ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study describes the effects of introducing a protocol omitting preoperative α-blockade dose-escalation (de-escalation) in a prospective patient group. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The decline of mortality and morbidity associated with pheochromocytoma resection is frequently attributed to the introduction of preoperative α-blockade. Current protocols require preoperative α-blockade dose-escalation and multiple-day hospital admissions. However, correlating evidence is lacking. Moreover, recent data suggest equal perioperative safety regardless of preoperative α-blockade escalation. METHODS: Single-institution evaluation of protocol implementation, including patients who underwent adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma between 2015 and 2023. Intraoperative hemodynamic control was regulated by active adjustment of blood pressure using vasoactive agents. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypertension, defined as time-weighted average of systolic blood pressure (TWA-SBP) above 200 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes included perioperative hypotension, postoperative blood pressure support requirement, hospital stay duration and complications. RESULTS: Of 102 pheochromocytoma patients, 82 were included; 44 in the de-escalated preoperative α-adrenergic protocol and 38 following the previous dose-escalation protocol. Median [IQR] TWA-SBP above 200 mm Hg was 0.01 [0.0-0.4] mm Hg in the de-escalated group versus 0.0 [0.0-0.1] mm Hg in the dose-escalated group (P=0.073). Median duration of postoperative continuous norepinephrine administration was 0.3 hrs [0.0-5.5] versus 5.1 hrs [0.0-14.3], respectively (P=0.003). Postoperative symptomatic hypotension occurred in 34.2% versus 9.1% of patients (P=0.005). Median hospital stay was 2.5 days [1.9-3.6] versus 7.1 days [6.0-11.9] (P<0.001). No significant differences in complication rates were observed. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma employing a de-escalated preoperative α-blockade protocol is safe and results in a shorter hospital stay.
ABSTRACT
Aim: Tumor markers often remain elevated after intended curative resection of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). The aim of this study was to determine the expression of αvß3, a promising theranostics target, in MTC and its metastases.Materials & methods: Avß3 expression was analyzed in 104 patients using a tissue microarray and correlated with clinicopathological variables and survival.Results: Cytoplasmic αvß3 positivity was seen in 70 patients and was associated with lymph node metastases at time of initial surgery. Membranous positivity was considered positive in 30 patients and was associated with sporadic MTC.Conclusion: Avß3 was expressed in the cytoplasm of 67% of MTC patients. Membranous expression, which is presumably most relevant for the theranostic use of αvß3, was seen in 29%.
[Box: see text].
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine , Integrin alphaVbeta3 , Thyroid Neoplasms , Humans , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/metabolism , Thyroid Neoplasms/genetics , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/pathology , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/genetics , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/metabolism , Integrin alphaVbeta3/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Lymphatic Metastasis , Young Adult , Prognosis , Aged, 80 and over , Tissue Array Analysis , Immunohistochemistry , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is rare and data on long-term oncological outcomes are scarce. This study aimed to describe the long-term recurrence and survival rates of AYAs with FTC, and identify risk factors for recurrence. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study combining two national databases, including all patients aged 15-39 years, diagnosed with FTC in The Netherlands between 2000 and 2016. Age, sex, tumor size, focality, positive margins, angioinvasion, pT-stage, and pN-stage were included in a Cox proportional hazard model to identify risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: We included 192 patients. Median age was 31.0 years (IQR 24.7-36.3) and the male to female ratio was 1:4.1. Most patients presented with a minimally invasive FTC (MI-FTC) (95%). Five patients presented with synchronous metastases (2.6%), including two with locoregional metastases (1%) and three with distant metastases (1.6%). During a median follow-up of 12.0 years, three patients developed a recurrence (1.6%), of which one patient developed a local recurrence (33%), and two patients a distant recurrence (67%). Five patients died during follow-up (2.6%). Cause of death was not captured. A Cox proportional hazard model could not be performed due to the low number of recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: FTC in AYAs is generally characterized as a low-risk tumor, as it exhibits a very low recurrence rate, a high overall survival, and it typically presents as MI-FTC without synchronous metastases. These findings underscore the favorable long-term oncological prognosis of FTC in AYAs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether liver surgery leads to increased RAAS activity and anti-diuretic hormone (ADH) levels and subsequent fluid accumulation. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the peri-operative fluid strategy changes this effect. METHODS: This is a pre-planned post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial which compared restrictive (n = 20) versus liberal fluid strategy (n = 20) in patients undergoing liver surgery. Primary outcomes for the current study were the difference in hormone levels after anaesthesia induction and after liver resection. Fluid overload was defined as a ≥10% increase in weight. RESULTS: Renin activity (6 [2.1-15.5] vs. 12 [4.6-33.5]) and ADH levels (6.0 [1.7-16.3] vs. 3.8 [1.6-14.7]) did not differ significantly before and after resection. However, aldosterone levels were significantly higher after resection (0.30 [0.17-0.49] vs. 0.69 [0.31-1.21] ). Renin activity and aldosterone levels did not differ between the groups. ADH was significantly higher in the restrictive strategy group (1.6 [1.1-2.1] vs 5.9 [3.8-16.0]). No differences in hormone levels were found in patients with and without fluid overload. DISCUSSION: Aldosterone levels increased after liver surgery but renin activity and ADH levels did not. ADH levels were higher in the restrictive group. Development of post-operative fluid overload was not associated with RAAS activity or ADH levels.
