Signatures of selection for resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep and goats.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal nematode infection (GNI) is the most important disease affecting the small ruminant industry in U.S. The environmental conditions in the southern United States are ideal for the survival of the most pathogenic gastrointestinal nematode, Haemonchus contortus. Host genetic variation for resistance to H. contortus allows selective breeding for increased resistance of animals. This selection process increases the prevalence of particular alleles in sheep and goats and creates unique genetic patterns in the genome of these species. The aim of this study was to identify loci with divergent allelic frequencies in a candidate gene panel of 100 genes using two different approaches (frequentist and Bayesian) to estimate Fst outliers in three different breeds of sheep and goats exposed to H. contortus. RESULTS: Our results for sheep populations showed SNPs under selection in C3AR1, CSF3, SOCS2, NOS2, STAT5B, TGFB2 and IL2RA genes using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. For goats, SNPs in CD1D, ITGA9, IL12A, IL13RA1, CD86 and TGFB2 genes were under selection. Common signatures of selection in both species were observed in NOS2, TGFB2 and TLR4 genes. Directional selection was present in all SNPs evaluated in the present study. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 13 SNPs within 7 genes of our candidate gene panel related to H. contortus exposure were identified under selection in sheep populations. For goats, 11 SNPs within 7 genes were identified under selection. Results from this study support the hypothesis that resistance to H. contortus is likely to be controlled by many loci. Shared signatures of selection related to mechanisms of immune protection against H. contortus infection in sheep and goats could be useful targets in breeding programs aimed to produce resistant animals with low FEC.

Effects of lespedeza condensed tannins alone or with monensin, soybean oil, and coconut oil on feed intake, growth, digestion, ruminal methane emission, and heat energy by yearling Alpine doelings.

Fifty-four Alpine doelings (initial BW and age of 31.7 ± 0.38 kg and 306 ± 1.9 d, respectively) were allocated to nine treatments individually fed for ad libitum intake of 25% concentrate and 75% forage diets (DM basis). Alfalfa was the forage in the control diet. Other diets contained Sericea lespedeza as the forage, with 1.25% DM of quebracho extract included in the concentrate fraction for a dietary condensed tannin level of 8.4%. Lespedeza treatments were no additive (L) and inclusion of monensin (I) at 22 mg/kg DM (L-I), soybean oil at 3% (L-S), coconut oil at 3% (L-N), I and 3% soybean oil (L-I-S), I and 3% coconut oil (L-I-N), 1.5% soybean oil and 1.5% coconut oil (L-S-N), and I, 1.5% soybean oil, and 1.5% coconut oil (L-I-S-N). The experiment was 12 wk with two 6-wk periods. Gas exchange was determined in weeks 6 and 12, and other measures occurred in weeks 5 and 11. The control diet offered averaged 2.67% nitrogen, 43.8% neutral detergent fiber, and 8.8% acid detergent lignin, and the L diet offered averaged 2.03% nitrogen, 42.8% neutral detergent fiber, and 13.2% acid detergent lignin. There were no treatment × period interactions for digestibilities (P ≥ 0.770) or methane emission (P ≥ 0.324). There were differences (P < 0.001) between the control treatment and diets with lespedeza in intake of DM (1.46, 1.23, 1.30, 1.18, 1.32, 1.10, 1.02, 1.20, and 1.01 kg/d; SEM = 0.059), digestibility of OM (57.4%, 50.9%, 51.8%, 52.7%, 50.3%, 52.1%, 52.1%, 51.9%, and 49.8%; SEM = 1.42), and digestibility of nitrogen (59.1%, 31.2%, 32.5%, 37.1%, 31.6%, 38.3%, 30.4%, 38.4%, and 34.1% for control, L, L-I, L-S, L-N, L-I-S, L-I-N, L-S-N, and L-I-S-N, respectively; SEM = 2.21). Ruminal methane emission was less (P < 0.001) for diets with lespedeza than for the control in MJ/d (1.36, 0.76, 0.84, 0.71, 0.71, 0.66, 0.65, 0.68, and 0.68; SEM = 0.048) and relative to intake of gross energy (5.92%, 3.27%, 3.49%, 3.19%, 2.84%, 2.91%, 3.20%, 3.20%, and 3.27%; SEM = 0.165) and digestible energy (11.19%, 6.98%, 7.40%, 6.38%, 5.90%, 5.69%, 6.37%, 6.38%, and 6.70% for control, L, L-I, L-S, L-N, L-I-S, L-I-N, L-S-N, and L-I-S-N, respectively; SEM = 0.400). In conclusion, the magnitude of effect of condensed tannins from lespedeza and quebracho extract on ruminal methane emission by Alpine doelings did not diminish over time and was not markedly influenced by dietary inclusion of monensin, soybean oil, or coconut oil.