Attitudes toward psychedelics and psychedelic-assisted therapy among potential mental health service users and the general population in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: Despite rapid advances in psychedelic sciences and the increasing number of countries legalizing psychedelics for the treatment of mental illnesses, the attitudes, knowledge and readiness of both mental health consumers and the general population remain largely unknown. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Australians, targeting individuals with mental illness as potential mental health service users. A sub-sample of individuals free of mental illness was also surveyed to assess attitudes in the general population. Participants completed the Attitudes on Psychedelics Questionnaire, the Basic Knowledge of Psychedelics Test and a questionnaire by Corrigan et al. to capture attitudes toward psychedelic therapy by mental health service users. RESULTS: Of the 502 respondents, 64.5% self-identified as having a mental illness. A significant proportion favored legalizing psychedelics for medical use (43%) and were open to their use (52.4%), yet fewer viewed their effects positively (24%) or considered them safe (33%). Most participants reported to be psychedelic naive (61%). Participants with mental illness had significantly more experience with psychedelics than participant free of mental illness (44.1% vs 29.7%). Experience, perceived knowledge and actual knowledge significantly predicted attitudes toward legalization, effects, risks and openness to psychedelics. CONCLUSIONS: While a large proportion of Australians are in favor of legalizing psychedelics for medical purposes, concerns about safety remain. People with self-identified mental illness, those with previous recreational psychedelic experience and those with greater knowledge of psychedelics were more likely to have positive attitudes toward psychedelics and psychedelic-assisted therapy.

Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with cognitive trajectory in the first year after stroke.

Introduction: Stroke often leads to cognitive impairment, but its progression and influencing factors over time remain poorly understood. This study evaluates immediate post-stroke cognitive impacts and investigates the influence of concurrent factors on cognitive evolution over the first year. Patients and methods: In the STRATEGIC study, 179 patients with first symptomatic ischemic stroke underwent neuropsychological assessments within three months post-stroke, and 141 were re-evaluated at 12 months. Risk factors tested for associations with cognitive outcome included demographic variables, cardiovascular and other medical factors, and lesion characteristics. Cognitive performance was primarily measured via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with domain-specific assessments for episodic memory (Free and Cued Selective Reminding Task), short-term memory (Digit Span forward), and working memory (Digit Span backward). Results: At the time of stroke, participants ranged in age from 46 to 89 years (M = 70, SD = 9.5) and 36.9% were female. Ischemic heart disease predicted cognitive non-improvement between 3 and 12 months. Atrial fibrillation and carotid stenosis were linked to changes in episodic and working memory, respectively. Moreover, female sex and lower education correlated with stagnant global cognition and episodic memory. Discussion and conclusion: Our findings underscore the important influence of cardiovascular risk factors on cognitive functional recovery after stroke. Interventions targeting these risk factors may improve cognitive prognosis and affect traditional outcome measures such as recurrent vascular events. Future trials should include cognitive measures to fully capture the potential benefits of intensive risk factor intervention.