ABSTRACT
Modular hip implants allow intra-operative adjustments for patient-specific customization and targeted replacement of damaged elements without full implant extraction. However, challenges arise from relative micromotions between components, potentially leading to implant failure due to cytotoxic metal debris. In this study magnitude and directions of micromotions at the taper junction were estimated, aiming to understand the effect of variations in head size and neck length. Starting from a reference configuration adhering to the 12/14 taper standard, six additional implant configurations were generated by varying the head size and/or neck length. A musculoskeletal multibody model of a prothesized lower limb was developed to estimate hip contact force and location during a normal walking task. Following the implant assembly, the multibody-derived loads were imposed as boundary conditions in a finite element analysis to compute the taper junction micromotions as the relative slip between the contacting surfaces. Results highlighted the L-size head as the most critical configuration, indicating a 2.81 µm relative slip at the mid-stance phase. The proposed approach enables the investigation of geometric variations in implants under accurate load conditions, providing valuable insights for designing less risky prostheses and informing clinical decision-making processes.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hip Prosthesis , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Mechanical Phenomena , Metals , CorrosionABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) sense and respond to biomechanical and biophysical stimuli, yet the involved signaling pathways are not fully identified. The clinical application of biophysical stimulation including pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has gained momentum in musculoskeletal disorders and bone tissue engineering. METHODOLOGY: We herein aim to explore the role of PEMF stimulation in bone regeneration by developing trabecular bone-like tissues, and then, culturing them under bone-like mechanical stimulation in an automated perfusion bioreactor combined with a custom-made PEMF stimulator. After selecting the optimal cell seeding and culture conditions for inspecting the effects of PEMF on hMSCs, transcriptomic studies were performed on cells cultured under direct perfusion with and without PEMF stimulation. RESULTS: We were able to identify a set of signaling pathways and upstream regulators associated with PEMF stimulation and to distinguish those linked to bone regeneration. Our findings suggest that PEMF induces the immune potential of hMSCs by activating and inhibiting various immune-related pathways, such as macrophage classical activation and MSP-RON signaling in macrophages, respectively, while promoting angiogenesis and osteogenesis, which mimics the dynamic interplay of biological processes during bone healing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the adopted bioreactor-based investigation platform can be used to investigate the impact of PEMF stimulation on bone regeneration.