Subject(s)
Aldosterone , Fluid Therapy , Hepatectomy , Renin-Angiotensin System , Renin , Humans , Renin/blood , Aldosterone/blood , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Biomarkers/blood , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have found aristaless-related homeobox gene (ARX)/pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX1), alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX)/death domain-associated protein (DAXX) and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) to be promising prognostic biomarkers for non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-PanNETs). However, they have not been comprehensively evaluated, especially among small NF-PanNETs (≤2.0 cm). Moreover, their status in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) from other sites remains unknown. DESIGN: An international cohort of 1322 NETs was evaluated by immunolabelling for ARX/PDX1 and ATRX/DAXX, and telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridisation for ALT. This cohort included 561 primary NF-PanNETs, 107 NF-PanNET metastases and 654 primary, non-pancreatic non-functional NETs and NET metastases. The results were correlated with numerous clinicopathological features including relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: ATRX/DAXX loss and ALT were associated with several adverse prognostic findings and distant metastasis/recurrence (p<0.001). The 5-year RFS rates for patients with ATRX/DAXX-negative and ALT-positive NF-PanNETs were 40% and 42% as compared with 85% and 86% for wild-type NF-PanNETs (p<0.001 and p<0.001). Shorter 5-year RFS rates for ≤2.0 cm NF-PanNETs patients were also seen with ATRX/DAXX loss (65% vs 92%, p=0.003) and ALT (60% vs 93%, p<0.001). By multivariate analysis, ATRX/DAXX and ALT status were independent prognostic factors for RFS. Conversely, classifying NF-PanNETs by ARX/PDX1 expression did not independently correlate with RFS. Except for 4% of pulmonary carcinoids, ATRX/DAXX loss and ALT were only identified in primary (25% and 29%) and NF-PanNET metastases (62% and 71%). CONCLUSIONS: ATRX/DAXX and ALT should be considered in the prognostic evaluation of NF-PanNETs including ≤2.0 cm tumours, and are highly specific for pancreatic origin among NET metastases of unknown primary.
Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Pancreatic Neoplasms , alpha-Thalassemia , Co-Repressor Proteins/genetics , Genes, Homeobox , Homeodomain Proteins , Humans , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Molecular Chaperones/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Telomere/genetics , Telomere/pathology , Transcription Factors/genetics , X-linked Nuclear Protein/genetics , alpha-Thalassemia/geneticsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE induces objective response in up to 57% of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs). Therefore, PRRT may comprise a downstaging option for panNEN patients who are not eligible for upfront curative surgery or are at high risk for recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess the potency of induction PRRT for locally advanced panNENs and to evaluate the effect of surgery after PRRT on overall survival (OS). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of panNEN patients treated with induction 177Lu-DOTATATE. RESULTS: After PRRT, 26 out of 49 patients underwent pancreatic surgery with curative intent (PRRT + surgery). Partial objective response was obtained in 62% of the PRRT + surgery group versus 26% of the patients not undergoing panNEN surgery (PRRT-only group, p = 0.02). Downstaging in tumour-vessel interface was observed in 38% of all patients with at least one involved vessel. Median OS was 14.7 years (95% CI 5.9-23.6) for the PRRT + surgery group compared to 5.5 years (95% CI 4.5-6.5) for the PRRT-only group (p = 0.003). In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, surgery was not significantly associated with OS after propensity score adjustment with cumulative activity, performance status, tumour size after PRRT, and tumour grade. Median progression-free survival was 5.3 years (95% CI 2.4-8.1) for the PRRT + surgery group and 3.0 years (95% CI 1.6-4.4) for the PRRT-only group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Early administration of PRRT followed by surgery is associated with favourable long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced or oligometastatic panNEN and can be considered for selected patients with vascular involvement and/or increased risk of recurrence.
