ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to estimate the excess burden of RA in Ontario, the largest province in Canada. METHODS: The records of all adult Ontarians who participated in the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) cycle 1.1 (2000/2001) and provided consent to data linkage were linked to the Ontario Health Insurance Program (OHIP) physician claims database and the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) In-Patient (i.e. hospitalisation) and Day-Procedure databases. RA individuals (n=233) were identified using CCHS 1.1 and the physician claims database. A control group matched by age, gender and rural/urban status was created with three controls for one case (n=699). Socio-demographic variables, medical characteristics, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and one-year physician services, hospitalizations and day procedures costs were determined for the RA and non-RA groups. Regression techniques were used to identify predictors of medical characteristics, utility and cost data. RESULTS: The mean age of the population was 59 years and 76% were female. Compared to the matched control group, individuals with RA were statistically more likely to be obese, less educated, physically inactive and have a lower income. RA individuals also reported a statistically higher number of comorbidities and a lower HRQoL. Although no statistical differences were observed between the RA and non-RA groups for the costs associated with hospitalisations, the physician ($1,015 vs. $624, respectively) and day procedure ($102 vs. $51, respectively) costs were statistically higher among RA individuals. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the human and economic burden of RA in Ontario is considerable.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/economics , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Aged , Ambulatory Care/economics , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/psychology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Cost of Illness , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Health Surveys , Hospital Costs , Humans , Linear Models , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Office Visits/economics , Ontario/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Serum testosterone levels decline significantly with aging. Testosterone supplementation to older men might beneficially affect the aging processes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of testosterone supplementation on functional mobility, cognitive function, bone mineral density, body composition, plasma lipids, quality of life, and safety parameters in older men with low normal testosterone levels. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 237 healthy men between the ages of 60 and 80 years with a testosterone level lower than 13.7 nmol/L conducted from January 2004 to April 2005 at a university medical center in the Netherlands. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 80 mg of testosterone undecenoate or a matching placebo twice daily for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional mobility (Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, timed get up and go test, isometric handgrip strength, isometric leg extensor strength), cognitive function (8 different cognitive instruments), bone mineral density of the hip and lumbar spine (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning), body composition (total body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and abdominal ultrasound of fat mass), metabolic risk factors (fasting plasma lipids, glucose, and insulin), quality of life (Short-Form Health 36 Survey and the Questions on Life Satisfaction Modules), and safety parameters (serum prostate-specific antigen level, ultrasonographic prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom score, serum levels of creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, hemoglobin, and hematocrit). RESULTS: A total of 207 men completed the study. During the study, lean body mass increased and fat mass decreased in the testosterone group compared with the placebo group but these factors were not accompanied by an increase of functional mobility or muscle strength. Cognitive function and bone mineral density did not change. Insulin sensitivity improved but high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased; by the end of the study, 47.8% in the testosterone group vs 35.5% in the placebo group had the metabolic syndrome (P = .07). Quality-of-life measures were no different except for one hormone-related quality-of-life measure that improved. No negative effects on prostate safety were detected. CONCLUSION: Testosterone supplementation during 6 months to older men with a low normal testosterone concentration did not affect functional status or cognition but increased lean body mass and had mixed metabolic effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN23688581.