A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Knotless barbed sutures are monofilament sutures with barbs cut into them. These sutures self-anchor, maintaining tissue approximation without the need for surgical knots. OBJECTIVE: The hypothesis of this study was that knotless barbed suture could be used on the myometrium to close the hysterotomy at cesarean delivery. The objective was to compare uterine closure time, need for additional sutures, and blood loss between this and a conventional suture. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, unblinded, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel. The primary outcome was the length of time needed to close the uterine incision, which was measured from the start of the first suture on the uterus until obtaining uterine hemostasis. To minimize provider bias, women were randomized by sealed envelopes that were opened in the operating room just prior to uterine closure with either a bidirectional knotless barbed suture or conventional suture. Secondary outcomes included the number of additional hemostatic sutures needed and blood loss during incision closure. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled from August 2016 until March 2017. One hundred two women were randomized. Fifty-one had uterine closure with knotless barbed suture and 51 with conventional suture. The groups were similar for demographics as well as number of previous cesarean deliveries. Uterine closure time using the knotless barbed suture was significantly shorter than the conventional suture by a mean of 1 minute 43 seconds (P < .001, 95% confidence interval, 67.69-138.47 seconds). Knotless barbed sutures were associated with a lower need for hemostatic sutures (median 0 vs 1, P < .001), and blood loss measured during incision closure was significantly lower (mean 221 mL vs 268 mL, P < .005). CONCLUSION: The use of a knotless barbed suture is a reasonable alternative to conventional sutures because it reduced the closure time of the uterine incision. There was also less need for additional hemostatic sutures and slightly reduced estimated blood loss.

The History of the Low Transverse Cesarean Section: The Pivotal Role of Munro Kerr.

BACKGROUND: Cesarean section has undergone a transformation that has radically changed the prognosis of both the pregnant woman and her unborn child. The attributed mortality rate of Cesarean section during the 19th century was over 50% worldwide. Today, mortality from Cesarean delivery is rare. However, the technique of transversely incising the uterus in its lower uterine segment, although less than a century old, is passed on from instructor to apprentice, often without either of them being aware of its noble history. In this brief review, we discuss the reported history regarding this incision and the significant role played by John Munro Kerr.

Isolated polyhydramnios in the third trimester: is a gestational diabetes evaluation of value?

We evaluated implications of testing for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnancies complicated by third trimester isolated polyhydramnios with previous negative diabetes screening test. In this retrospective cohort study of 104 pregnant women with polyhydramnios between 2005 and 2013, all had normal first trimester fasting glucose and normal glucose challenge test (GCT < 140 mg/dL). Late onset GDM was diagnosed in five women (4.8%) with isolated polyhydramnios, one abnormal value in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was identified in four additional women (3.8%). No significant differences were found in risk factors for GDM, mean second trimester GCT (117.5 vs. 107.2 mg/dL, p = 0.38) or fasting glucose values (82 vs. 86 mg/dL, p = 0.29) between women in the polyhydramnios group with and without late GDM diagnosis. Moreover, no significant difference was found in relation to the mode of delivery or birth weight between the studied groups (3437 ± 611 vs. 3331 ± 515 g, p = 0.63). Diagnosis of third trimester polyhydramnios was not associated with increased risk for GDM or neonatal complications.

Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Following cesarean delivery, wound dressings are typically left over the incision for 24-48 hours. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if early removal of the wound dressing at 6 hours postsurgery has any effect on wound complications. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, controlled study from August 2013 through January 2015 in which 320 low-risk women aged 18-44 years having scheduled primary, first repeat, or second repeat cesarean delivery were randomized for wound dressing removal at either 6 or 24 hours postsurgery. Skin closure was with staples in all cases. The primary outcome was postoperative wound complications, defined as infection, disruption (skin dehiscence or deeper), or seroma/hematoma. Also examined was patient satisfaction with timing of their ability to wash or shower after wound dressing removal. A sample size of 160 women in each group was needed to show a 100% increase in the wound complication incidence from 12-24%. RESULTS: A total of 320 women were randomized, 160 in the 6-hour group and 160 in the 24-hour group. The proportion of primary and repeat cesarean deliveries was similar. The incidence of wound complications was not significantly different between the groups, 13.8% in the 6-hour group and 12.5% in the 24-hour group (odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-2.14). More women were pleased and satisfied with their ability to wash or shower soon after wound dressing removal in the 6-hour group (75.6%) compared to the 24-hour group (56.9%; odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-3.79). CONCLUSION: Early removal of the wound dressing at 6 hours following cesarean delivery has no detrimental effect on incision healing. Early removal permits the woman to attend to personal hygiene earlier, making her more satisfied with her postoperative recovery.

