Beware of thermal epiglottis! A case report describing 'teapot syndrome'.

BACKGROUND: The type of scalding injury known as 'teapot syndrome', where hot liquid is grabbed by the child with the aim of ingestion and falls over a child causing burns on the face, upper thorax and arms, is known to cause peri-oral and facial oedema. Thermal epiglottitis following scalds to face, neck and thorax is rare and can occur even in absence of ingestion of a damaging agent or intraoral burns, Awareness of the possibility of thermal epiglottitis, also in scald burns, is imperative to ensure prompt airway protection. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a child with thermal epiglottitis after a scalding burn from boiling milk resulting in mixed deep burns of the face, neck and chest, but no history of ingestion. Upon presentation there was a progressive stridor and signs of respiratory distress requiring intubation. Laryngoscopy revealed epiglottis oedema, confirming the diagnosis of thermal epiglottitis. Final extubation took place 5 days after initial burn. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal epiglottitis following scalds to face, neck and thorax is rare and can occur even in absence of ingestion and intra-oral damage. Burns to the peri-oral area should raise suspicion of additional damage to oral cavity and supraglottic structures, even in absence of intra-oral injury or initial respiratory distress. Awareness of the occurrence of thermal epiglottitis in absence of intra-oral injury is important to diagnose impending upper airway obstruction requiring intubation.

Epidemiology and costs of patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis: a 27-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the importance of reporting the results and principles of management in Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) patients was underscored. Treatment of TEN focuses on supportive care, often provided in a burn centre setting. Mortality in TEN patients can be high; the SCORTEN score is a scoring system that predicts mortality in patients with TEN. The predictive value of the SCORTEN score in our setting is unclear, as are the treatment costs of TEN patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient characteristics, treatment, outcome and direct medical costs of patients with TEN treated in one Dutch burn centre in a 27-year period. In addition, determinants of mortality and the predictive value of the SCORTEN score were assessed. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in all patients with TEN (including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and overlap SJS-TEN) admitted to the burn centre Rotterdam between January 1987 and December 2013. The discriminative value of the SCORTEN score was assessed by receiver-operator characteristics curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were admitted in 27-year period. Overall mortality was 39.7%, mortality in TEN patients (>30%TBSA) was 37.1%. A higher age (OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.02-1.07) and comorbidity (OR = 4.25, 95%CI: 1.2-14.7) were associated with mortality. The discriminative value of the SCORTEN prediction model in our population was limited (AUC=0.72, 95%CI: 0.57-0.86). The mean direct medical hospital-based costs was €41.361. CONCLUSION: Toxic epidermal necrolysis is a severe adverse drug reaction, with a high mortality. Elderly patients and patients with comorbidity, especially circulatory comorbidity, have a relatively high risk of decease. The SCORTEN score, a frequently used prediction model in patients with TEN, underestimated the mortality in our study, mainly due to limited availability in patients with a good prognosis. The treatment of patient with TEN is associated with high direct medical hospital-based costs, also compared to burn patients in general.

Photographic assessment of burn size and depth: reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of using photographs of burns to assess both burn size and depth. METHOD: Fifty randomly selected photographs taken on day 0-1 post burn were assessed by seven burn experts and eight referring physicians. Inter-rater reliability in both groups (experts vs. referrers) was calculated. The validity of burn size assessment was calculated using live assessment as the gold standard, and of burn depth using clinical assessment in combination with laser Doppler imaging as the gold standard. The validity of the photographically-assessed indication for surgery was calculated using laser Doppler imaging and actual treatment as the gold standard. Finally, agreement in referral indication was calculated. RESULTS: Using photographs, burn size could be assessed reliably and validly by experts (ICCs of 0.83 and 0.87), but not by referrers (ICCs of 0.68 and 0.78). Photographic assessment of burn depth was neither reliable nor valid, with ICCs respectively of 0.38 and 0.28 for experts and 0.24 and 0.13 for referrers. The indication for surgery could also not be assessed validly. Agreement between assessors regarding referral indication was low. CONCLUSION: Burn size, but not burn depth, can be assessed reliably and validly by experts using photographs of the burn wound. We recommend exploring other forms of telemedicine, like live interactive video, to investigate whether this leads to an improved burn depth assessment where clinical assessment is not possible. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: There were no external sources of funding for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare with regard to the manuscript or its content.

Functional outcome after burns: a review.

We conducted a Medline search (1966-11/2003) on empirical studies into the consequences of burns. The International Classification of Functioning, disabilities and health (ICF) was used to classify dimensions of functional outcome. We included 50 studies, reporting a wide spectrum of ICF-dimensions. The current state of knowledge on the functional outcome after burns was hard to summarise, due to the wide variety in study designs and outcome assessment methods. Some indications on the major functional problems after burns were gained. Problems in mental function were described in subgroups of patients, both in children/adolescents and adults. Restrictions in range of motion were observed in about one-fifth of burn patients, even 5 years after injury. Problems with appearance were reported often (up to 43%), even in patients with minor burns (14%). Problems with work were reported in 21-50% of the adult patients, with permanent incapacity for work in 1-5%. None of the publications gave sufficient information to fully estimate the functional consequences of burns. We recommend the development of a standard core set for measurement and reporting of functional outcome after burns.

Reliability and validity of the Health Outcomes Burn Questionnaire for infants and children in The Netherlands.

