ABSTRACT
Diagnostic load testing refers to the use of the measured historical responses of the structure in the field data to better understand its dynamic and static structural behaviours. It is important and necessary to predict the health state, load capacity, and aging of the structure by updating the finite element (FE) model, which can give useful information to aid the design of retrofits and the maintenance of the existing bridge in the future. The paper presents an update of the full-scale FE model for the reinforced concrete (RC) bridge structure over the seawater river based on the experimental strains under the static load testing in which the representative FE model of the actual structure is determined from the optimisation procedures. The optimisation variables are applied, including the cross-sectional properties and concrete material calibrated through the genetic algorithm (GA) optimisation in the MATLAB software, which interfaces with the FE modelling in the scripting of the SOFISTIK TEDDY software automatically. The bending moments at the mid-span of the RC girders are determined in the FE modelling to compute stresses, which are compared with the measured stresses through optimisation scenarios with a percentage error of the objective function less than 10%. The measured data of concrete strains are recorded from reusable strain transducers installed on the mid-span girders for every bridge span, which are used to calibrate the bridge model in static load testing. The novelty of the solution is to implement innovative techniques using field data as an improved approach for calibrating automatically the analytical FE model parameters of all RC spans of the bridge until its static behaviours are very similar to those of the actual bridge. The final updated FE modelling is used to apply truck load configurations according to bridge design standards such as the AASHTO specifications, which can predict the load limits of the existing bridge structure more accurately and reliably. These proposed approaches can be applied to large bridges as well as complex structures with supporting FE analysis software and data processing software.
Subject(s)
Aging , Records , Humans , Finite Element Analysis , Rivers , Asian PeopleABSTRACT
Melorheostosis is a rare benign bone pathology involving bone dysplasia and hyperostosis. The disease can be recognized with a characteristic radiographic feature of radiopaque lesions dripping along a long bone's diaphysis. The aberrant bone formation and development manifests mainly as pain, edema, and paresthesia of the affected limb. Severe cases may report limb deformity as well as limited range of motion. Until now, there have been approximately 300 cases reported about melorheostosis worldwide and its diverse clinical picture and age distribution. In Vietnam, there is only one known case of melorheostosis discovered incidentally via radiography. The scarcity of cases presents a challenge within the medical community in recognizing and diagnosing the condition, and a delayed diagnosis can lead to severe contracture and compromised limb motility. In this article, we reported an 82-year-old case of polyostotic melorheostosis with late onset and predominant edema, affecting the sternum, the ribs, and multiple bones of the right extremities and presented our clinical approach for a geriatric patient with chronic limb edema. Our case is distinctive in terms of anatomical location as well as the predominant 20-year non-pitting edema. A prompt diagnosis was made upon the classic dripping candle wax radiographic features emphasizing the role of plain X-ray in establishing the diagnosis without extraneous utilization of other modalities and invasive procedures. Exclusion of other causes of chronic edema such as lymphadenopathy, malignancy as well as parasitic infection is of clinical importance.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Many health care systems lack the efficiency, preparedness, or resources needed to address the increasing number of patients with type 2 diabetes, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To examine the effects of a quality improvement intervention comprising information and communications technology and contact with nonphysician personnel on the care and cardiometabolic risk factors of patients with type 2 diabetes in 8 Asia-Pacific countries. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 12-month multinational open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 28, 2012, to April 28, 2016, at 50 primary care or hospital-based diabetes centers in 8 Asia-Pacific countries (India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam). Six countries were low and middle income, and 2 countries were high income. The study was conducted in 2 phases; phase 1 enrolled 7537 participants, and phase 2 enrolled 13 297 participants. Participants in both phases were randomized on a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control groups. Data were analyzed by intention to treat and per protocol from July 3, 2019, to July 21, 2020. Interventions: In both phases, the intervention group received 3 care components: a nurse-led Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) technology-guided structured evaluation, automated personalized reports to encourage patient empowerment, and 2 or more telephone or face-to-face contacts by nurses to increase patient engagement. In phase 1, the control group received the JADE technology-guided structured evaluation and automated personalized reports. In phase 2, the control group received the JADE technology-guided structured evaluation only. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of diabetes-associated end points, including cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, visual impairment or eye surgery, lower extremity amputation or foot ulcers requiring hospitalization, all-site cancers, and death. The secondary outcomes were the attainment of 2 or more primary diabetes-associated targets (glycated hemoglobin A1c <7.0%, blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL) and/or 2 or more key performance indices (reduction in glycated hemoglobin A1c≥0.5%, reduction in systolic blood pressure ≥5 mm Hg, reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥19 mg/dL, and reduction in body weight ≥3.0%). Results: A total of 20â¯834 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized in phases 1 and 2. In phase 1, 7537 participants (mean [SD] age, 60.0 [11.3] years; 3914 men [51.9%]; 4855 patients [64.4%] from low- and middle-income countries) were randomized, with 3732 patients allocated to the intervention group and 3805 patients allocated to the control group. In phase 2, 13 297 participants (mean [SD] age, 54.0 [11.1] years; 7754 men [58.3%]; 13 297 patients [100%] from low- and middle-income countries) were randomized, with 6645 patients allocated to the intervention group and 6652 patients allocated to the control group. In phase 1, compared with the control group, the intervention group had a similar risk of experiencing any of the primary outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.21) but had an increased likelihood of attaining 2 or more primary targets (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.21-1.49) and 2 or more key performance indices (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04-1.34). In phase 2, the intervention group also had a similar risk of experiencing any of the primary outcomes (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.83-1.25) and had a greater likelihood of attaining 2 or more primary targets (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.14-1.37) and 2 or more key performance indices (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.33-1.68) compared with the control group. For attainment of 2 or more primary targets, larger effects were observed among patients in low- and middle-income countries (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29-1.74) compared with high-income countries (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.39) (P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this 12-month clinical trial, the use of information and communications technology and nurses to empower and engage patients did not change the number of clinical events but did reduce cardiometabolic risk factors among patients with type 2 diabetes, especially those in low- and middle-income countries in the Asia-Pacific region. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01631084.