ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The appropriate timing to administer antithrombotic therapies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the role of antithrombotic therapy administration at first medical contact (FMC) compared with the administration in the Cathlab. METHODS: We conducted a "before-after" observational study enrolling STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Outcomes were evaluated during two successive periods, before (control group: aspirin only at FMC) and after (pretreated intervention group: heparin, aspirin plus ticagrelor at FMC) the introduction of a new regional pretreatment protocol. RESULTS: A total of 537 consecutive patients (300 in control vs. 237 in intervention group) were enrolled. The pretreated compared with no pretreated population showed better basal reperfusion, expressed as basal Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-flow (p for trend p < 0.001). Pretreated population showed lower frequency of TIMI 0 (56.5% vs. 73.7%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.67, p < 0.001) and higher frequency of TIMI 2-3 (33.3% vs. 19.3% OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.38-2.00, p < 0.001) and TIMI 3 (14.3% vs. 9.7%, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: (0.92-2.65), p = 0.094). Pretreated compared with no pretreated population showed reduced infarct size expressed as Troponin Peak (20,286 (8726-75,027) versus 48,676 (17,229-113,900), p = 0.001), and higher left ventricular ejection fraction at discharge (53% (44-59) vs. 50% (44-56), p = 0.027). In-hospital BARC ≥ 2 bleeding were similar (2.1% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.929, in pretreated versus no pretreated population, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study provides support for an early pretreatment strategy in STEMI patients and confirmed the importance of an efficient organization of STEMI networks which allow initiation of antithrombotic treatment at FMC.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Stroke Volume , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel disease (MVD) may be treated with different revascularisation strategies. However, the potential predictors of outcomes on top of different revascularisation strategies are poorly studied. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of two different revascularisation strategies and the potential impact of medical therapy. METHODS: Using a propensity score approach, the impact of two treatment strategies was analysed -staged non-culprit revascularisation group vs culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group -- on a composite outcome of cardiovascular death (CVD), myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularisation. Moreover, models were further adjusted for medication at discharge. RESULTS: Among 1,385 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, a subgroup of 433 with MVD was analysed. At the median follow-up of 41 (IQR, 21-65) months, after propensity-score adjustment, the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that the staged non-culprit revascularisation group was associated with a lower composite endpoint (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82; p=0.01), lower CVD (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.82; p=0.02), and lower all-cause death (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; p=0.02). Use of renin-angiotensin inhibitors was associated with lower CVD (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.95; p=0.03), and both renin-angiotensin inhibitors (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.86; p=0.01) and beta blockers (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.79; p=0.01) were associated with lower all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-word STEMI population with multivessel disease, staged non-culprit revascularisation was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality compared with a culprit-only PCI strategy. However, both revascularisation and medical therapy played a role in the improvement of mortality outcomes. Medical therapy amplified the benefit of myocardial revascularisation.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Humans , Myocardial Revascularization , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The impact of patient delay on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), when system delay has performance that meets the current recommended guidelines, is poorly investigated. METHODS: We evaluated a cohort of STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and with an ECG STEMI diagnosis to wire crossing time (ETW) ≤120 min. Independent predictors of pre-discharge decreased LVEF (≤45%) were analyzed. RESULTS: 490 STEMI patients with both ETW time ≤120 min and available pre-discharge LVEF were evaluated. Mean age was 64.2 ± 12 years, 76.2% were male, 19.5% were diabetics, 42.7% had and anterior myocardial infarction (MI), and 9.8% were in Killip class III-IV. Median time of patient's response to initial symptoms (patient delay) was 58,5 (IQR 30;157) minutes and median ETW time was 78 (IQR 62-95) minutes. 115 patients (23.4%) had pre-discharge LVEF ≤45%. At multivariable analysis independent predictors of decreased LVEF (≤45%) were anterior MI (OR 4,659, 95% CI 2,618-8,289, p < 0,001), Killip class (OR 1,449, 95% CI 1,090-1,928, p = 0,011) and patients delay above the median (OR 2,030, 95% CI 1,151-3.578, p = 0,014). These independent predictors were confirmed in patients with ETW time ≤90 min. CONCLUSIONS: When system delay meets the recommended criteria for pPCI, patient delay becomes an independent predictor of pre-discharge LVEF. These findings provide further insights into the potential optimization of STEMI management and identify a target that needs to be improved, considering that still a significant proportion of patients continue to delay seeking medical care.
Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/standards , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , Time Factors , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/epidemiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/prevention & controlABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the current state of the art of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: The first-line treatment of severe FMR consists of guideline medical therapy (GMT) and resynchronization therapy when indicated; the impact of new medical therapies like sacubitril/valsartan needs further assessment. Valvular intervention may be considered in FMR symptomatic patients despite GMT, and can be performed surgically or percutaneously. MitraClip is a safe percutaneous procedure associated with symptoms improvement. Recently, the COAPT trial showed superior outcomes for MitraClip versus GMT contrasting the MITRA-FR trial which showed no benefit of MitraClip compared with GMT. These results should be interpreted as complementary rather than opposite. The COAPT trial provided a "proof of concept" that percutaneous treatment of severe FMR in patients without too advanced left ventricular disease translates into a prognostic benefit. Careful patient selection will play a critical role in defining the clinical niche for successful interventions.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Female , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) may improve survival with favorable neurological outcome in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Unfortunately, recent results from randomized controlled trials were inconclusive. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of E-CPR on neurological outcome compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR). METHODS: A systematic research for articles assessing outcomes of adult patients with OHCA either treated with E-CPR or C-CPR up to April 27, 2023 was performed. Primary outcome was survival with favorable neurological outcome at discharge or 30 days. Overall survival was also assessed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included. E-CPR was associated with better survival with favorable neurological status at discharge or 30 days (14% vs 7%, OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.61-3.43, I2 = 80%, p < 0.001, NNT = 17) than C-CPR. Results were consistent if the analysis was restricted to RCTs. Overall survival to discharge or 30 days was also positively affected by treatment with E-CPR (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.18-2.46, I2 = 81%, p = 0.004, NNT = 11). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, E-CPR had a positive effect on survival with favorable neurological outcome and, to a smaller extent, on overall mortality in patients with refractory OHCA.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Humans , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/statistics & numerical data , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/complications , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To organize a common approach on the management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke that may be shared by different specialists. BACKGROUND: The management of PFO related to cryptogenic stroke is controversial, despite an increase in interventional closure procedures. METHODS: A consensus statement was developed by approaching Italian national cardiological, neurological, and hematological scientific societies. Task force members were identified by the president and/or the boards of each relevant scientific society or working group, as appropriate. Drafts were outlined by specific task force working groups. To obtain a widespread consensus, these drafts were merged and distributed to the scientific societies for local evaluation and revision by as many experts as possible. The ensuing final draft, merging all the revisions, was reviewed by the task force and finally approved by scientific societies. RESULTS: Definitions of transient ischemic attack and both symptomatic and asymptomatic cryptogenic strokes were specified. A diagnostic workout was identified for patients with candidate event(s) and patient foramen ovale to define the probable pathogenesis of clinical events and to describe individual PFO characteristics. Further recommendations were provided regarding medical and interventional therapy considering individual risk factors of recurrence. Finally, follow-up evaluation was appraised. CONCLUSIONS: Available data provided the basis for a shared approach to management of cryptogenic ischemic cerebral events and PFO among different Italian scientific societies. Wider international initiatives on the topic are awaited.
Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Foramen Ovale, Patent/therapy , Ischemic Attack, Transient/therapy , Neurology/standards , Stroke/therapy , Consensus , Cooperative Behavior , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Foramen Ovale, Patent/complications , Foramen Ovale, Patent/diagnosis , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Ischemic Attack, Transient/diagnosis , Ischemic Attack, Transient/etiology , Italy , Patient Care Team/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/etiology , Terminology as Topic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To organize a common approach on the management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke that may be shared by different specialists. BACKGROUND: The management of PFO related to cryptogenic stroke is controversial, despite an increase in interventional closure procedures. METHODS: A consensus statement was developed by approaching Italian national cardiological, neurological, and hematological scientific societies. Task force members were identified by the president and/or the boards of each relevant scientific society or working group, as appropriate. Drafts were outlined by specific task force working groups. To obtain a widespread consensus, these drafts were merged and distributed to the scientific societies for local evaluation and revision by as many experts as possible. The ensuing final draft, merging all the revisions, was reviewed by the task force and finally approved by scientific societies. RESULTS: Definitions of transient ischemic attack and both symptomatic and asymptomatic cryptogenic strokes were specified. A diagnostic workout was identified for patients with candidate event(s) and patient foramen ovale to define the probable pathogenesis of clinical events and to describe individual PFO characteristics. Further recommendations were provided regarding medical and interventional therapy considering individual risk factors of recurrence. Finally, follow-up evaluation was appraised. CONCLUSIONS: Available data provided the basis for a shared approach to management of cryptogenic ischemic cerebral events and PFO among different Italian scientific societies. Wider international initiatives on the topic are awaited.
Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Foramen Ovale, Patent/therapy , Ischemic Attack, Transient/therapy , Neurology/standards , Stroke/therapy , Consensus , Cooperative Behavior , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Foramen Ovale, Patent/complications , Foramen Ovale, Patent/diagnosis , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Ischemic Attack, Transient/diagnosis , Ischemic Attack, Transient/etiology , Italy , Patient Care Team/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/etiology , Terminology as Topic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is the third leading cause of death in industrialized countries. Although most cardiac arrests are witnessed, survival is only 2-10%, since bystanders are often unable to correctly perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study aims to assess the theoretical and practical knowledge of CPR and the use of the automatic external defibrillator in university students. METHODS: The study involved a total of 1686 students from 21 different faculties of the University of Trieste, 662 students from healthcare faculties and 1024 from non-healthcare faculties. Basic life support and early defibrillation (BLS-D) courses and retrainings after 2 years are mandatory for students in their final 2-year healthcare faculties at the University of Trieste. Through the platform "EUSurvey" from March to June 2021, they were given an online questionnaire of 25 multiple choice questions to investigate the performance of BLS-D. RESULTS: In the overall population, 68.7% knew how to diagnose a cardiac arrest and 47.5% knew the time frame after which irreversible brain damage occurs. Practical knowledge was analyzed by evaluating the correct answers to all four questions on performing CPR (i.e. hand position during compressions, frequency of compressions, depth of compressions, and ventilation-compression ratio). Health faculties students have better theoretical and practical knowledge of CPR than their colleagues of non-healthcare faculties, with better overall knowledge on the all four practical questions (11.2% vs 4.3%; p<0.001). Final-year medical students of the University of Trieste, who attended the BLS-D course and underwent retraining after 2 years, have achieved better results than first year medical students (without BLS-D training) (38.1% vs 2.7%; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Mandatory BLS-D training and retraining leads to a better knowledge of cardiac arrest management and consequently a better patient outcome. In order to improve patient survival, heartsaver (BLS-D for laics) training should be extended as obligatory in all university courses.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Humans , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Defibrillators , Students , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The MIRACLE2 score is the only risk score that does not incorporate and can be used for selection of therapies after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the discrimination performance of the MIRACLE2 score, downtime, and current randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruitment criteria in predicting poor neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: We used the EUCAR (European Cardiac Arrest Registry), a retrospective cohort from 6 centers (May 2012-September 2022). The primary outcome was poor neurologic outcome on hospital discharge (cerebral performance category 3-5). RESULTS: A total of 1,259 patients (total downtime = 25 minutes; IQR: 15-36 minutes) were included in the study. Poor outcome occurred in 41.8% with downtime <30 minutes and in 79.3% for those with downtime >30 minutes. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, MIRACLE2 had a stronger association with outcome (OR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.98-2.51; P < 0.0001) than zero flow (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.13; P = 0.013), low flow (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.99-1.09; P = 0.054), and total downtime (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95-1.03; P = 0.52). MIRACLE2 had substantially superior discrimination for the primary endpoint (AUC: 0.877; 95% CI: 0.854-0.897) than zero flow (AUC: 0.610; 95% CI: 0.577-0.642), low flow (AUC: 0.725; 95% CI: 0.695-0.754), and total downtime (AUC: 0.732; 95% CI: 0.701-0.760). For those modeled for exclusion from study recruitment, the positive predictive value of MIRACLE2 ≥5 for poor outcome was significantly higher (0.92) than the CULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit lesion only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) (0.80), EUROSHOCK (Testing the value of Novel Strategy and Its Cost Efficacy In Order to Improve the Poor Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock) (0.74) and ECLS-SHOCK (Extra-corporeal life support in Cardiogenic shock) criteria (0.81) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MIRACLE2 score has superior prediction of outcome after OHCA than downtime and higher discrimination of poor outcome than the current RCT recruitment criteria. The potential for the MIRACLE2 score to improve the selection of OHCA patients should be evaluated formally in future RCTs.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/diagnosis , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Shock, Cardiogenic , ForecastingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite prognostic improvements in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) have still high mortality. Which are the relevant early prognostic factors despite revascularization in this high-risk population is poorly investigated. METHODS: We analyzed STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and enrolled at the University Hospital of Trieste between 2012 and 2018. A decision tree based on data available at first medical contact (FMC) was built to stratify patients for 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis was used to explore independent factors associated with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 1222 STEMI patients consecutively enrolled, 7.5% presented with CS. CS compared with no-CS patients had worse 30-day mortality (33% vs 3%, Pâ<â0.01). Considering data available at FMC, CS patients with a combination of age ≥76âyears, anterior STEMI and an expected ischemia time > 3âh and 21âmin were at the highest mortality risk, with a 30-day mortality of 85.7%. In CS, age (OR 1.246; 95% CI 1.045-1,141; Pâ=â0.003), final TIMI flow 2-3 (OR 0.058; 95% CI 0.004-0.785; Pâ=â0.032) and Ischemia Time (ORâ=â1.269; 95% CI 1.001-1.609; Pâ=â0.049) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary real-world population presenting with CS due to STEMI, age is a relevant negative factor whereas an early and successful PCI is positively correlated with survival. However, a subgroup of elderly patients had severe prognosis despite revascularization. Whether pPCI may have an impact on survival in a very limited number of irreversibly critically ill patients remains uncertain and the identification of irreversibly shocked patients remains nowadays challenging.
Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Aged , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Prognosis , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The COVID-19 global pandemic has changed considerably the way time-sensitive disorders are treated. Home isolation, people's fear of contracting the virus and hospital reorganisation have led to a significant decrease in contacts between citizens and the healthcare system, with an expected decrease in calls to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) of the Friuli-Venezia Giulia (FVG) region. However, mortality in clinical emergencies like acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), stroke and out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) remained high. An observational retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out in FVG, taking into account the period between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020, the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and comparing it with the same period in 2019. The flow of calls to the EMS was analysed and COVID-19 impact on time-sensitive disorders (STEMIs, ischemic strokes and OHCPAs) was measured in terms of hospitalisation, treatment and mortality. Despite a -8.01% decrease (p value Ë0.001) in emergency response, a 10.89% increase in calls to the EMS was observed. A lower number of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPR) (75.8 vs 45.2%, p=0.000021 in April) and ROSC (39.1 vs 11.6%, p=0.0001 in April) was remarked, and survival rate dropped from 8.5 to 5%. There were less strokes (-27.5%, p value=0.002) despite a more severe onset of symptoms at hospitalisation with NHISSË10 in 38.47% of cases. Acute myocardial infarctions decreased as well (-20%, p value=0.05), but statistical significances were not determined in the variables considered and in mortality. Despite a lower number of emergency responses, the number of calls to the EMS was considerably higher. The number of cardiac arrests treated with advanced CPR (ALS) was lower, but mortality was higher. The number of strokes decreased as well, but at the time of hospitalisation the clinical picture of the patient was more severe, thus affecting the outcome when the patient was discharged. Finally, STEMI patients decreased; however, no critical issues were observed in the variables taken into account, neither in terms of response times nor in terms of treatment times.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of performing immediate coronary angiography (CAG) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with stratification of predicted neurologic injury and cardiogenic shock on arrival to a center. BACKGROUND: The role of immediate CAG for patients with OHCA is unclear, which may in part be explained by the majority of patients dying of hypoxic brain injury. METHODS: Between May 2012 and July 2020, patients from 5 European centers were included in the EUCAR (European Cardiac Arrest Registry). Patients were retrospectively classified into low vs high neurologic risk (MIRACLE2 score 0-3 vs ≥4) and degree of cardiogenic shock on arrival (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions [SCAI] grade A vs B-E). A multivariable logistic regression analysis including immediate CAG was performed for the primary outcome of survival with good neurologic outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Nine hundred twenty-six patients were included in the registry, with 405 (43.7%) in the low-risk group and 521 (56.3%) in the high-risk group. Immediate CAG was independently associated with improved survival with good neurologic outcome in the low MIRACLE2 risk group with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR: 11.80; 95% CI: 2.24-76.74; P = 0.048) and with SCAI grade B to E shock (OR: 3.23; 95% CI: 1.10-9.50; P = 0.031). No subgroups, including those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and with SCAI grade B to E shock, achieved any benefit from early CAG in the high MIRACLE2 group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined classification of patients with OHCA with 12-lead electrocardiography, MIRACLE2 score 0 to 3, and SCAI grade B to E identifies a potential cohort of patients at low risk for neurologic injury who benefit most from immediate CAG.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/diagnostic imaging , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
With the regional law n. 26 of December 30, 2020, the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region wanted to promote the establishment of the Regional Register of Sudden Cardiac Death, with the aim of favoring the study of all those deaths that occurred suddenly and unexpectedly under the age of 50 years in which it is not possible to trace the cause of death with certainty. Such dramatic events, difficult to quantify considering the complexity of data collection, are often accepted with resignation without any further investigation of the possible causes. The Regional Register of Sudden Cardiac Deaths of Friuli Venezia Giulia was born from this premise and from the awareness of the importance of going back with a rigorous scientific methodology and through a multidisciplinary approach, to the diagnosis of hereditary heart diseases which, when determined, allow the enrollment of relatives in a cardiological screening process and, therefore, primary prevention of potentially fatal events. The authors describe the operating procedures feeding the Regional Register and present the results of the first year of activity on 26 cases.
Subject(s)
Death, Sudden, Cardiac , Humans , Middle Aged , Registries , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Italy/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Cardiovascular diseases are still the main cause of death among women despite the improvements in treatment and prognosis achieved in the last 30 years of research. The determinant factors and causes have not been completely identified but the role of "gender" is now recognized. It is well known that women tend to develop cardiovascular disease at an older age than men, and have a high probability of manifesting atypical symptoms not often recognized. Other factors may also co-exist in women, which may favor the onset of specific cardiac diseases such as those with a sex-specific etiology (differential effects of estrogens, pregnancy pathologies, etc.) and those with a different gender expression of specific and prevalent risk factors, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and cancer. Whether the gender differences observed in cardiovascular outcomes are influenced by real biological differences remains a matter of debate.This ANMCO position paper aims at providing the state of the research on this topic, with particular attention to the diagnostic aspects and to care organization.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Estrogens , Female , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
Right ventricular involvement in inferior myocardial infarction (MI) was historically associated with a poor prognosis. However, few studies addressed the impact of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in the primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) era. Our aim was to assess the prognostic significance of RV dysfunction in right coronary artery (RCA) related MI treated with pPCI. METHODS: A total of 298 patients with a RCA related MI undergone pPCI between January 2011 and June 2015 were included. RV dysfunction was defined by a RV-FAC <35% at echocardiographic examination and further divided into mild (RV-FAC between 35 and 25%) and moderate-severe (RV-FACâ¯<25%). RV function before discharge was reassessed in 95% of the study cohort. The primary endpoint was overall mortality. Median follow-up was 29 months. RESULTS: In RCA related MI, moderate-severe (HR 5.882, pâ¯=â¯0.002, 95% CI 1.882-18.385) but not mild RV dysfunction independently predicted lower survival at follow-up along with age (HR 1.104, pâ¯<0.001, CI 1.045-1.167). Importantly, patients recovering RV function at discharge showed a lower mortality (pâ¯=â¯0.001) vs patients with persistent moderate-severe RV dysfunction) that approached the risk of patients without RV dysfunction at presentation. CONCLUSION: In RCA related MI treated with pPCI, RV dysfunction was one of the strongest independent predictor of lower overall survival. However, patients with only transient RV dysfunction showed a better prognosis compared to patients who had persistent RV dysfunction. The focus on intensive support management of the RV in the first hours after pPCI may be important to overcome the acute phase and to promote RV recovery.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/physiopathology , Ventricular Function, Right , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Recovery of Function , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/mortalitySubject(s)
Cardiologists , Heart Arrest , Humans , Heart Arrest/therapy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Tricuspid regurgitation is a frequent valvular heart disease, particularly in the elderly and in association with other left-sided heart diseases. It has an adverse prognostic impact, with progressively increasing mortality as the degree of regurgitation increases. Isolated or combined (with mitral and/or aortic) surgery remains the treatment of choice, provided operative risk is acceptable. Several transcatheter treatment techniques, currently in early clinical or preclinical study phase, could provide alternative treatment options for patients with high surgical risk.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aged , Humans , Prognosis , Severity of Illness Index , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pericardial effusion is frequent in the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, its prognostic role in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not completely understood. METHODS: We investigated the association between pericardial effusion, assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, and survival in a large cohort of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, enrolled in the Trieste primary percutaneous coronary intervention registry from January 2007 to March 2017. Multivariable analysis and a propensity score approach were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1732 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were included. Median follow-up was 45 (interquartile range 19-79) months. Pericardial effusion was present in 246 patients (14.2%). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was similar between patients with and without pericardial effusion (7.8% vs. 5.4%, P=0.15), whereas crude long-term survival was worse in patients with pericardial effusion (26.2% vs. 17.7%, P≤0.01). However, at multivariable analyses the presence of pericardial effusion was not associated with long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.82, P=0.22). Matching based on propensity scores confirmed the lack of association between pericardial effusion and both 30-day (hazard ratio 1, 95% confidence interval 0.42-2.36, P=1) and long-term (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.78, P=0.53) all-cause mortality. Patients with pericardial effusion experienced a higher incidence of free wall rupture (2.8% vs. 0.5%, P<0.0001) independently of the entity of pericardial effusion. CONCLUSIONS: In acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the onset of pericardial effusion after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is not independently associated with short and long-term higher mortality. Free wall rupture has to be considered rare compared to the fibrinolytic era and occurs more frequently in patients with pericardial effusion, suggesting a close monitoring of these patients in the early post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention phase.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and high-grade functional mitral regurgitation (MR) may benefit from percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR). However, patient selection still remains a central issue. We sought to investigate the potential role of the global longitudinal strain- (GLS-) based left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) at dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in this setting. METHODS: Thirty-three stable HF patients (MR grade ≥ 3+; median LVEF, 29%; median GLS, -8.3%) who were candidates for PMVR were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent DSE to assess LVCR (LVEF increase ≥ 5%; GLS increase ≥ 2%; stroke volume [SV] increase ≥ 20% of the measured SV value). RESULTS: After DSE, a positive LVCRLVEF was detected in 21 patients (64%), positive LVCRGLS in 12 patients (36%), and positive LVCRSV in 14 patients (42%). LVCRGLS was associated with better symptom relief, MR improvement, and LV reverse remodeling in a short-term follow-up. A significant improvement of GLS during DSE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.549; 95% CI, 0.395-0.765; P < .001), along with history of HF hospitalization (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.119-1.967; P = .006) and beta-blocker therapy (HR, 0.146; 95% CI, 0.046-0.462; P = .001), were independently associated with risk of death/heart transplantation/HF-related hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: LVCR, assessed by speckle-tracking DSE, is associated with better results after PMVR in the setting of advanced HF. Improvement of longitudinal function emerged, beyond the ejection fraction, as an independent predictor of outcomes and could improve the selection of best candidates for the percutaneous correction of functional MR.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Myocardial Contraction/physiology , Patient Selection , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Aged , Echocardiography, Stress , Female , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , ROC Curve , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pericardial effusion is frequent in the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, its prognostic role in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not completely understood. METHODS: We investigated the association between pericardial effusion, assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, and survival in a large cohort of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, enrolled in the Trieste primary percutaneous coronary intervention registry from January 2007 to March 2017. Multivariable analysis and a propensity score approach were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1732 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were included. Median follow-up was 45 (interquartile range 19-79) months. Pericardial effusion was present in 246 patients (14.2%). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was similar between patients with and without pericardial effusion (7.8% vs. 5.4%, P=0.15), whereas crude long-term survival was worse in patients with pericardial effusion (26.2% vs. 17.7%, P≤0.01). However, at multivariable analyses the presence of pericardial effusion was not associated with long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.82, P=0.22). Matching based on propensity scores confirmed the lack of association between pericardial effusion and both 30-day (hazard ratio 1, 95% confidence interval 0.42-2.36, P=1) and long-term (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.78, P=0.53) all-cause mortality. Patients with pericardial effusion experienced a higher incidence of free wall rupture (2.8% vs. 0.5%, P<0.0001) independently of the entity of pericardial effusion. CONCLUSIONS: In acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the onset of pericardial effusion after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is not independently associated with short and long-term higher mortality. Free wall rupture has to be considered rare compared to the fibrinolytic era and occurs more frequently in patients with pericardial effusion, suggesting a close monitoring of these patients in the early post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention phase.