Impact of untreated chronic obstructive coronary artery disease on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) recipients, the optimal management of concomitant chronic obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown. Some advocate for pre-TAVR percutaneous coronary intervention, while others manage it expectantly. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of varying degrees and extent of untreated chronic obstructive CAD on TAVR and longer-term outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of TAVR recipients from January 2015 to November 2021, separating patients into stable non-obstructive or varying degrees of obstructive CAD. The major outcomes of interest were procedural all-cause mortality and complications, major adverse cardiovascular events, and post-TAVR unplanned coronary revascularization. RESULTS: Of the 1911 patients meeting inclusion, 75%, 6%, 10%, and 9% had non-obstructive, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and extreme-risk CAD, respectively. Procedural complication rates overall were low (death 0.4%, shock 0.1%, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 0.1%), with no difference across groups. At a median follow-up of 21 months, rates of acute coronary syndrome and unplanned coronary revascularization were 0.7% and 0.5%, respectively, in the non-obstructive population, rising in incidence with increasing severity of CAD (P < .001 for acute coronary syndrome/unplanned coronary revascularization). Multivariable analysis did not yield a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events across groups. One-year acute coronary syndrome and unplanned coronary revascularization rates in time-to-event analyses were significantly greater in the non-obstructive (98%) vs. obstructive (94%) subsets (Plog-rank< .001). CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement can be performed safely in patients with untreated chronic obstructive CAD, without portending higher procedural complication rates and with relatively low rates of unplanned coronary revascularization and acute coronary syndrome at 1 year.

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes with new-onset left bundle branch block after SAPIEN-3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) can develop after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) resulting in worse outcomes. AIMS: Describe clinical and echocardiographic outcomes with new-onset LBBB after TAVR. METHODS: We included consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral-TAVR with SAPIEN-3 (S3) valve between April 2015 and December 2018. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing LBBB, right BBB, left anterior hemiblock, left posterior hemiblock, wide QRS ≥ 120ms, prior permanent pacemaker (PPM), and nontransfemoral access. RESULTS: Among 612 patients, 11.4% developed new-onset LBBB upon discharge. The length of stay was longer with new-onset LBBB compared with no LBBB [3 (2-5) days versus 2 (1-3) days; p < 0.001]. New-onset LBBB was associated with higher rates of 30-day PPM requirement (18.6% vs. 5.4%; p < 0.001) and 1-year heart failure hospitalizations (10.7% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.033). There was no difference in 3-year mortality between both groups (30.9% vs. 30.6%; p = 0.829). Further, new-onset LBBB was associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at both 30 days (55.9 ± 11.4% vs. 59.3 ± 9%; p = 0.026) and 1 year (55 ± 12% vs. 60.1 ± 8.9%; p = 0.002). These changes were still present when we stratified patients according to baseline LVEF (≥50% or <50%). New-onset LBBBs were associated with a higher 1-year LV end-diastolic volume index (51.4 ± 18.6 vs. 46.4 ± 15.1 ml/m2 ; p = 0.036), and LV end-systolic volume index (23.2 ± 14.1 vs. 18.9 ± 9.7 ml/m2 ; p = 0.009). Compared with resolved new-onset LBBB, persistent new-onset LBBB was associated with worse LVEF and higher PPM at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: New-onset LBBB after S3 TAVR was associated with higher PPM requirement, worse LVEF, higher LV volumes, and increased heart failure hospitalizations, with no difference in mortality.

Surgical versus medical management of infective endocarditis after TAVR.

We assessed the incidence of aortic valve surgery intervention in the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and compared the characteristics and outcomes of surgical intervention versus medical management alone in this cohort using a nationwide data set. We identified all the hospitalizations in patients undergoing TAVR who developed IE within 1-year (i.e., early IE) of the procedure from 2014 to 2017 using the Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD). The primary outcomes of the study were in-hospital mortality. A total of 906 hospitalizations were identified for IE amongst the TAVR patients from 2014 to 2017 of which 20 (2.21%) underwent aortic valve surgery during the hospitalization. Patients undergoing surgery were younger, more likely to have Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis, cardiogenic shock, and acute kidney injury (AKI) during the hospitalization. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (9.9% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.824; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.26 (0.01-1.58), p = 0.223) and 30-day readmissions. However, the length of stay and hospitalization costs were higher in surgical intervention group. The important predictors of in-hospital mortality in TAVR-related IE patients were dialysis during IE hospitalization, AKI, cardiogenic shock, Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis, stroke, and female sex. The utilization of surgical management for IE post-TAVR during the index hospitalization is low, and there is no significant mortality benefit with surgical intervention as compared with the medical management.