Use of the Combined First-Trimester Screen in High- and Low-Risk Patient Populations After Introduction of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.

OBJECTIVES: To report changes in the use of the combined first-trimester screen (FTS) in patients classified as high and low risk for fetal aneuploidy, including after introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). METHODS: A prospectively collected database was reviewed to investigate changes in FTS use before and after American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin No. 77 (Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:217-227), which recommended that all patients be offered aneuploidy screening, and after NIPT introduction. High-risk patients were classified as 35 years or older at the estimated time of delivery or those with an abnormal prior screen, abnormal ultrasound findings, or family history of aneuploidy. Data were normalized per 100 morphologic ultrasound examinations to account for changes in patient number over time. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 10,125 FTSs were recorded during the 88-month study period, including 2962 in high-risk patients and 7163 in low-risk patients. The total number of FTSs performed per 100 morphologic ultrasound examinations significantly increased after ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77 and significantly decreased after NIPT introduction. In high-risk patients, the total number of FTSs performed per 100 morphologic ultrasound examinations significantly increased after ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77 but significantly decreased after NIPT introduction. In contrast, in low-risk patients, the total number of FTSs performed per 100 morphologic ultrasound examinations significantly increased after ACOG Practice Bulletin No.77 but was not statistically different after NIPT introduction. CONCLUSIONS: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin No. 77 significantly increased patient use of FTS. The introduction of NIPT significantly decreased FTS use in the high-risk population but not in the low-risk population.

Counseling for fetal macrosomia: an estimated fetal weight of 4,000 g is excessively low.

OBJECTIVE: Because of the known complications of fetal macrosomia, our hospital's policy has been to discuss the risks of shoulder dystocia and cesarean section (CS) in mothers with a sonographic estimated fetal weight (SEFW) ≥ 4,000 g at term. The present study was performed to determine the effect of this policy on CS rates and pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: We examined the pregnancy outcomes of the macrosomic (≥ 4,000 g) neonates in two cohorts of nondiabetic low risk women at term without preexisting indications for cesarean: (1) SEFW ≥ 4,000 g (correctly suspected macrosomia) and (2) SEFW < 4,000 g (unsuspected macrosomia). RESULTS: There were 238 neonates in the correctly suspected group and 205 neonates in the unsuspected macrosomia group, respectively. Vaginal delivery was accomplished in 52.1% of the suspected group and 90.7% of the unsuspected group, respectively, p < 0.001. There was no difference in the rates of shoulder dystocia. The odds ratio for CS was 9.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.3-15.4) when macrosomia was correctly suspected. CONCLUSION: The policy of discussing the risk of macrosomia with SEFW ≥ 4,000 g to women is not justified. A higher SEFW to trigger counseling for shoulder dystocia and CS, more consistent with American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) guidelines, should be considered.

Reconsidering the Current Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes Antibiotic Prophylactic Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine whether the current antibiotic regimen for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is adequate for covering the current causative agents and sensitivities of chorioamnionitis and early-onset neonatal sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: During a 3-year period, we retrieved the results from placental and amniotic membrane cultures obtained at delivery in cases of maternal fever, chorioamnionitis, and PPROM, and from blood cultures obtained from neonates with early-onset sepsis (EOS) in three participating hospitals. Sensitivity of pathogens to antimicrobial agents was performed using routine microbiologic techniques. RESULTS: There were 1,133 positive placental or amniotic cultures, 740 (65.3%) were from gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae. There were 27 neonates diagnosed with EOS with positive blood cultures. Aerobic Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 14 cases (52%) and group B streptococcus for 7 cases (26%). Of the Escherichia coli and Klebsiella sp., only 38% were sensitive to ampicillin. CONCLUSION: Local pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity profiles should be explored every few years and an effective antibiotic protocol chosen to cover the main pathogens causing chorioamnionitis and EOS. Consideration should be made for changing ampicillin in women with PPROM to a regimen with better coverage of gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae.

Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing at a large academic referral center.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a recently developed risk-assessment technique with high sensitivity and specificity for fetal aneuploidy. The effect NIPT has had on traditional screening and diagnostic testing has not been clearly demonstrated. In this study, NIPT uptake and subsequent changes in the utilization of first-trimester screen (FTS), chorionic villus sampling (CVS), and amniocentesis in a single referral center is reported. STUDY DESIGN: Monthly numbers of NIPT (in high-risk patients), FTS, CVS, and amniocentesis were compared between a 35-month baseline period (April 2009 through February 2012) before introduction of NIPT, and the initial 16 months following NIPT introduction divided in 4-month quarters beginning in March 2012 through June 2013. RESULTS: A total of 1265 NIPT, 6637 FTS, 251 CVS, and 1134 amniocentesis were recorded over the 51-month study period in singleton pregnancies of women who desired prenatal screening and diagnostic testing. NIPT became the predominant FTS method by the second quarter following its introduction, increasing by 55.0% over the course of the study period. Total first-trimester risk assessments (NIPT+FTS) were not statistically different following NIPT (P = .312), but average monthly FTS procedures significantly decreased following NIPT introduction, decreasing by 48.7% over the course of the study period. Average monthly CVS and amniocentesis procedures significantly decreased following NIPT introduction, representing a 77.2% and 52.5% decrease in testing, respectively. Screening and testing per 100 morphological ultrasounds followed a similar trend. CONCLUSION: NIPT was quickly adopted by our high-risk patient population, and significantly decreased alternate prenatal screening and diagnostic testing in a short period of time.

Removal of an intraabdominal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device during pregnancy.

A woman with a viable intrauterine 12-week pregnancy and an intraabdominal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device had the device successfully removed under local anesthesia. The pregnancy continued without complication. The decision to remove an intraabdominal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device during pregnancy remains controversial.

Suture type for hysterotomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated an association between uterine closure technique at the time of cesarean delivery and short- and long-term operative outcomes with varied results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine types of suture material used for cesarean delivery. DATA SOURCES: Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception of each database to October 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials that compared types of suture materials used for hysterotomy closure during low-transverse cesarean delivery at ≥24 weeks' gestation and examined maternal outcomes were included for this review. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss. Secondary outcomes included additional surgical complications. METHODS: Results were summarized as mean difference or risk ratio with associated 95% confidence intervals. The quality of studies was evaluated with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions for judging risk of bias. Heterogeneity was measured using I-squared (Higgins I2). RESULTS: This review included 7 randomized controlled trials, of which 3 compared multifilament with barbed suture (136 vs 136 participants), 3 compared multifilament with conventional monofilament suture (245 vs 244 participants), and 1 trial compared multifilament with chromic suture (4590 vs 4595 participants). Primary analysis showed no difference in estimated blood loss between the multifilament and the barbed suture group (mean difference, 46.2 mL; 95% confidence interval, -13.6 to 105.9), nor in change in hemoglobin concentration between the multifilament and the conventional monofilament group (mean difference, -0.1%; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 0.3). Secondary outcomes showed a reduction in operative time with barbed vs multifilament suture (mean difference, 1.9 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-3.8). Analysis also demonstrated an increased uterine scar thickness with use of conventional monofilament vs multifilament suture (mean difference, -1.05 mm; 95% confidence interval, -1.9 to -0.2). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis does not support a specific type of suture material for uterine closure at cesarean delivery because of insufficient data. Although barbed suture was associated with an overall decrease in operative time, and use of conventional monofilament suture was associated with an increase in uterine scar thickness, the clinical utility of these differences is not clear. Further adequate randomized controlled trials are warranted for evaluation of different suture materials for hysterotomy closure.

