Evaluation of Skin-Soft Tissue Envelope Thickness by Ultrasonography after Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Excessive nasal edema is among the complications after rhinoplasty translating into Skin-Soft Tissue Envelope (SSTE) thickening and disruption in the nasal framework's definition. Revision rhinoplasties are suspected of causing even more nasal edema. The objective postoperative SSTE thickness between revisionary and primary rhinoplasties is compared in this study. METHODS: A study was conducted over a recorded database of eligible candidates who had attended the senior author's private clinic in a 12-month period and underwent primary and revisionary open-approach rhinoplasties. The SSTE thickness was measured by ultrasonography in each nasion, rhinion, supratip, and tip region at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after each episode of rhinoplasty. Paired T-test was used for pairwise comparisons of the corresponding region-time thicknesses between primary and revisionary rhinoplasties. Repeated measure ANOVA tests were used to assess mean thickness changes over time after each surgery-P < 0.05 indicated significance. RESULTS: Of the 36 participants analyzed, the SSTE was significantly thicker after revisionary surgery in all the follow-up sessions and nasal regions, except for the 1-month follow-up in the nasion (p = 0.273) and 12-month follow-up in the rhinion (p = 0.050). Mean nasal SSTE thickness showed decreasing trends in each region after either primary or revisionary surgery, with a lower level of resolution in the nasion region after revision rhinoplasty (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The nasal SSTE had been significantly thicker in most regions after revisionary procedures than primary ones, and the swelling had subsided slightly slower. Surgeons are recommended to consider revisionary rhinoplasties based on these findings cautiously. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Short and long-term outcomes of patients with coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major problem in Iran as well as throughout the globe, and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is an appropriate option for many patients with symptomatic and severe CAD. The main purpose of this study was assessment of the short and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing CABG in Yazd Province, Iran. METHODS: This historical cohort study examined the mortality rates of patients who had undergone CABG in Afshar Hospital in Yazd from 2011 to 2013. During this period, 2510 patients undergoing CABG were entered into the study and then followed for in-hospital and long-term mortality. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 61.37 ± 10.50 years and 34.1% were women. In-hospital mortality turned out to be 3.7% and age over 70, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, female gender, and left main (LM) involvement induced significant higher in-hospital mortality. Of all the patients, 84.1% were followed for a period of 41 ± 20 months. The survival rate proved to be 92.4% in one year and 82.9% in five years. The patients with age over 70, diabetes mellitus (DM), and LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) showed significant lower survival rate, whereas the patients with utilization of left internal mammary artery (LIMA) demonstrated significant higher survival rate. CONCLUSION: In-hospital and long-term mortality rate of patients undergoing CABG surgery is acceptable in comparison with other studies and more effort is needed into making this event a success.