Subject(s)
Neuroendocrine Tumors , Organometallic Compounds , Radiopharmaceuticals , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/radiotherapy , Octreotide/therapeutic use , Organometallic Compounds/therapeutic use , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
1: ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as the best tool to characterize subepithelial lesion (SEL) features (size, location, originating layer, echogenicity, shape), but EUS alone is not able to distinguish among all types of SEL.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE suggests providing tissue diagnosis for all SELs with features suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) if they are of size >â20âmm, or have high risk stigmata, or require surgical resection or oncological treatment.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) or mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) equally for tissue diagnosis of SELs ≥â20âmm in size.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends against surveillance of asymptomatic gastrointestinal (GI) tract leiomyomas, lipomas, heterotopic pancreas, granular cell tumors, schwannomas, and glomus tumors, if the diagnosis is clear.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests surveillance of asymptomatic esophageal and gastric SELs without definite diagnosis, with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at 3-6 months, and then at 2-3-year intervals for lesions <â10âmm in size, and at 1-2-year intervals for lesions 10-20âmm in size. For asymptomatic SELs >â20âmm in size that are not resected, ESGE suggests surveillance with EGD plus EUS at 6 months and then at 6-12-month intervals.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends endoscopic resection for type 1 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) if they grow larger than 10âmm. The choice of resection technique should depend on size, depth of invasion, and location in the stomach.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7: ESGE suggests considering removal of histologically proven gastric GISTs smaller than 20âmm as an alternative to surveillance. The decision to resect should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting. The choice of technique should depend on size, location, and local expertise.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 8: ESGE suggests that, to avoid unnecessary follow-up, endoscopic resection is an option for gastric SELs smaller than 20âmm and of unknown histology after failure of attempts to obtain diagnosis.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 9: ESGE recommends basing the surveillance strategy on the type and completeness of resection. After curative resection of benign SELs no follow-up is advised, except for type 1 gastric NEN for which surveillance at 1-2 years is advised.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 10: For lower or upper GI NEN with a positive or indeterminate margin at resection, ESGE recommends repeating endoscopy at 3-6 months and another attempt at endoscopic resection in the case of residual disease.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Endosonography/standards , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/standards , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/surgery , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/surgery , Humans , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate the impact of family visit restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic on deliriums, falls, pneumonia, pressure ulcers and readmissions among surgical inpatients with gastrointestinal (oncologic) diseases. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: This study was conducted among adult inpatients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery in two academic hospitals. During the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, over a 10-week period, one cohort was subjected to family visit restrictions. Per patient, one person per day was allowed to visit for a maximum of 30 min. This cohort was compared with another cohort in which patients were not subjected to such restrictions during a 10-week period in 2019. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the impact of the restrictions on deliriums, falls, pneumonia, pressure ulcers and readmissions. RESULTS: In total, 287 patients were included in the 2020 cohort and 243 in the 2019 cohort. No differences were observed in the cohorts with respect to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analyses showed no significant differences in deliriums, falls, pneumonia, pressure ulcers and readmissions between the cohorts. CONCLUSION: We cautiously conclude that the family visit restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic did not contribute to deliriums, falls, pneumonia, pressure ulcers or readmissions in surgical patients with gastrointestinal (oncologic) diseases. IMPACT: COVID-19 influenced family-centred care due to family visit restrictions. Nurses need to continue monitoring outcomes known to be sensitive to family-centred care to gain insight into the effects of visit restrictions and share the results in order to include nurses' perspectives in COVID-19-decision-making. Re-implementing of family visit restrictions should be carefully considered in policy-making.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Pressure Ulcer , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia/epidemiology , PolicyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine among surgical nurses whether work-role conflict, work-role ambiguity, respect, distress and trust in collaboration due to interactions with family caregivers in the nursing ward are associated with the quality of contact with patients and their families. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted between January and March 2020. Surgical nurses completed a questionnaire recording work-role conflict, work-role ambiguity, sense of respect, distress, trust in collaboration and quality of contact with patients and their families. Data were analysed using correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and mediation regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 135 nurses completed the questionnaire. The correlation analysis showed significant correlations between nurses' impaired quality of contact with patients and their families and nurses' work-role conflicts, work-role ambiguity, trust in collaboration and distress (p < 0.05). The multiple regression analyses corroborated that work-role conflict and distress were significantly and positively associated with impaired quality of contact. Furthermore, mediation regression analysis showed that work-role conflict was associated indirectly and significantly with quality of contact through distress. CONCLUSION: Work-role conflict due to having family caregivers involved in the care of hospitalised patients is significantly associated with nurses' distress and quality of contact with patients and their families.
