metastasis in clinical practice. (2) Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted between December 2021 and June 2023. We investigated AGC patients with massive ascites or inadequate oral intake due to severe peritoneal metastasis and who received nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6. (3) Results: Among 106 patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 21 (19.8%) had severe peritoneal metastasis, with 14 receiving nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6. The median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95%CI 1.9-10.1), and the median overall survival was 10.7 months (95%CI 5.3-NA), with four patients (28.5%) surviving more than 12 months. Improved ascites and oral intake were observed in 6/14 patients (42.8%) and 10/11 patients (90.9%), respectively. The major grade 3 or more adverse events included leukopenia (28.5%) and neutropenia (21.4%), with no severe immune-related adverse events reported. (4) Conclusions: The safety and moderate efficacy of nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6 were suggested even in AGC patients with severe peritoneal metastasis.

Efficacy and Safety of FOLFOX in Advanced Gastric Cancer Initially Presenting With Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) rarely presents with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) at the time of diagnosis. Chemotherapy should be selected in consideration of hematological toxicities because these patients are at high risk of hemorrhagic complications. The leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen is an effective and less toxic regimen for patients with AGC and poor performance status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study assessed overall survival of all patients receiving first-line chemotherapy with and without DIC using Kaplan-Meier methods and examined the clinicopathological factors, DIC parameters, response, and survival of five patients with AGC and DIC who received FOLFOX in the first-line setting between February 2017 and February 2020. RESULTS: Among the patients, four patients (80%) recovered from DIC after a median of 12 days of FOLFOX therapy (range=12-25), and their platelet count gradually increased within 1 week after the start of chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 46 (range=22-296) and 115 days (range=83-324), respectively. No patients experienced adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation, including gastrointestinal bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, all patients received second-line treatment after progression, and one patient exhibited improvement of DIC symptoms following nab-paclitaxel and ramucirumab treatment. CONCLUSION: FOLFOX therapy is well tolerated and effective in patients with AGC initially presenting with DIC and subsequent second-line treatment might be crucial for better prognosis.

Intrahepatic Bile Duct Injury as a Hepatic Immune-Related Adverse Event after Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment.

The increased use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors to treat various types of cancer has increased the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Hepatic irAEs are frequent and can lead to serious conditions. Among the various types of hepatic irAEs reported to date, bile duct injury has been shown refractory to steroid treatment. This study describes 2 patients with hepatic irAEs manifesting as intrahepatic bile duct injury. Immunostaining with antibodies to both CD8 and cytokeratin-7 was useful for the diagnosis, and both patients were refractory to steroid treatment. Prompt diagnosis and active immunosuppressive therapies are required in such cases.