The Health Outcomes Burn Questionnaire (HOBQ) is a self-administered questionnaire to monitor outcome after burns in young children. This study aimed to assess feasibility, reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the HOBQ. The HOBQ was adapted into Dutch and tested in a population of children aged 0-4 years with a primary admission to a Dutch burn centre in March 2001-February 2004. Parents of 413 children were sent a questionnaire. To assess validity, a generic outcome instrument was included, the Infant Toddler Quality of Life Questionnaire (ITQOL). The response rate was 50.0% (n=196). Mean self-reported completion time was 16.7 min. The internal consistency of all the HOBQ-scales was good (Cronbach's alpha's>0.69). Test-retest results showed no differences in 7 out of 10 scales. High correlations between HOBQ-scales and conceptually equivalent ITQOL and scales were found in 5 out of 7 comparisons. The majority of the HOBQ-scales (7 out of 10) showed significant differences in the expected direction between children with a long versus short length of stay. Our data support the reliability and validity of the Dutch HOBQ. The HOBQ can be used as a research tool, to monitor functional outcome after burns in young children. Further research in other samples is recommend to fully establish the reliability and validity of the HOBQ.

Reduction in skin grafting after the introduction of hydrofiber dressings in partial thickness burns: a comparison between a hydrofiber and silver sulphadiazine.

AIM/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcome of children with scald burns treated with a hydrofiber dressing (Aquacel(®), Convatec Inc.) with the former standard of care with silver sulfadiazine (Flammazine(®); Solvay Pharmaceuticals), considering surgical intervention and length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A retrospective study of all consecutive children from zero to four years with primary scald burns up to 10% admitted to the Burn Centre of the Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam between January 1987 and January 2010 were reviewed. For data collection a prospective computerized database was used. For comparison the study period was divided into two periods representing the period before and after the introduction of the hydrofiber dressing (HFD), respectively 1987-1999 (period 1) and 1999-2010 (period 2). RESULTS: Over the whole study period 27.3% of 502 patients treated with silver sulfadiazine (Ag-SD) underwent surgery, while before the introduction of HFD 30.5% of 338 Ag-SD treated patients were operated upon. After the introduction of the HFD 20.7% of 164 patients treated with Ag-SD eventually underwent skin grafting, a significant difference with the 11.6% of 302 patients whose wounds were dressed with HFD (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to silver sulfadiazine treatment a reduced number of surgical interventions was observed in mixed partial thickness scald burns up to 10% TBSA burned in children aged 0-4 years after the introduction of hydrofiber dressings. The mode of treatment with this wound dressing also limited hospital length of stay.

Quality of life after burns in childhood (5-15 years): children experience substantial problems.

The aim of our study was to assess prevalence and correlates related to sub optimal outcome after pediatric burns and to make a comparison with pediatric injuries not related to burns. We conducted a cross-sectional study on quality of life (QOL) after burns in a sample (n=138; median 24 months post-burn) of Dutch and Flemish children (5-15 years) with an admission to a burn center. QOL was assessed with the Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ). The generic EuroQol-5D was used to allow for a comparison with children after injuries not related to burns. More than half of the children had long-term limitations. According to the BOQ, children frequently (>50%) experienced sub optimal functioning on 5 out of 12 dimensions, concerning 'appearance', 'parental concern', 'itch', 'emotional health' and 'satisfaction with current state'. Children with a high total burned surface area (TBSA ≥10%) showed significantly more sub optimal functioning on 'upper extremity function' (OR=5.3; ≥20% TBSA), 'appearance' (OR=5.5; ≥10-20% TBSA), 'satisfaction with current state' (OR=3.4; ≥10-20% TBSA) and 'parental concern' (OR=3.4; ≥10-20% TBSA), compared to children with less than 10% TBSA. Burn victims at 9 months post-injury appeared to be worse off at several health dimensions. After 24 months generic quality of life of in pediatric burns was more comparable to pediatric injuries not related to burns. Children after burns experience substantial problems, mainly on itch and appearance and several psychosocial dimensions. More extensive burns are related to sub optimal functioning. These problems are in part specific for burns and not picked up by generic measures.

Mortality and causes of death in a burn centre.

Mortality rates are important outcome parameters after burn, and can serve as objective end points for quality control. Causes of death after severe burn have changed over time; in the international literature, multisystem organ failure is seen as the most important cause, but the exact distribution of causes of death remains unknown. Insight into underlying agents of mortality can be directive in research and prevention programmes. This comparison between results from the Rotterdam Burn Centre (RBC) and the American National Burn Repository (NBR) examines the most important predictive parameters for fatal outcome, i.e. age, total body surface area involved and presence of inhalation injury. Causes of death were attributed for all fatal outcomes treated in the RBC from 1996 to 2006. The mortality rate at the RBC was 6.9% and at the NBR was 5.6%, with almost no differences in age or total body surface area involved. The discrepancy in mortality rate might have been due to the high incidence of inhalation injury among the RBC population. However, the mortality rate at the RBC after admission with intention to treat decreased to 4.9%. The most frequent cause of death appeared to be multisystem organ failure, in 64.9% of cases; 93% of these had systemic inflammatory response syndrome at time of death and, in 45.9%, infection was deemed responsible for the fatal clinical deterioration (in 21.3% sepsis was proved and in 24.6% was highly suspected). To compare mortality rates between different burn centres and periods of time, uniform classifications are needed, particularly for presence of inhalation injury and for causes of death. Prevention of multisystem organ failure, by better management of infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome, might do most to decrease mortality after burn.