Subject(s)
Hospitals , Nurses , Caregivers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Literature on laparoscopic resection of small-bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms consists of single case descriptions or small selected case-series only, likely because of challenging mesenteric lymphadenectomy. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated an institutional change in approach from open to laparoscopic resection of small-bowel neuroendocrine neoplasm independent from lymph node involvement. DESIGN: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients with small-bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms were included. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic or open segmental bowel resection with central mesenteric lymphadenectomy was the studied intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complexity of lymphadenectomy was assessed by determining the distance between suspect lymph nodes and main mesenteric branches on preoperative CT. Number of (tumor-positive) lymph nodes, conversion to open surgery, and postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification and length of stay were measured. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were identified, of whom 11 (32%) underwent open and 23 (68%) laparoscopic surgery. Distances between lymph nodes and main mesenteric branches and number of examined and tumor-positive lymph nodes did not differ significantly. Laparoscopy was converted in 7 patients (30%). Major postoperative complications (grades 3-5) occurred in 1 patient (9%) in the open surgery group (grade 5) and 2 patients (9%) in the laparoscopic surgery group (grade 3b). The length of stay was 8 days (range, 6-18 d) in the open surgery group and 4 days (4-8 d) in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.036). LIMITATIONS: Long-term outcomes could not reliably be assessed because of the relatively short follow-up time of the laparoscopy group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic bowel resection with central mesenteric lymphadenectomy for small-bowel neuroendocrine neoplasm appears safe and associated with similar pathologic outcome and shorter length of stay in the setting of a tertiary referral center. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B512. VALOR DE LA LAPAROSCOPIA PARA LA RESECCIN DE NEOPLASIAS NEUROENDOCRINAS DEL INTESTINO DELGADO, INCLUIDA LA LINFADENECTOMA MESENTRICA CENTRAL: ANTECEDENTES:La literatura sobre la resección laparoscópica de neoplasias neuroendocrinas del intestino delgado consiste en descripciones de casos únicos o en series de pequeños casos seleccionados, probablemente debido a la dificultad de la linfadenectomía mesentérica.OBJETIVO:Evaluamos un cambio institucional en el enfoque de la resección abierta a laparoscópica de SB-NEN independientemente de la afectación de los ganglios linfáticos.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de cohorte comparativo retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en un centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes con neoplasias neuroendocrinas de intestino delgado.INTERVENCIONES:Resección intestinal segmentaria laparoscópica o abierta con linfadenectomía mesentérica central.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La complejidad de la linfadenectomía se evaluó determinando la distancia entre los ganglios linfáticos sospechosos y las principales ramas mesentéricas en la TC preoperatoria. Número de ganglios linfáticos (tumor positivos), conversión a cirugía abierta, complicaciones postoperatorias según Clavien-Dindo y duración de la estancia.RESULTADOS:Se identificaron 34 pacientes, de los cuales 11 (32%) fueron sometidos a cirugía abierta y 23 (68%) laparoscópica. Las distancias entre los ganglios linfáticos y las principales ramas mesentéricas y el número de ganglios linfáticos examinados y con tumores positivos no difirieron significativamente. La laparoscopia se convirtió en 7 pacientes (30%). Se produjeron complicaciones posoperatorias importantes (grados 3-5) en un paciente (9%) en el grupo de cirugía abierta (grado 5) y en 2 (9%) pacientes en el grupo de cirugía laparoscópica (grado 3b). La estancia intrahospitalaria fue de 8 días (rango 6-18) en el grupo de cirugía abierta y 4 días (4-8) en el grupo laparoscópico (p = 0.036).LIMITACIONES:Los resultados a largo plazo no se pudieron evaluar de manera confiable debido al seguimiento relativamente corto del grupo de laparoscopia.CONCLUSIONES:La resección intestinal laparoscópica con linfadenectomía mesentérica central para SB-NEN parece segura y se asocia con un resultado patológico similar y una estadía más corta en el contexto de un centro de referencia terciario. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B512.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Aged , Cohort Studies , Conversion to Open Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intestine, Small/pathology , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Mesentery/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading/methods , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thyroid storm is a feared complication in patients with hyperthyroidism undergoing surgery. We assessed the risk of thyroid storm for different preoperative treatment options for patients with primary hyperthyroidism undergoing surgery. METHODS: Pubmed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched systematically for all studies reporting on adult hyperthyroid patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Selected studies were categorised based on preoperative treatment: no treatment, antithyroid medication (thionamides), iodine, ß-blocking medication, or a combination thereof. Treatment effect, that is restoring euthyroidism, was extracted from the publications if available. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) or the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised studies. RESULTS: The search yielded 7009 articles, of which 26 studies published between 1975 and 2020 were selected for critical appraisal. All studies had moderate to critical risk of bias, mainly attributable to risk of confounding, classification of intervention status, and definition of the outcome. All studies reported on thyroidectomy patients. We found no randomised studies comparing the risk of thyroid storm between treated and untreated patients. Cases of thyroid storm were reported in all treatment groups with incidences described ranging from 0% to 14%. CONCLUSION: Evidence assessing the risk of perioperative thyroid storm is of insufficient quality. Given the seriousness of this complication and the impossibility of identifying patients at increased risk, preoperative treatment of these patients remains warranted.
Subject(s)
Hyperthyroidism/complications , Hyperthyroidism/physiopathology , Perioperative Period , Preoperative Care/methods , Thyroid Crisis/complications , Thyroid Crisis/physiopathology , Humans , Risk Assessment , Surgical Procedures, OperativeABSTRACT
AIM: Open resection of small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms (SB-NEN) is still considered standard-of-care, mainly because of frequently encountered multifocality and central mesenteric masses. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical approach for SB-NEN at a national level and determine predictors for overall survival. METHODS: Patients with SB-NEN who underwent resection between 2005 and 2015 were included from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between laparoscopic and open approach. Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and compared with the Log-rank test. Independent predictors were determined by Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In total, 482 patients were included, of whom 342 (71%) underwent open and 140 (29%) laparoscopic resection. The open resection group had significantly more multifocal tumors resected (24% vs. 14%), pN2 lymph nodes (18% vs. 7%) and stage IV disease (36% vs. 22%). Overall survival after open resection was significantly shorter compared to laparoscopic resection (3-year: 81% vs. 89%, 5-year: 71% vs. 84%, p = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, age above 60-years (60-75, HR 3.38 (95% CI 1.84-6.23); > 75 years, HR 7.63 (95% CI 3.86-15.07)), stage IV disease (HR 1.86 (95% CI 1.18-2.94)) and a laparoscopic approach (HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.28-0.94)) were independently associated with overall survival, whereas multifocal primary tumor, grade and resection margin status were not. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection was the approach in 29% of SB-NEN at a national level with selection of the more favorable patients. Laparoscopic resection remained independently associated with better overall survival besides age and stage, but residual confounding cannot be excluded.