One-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN 3 Ultra versus SAPIEN 3.

BACKGROUND: The newest-generation balloon-expandable valve, SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U), is expected to function well with the enhanced sealing skirt compared with SAPIEN 3 (S3). However, current literature on the comparison between these two valves is limited to short-term follow-ups. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the 1-year outcomes and echocardiographic changes of S3U compared with S3. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent transfemoral-transcatheter aortic valve replacement with S3U or S3 (20/23/26 mm) at our institution in 2018-2020. Outcomes were 1-year clinical events and echocardiographic parameters, and were compared between S3U and S3 after adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: The S3U and S3 groups included 297 (25.7%) and 858 (74.3%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical events (death 5.8% vs. 5.5%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.90; death or heart failure hospitalization 10.3% vs. 10.1%, HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.67-1.62). The S3U group had a lower prevalence of mild paravalvular leakage (PVL) (13.7% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.044), with similar moderate PVL (0.7% vs. 1.2%, p > 0.99). No significant differences were observed in aortic valve mean gradient and Doppler velocity index at 1 year. However, the S3U group had a larger increase in mean gradient from implantation to 1 year (median +4.70 vs. +1.63 mmHg, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: S3U and S3 carried similarly favorable clinical event risks. Nonetheless, S3U was associated with less frequent mild PVL but a larger increase in transprosthetic gradient. Further studies are needed to determine the prognostic impact of these hemodynamic differences.

Incidence, treatment, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction following transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR). BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is common in patients who undergo aortic valve replacement. However, little is known about differences in clinical features of post-TAVR or post-SAVR AMI. METHODS: We retrospectively identified post-TAVR or post-SAVR (including isolated and complex SAVR) patients admitted with AMI using the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2012-2017. Incidence, invasive strategy (coronary angiography or revascularization), and in-hospital outcomes were compared between post-TAVR and post-SAVR AMIs. RESULTS: The incidence of 180-day AMI was higher post-TAVR than post-SAVR (1.59% vs. 0.72%; p < 0.001). Post-TAVR AMI patients (n = 1315), compared with post-SAVR AMI patients (n = 1344), were older, had more comorbidities and more frequent non-ST-elevation AMI (NSTEMI: 86.6% vs. 78.0%; p < 0.001). After propensity-score matching, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between post-TAVR and post-SAVR AMIs (14.7% vs. 16.1%; p = 0.531), but the mortality was high in both groups, particularly in ST-elevation AMI (STEMI: 38.8% vs. 29.2%; p = 0.153). Invasive strategy was used less frequently for post-TAVR AMI than post-SAVR AMI (25.6% vs. 38.3%; p < 0.001). Invasive strategy was associated with lower mortality in both post-TAVR (adjusted odds ratio = 0.40; 95% confidence interval = [0.24-0.66]) and post-SAVR groups (0.60 [0.41-0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: AMI, albeit uncommon, was more frequent post-TAVR than post-SAVR. Patients commonly presented with NSTEMI, but the mortality of STEMI was markedly high. Further studies are needed to understand why a substantial percentage of patients do not receive invasive coronary treatment, particularly after TAVR, despite seemingly better outcomes with invasive strategy.

Two-year outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated surgical valves.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) has emerged in recent years as a safe alternative to redo surgery in high-risk patients. Although early results are encouraging, data beyond short-term outcomes are lacking. Herein, we aimed to assess the 2-year outcomes after ViV-TAVI. METHODS: Patients undergoing ViV-TAVI for degenerated surgical valves between 2013 and 2019 at the Cleveland Clinic were reviewed. The coprimary endpoints were all-cause mortality and congestive heart failure (CHF) hospitalizations. We used time-to-event analyses to assess the primary outcomes. Further, we measured the changes in transvalvular gradients and the incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD). RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight patients were studied (mean age = 76 years; 65% males). At 2 years of follow-up, all-cause mortality and CHF hospitalizations occurred in 15 (8%) and 28 (14.9%) patients, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the postprocedural length of stay was a significant predictor for both all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.19) and CHF hospitalization (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.27). However, the internal diameter of the surgical valve was not associated with significant differences in both primary endpoints. For hemodynamic outcomes, nine patients (4.8%) developed SVD. The mean and peak transvalvular pressure gradients remained stable over the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: ViV-TAVI for degenerated surgical valves was associated with favorable 2-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. Further studies are needed to better understand the role of ViV-TAVI as a treatment option in the life management of aortic valve disease.