A novel extended prophylactic antibiotic regimen in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: Prophylactic antibiotic use in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM) is associated with a significant reduction in intra-amniotic infection and improved neonatal outcome. However, data is insufficient to determine the optimal antibiotic regimen. Considering the rise in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia early-onset sepsis rate and the emergence of ampicillin resistance, our aim is to compare the efficiency of two antibiotic regimens in prolonging pregnancy and reducing infectious morbidity. DESIGN: This multicenter randomized unblinded controlled prospective trial compared two antibiotic prophylactic protocols in PPROM: ampicillin + roxithromycin vs. cefuroxime + roxithromycin in 84 women with PPROM, from 12/2015-12/2019. RESULTS: The median latency period was significantly longer (p = 0.039) in the cefuroxime + roxithromycin group (4.63 [0.59-50.18] days) than in the ampicillin + roxithromycin group (2.3 [0.15-58.3] days). Neonatal admission to neonatal intensive care unit rate, hospitalization length, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal fever, and need for respiratory support or mechanical ventilation, were similar between the groups. K. pneumonia cultures were significantly more frequent in the ampicillin + roxithromycin group. None of the cultures were group B Streptococcus positive. CONCLUSIONS: To prolong latency period and reduce gram-negative early-onset sepsis, cefuroxime + roxithromycin is recommended as the first-line protocol in PPROM. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02819570.

Elites in social networks: An axiomatic approach to power balance and Price's square root law.

A common two-tier structure for social networks is based on partitioning society into two parts, referred to as the elite and the periphery, where the "elite" is the relatively small but well-connected and highly influential group of powerful individuals around which the society is centered, and the "periphery" consists of the rest of society. It is observed that the relative sizes of economic and social elites in various societies appear to be continually declining. One possible explanation is that this is a natural social phenomenon, resembling Price's "square root" law for the fraction of good scientists in the scientific community. We try to assess the validity of this explanation by studying the elite-periphery structure via introducing a novel axiom-based model for representing and measuring the influence between the elite and the periphery. The model is accompanied by a set of axioms that capture the elite's dominance, robustness and density, as well as a compactness property. Relying on the model and the accompanying axioms, we are able to draw a number of insightful conclusions about the elite-periphery structure. In particular, we show that in social networks that respect our axioms, the size of a compact elite is sublinear in the network size. This agrees with Price's principle but appears to contradict the common belief that the elite size tends to a linear fraction of society (recently claimed to be around 1%). We propose a natural method to create partitions with nice properties, based on the key observation that an elite-periphery partition is at what we call a 'balance point', where the elite and the periphery maintain a balance of powers. Our method is based on setting the elite to be the k most influential nodes in the network and suggest the balance point as a tool for choosing k and therefore the size of the elite. When using nodes degrees to order the nodes, the resulting k-rich club at the balance point is the elite of a partition we refer to as the balanced edge-based partition. We accompany these findings with an empirical study on 32 real-world social networks, which provides evidence that balanced edge-based partitions which satisfying our axioms commonly exist.

The effect of chart speed on fetal monitor interpretation.

OBJECTIVE: Electronic fetal heart monitor chart speeds vary between countries, and it is unclear whether differing chart speeds affect physician tracing interpretation. METHODS: Twenty-minute segments of 19 tracings were displayed on both 1 and 3 cm/min strips and interpreted by 14 physicians at the particular speed they were accustomed to reading. Interpretations of tracing characteristics were compared between groups using free margin kappa, a measure of interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Compared to 3 cm/min tracings, 1 cm/min tracings were significantly more often identified as having absent than minimal variability, and minimal than moderate variability. Accelerations were significantly more often identified in 1 versus 3 cm/min strips. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to baseline fetal heart rate, prolonged or repetitive decelerations, or American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists tracing category. Neither chart speed had substantial interobserver agreement in tracing variables; however, agreement was consistently higher in 3 versus 1 cm/min tracings (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tracing interpretation is significantly affected by fetal monitor chart speed with regards to variability, acceleration and deceleration. Further studies are required to determine if differences in chart speed interpretation affect clinical management.