Subject(s)
Intestinal Neoplasms , Laparoscopy , Humans , Intestinal Neoplasms/surgery , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Calcimimetics are currently indicated for severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). However, the role of parathyroidectomy (PTX) for these patients is still under debate, and its impact on subsequent kidney transplantation (KTX) is unclear. In this study, we compare the outcomes of kidney transplantation after PTX or medical treatment. METHODS: Patients who underwent KTX and had SHPT were analyzed retrospectively. Two groups were selected (patients who had either PTX or calcimimetics prior to KTX) using a propensity score for sex, age, donor type, and parathyroid hormone levels (PTH) during dialysis. The primary outcome was graft failure, and secondary outcomes were surgical KTX complications, survival, serum PTH, serum calcium, and serum phosphate levels post-KTX. RESULTS: Matching succeeded for 92 patients. After PTX, PTH was significantly lower on the day of KTX as well as at 1 and 3 years post-KTX (14.00 pmol/L (3.80-34.00) vs. 71.30 pmol/L (30.70-108.30), p < 0.01, 10.10 pmol/L (2.00-21.00) vs. 32.35 pmol/L (21.58-51.76), p < 0.01 and 13.00 pmol/L (6.00-16.60) vs. 19.25 pmol/L (13.03-31.88), p = 0.027, respectively). No significant differences in post-KTX calcium and phosphate levels were noted between groups. Severe KTX complications were more common in the calcimimetics group (56.5% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.047). There were no differences in 10-year graft failure and overall survival. CONCLUSION: PTX resulted in lower PTH after KTX in comparison to patients who received calcimimetics. Severe complications were more common after calcimimetics, but graft failure and overall survival were similar.
Subject(s)
Calcimimetic Agents/therapeutic use , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/drug therapy , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Parathyroidectomy , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Propensity Score , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The subject of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), subdivided into well-differentiated NENs, termed neuroendocrine tumours (NETs; grade (G) 1 and 2), and poorly differentiated NENs, termed neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs; G3) according to the 2010 World Health Organisation (WHO) classification, has arguably not had as much attention or study as NENs occurring in other sites. Colorectal NETs and NECs are however easier to study than many others since they are usually not difficult to remove and are increasingly detected because of intensified colorectal cancer screening and surveillance programmes. Colorectal NETs and NECs show site-specific heterogeneity with variable behaviour and different therapeutic options; these various aspects provide unique challenges. Because of bowel cancer screening programmes, colorectal NENs, like conventional adenocarcinomas, may be diagnosed at a stage that is associated with improved survival. In this article we intend to describe and define areas of unmet needs relating to the epidemiology, classification, pathology, diagnosis and therapy of colorectal NETs (including NETs G3), colorectal NECs, and finally, mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) by reviewing and discussing the relevant literature.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Biomedical Research/trends , Colorectal Neoplasms/classification , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/classification , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Pulmonary carcinoids (PCs) display the common features of all well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and are classified as low- and intermediate-grade malignant tumours (i.e., typical and atypical carcinoid, respectively). There is a paucity of randomised studies dedicated to advanced PCs and management principles are drawn from the larger gastroenteropancreatic NEN experience. There is growing evidence that NEN anatomic subgroups have different biology and different responses to treatment and, therefore, should be investigated as separate entities in clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the existing evidence and limitations of tumour classification, diagnostics and staging, prognostication, and treatment in the setting of PC, with focus on unmet medical needs and directions for the future.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/trends , Carcinoid Tumor , Lung Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Carcinoid Tumor/classification , Carcinoid Tumor/diagnosis , Carcinoid Tumor/drug therapy , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/classification , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/classification , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , PrognosisABSTRACT
Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANEN) are mostly discovered coincidentally during appendicectomy and usually have a benign clinical course; thus, appendicectomy alone is considered curative. However, in some cases, a malignant potential is suspected, and therefore additional operations such as completion right hemicolectomy are considered. The existing European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) guidelines provide useful data about epidemiology and prognosis, as well as practical recommendations with regards to the risk factors for a more aggressive disease course and the indications for a secondary operation. However, these guidelines are based on heterogeneous and retrospective studies. Therefore, the evidence does not seem to be robust, and there are still unmet needs in terms of accurate epidemiology and overall prognosis, optimal diagnostic and follow-up strategy, as well as identified risk factors that would indicate a more aggressive surgical approach at the beginning and a more intense follow-up. In this review, we are adopting a critical approach of the ENETS guidelines and published series for ANEN, focusing on the above-noted "grey areas".