Cerebral embolic protection and severity of stroke following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The cerebral embolic protection (CEP) device captures embolic debris during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the impact of CEP on stroke severity following TAVR remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether CEP was associated with reduced severity of stroke following TAVR. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2839 consecutive patients (mean age: 79.2 ± 9.5 years, females: 41.5%) who underwent transfemoral TAVR at our institution between 2013 and 2020. We categorized patients into Sentinel CEP users and nonusers. Neuroimaging data were reviewed and the final diagnosis of a cerebrovascular event was adjudicated by a neurologist blinded to the CEP use or nonuse. We compared the incidence and severity (assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) of stroke through 72 h post-TAVR or discharge between the two groups using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) of propensity scores. RESULTS: Of the eligible patients, 1802 (63.5%) received CEP during TAVR and 1037 (36.5%) did not. After adjustment for patient characteristics by stabilized IPTW, the rate of overall stroke was numerically lower in CEP users than in CEP nonusers, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (0.49% vs. 1.18%, p = 0.064). However, CEP users had significantly lower rates of moderate-or-severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 6: 0.11% vs. 0.69%, p = 0.013) and severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 15: 0% vs. 0.29%, p = 0.046). Stroke following CEP use (n = 8), compared with stroke following CEP nonuse (n = 15), tended to carry a lower NIHSS (median [IQR], 4.0 [2.0-7.0] vs. 7.0 [4.5-19.0], p = 0.087). Four (26.7%) out of 15 patients with stroke following CEP nonuse died within 30 days, with no death after stroke following CEP use. CONCLUSIONS: CEP use may be associated with attenuated severity of stroke despite no significant difference in overall stroke incidence compared with CEP nonuse. This finding is considered hypothesis-generating and needs to be confirmed in large prospective studies.

Comparing outcomes of general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience.

BACKGROUND: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) has become more widely used during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to avoid the complications of general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: We included consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral-TAVR at our institution between January 2012 and April 2017. We compared outcomes with GA versus MAC. RESULTS: Of 998 patients, MAC was used in 43.9%. MAC was associated with shorter procedural time (96.9 ± 30.9 vs. 135 ± 64.6 mins; p < .001), fluoroscopy time (20.4 ± 8.9 vs. 29 ± 18.7 mins; p < .001), lower contrast volume (45.5 ± 27 vs. 60.4 ± 43 cc; p < .001), and decreased radiation exposure (12,869 ± 8,099 vs. 20,630 ± 16,276 cGy-cm2 ; p < .001). Patients who underwent MAC had a briefer median (IQR) intensive care unit stay [23.3 (21-24) vs. 23.4 (20.8-26) hrs; p < .001], and hospital stay [2 (2, 3) vs. 3 (2-6) days; p < .001], and were more frequently discharged to home (93.4% vs. 82.9%; p < .001). MAC was associated with lower mortality at 30 days (0.5% vs. 2.9%; log-rank p = .012; adjHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.82; p = .024), but not at 1 year (11.7% vs. 14.6%; log-rank p = .157) or 3 years (36.8% vs. 38.4%; log-rank p = 0.433). There were no differences in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at either 30 days (4.6% vs. 9.3%; log-rank p = .14) or 1 year (21.1% vs. 21.5%; log-rank p = .653). Similar findings were seen among patients who received newer-generation SAPIEN-3 valves. CONCLUSION: Utilizing MAC and omitting intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography during TAVR seems to be more efficient without compromising safety. Better TAVR outcomes can be achieved with newer generation valves without needing GA.

Impact of baseline conduction abnormalities on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN-3.

BACKGROUND: Baseline conduction abnormalities are known risk factors for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to determine the impact of baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB), left bundle branch block (LBBB), left anterior hemiblock (LAHB), first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) on TAVR outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with SAPIEN-3 (S3) were included. We excluded patients with prior PPM, nontransfemoral access or valve-in-valve. RESULTS: Among 886 patients, baseline RBBB was seen in 15.9%, LBBB in 6.3%, LAHB in 6.2%, first-degree AVB in 26.3% and AF in 37.5%. The rate of 30-day PPM was 10.1%. Baseline RBBB (OR 4.005; 95% CI 2.386-6.723; p < .001) and first-degree AVB (OR 1.847; 95% CI 1.133-3.009; p = .014) were independent predictors of 30 day PPM. LAHB also resulted in higher PPM rates but only in unadjusted analysis (21.8% vs. 9.4%; p = .003). Baseline LBBB and AF were associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at both baseline and 1 year after TAVR. However, Δ LVEF over time were noted to be similar with baseline LBBB (1.8% vs. 1.4%; p = .809) and AF (1.1% vs. 1.7%; p = .458). Moreover, baseline AF was also associated with higher stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) at 1 year (4.4% vs. 1.8%; p = .019), 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (19.5% vs. 13.3%; p = .012) and 2 year mortality (23.5% vs. 15.2%; p = .016). None of the other baseline conduction defects affected long-term mortality or MACCE. CONCLUSION: In our S3 TAVR population, baseline RBBB and first-degree AVB predicted higher PPM risk. Prior LBBB and AF were associated with lower LVEF at both baseline and 1 year. Lastly, preexisting AF was associated with higher rates of mortality, stroke/TIA, and MACCE.

The utilization of single versus double Perclose devices for transfemoral aortic valve replacement access site closure: Insights from Cleveland Clinic Aortic Valve Center.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous femoral access is the preferred access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The majority of experienced TAVR centers use two 6F Perclose ProGlide™ devices to close the primary vascular access site, deployed prior to upsizing sheath size with closure completed at the end of the case (the "preclose" approach). A strategy of utilizing a single Perclose device to preclose may have advantages including fewer complications, complexity, and cost, but the safety of this is unknown. This study examines in the safety and efficacy of using a single Perclose versus double Perclose for perclosure of large bore access during TAVR. METHODS: Patients undergoing Transfemoral (TF) TAVR from January 2014 to December 2017 within the Cleveland Clinic Aortic Valve Center were identified. A retrospective review of medical charts was conducted. Vascular complications were defined according to the VARC-2 criteria. RESULTS: A total of 740 patients were included; 487 (65.8%) received a single Perclose device while 253 (34.2%) received double Perclose devices. Baseline characteristics were similar with no differences between the single versus double Perclose groups, respectively. The access sheath size was similar in both groups with (14, 16, and 18 F) being the most common sizes utilized. Of the total 487 patients with single Perclose, 75.6% needed additional closure device (AngioSeal). With double Perclose strategy, additional closure device (AngioSeal) was used in 40.3% patients with 470 (63.5%) patients being successfully perclosed. Vascular complication rates including hematoma, stenosis requiring stenting, pseudoaneurysm, and other major vascular complications were similar between both groups. CONCLUSION: Single 6F ProGlide use for preclosure is a safe strategy for TF TAVR using the S3 valve. Additional closure device was not needed in almost one-quarter of the patients. When necessary, residual bleeding can be controlled with the AngioSeal Device at the end of the procedure. This single device preclose strategy can help to reduce the cost of TAVR procedure without increasing risk.

Angiographic predictors of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with radiation associated coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: To determine procedural predictors of long-term outcomes for patients with radiation associated coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Patients who develop CAD after external beam radiation therapy (XRT) for cancer are at high-risk for adverse events following PCI. It is unknown if specific angiographic features can predict outcomes in this population. METHODS: This is an observational study of 157 patients with malignancy who received XRT prior to PCI. Rates of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or stroke) were compared across patient characteristics over time with the Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier's analyses. RESULTS: During follow-up of 5.4 ± 4.5 years, 91 (58%) patients had MACCE. On Kaplan-Meier's analysis of angiographic characteristics, MACCE was more frequent in patients with at least moderate target vessel calcification (P = 0.023), ostial stenosis (P = 0.049), target vessel diameter ≥ 3.0 mm (P = 0.018), a SYNTAX score ≥ the median of 11 (P = 0.014), or bare metal stenting (BMS)/balloon angioplasty (BA) compared to drug-eluting stenting (DES) (P = 0.006). Cardiac death was more frequent in patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 11 (P = 0.028) or BMS (P = 0.043). After multivariable adjustment for both angiographic and clinical characteristics, independent predictors of MACCE were BMS placement (P = 0.013), chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 3 (P = 0.019), New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class ≥3 (P = 0.034), and SYNTAX score ≥ 11 (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In patients previously exposed to XRT treated with PCI, independent angiographic predictors of MACCE include SYNTAX score ≥ 11 and BMS placement, suggestive that DES should be preferred in this population.

Acute myocardial infarction.

Acute myocardial infarction has traditionally been divided into ST elevation or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; however, therapies are similar between the two, and the overall management of acute myocardial infarction can be reviewed for simplicity. Acute myocardial infarction remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, despite substantial improvements in prognosis over the past decade. The progress is a result of several major trends, including improvements in risk stratification, more widespread use of an invasive strategy, implementation of care delivery systems prioritising immediate revascularisation through percutaneous coronary intervention (or fibrinolysis), advances in antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and greater use of secondary prevention strategies such as statins. This seminar discusses the important topics of the pathophysiology, epidemiological trends, and modern management of acute myocardial infarction, focusing on the recent advances in reperfusion strategies and pharmacological treatment approaches.

Influence of smoking on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel differs according to clopidogrel dose: Insights from the GRAVITAS trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of smoking on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Certain studies suggest smokers may have enhanced clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition compared to non-smokers after PCI. Whether this is affected by clopidogrel dose is unknown. METHODS: In this study, we conducted an analysis of 5,429 patients in the Gauging Responsiveness With A VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial. Platelet reactivity was assessed 12-24 hr after PCI (baseline). Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (OTR) (P2Y12 reaction units [PRU] ≥ 230) were randomized to clopidogrel 75 mg or 150 mg daily. Reactivity was subsequently assessed at 30-days, and 6-months. Patients were stratified by smoking status. RESULTS: Smoking was independently associated with lower PRU (P = 0.001), and smokers were less likely to have high OTR (odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.94; P = 0.006) at baseline. Among patients assigned to clopidogrel 75 mg, smokers had lower PRU and were less likely to still have high OTR at 30-days (P < 0.001) and 6-months (P < 0.001). However, in patients assigned clopidogrel 150 mg, PRU and high OTR did not differ by smoking status at any time. Tests demonstrated an interaction between smoking and dose at 30 days (P = 0.007), and a trend at 6-months (P = 0.098). CONCLUSIONS: Smokers treated with clopidogrel exhibit reduced platelet reactivity and are less likely to have persistent high OTR than non-smokers. This difference is mitigated by clopidogrel 150 mg, indicating non-smokers may require double-dose therapy to achieve a similar antiplatelet effect after PCI. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Troponin Elevation After Colorectal Surgery: Significance and Management.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify the association between early postoperative troponin elevations and outcomes after major colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction is the leading cause of death after noncardiac surgery. Most postoperative myocardial infarctions are clinically silent, and asymptomatic troponin elevations have the same early mortality as symptomatic infarctions. METHODS: Patients over the age of 45, undergoing major colorectal surgery from March 2015 to January 2016, were identified. Plasma troponin T concentrations were prospectively collected within 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Characteristics, evaluations, management, and outcomes of patients with elevated troponin concentrations were analyzed. Mortality within the follow-up period was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 1020 patients were screened with postoperative troponin concentrations. Fifty patients had troponin concentrations >0.01 ng/mL. Patients rarely (16%) had ischemic symptoms. Cardiology was consulted for 23 patients and started on medical therapy. Seventeen of these patients were alive at follow-up. Ten patients (20%) with troponin concentrations >0.01 ng/mL died within the follow-up period, 7 of which had concentrations ≥0.03 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Most postoperative myocardial injury is asymptomatic and may only be detected by routine troponin screening. Elevated troponin concentrations after colorectal surgery may facilitate identifying patients at postoperative risk and prompt appropriate testing. Early intervention in select patients may lead to potential reduction of mortality after major colorectal surgery.

Time to Wound Healing and Major Adverse Limb Events in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia Treated with Endovascular Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies that quantify the impact of time to wound healing on outcomes after endovascular revascularization of critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 179 patients with CLI and tissue loss were assessed for adverse events after endovascular therapy. Associations between time to wound healing and outcomes were determined via Cox proportional hazards analysis. The long-term probability of events was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The primary end point was major adverse limb events (MALE-major amputation, surgical endarterectomy, or bypass). Secondary end points were major amputation, need for repeat endovascular therapy, and mortality. RESULTS: After multivariable adjustment for time-dependent wound healing, age, renal function, diabetes, and Rutherford class, independent predictors of MALE included the presence of an unhealed wound (hazard ratio [HR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3-11.8; P < 0.0001) and creatinine ≥ 2.0 (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3; P = 0.003). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probability of MALE was greater in patients with unhealed wounds compared with healed wounds (log-rank P < 0.0001). Patients whose wounds healed within 4 months had a lower probability of MALE than patients who did not heal by 4 months (log-rank, P = 0.04). Unhealed wounds were also independently associated with major amputation (HR, 9.0; 95% CI, 2.6-31.1; P = 0.0004), and patients whose wounds healed by 3 months had less major amputation (log-rank, P = 0.04). Unhealed wounds were independently associated with increased risk of mortality (HR, 42.7; 95% CI, 5.7-319.0; P = 0.002) but not repeat revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Unhealed wounds are an independent risk factor for MALE, major amputation, and mortality after endovascular treatment of CLI. Wound healing within 3 months is associated with less risk of major amputation, and within 4 months less risk of MALE. A focus should be on achieving wound healing as fast as possible in this population.