Inactivation of spinal cord stimulator implanted pulse generators after elective surgery: an under-recognized problem.

STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed a database of implanted pulse generators (IPGs) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implanted by a single surgeon (NDT). We additionally report a series of five illustrative patient cases. OBJECTIVES: The electronics of SCS IPGs are susceptible to damage when implanted patients undergo surgery. Some SCSs have a dedicated surgery mode, while others recommend turning the SCS off to protect it from damage. IPG inactivation may require resetting or replacement surgery. We aimed to explore the prevalence of this real-world problem which has not been studied. SETTING: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. METHODS: Using a single surgeon SCS database, we identified cases of IPG inactivation after a non-SCS surgery and analyzed the management. We then reviewed the charts of five illustrative cases. RESULTS: Among 490 SCS IPG implantations between 2016-2022, 15 (3%) of the 490 patients' IPGs became inactivated after another non-SCS surgery. 12 (80%) required surgical IPG replacement, while 3 (20%) were able to have their IPG function restored non-operatively. In cases analyzed thus far, surgery mode was often not activated prior to surgery. CONCLUSION: SCS IPG inactivation by surgery is not a rare problem and is presumably engendered by monopolar electrocautery. Premature IPG replacement surgery carries risks and reduces the cost-effectiveness of SCS. Awareness of this problem may prompt more preventative measures to be taken by surgeons, patients, and caretakers, and encourage technological advances to render IPGs less vulnerable to surgical tools. Further research is needed to determine what quality improvement measures could prevent electrical damage to IPGs.

Paddle Lead Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Morbidly Obese Patient Population: Outcomes and Complications in a Single-Surgeon Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Paddle lead spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used to treat refractory chronic pain. Morbidly obese patients seek SCS to reduce chronic pain. However, these patients face worse surgical outcomes, and the SCS literature has not evaluated safety and efficacy in this patient population. This study is the largest single-surgeon case series to date on morbidly obese patients with paddle lead SCS implantations. The primary objective is to report postoperative complication rates in morbidly obese patients receiving SCS implants. The secondary objective is to report patient-reported pain scores and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and physical function scores in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted. The patient charts were reviewed from the day of procedure consent to 6 months postop. Demographic information, pain scores, PROMIS scores, neurological complications, infections, and wound complications were documented. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included. The mean preoperative BMI was 44.47 ± 4.02 kg/m2. The mean age was 58.9 ± 11.4 years old. There were no neurological complications. 3/67 (4%) developed culture-positive infections. Nine out of sixty-seven (13%) patients developed superficial wound dehiscence without underlying infection. The mean postop PROMIS physical function score was 31.6 ± 6.2 (n = 16) and the mean post-op PROMIS pain interference score was 64.0 ± 6.4 (n = 16). There was a reduction in pain scores, from 7.9 ± 1.7 preop to 5.7 ± 2.5 postop (n = 22, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Paddle lead SCS implantation is safe for morbidly obese patients. The only minimal-risk complications present were postoperative infections and wound dehiscence. Surgical care can be modified to further reduce the rates of infection and dehiscence.

Glioblastoma in pregnant patient with pathologic and exogenous sex hormone exposure and family history of high-grade glioma: A case report and review of the literature.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) incidence is higher in males, suggesting sex hormones may influence GBM tumorigenesis. Patients with GBM and altered sex hormone states could offer insight into a relationship between the two. Most GBMs arise sporadically and heritable genetic influence on GBM development is poorly understood, but reports describing familial GBM suggest genetic predispositions exist. However, no existing reports examine GBM development in context of both supraphysiologic sex hormone states and familial predisposition for GBM. We present a case of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild type GBM in a young pregnant female with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), history of in vitro fertilization (IVF), and significant family history of GBM and further discuss how unique sex hormone states and genetics may affect GBM development or progression. Case Description: A 35-year-old pregnant female with PCOS and recent history of IVF treatment and frozen embryo transfer presented with seizure and headache. Imaging revealed a right frontal brain mass. Molecular and histopathological analysis of the resected tumor supported a diagnosis of IDH-wild type GBM. The patient's family medical history was significant for GBM. Current literature indicates testosterone promotes GBM cell proliferation, while estrogen and progesterone effects vary with receptor subtype and hormone concentration, respectively. Conclusion: Sex hormones and genetics likely exert influence on GBM development and progression that may compound with concurrence. Here, we describe a unique case of GBM in a young pregnant patient with a family history of glioma and atypical sex hormone exposure due to endocrine disorder and pregnancy assisted by exogenous IVF hormone administration.