Subject(s)
Appendiceal Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Appendiceal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Appendiceal Neoplasms/surgery , Biomedical Research/trends , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Parathyroidectomy (PTx) is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with therapy-resistant hyperparathyroidism (HPT). The optimal timing of PTx for ESRD-related HPT-before or after kidney transplantation (KTx)-is subject of debate. METHODS: Patients with ESRD-related HPT who underwent both PTx and KTx between 1994 and 2015 were included in a multicenter retrospective study in four university hospitals. Two groups were formed according to treatment sequence: PTx before KTx (PTxKTx) and PTx after KTx (KTxPTx). Primary endpoint was renal function (eGFR, CKD-EPI) between both groups at several time points post-transplantation. Correlation between the timing of PTx and KTx and the course of eGFR was assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE). RESULTS: The PTxKTx group consisted of 102 (55.1%) and the KTxPTx group of 83 (44.9%) patients. Recipient age, donor type, PTx type, and pre-KTx PTH levels were significantly different between groups. At 5 years after transplantation, eGFR was similar in the PTxKTx group (eGFR 44.5 ± 4.0 ml/min/1.73 m2) and KTxPTx group (40.0 ± 6.4 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.43). The unadjusted GEE model showed that timing of PTx was not correlated with graft function over time (mean difference -1.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, 95% confidence interval -8.4 to 6.4, p = 0.79). Adjustment for potential confounders including recipient age and sex, various donor characteristics, PTx type, and PTH levels did not materially influence the results. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter cohort study, timing of PTx before or after KTx does not independently impact graft function over time.
Subject(s)
Allografts/physiology , Hyperparathyroidism/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Kidney/physiology , Parathyroidectomy , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism/etiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) after surgery is common. Strategies to detect recurrence have limitations. We investigated the role of clinical criteria and the multigene polymerase chain reaction-based NETest during post-operative follow-up of pNET. METHODS: We studied 3 groups of resections: R0 with no recurrence (n = 11), R0 with recurrence (n = 12), and R1 with no recurrence (n = 12). NETest levels (>40%) were compared with chromogranin A (CgA) and clinicopathological criteria (CC; grade, lymph node metastases, size). Nonparametric, receiver operating characteristics, logistic regression, and predictive feature importance analyses were performed. RESULTS: NETest was higher in R0 with recurrence (56 ± 8%) compared with R1 with no recurrence (39 ± 6%) and R0 with no recurrence (28 ± 6%, P < .005). NETest positively correlated with recurrence (area under the curve: 0.82), CgA was not (area under the curve: 0.51 ± 0.09). Multiple regression analysis defined factor impact as highest for NETest (P < .005) versus CC (P < .03) and CgA (P = .23). NETest gave false positive or negative recurrence in 18% using a 40% cutoff. Logistic regression modeling of CC was 83% accurate; it was 91% when the NETest was included. Combining CC and NETest was approximately 2× more effective than individual CC alone (increase in R 2 value from 43% to 80%). CONCLUSIONS: A multigene blood test facilitates effective identification of pNET recurrence, prediction of disease relapse, and outperforms CgA.
Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Neuroendocrine Tumors/blood , Pancreatic Neoplasms/blood , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Chromogranin A/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is a common abnormality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Since the introduction of cinacalcet in 2004, a shift from surgery toward predominantly medical treatment has occurred. Surgery is thought to be associated with more complications than oral medication. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate 30-day outcomes and effectiveness of parathyroidectomy (PTx) in ESRD patients in the Netherlands. METHODS: A national database containing data from four academic medical centers in the Netherlands of patients with ESRD-related HPT, who had undergone PTx and kidney transplantation between 1994 and 2015, was established. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and complication rate. Secondary endpoints were biochemical measurements. RESULTS: We identified 187 HPT patients undergoing PTx, with a median age of 46 years. Median preoperative PTH level was 866 pg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 407-1547 pg/mL). At 3 months, the median PTH drop from baseline was 93% (IQR, 71-98%) to a median of 61 pg/mL (IQR, 23-148 pg/mL, p < 0.001). Over the 25-year inclusion period, 13 patients (7.0%) required re-exploration for persistent or recurrent disease. Thirty-day mortality and complication rate were 0.0% and 7.9% respectively. Median serum calcium levels improved significantly postoperatively from 2.6 (2.4-2.8) mmol/L to 2.3 (2.1-2.5) mmol/L (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PTx is a safe and effective procedure in the frail ESRD population. These data show that there should be no reluctance for surgical intervention and when indicated, nephrologists can safely refer these patients for PTx.