Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Radiol ; 47(10): 1369-1380, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28852767

ABSTRACT

At the occasion of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) annual meeting 2015 in Graz, Austria, the newly termed ESPR abdominal (gastrointestinal and genitourinary) imaging task force set out to complete the suggestions for paediatric urogenital imaging and procedural recommendations. Some of the last missing topics were addressed and proposals on imaging of children with anorectal and cloacal malformations and suspected ovarian torsion were issued after intense discussions and a consensus finding process that considered all evidence. Additionally, the terminology was adapted to fit new developments introducing the term pelvicalyceal dilatation/distension (PCD) instead of the sometimes misunderstood hydronephrosis. The present state of paediatric urogenital radiology was discussed in a dedicated minisymposium, including an attempt to adapt terminology to create a standardised glossary.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/abnormalities , Cloaca/abnormalities , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Ovary/abnormalities , Pediatrics/standards , Rectum/abnormalities , Terminology as Topic , Torsion Abnormality/diagnostic imaging , Urogenital System/diagnostic imaging , Urology/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male
2.
Pediatr Radiol ; 44(11): 1478-84, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25331025

ABSTRACT

Our purpose is to harmonise and standardise terminology in paediatric uroradiology, to provide and update recommendations for contrast-enhanced US to standardise imaging and encourage further research, and to assess the impact of the existing recommendations in paediatric urogenital imaging. Based on thorough review of literature and variable practice at several centres and after discussion within urogenital imaging groups as well as with other subspecialties, we propose a standardisation of terminology in urogenital imaging. An update with recommendations on paediatric contrast-enhanced US has been issued based on available literature and reports. Finally, a questionnaire has been used to assess the knowledge, applicability and usefulness of, and the adherence to existing recommendations of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) Uroradiology Task Force. In conclusion, the ESPR is working to improve patient safety and optimise paediatric urogenital imaging. Standardisation of terminology and provision of updated knowledge on contrast-enhanced US in childhood will contribute to this task, ideally reducing the need for invasive or radiating imaging. Not all existing recommendations are commonly known, which limits adherence to these recommendations and the availability of comparable data and evidence for future adaptation of imaging strategies in paediatric uroradiology.


Subject(s)
Pediatrics/standards , Radiology/standards , Terminology as Topic , Ultrasonography/standards , Urogenital System/diagnostic imaging , Urology/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Contrast Media , Europe , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL