Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Transplant Proc ; 39(2): 505-8, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17362768

ABSTRACT

There is only limited information about recipient risk factors for graft survival in living- donor kidney transplantation. This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors and their impact on living-related and unrelated renal transplant recipients. From October 2000 until October 2004, 81 adult living-related renal transplantations were performed at our institution. Using multivariate analysis, the association of the following variables with kidney graft outcome was studied: ages of donors and recipients, gender and body mass index, cold and warm ischemia, HLA mismatches, identity and compatibility of blood group, duration of dialysis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, recipient original disease, surgical and general complications, and status of retransplantation. Multivariate analysis revealed significant reduction of graft function and graft survival in recipients with retransplantation, more than 4 mismatches, and a high body mass index. Thus, living-donor kidney transplantation can be regarded as a safe and standardized operation relating to surgical technique, but further consideration of the recipient body mass index and the number of mismatches are recommended during the preparation for transplantation.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Living Donors , Adult , Blood Group Incompatibility/epidemiology , Female , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
2.
Transplant Proc ; 42(10): 4049-52, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21168624

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since previous in vitro studies suspected the metabolite mycophenolate acyl-glucuronide (AcMPAG) to be responsible for the gastrointestinal side effects, we examined the correlation between AcMPAG blood levels and patient gastrointestinal satisfaction inquiries using a standardized, validated questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 63 renal transplant patients, however, two discontinued the study and 16 were excluded because of inadequate completion of the questionnaires or missing blood values or discontinuation of enteric coated mycophenolic acid (EC-MPA) therapy, severe side effects or viral infections. The final responses of 45 people were subjects to statistical analysis. Gastrointestinal side effects were examined using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) completed at three times: T1 (3-5 days after transplantation), T2 (10-15 days), and T3 (3 months). The GSRS results generated two groups of patients based on cutoff values set at a score of 4 points for each item. Scores less than 4 were assumed to be "no side effects"; ≥4, "side effects." AcMPAG was measured by mass spectroscopy on blood samples obtained at fixed times generating three pharmacokinetic profiles per patient. RESULTS: There was no relation between high AcMPAG blood concentrations and gastrointestinal dissatisfaction. Neither Ac-MPAG area under the curve (AUC) in the absorption phase nor AcMPAG peak values correlated with gastrointestinal dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: There was no significant correlation between mean AcMPAG and GSRS scores, although previous studies had suggested AcMPAG maximum values or alternatively AcMPAG AUC in the absorption phase to relate to side effects.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Tract/drug effects , Glucuronides/blood , Immunosuppressive Agents/blood , Kidney Transplantation , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Area Under Curve , Glucuronides/pharmacokinetics , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Mycophenolic Acid/blood , Mycophenolic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16687330

ABSTRACT

Primary and secondary liver tumors may be treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to improve tumor control and to increase patient survival. Lesions are punctured percutaneously or during open surgery. However, not all of the lesions are accessible percutaneously due to their localization: Adjacent structures could be endangered and/or the treatment would cause severe pain. Open surgery is an option in these cases but significantly more invasive. Laparoscopic RFA (LRFA) is an additional possibility in those cases: It offers a better access to difficult lesions than via the percutaneous route and is also less invasive than open surgery. The precision of targeting, however, in LRFA still has to be improved. In an in-vivo feasibility study we used a tumor mimic model in pigs to examine the applicability of laparoscopic RFA in combination with laparoscopic ultrasound using a set of dedicated new instruments to handle the RFA probe. To increase the ablation volume, the liver blood flow was reduced performing a Pringle maneuver. It is demonstrated that this set of specially designed instruments is indeed applicable and facilitates the targeting of liver lesions of any localization. Accordingly, it could significantly enlarge the applicability of LRFA.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/methods , Laparoscopes , Laparoscopy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Animals , Catheter Ablation/instrumentation , Disease Models, Animal , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Female , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL