Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 129(2): 272-282, 2023 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36321193

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study presents the preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) initiated in January 2006 in India to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical breast examination (CBE) in reducing breast cancer mortality as compared to a no-screening control group reported significant downstaging in the intervention group. The present manuscript reports long-term follow-up outcomes. METHODS: Women 30-69 years old from 133 intervention clusters and 141 control clusters were invited to participate. Women in the intervention arm underwent three rounds of CBE every 3 years. CBE-positive women were reexamined by a physician, and triple-assessment was performed on those confirmed to have abnormalities. All participants were followed through home visits and linkage with population-based cancer registry. RESULTS: Of the 55,843 eligible women in the intervention arm, 95.7% had CBE at least once and 11.5% were CBE-positive. Breast cancers were diagnosed in 335 participants in the intervention group and 273 in the control group (N = 59,447). Age-standardized incidence rate of early cancer was 30.4 of 100,000 in the intervention and 21.9 of 100,000 in the control group, with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.8). The age-standardized breast cancer mortality rates were 11.3 and 11.1 per 100,000 in intervention and control arms, respectively (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.5) after 15 years. Five-year breast cancer survival rates were 77.0% in the intervention and 71.2% in the control groups (overall p value = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Triennial CBE screening failed to demonstrate any mortality benefit despite achieving a shift toward earlier stage at detection and improved survival in the intervention arm. CBE is a valuable tool for diagnosis of breast cancer in symptomatic women especially in areas where mammography and/or breast cancer screening programs are not widely available.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammography , Female , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Physical Examination/methods , Mass Screening/methods , India/epidemiology
3.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 22(5): 396-401, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28831279

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine the systematic error (∑), random error (σ) and derive PTV margin at different levels of the target volumes in Nasopharyngeal Cancer (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective offline review was done for patients who underwent IMRT for NPC from June 2015 to May 2016 at our institution. Alternate day kV images were matched with digitally reconstructed radiographs to know the setup errors. All radiographs were matched at three levels - the clivus, third cervical (C3) and sixth cervical (C6) vertebra. The shifts in positions along the vertical, longitudinal and lateral axes were noted and the ∑ and σ at three levels were calculated. PTV margins were derived using van Herk's formula. RESULTS: Twenty patients and 300 pairs of orthogonal portal films were reviewed. The ∑ for the clivus, C3 and C6 along vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were 1.6 vs. 1.8 vs. 2 mm; 1.2 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.4 mm and 0.9 vs. 1.6 and 2.3 mm, respectively. Similarly, the random errors were 1.1 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.8 mm; 1.1 vs. 1.2 vs. 1.2 mm and 1.2 vs. 1.3 vs. 1.6 mm. The PTV margin at the clivus was 4.4 mm along the vertical, 4 mm along the longitudinal direction and 3.2 m in the lateral direction. At the C3 level, it was 5.5 mm in the vertical, 5 mm in the lateral direction and 4.4 mm in the longitudinal direction. At the C6 level, it was 6.4 mm in the vertical, 6.9 mm in the lateral direction and 4.4 mm in the longitudinal direction. CONCLUSION: A differential margin along different levels of target may be necessary to adequately cover the target.

4.
Am J Epidemiol ; 182(5): 381-9, 2015 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26243736

ABSTRACT

Many potentially modifiable risk factors for prostate cancer are also associated with prostate cancer screening, which may induce a bias in epidemiologic studies. We investigated the associations of body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)), smoking, and alcohol consumption with risk of fatal prostate cancer in Asian countries where prostate cancer screening is not widely utilized. Analysis included 18 prospective cohort studies conducted during 1963-2006 across 6 countries in southern and eastern Asia that are part of the Asia Cohort Consortium. Body mass index, smoking, and alcohol intake were determined by questionnaire at baseline, and cause of death was ascertained through death certificates. Analysis included 522,736 men aged 54 years, on average, at baseline. During 4.8 million person-years of follow-up, there were 634 prostate cancer deaths (367 prostate cancer deaths across the 11 cohorts with alcohol data). In Cox proportional hazards analyses of all cohorts in the Asia Cohort Consortium, prostate cancer mortality was not significantly associated with obesity (body mass index >25: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85, 1.36), ever smoking (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.84, 1.21), or heavy alcohol intake (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.35). Differences in prostate cancer screening and detection probably contribute to differences in the association of obesity, smoking, or alcohol intake with prostate cancer risk and mortality between Asian and Western populations and thus require further investigation.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Obesity/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Asia , Body Weight , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Risk Factors
5.
PLoS Med ; 11(4): e1001631, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24756146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is a major risk factor for many diseases. We sought to quantify the burden of tobacco-smoking-related deaths in Asia, in parts of which men's smoking prevalence is among the world's highest. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed pooled analyses of data from 1,049,929 participants in 21 cohorts in Asia to quantify the risks of total and cause-specific mortality associated with tobacco smoking using adjusted hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. We then estimated smoking-related deaths among adults aged ≥45 y in 2004 in Bangladesh, India, mainland China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan-accounting for ∼71% of Asia's total population. An approximately 1.44-fold (95% CI = 1.37-1.51) and 1.48-fold (1.38-1.58) elevated risk of death from any cause was found in male and female ever-smokers, respectively. In 2004, active tobacco smoking accounted for approximately 15.8% (95% CI = 14.3%-17.2%) and 3.3% (2.6%-4.0%) of deaths, respectively, in men and women aged ≥45 y in the seven countries/regions combined, with a total number of estimated deaths of ∼1,575,500 (95% CI = 1,398,000-1,744,700). Among men, approximately 11.4%, 30.5%, and 19.8% of deaths due to cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and respiratory diseases, respectively, were attributable to tobacco smoking. Corresponding proportions for East Asian women were 3.7%, 4.6%, and 1.7%, respectively. The strongest association with tobacco smoking was found for lung cancer: a 3- to 4-fold elevated risk, accounting for 60.5% and 16.7% of lung cancer deaths, respectively, in Asian men and East Asian women aged ≥45 y. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco smoking is associated with a substantially elevated risk of mortality, accounting for approximately 2 million deaths in adults aged ≥45 y throughout Asia in 2004. It is likely that smoking-related deaths in Asia will continue to rise over the next few decades if no effective smoking control programs are implemented. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Neoplasms/mortality , Respiratory Tract Diseases/mortality , Smoking/mortality , Adult , Asia/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cost of Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/etiology , Prevalence , Respiratory Tract Diseases/economics , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Diseases/etiology , Risk , Risk Factors , Smoking/economics , Smoking/epidemiology
6.
N Engl J Med ; 364(8): 719-29, 2011 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21345101

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most studies that have evaluated the association between the body-mass index (BMI) and the risks of death from any cause and from specific causes have been conducted in populations of European origin. METHODS: We performed pooled analyses to evaluate the association between BMI and the risk of death among more than 1.1 million persons recruited in 19 cohorts in Asia. The analyses included approximately 120,700 deaths that occurred during a mean follow-up period of 9.2 years. Cox regression models were used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: In the cohorts of East Asians, including Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans, the lowest risk of death was seen among persons with a BMI (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) in the range of 22.6 to 27.5. The risk was elevated among persons with BMI levels either higher or lower than that range--by a factor of up to 1.5 among those with a BMI of more than 35.0 and by a factor of 2.8 among those with a BMI of 15.0 or less. A similar U-shaped association was seen between BMI and the risks of death from cancer, from cardiovascular diseases, and from other causes. In the cohorts comprising Indians and Bangladeshis, the risks of death from any cause and from causes other than cancer or cardiovascular disease were increased among persons with a BMI of 20.0 or less, as compared with those with a BMI of 22.6 to 25.0, whereas there was no excess risk of either death from any cause or cause-specific death associated with a high BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Underweight was associated with a substantially increased risk of death in all Asian populations. The excess risk of death associated with a high BMI, however, was seen among East Asians but not among Indians and Bangladeshis.


Subject(s)
Asian People , Body Mass Index , Mortality , Obesity/ethnology , Asia/epidemiology , Cause of Death , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Overweight/ethnology , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk
7.
BMC Med ; 12: 3, 2014 Jan 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24400922

ABSTRACT

Asia accounts for 60% of the world population and half the global burden of cancer. The incidence of cancer cases is estimated to increase from 6.1 million in 2008 to 10.6 million in 2030, due to ageing and growing populations, lifestyle and socioeconomic changes. Striking variations in ethnicity, sociocultural practices, human development index, habits and dietary patterns are reflected in the burden and pattern of cancer in different regions. The existing and emerging cancer patterns and burden in different regions of Asia call for political recognition of cancer as an important public health problem and for balanced investments in public and professional awareness. Prevention as well as early detection of cancers leads to both better health outcomes and considerable savings in treatment costs. Cancer health services are still evolving, and require substantial investment to ensure equitable access to cancer care for all sections of the population. In this review, we discuss the changing burden of cancer in Asia, along with appropriate management strategies. Strategies should promote healthy ageing via healthy lifestyles, tobacco and alcohol control measures, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, cancer screening services, and vertical investments in strengthening cancer healthcare infrastructure to improve equitable access to services.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Early Detection of Cancer/trends , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Asia/epidemiology , Disease Management , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis
8.
South Asian J Cancer ; 12(3): 256-262, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38047047

ABSTRACT

Malu RafiObjectives This study was undertaken to evaluate the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with adenoid cystic carcinomas of the head and neck region treated at a tertiary cancer center in south India. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study done on patients treated at the institute between 2004 and 2011. Clinicopathological details and treatment outcomes were captured from the treatment records to estimate the treatment outcomes and factors affecting them. Results There were a total of 140 patients with mean age of presentation of 46 years and a median follow-up of 65 months. The most common single site of presentation was the oral cavity. One-hundred eighteen patients (84.3%) underwent primary surgical resection in which 38% had negative surgical margins. Ninety-nine patients were given adjuvant radiotherapy and 18 patients received radical radiotherapy, mostly for surgically inaccessible and inoperable tumors. Median time to recurrence and distant metastasis was 37 and 34 months, respectively. The overall survival and disease-free survival estimate using the Kaplan-Meier method were 92.3 and 71.9%, respectively, at 5 years. Surgical removal of the primary tumor and the nodal stage had the most significant impact on the overall survival outcomes of these patients. Conclusion Surgery remains the most impactful treatment modality in the management of these rare epithelial tumors. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy may help to tackle the issues of perineural spread and inadequate surgical margins in technically difficult sites. Radical radiotherapy also has impressive response rates.

9.
J Cancer Policy ; 35: 100381, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36599217

ABSTRACT

Screening aims to detect cancer in asymptomatic populations. In oral cancer, clinical oral examination is the current standard method for screening. Oral cancer screening may be performed by a physician or a healthcare workers and is an affordable and feasible method. There is some evidence that this low-cost method is effective in decreasing mortality from oral cancer in high risk population. The cluster-randomised trial in India that had 15 years of follow-up reported an 81 % mortality reduction in high-risk populations of tobacco and/or alcohol users who adhered to four screening rounds. The observational studies similarly reported 21-22 % reduction in advanced oral cancer and 24-26 % reduction in oral cancer mortality among high risk population. Implementation and evaluation of oral cancer screening programmes in high risk population will support the goals of the World Health Organisation on global oral health.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Mouth Neoplasms , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Early Detection of Cancer , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Alcohol Drinking
10.
Mol Clin Oncol ; 18(1): 1, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36545209

ABSTRACT

Chemoradiation is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma with intact cartilage and functional larynx. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with locally advanced (stage III and stage IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx who have been treated with definitive radical radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy in a tertiary cancer center in India between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015. Data were collected using structured proforma. The patients were treated with RT alone, induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by RT, concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) or IC followed by CCRT. Response assessment was conducted at 3-4 months post-treatment. Patient-, tumor- and treatment-related factors were documented and were associated with DFS and OS. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the statistical significance of survival curves was assessed using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. A total of 630 patients were included in the present study. The most common age group at presentation was 50-70 years (n=477; 75.7%) and 95.4% (n=601) patients were male. The most common stage at presentation was stage III (n=367, 58.1%). The median follow-up period for the entire group of was 59 months (range, 2-175 months). A complete response after treatment was seen in 549 patients (87.1%). Salvage surgery was performed for 11 patients with residual disease. A total of 134 patients (21.3%) had developed locoregional and distant relapses, and salvage surgery was performed for 31 out of 102 patients with locoregional relapse. The 5-year OS was 48.7% and the 5-year DFS was 45.7%. The stage-wise OS rates were 58.9, 34.9 and 30.4% (P=0.001) and the stage-wise DFS rates were 56.3, 32.0 and 21.7 (P=0.001) for stage III, IVa and IVb, respectively. Results from the present study demonstrated the feasibility of delivery of chemoradiation protocols with good results in a developing country.

11.
Ecancermedicalscience ; 16: 1479, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36819809

ABSTRACT

Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA quantification in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is an indicator of the tumour burden, stage and survival. Although EBV dynamics in endemic regions has been extensively studied and reported, the data from non-endemic regions is sparse. This study attempts to investigate the EBV dynamics in NPC patients from a non-endemic region and also to identify the factors impacting the outcomes. Materials and methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care centre in South India and enrolled patients with non-metastatic, biopsy proven NPC, who were suitable for radical chemo-radiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy. Two blood samples, one prior to initiation of any anticancer treatment, and second at 6 weeks post treatment, were collected to quantify EBV DNA using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Antibodies against EBV viral capsid antigen (EBV VCA IgM), EBV Early Antigen (EBV EA IgG) and EBV Nuclear Antigen (EBV EBNA IgG) were also measured in the sample. The impact of EBV dynamics on the outcomes was then analysed. Results: The study included a total of 35 patients. Thirty-three had identifiable EBV DNA (94.3%) and a histological diagnosis of non-keratinising undifferentiated type of squamous cell carcinoma. There was no correlation between the EBV DNA and anti-EBV antibodies. There was a significant association between composite stage and pre-treatment DNA titre (p = 0.030). The mean EBV DNA titre was lower for patients with no clinically demonstrable disease at last follow-up and the reduction in EBV DNA titres was significant (p = 0.020) for those patients who remained disease free. Conclusion: Plasma EBV DNA is an accurate and reliable biomarker for NPC for WHO type 2 and 3 tumours even in non-endemic regions.

12.
Indian J Cancer ; 59(4): 584-590, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36861529

ABSTRACT

Background: The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) for oral cancer has incorporated additional pathological features like depth of invasion (DOI) and extranodal extension (ENE) into T and N staging. The incorporation of these two factors will impact the staging and, hence, the treatment decisions. The aim of the study was to clinically validate the new staging system in predicting the outcome in patients treated for carcinoma oral tongue. The study also examined the correlation of pathological risk factors with survival. Methods: We studied 70 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue who underwent primary surgical treatment at a tertiary care center in the year 2012. All these patients were restaged pathologically according to the new AJCC eighth staging system. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Akaike information criterion and concordance index were calculated between both staging systems to identify a better predictive model. Log-rank test and univariate Cox regression analysis were conducted to find out the significance of different pathological factors on outcome. Results: Incorporation of DOI and ENE resulted in 47.2% and 12.8% stage migration, respectively. DOI less than 5 mm was associated with a 5-year OS and DFS of 100% and 92.9%, respectively, compared to 88.7% and 85.1%, respectively, when the DOI was more than 5 mm. Presence of lymph node involvement, ENE, and perineural invasion (PNI) were associated with inferior survival. The eighth edition had lower Akaike information criterion and improved concordance index values compared with the seventh edition. Conclusion: The eighth edition of AJCC allows better risk stratification. Restaging of cases based on the eighth edition AJCC staging manual resulted in significant upstaging with difference in survival.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Tongue Neoplasms , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Tongue Neoplasms/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Tongue , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery
13.
Indian J Med Res ; 133: 479-86, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21623031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Even though Kerala State is well-known for its egalitarian policies in terms of healthcare, redistributive actions and social reforms, and its health indicators close to those of high-resource countries despite a poor per-capita income, it is not clear whether socio-economic disparities in terms of life expectancy are observed. This study was therefore carried out to study the impact of socio-economic level on life expectancy in individuals living in Kerala. METHODS: A cohort of 1,67,331 participants aged 34 years and above in Thiruvananthapuram district, having completed a lifestyle questionnaire at baseline in 1995, was followed up for mortality and cause of death until 2005. Survival estimates were based on the participants' vital status and death rates were calculated separately for men and women and for several socio-economic factors, stratified by age. RESULTS: At 40 years, men and women were expected to live another 34 and 37 years, respectively. Life expectancy varied across the participants' different socio-economic categories: those from high income households with good housing conditions, materially privileged households and small households, had a 2-3 years longer life expectancy as compared to the deprived persons. Also, those who went to college lived longer than the illiterates. The gaps between categories were wider in men than in women. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic disparity in longevity was observed: wealthy people from Kerala State presented a longer life expectancy.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Infant Mortality , Life Expectancy , Models, Theoretical , Public Health Practice , Socioeconomic Factors , Adult , Age Factors , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Male , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
J Clin Oncol ; 39(6): 663-674, 2021 02 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33449824

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated proof of principle for resource-efficient, risk-based screening through reanalysis of the Kerala Oral Cancer Screening Trial. METHODS: The cluster-randomized trial included three triennial rounds of visual inspection (seven clusters, n = 96,516) versus standard of care (six clusters, n = 95,354) and up to 9 years of follow-up. We developed a Cox regression-based risk prediction model for oral cancer incidence. Using this risk prediction model to adjust for the oral cancer risk imbalance between arms, through intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses that accounted for cluster randomization, we calculated the relative (hazard ratios [HRs]) and absolute (rate differences [RDs]) screening efficacy on oral cancer mortality and compared screening efficiency across risk thresholds. RESULTS: Oral cancer mortality was reduced by 27% in the screening versus control arms (HR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98), including a 29% reduction in ever-tobacco and/or ever-alcohol users (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.99). This relative efficacy was similar across oral cancer risk quartiles (P interaction = .59); consequently, the absolute efficacy increased with increasing model-predicted risk-overall trial: RD in the lowest risk quartile (Q1) = 0.5/100,000 versus 13.4/100,000 in the highest quartile (Q4), P trend = .059 and ever-tobacco and/or ever-alcohol users: Q1 RD = 1.0/100,000 versus Q4 = 22.5/100,000; P trend = .026. In a population akin to the Kerala trial, screening of 100% of individuals would provide 27.1% oral cancer mortality reduction at number needed to screen (NNS) = 2,043. Restriction of screening to ever-tobacco and/or ever-alcohol users with no additional risk stratification would substantially enhance efficiency (43.4% screened for 23.3% oral cancer mortality reduction at NNS = 1,029), whereas risk prediction model-based screening of 50% of ever-tobacco and/or ever-alcohol users at highest risk would further enhance efficiency with little loss in program sensitivity (21.7% screened for 19.7% oral cancer mortality reduction at NNS = 610). CONCLUSION: In the Kerala trial, the efficacy of oral cancer screening was greatest in individuals at highest oral cancer risk. These results provide proof of principle that risk-based oral cancer screening could substantially enhance the efficiency of screening programs.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Analysis
15.
Bull World Health Organ ; 87(3): 200-6, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19377716

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate oral cancer screening by visual inspection. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled trial was initiated in Trivandrum district, Kerala, India. Of 13 population clusters, seven were randomly allocated to three rounds of screening between 1996 and 2004, while standard care was provided in six (control arm). An activity-based approach was employed to calculate costs associated with various components of the screening trial. Information on the resources used and on clinical events in each trial arm was derived from trial databases. Total costs for each cluster were estimated in 2004 United States dollars (US$). The incremental cost per life-year saved was calculated for all eligible individuals and for high-risk individuals (i.e. tobacco or alcohol users). FINDINGS: The proportion of oral cancers detected at an early stage (i.e. stage I or II) was higher in the intervention arm than the control arm (42% versus 24%, respectively). The incremental cost per life-year saved was US$ 835 for all individuals eligible for screening and US$ 156 for high-risk individuals. Oral cancer screening by visual inspection was performed for under US$ 6 per person. CONCLUSION: The most cost-effective approach to oral cancer screening by visual inspection is to offer it to the high-risk population. Targeted screening of this group will ensure that screening can be offered at a reasonable cost in a limited-resource setting.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/economics , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Cluster Analysis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality
16.
J Glob Oncol ; 5: 1-10, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31322993

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Lower socioeconomic status is associated with inferior cancer survival in high-income countries, but whether this applies to low- and middle-income countries is not well described. Here, we use a population-based cancer registry to explore the association between educational level and stage of cancer at diagnosis in South India. METHODS: We used the Trivandrum District population-based cancer registry to identify all cases of breast and cervical cancer (women) and oral cavity (OC) and lung cancer (men) who were diagnosed from 2012 to 2014. Educational status-classified as illiterate/primary school, middle school, or secondary school or higher-was the primary exposure of interest. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with advanced stage disease at diagnosis defined as stage III and IV (breast, cervix, or OC) or regional/metastatic (lung). RESULTS: The study population included 4,547 patients with breast (n = 2,283), cervix (n = 481), OC (n = 797), and lung (n = 986) cancer. Educational status was 22%, 19%, and 26% for illiterate/primary, middle, and secondary school or higher, respectively. Educational status was missing for 33% of patients. The proportion of all patients with advanced stage disease was 37% (breast), 39% (cervix), 67% (OC), and 88% (lung). Patients with illiterate/primary school educational status were considerably more likely to have advanced breast cancer (50% v 39% v 36%; P < .001), cervix cancer (46% v 43% v 24%; P = .002), and OC cancer (77% v 76% v 59%; P < .001) compared with patients with higher educational levels. The proportion of patients with advanced lung cancer did not vary across educational levels (89% v 84% v 88%; P = .350). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients in South India have advanced cancer at the time of diagnosis. This is particularly true among those with the lowest levels of education. Future health awareness and preventive interventions must target less-educated communities to reduce delays in seeking medical care for cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Developing Countries , Educational Status , Female , Humans , India , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasm Staging , Registries , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
17.
Oral Oncol ; 44(5): 446-54, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17933578

ABSTRACT

Oral cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world, with two-thirds of the cases occurring in developing countries. While cohort and nested case-control study designs offer various methodological strengths, the role of tobacco and alcohol consumption in the etiology of oral cancer has been assessed mainly in case-control studies. The role of tobacco chewing, smoking and alcohol drinking patterns on the risk of cancer of the oral cavity was evaluated using a nested case-control design on data from a randomized control trial conducted between 1996 and 2004 in Trivandrum, India. Data from 282 incident oral cancer cases and 1410 matched controls were analyzed using multivariate conditional logistic regression models. Tobacco chewing was the strongest risk factor associated with oral cancer. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for chewers were 3.1 (95% confidence interval (CI)=2.1-4.6) for men and 11.0 (95%CI=5.8-20.7) for women. Effects of chewing pan with or without tobacco on oral cancer risk were elevated for both sexes. Bidi smoking increased the risk of oral cancer in men (OR=1.9, 95%CI=1.1-3.2). Dose-response relations were observed for the frequency and duration of chewing and alcohol drinking, as well as in duration of bidi smoking. Given the relatively poor survival rates of oral cancer patients, cessation of tobacco and moderation of alcohol use remain the key elements in oral cancer prevention and control.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Mouth Neoplasms/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco, Smokeless/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Incidence , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Precancerous Conditions/etiology , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology
18.
South Asian J Cancer ; 6(2): 64-68, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28702409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiation with 3 weekly cisplatin (100 mg/m2) is the standard of care for locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, this regimen has been shown to be associated with lesser compliance and higher toxicities. Hence, there is a need to explore alternative concurrent cisplatin regimens. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicities of 3 weekly cisplatin (100 mg/m2) with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) concurrently with radiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase IIb trial randomized 56 patients with Stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx to Arm A or Arm B. Arm A received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 3 weekly and Arm B received cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly concurrently with radiation. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) and secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and acute toxicity. DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test was used to assess the difference in these distributions with respect to treatment. RESULTS: The 2-year DFS in Arm A and Arm B was 64.5% and 52.8%, respectively (P = 0.67). The OS at 2 years was 71% and 61.1% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (P = 0.61). There were no significant differences in acute hematological, renal, or mucosal toxicities between the two arms. CONCLUSION: This study showed a nonsignificant improvement in DFS and OS in the 3 weekly cisplatin arm over the weekly arm with comparable toxicities. The trial is registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI registration number: CTRI/2013/05/003703, URL-http://ctri.nic.in).

19.
Lancet ; 365(9475): 1927-33, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15936419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral cancer is common in men from developing countries, and is increased by tobacco and alcohol use. We aimed to assess the effect of visual screening on oral cancer mortality in a cluster-randomised controlled trial in India. METHODS: Of the 13 clusters chosen for the study, seven were randomised to three rounds of oral visual inspection by trained health workers at 3-year intervals and six to a control group during 1996-2004, in Trivandrum district, Kerala, India. Healthy participants aged 35 years and older were eligible for the study. Screen-positive people were referred for clinical examination by doctors, biopsy, and treatment. Outcome measures were survival, case fatality, and oral cancer mortality. Oral cancer mortality in the study groups was analysed and compared by use of cluster analysis. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Of the 96,517 eligible participants in the intervention group, 87,655 (91%) were screened at least once, 53,312 (55%) twice, and 29,102 (30%) three times. Of the 5145 individuals who screened positive, 3218 (63%) complied with referral. 95,356 eligible participants in the control group received standard care. 205 oral cancer cases and 77 oral cancer deaths were recorded in the intervention group compared with 158 cases and 87 deaths in the control group (mortality rate ratio 0.79 [95% CI 0.51-1.22]). 70 oral cancer deaths took place in users of tobacco or alcohol, or both, in the intervention group, compared with 85 in controls (0.66 [0.45-0.95]). The mortality rate ratio was 0.57 (0.35-0.93) in male tobacco or alcohol users and 0.78 (0.43-1.42) in female users. INTERPRETATION: : Oral visual screening can reduce mortality in high-risk individuals and has the potential of preventing at least 37,000 oral cancer deaths worldwide.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Alcohol Drinking , Areca , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Mastication , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Physical Examination , Risk Factors , Smoking
20.
J Med Screen ; 13 Suppl 1: S35-8, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17227640

ABSTRACT

Incidence of both cervical and oral cancer are high in India. Although there are no organized cervical or oral screening programmes in the country, a number of research projects are ongoing or recently completed. In cervical screening, a number of studies of visual inspection with various aids and studies of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing are in progress. Long-term follow-up of these will inform policy on cervical screening in limited resource countries. A randomized trial of oral visual inspection for cancer or premalignant lesions in 192,053 subjects has been conducted in Kerala, South India. In the trial population as a whole, the study group showed a non-significant 21% reduction in mortality from oral cancer compared with the control group. In users of alcohol, tobacco or both, in which more than 90% of oral cancer deaths occurred, the reduction was a significant 34% (relative risk = 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.95). On the basis of these results, screening for oral abnormalities has the potential to prevent 37,000 deaths per year worldwide.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/methods , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL