Validation of the standardization framework SSTR-RADS 1.0 for neuroendocrine tumors using the novel SSTR­targeting peptide [18F]SiTATE.

OBJECTIVES: Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SSTR-PET/CT) using [68Ga]-labeled tracers is a widely used imaging modality for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Recently, [18F]SiTATE, a SiFAlin tagged [Tyr3]-octreotate (TATE) PET tracer, has shown great potential due to favorable clinical characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of Somatostatin Receptor-Reporting and Data System 1.0 (SSTR-RADS 1.0) for structured interpretation and treatment planning of NET using [18F]SiTATE. METHODS: Four readers assessed [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT of 95 patients according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria at two different time points. Each reader evaluated up to five target lesions per scan. The overall scan score and the decision on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) were considered. Inter- and intra-reader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The ICC analysis on the inter-reader agreement using SSTR-RADS 1.0 for identical target lesions (ICC ≥ 85%), overall scan score (ICC ≥ 90%), and the decision to recommend PRRT (ICC ≥ 85%) showed excellent agreement. However, significant differences were observed in recommending PRRT among experienced readers (ER) (p = 0.020) and inexperienced readers (IR) (p = 0.004). Compartment-based analysis demonstrated good to excellent inter-reader agreement for most organs (ICC ≥ 74%), except for lymph nodes (ICC ≥ 53%). CONCLUSION: SSTR-RADS 1.0 represents a highly reproducible and consistent framework system for stratifying SSTR-targeted PET/CT scans, even using the novel SSTR-ligand [18F]SiTATE. Some inter-reader variability was observed regarding the evaluation of uptake intensity prior to PRRT as well as compartment scoring of lymph nodes, indicating that those categories require special attention during further clinical validation and might be refined in a future SSTR-RADS version 1.1. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a consistent framework for categorizing somatostatin receptor-targeted PET/CT scans when using [18F]SiTATE. The framework serves as a valuable tool for facilitating and improving the management of patients with NET. KEY POINTS: SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a valuable tool for managing patients with NET. SSTR-RADS 1.0 categorizes patients with showing strong agreement across diverse reader expertise. As an alternative to [68Ga]-labeled PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor imaging, SSTR-RADS 1.0 reliably classifies [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for response assessment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing tyrosine kinase or checkpoint inhibitor therapy: preliminary results.

INTRODUCTION: Tyrosine kinase (TKI) and checkpoint inhibitors (CI) prolonged overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Early prediction of treatment response is highly desirable for the individualization of patient management and improvement of therapeutic outcome; however, serum biochemistry is unable to predict therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, we compared 18F-PSMA-1007 PET imaging for response assessment in mRCC patients undergoing TKI or CI therapy compared to CT-based response assessment as the current imaging reference standard. METHODS: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was performed in mRCC patients prior to initiation of systemic treatment and 8 weeks after therapy initiation. Treatment response was evaluated separately on 18F-PSMA-PET and CT. Changes on PSMA-PET (SUVmean) were assessed on a per patient basis using a modified PERCIST scoring system. Complete response (CRPET) was defined as absence of any uptake in all target lesions on posttreatment PET. Partial response (PRPET) was defined as decrease in summed SUVmean of > 30%. The appearance of new, PET-positive lesions or an increase in summed SUVmean of > 30% was defined as progressive disease (PDPET). A change in summed SUVmean of ± 30% defined stable disease (SDPET). RECIST 1.1 criteria were used for response assessment on CT. Results of radiographic response assessment on PSMA-PET and CT were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 11 mRCC patients undergoing systemic treatment were included. At baseline PSMA-PET1, all mRCC patients showed at least one PSMA-avid lesion. On follow-up PET2, 3 patients showed CRPET, 3 PRPET, 4 SDPET, and 1 PDPET. According to RECIST 1.1, 1 patient showed PRCT, 9 SDCT, and 1 PDCT. Overall, concordant classifications were found in only 2 cases (2 SDCT + PET). Patients with CRPET on PET were classified as 3 SDCT on CT using RECIST 1.1. By contrast, the patient classified as PRCT on CT showed PSMA uptake without major changes during therapy (SDPET). However, among 9 patients with SDCT on CT, 3 were classified as CRPET, 3 as PRPET, 1 as PDPET, and only 2 as SDPET on PSMA-PET. CONCLUSION: On PSMA-PET, heterogeneous courses were observed during systemic treatment in mRCC patients with highly diverging results compared to RECIST 1.1. In the light of missing biomarkers for early response assessment, PSMA-PET might allow more precise response assessment to systemic treatment, especially in patients classified as SD on CT.

Secondary technical resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiotherapy in the randomized SIRFLOX trial.

BACKGROUND: Secondary resection of initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) can prolong survival. The added value of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) to downsize lesions for resection is not known. This study evaluated the change in technical resectability of CRLM with the addition of SIRT to FOLFOX-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up hepatic imaging of patients who received modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX6: fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (control arm) versus mFOLFOX6 (with or without bevacizumab) plus SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIRT arm) in the phase III SIRFLOX trial were reviewed by three or five (of 14) expert hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons for resectability. Reviewers were blinded to one another, treatment assignment, extrahepatic disease status, and information on clinical and scanning time points. Technical resectability was defined as at least 60 per cent of reviewers (3 of 5, or 2 of 3) assessing a patient's liver metastases as surgically removable. RESULTS: Some 472 patients were evaluable (SIRT, 244; control, 228). There was no significant baseline difference in the proportion of technically resectable liver metastases between SIRT (29, 11·9 per cent) and control (25, 11·0 per cent) arms (P = 0·775). At follow-up, significantly more patients in both arms were deemed technically resectable compared with baseline: 159 of 472 (33·7 per cent) versus 54 of 472 (11·4 per cent) respectively (P = 0·001). More patients were resectable in the SIRT than in the control arm: 93 of 244 (38·1 per cent) versus 66 of 228 (28·9 per cent) respectively (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Adding SIRT to chemotherapy may improve the resectability of unresectable CRLM.

ANTECEDENTES: La resección secundaria de metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal (colorectal cancer liver metastases, CRLM) inicialmente irresecables puede prolongar la supervivencia. Se desconoce el valor añadido de la radioterapia interna selectiva (selective internal radiation therapy, SIRT). Este estudio evaluó el cambio en la resecabilidad técnica de las CRLM secundario a la adición de SIRT a una quimioterapia tipo FOLFOX. MÉTODOS: Las pruebas de radioimagen basales y durante el seguimiento de pacientes tratados con un régimen FOLFOX modificado (mFOLFOX6: fluorouracilo, leucovorina, oxaliplatino) ± bevacizumab (grupo control) versus mFOLFOX6 (± bevacizumab) más SIRT usando microesferas de resina de yttrium-90, en el ensayo de fase III SIRFLOX, fueron revisadas por 3-5 (de 14) cirujanos expertos hepatobiliares para determinar la resecabilidad. Los expertos efectuaron la revisión de forma ciega unos respecto a otros en relación con la asignación al tratamiento, estado de la enfermedad extra-hepática y situación clínica en el momento del estudio radiológico. La resecabilidad técnica se definió como ≥ 60% de revisores evaluando las metástasis del paciente como quirúrgicamente resecables. RESULTADOS: Fueron evaluables un total de 472 pacientes (control, n = 228; SIRT, n = 244). No hubo diferencias significativas basales en la proporción de metástasis hepáticas técnicamente resecables entre SIRT (29/244; 11,9%) y el grupo control (25/228; 11,0%: P = 0,775). Durante el seguimiento y en ambos brazos de tratamiento, un número significativamente mayor de pacientes se consideraron técnicamente resecables en comparación con la situación basal (54/472 (11,4%) basal y 159/472 (33,7%) al seguimiento). Hubo más pacientes resecables en el grupo SIRT que en el control (93/244 (38,1%) y 66/228 (28,9%); P < 0,001, respectivamente). CONCLUSIÓN: La adición de SIRT a la quimioterapia puede mejorar la resecabilidad de las CRLM irresecables.

Prospective evaluation of CT-guided HDR brachytherapy as a local ablative treatment for renal masses: a single-arm pilot trial.

PURPOSE: In this pilot trial, we investigate the safety of CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as a local ablative treatment for renal masses not eligible for resection or nephrectomy. METHODS: We investigated renal function after irradiation by HDR-BT in 16 patients (11 male, 5 female, mean age 76 years) with 20 renal lesions (renal cell carcinoma n = 18; renal metastases n = 2). Two patients had previous contralateral nephrectomy and two had ipsilateral partial nephrectomy. Six lesions had a hilar localization with proximity to the renal pelvis and would have not been favorable for thermal ablation. Renal function loss was determined within 1 year after HDR-BT by renal scintigraphy and laboratory parameters. Further investigations included CT and MRI every 3 months to observe procedural safety and local tumor control. Renal function tests were analyzed by Wilcoxon's signed rank test with Bonferroni-Holm correction of p-values. Survival and local tumor control underwent a Kaplan-Meier estimation. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 22.5 months. One patient required permanent hemodialysis 32 months after repeated HDR-BT and contralateral radiofrequency ablation of multifocal renal cell carcinoma. No other patient developed a significant worsening in global renal function and no gastrointestinal or urogenital side effects were observed. Only one patient died of renal tumor progression. Local control rate was 95% including repeated HDR-BT of two recurrences. CONCLUSION: HDR-BT is a feasible and safe technique for the local ablation of renal masses. A phase II study is recruiting to evaluate the efficacy of this novel local ablative treatment in a larger study population.

[Neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach, duodenum and pancreas : Value of (hybrid) radiological diagnostics]. / Neuroendokrine Tumoren von Magen, Duodenum und Pankreas : Stellenwert der (hybriden) radiologischen Diagnostik.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the stomach, duodenum and pancreas are rare tumors with a low incidence but the exact tumor localization and staging diagnostics are of critical importance for further planning of treatment. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Standard primary diagnostic methods include multimodal imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but in 20-50% of the cases the localization of the primary tumor cannot be identified. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Modern hybrid imaging procedures combine radiological procedures and functional imaging, e.g. using somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography CT (PET)/CT imaging. For the exact diagnostics of the primary tumor and distant metastases morphological and functional aspects can be combined for targeted diagnostics. For primary tumor staging a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 88.4% are given in the literature. PERFORMANCE: The application of SSR PET/CT led to a change in patient management in 44% of all cases according to a recently published meta-analysis and therefore had a significant influence on the further procedure. ASSESSMENT: The use of SSR PET/CT can provide critical information for further treatment and can lead to a significant change in treatment management in a relevant proportion of patients. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Radiological imaging diagnostics and in particular hybrid functional imaging procedures using PET/CT will become increasingly more relevant for the diagnostics, treatment and follow-up of NET patients.

[Pulmonary carcinoids and carcinoids of the small intestine]. / Karzinoide der Lunge und im Abdomen.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Pulmonary carcinoids and carcinoids of the small intestine (jejunum and ileum) are often asymptomatic and can affect various parts of the body, which makes diagnosis difficult. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) is commonly used for primary diagnostics. In case of concomitant pulmonary consolidation (e.g., atelectasis or pneumonia), tumor lesions can be obscured. In addition, differentiation between atypical (AC) and typical carcinoids (TC) is not possible using CT. Small tumors of the small intestine are easily overlooked (sensitivity: 50-85%, specificity: 25-97%, based on the literature). Additional functional imaging evaluation using hybrid imaging techniques can be applied, e.g., positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). METHODICAL INNOVATIONS/PERFORMANCE: Depending on the histological characteristics of the tumor, PET/CT scans can be performed with different tracers. Since most carcinoids (e.g., TC) express somatostatin receptors (SSR), 68 gallium-radiolabeled PET tracers (e.g. 68 Ga-DOTA-TOC) are commonly used (sensitivity: 88-93%, specificity: 88-95%, based on the literature). Poorly differentiated carcinoids (e.g., AC) demonstrate lower SSR expression; thus, use of 18F­FDG (sensitivity: 37-72%, based on the literature) is indicated. In principle, these methods enable a noninvasive prognostic differentiation based on SSR expression and 18F­FDG uptake. However, the diagnosis must always be histologically confirmed. ACHIEVEMENTS/PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Hybrid imaging with CE-CT and PET is useful to detect pulmonary carcinoids and carcinoids of the small intestine, respectively, and can be utilized for primary diagnostics and restaging.

[Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma : Importance of diagnostic imaging]. / Phäochromozytom und Paragangliom : Stellenwert der bildgebenden Diagnostik.

CLINICAL BACKGROUND: If pheochromocytoma (PC) or paraganglioma (PGL) is diagnosed based on serologic studies, imaging is required to locate the adrenal mass for further management. Besides pathognomonic hormonal findings, PC/PGL can exhibit typical imaging features. However, PC/PGL can also show morphological overlap with other pathologies. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: The modality of choice for evaluation of PC is CT. In case of extra-adrenal location, MRI is superior to CT. Imaging with PET-CT provides complementary information in the differentiation of PC/PGL and is recommended as the imaging modality of choice for malignant PC/PGL. 68Ga-DOTATATE (or 68Ga-DOTATOC/ 68Ga-DOTANOC) PET-CT has high sensitivity for SDHx-mutated PC/PGL and serves for planning of radioreceptor therapy with somatostatin analogues. In contrast, 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy is important in assessing the potential efficacy of radioreceptor therapy with MIBG. METHODICAL DETAILS: The CT protocol for PC evaluation should include non-enhanced, arterial, portal-venous and late phases; the latter for the evaluation of wash-out. Recent studies indicate non-enhanced CT alone may be sufficient to rule out PC. For MRI, in- and opposed-phase sequences should be additionally acquired. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: A relevant proportion of PC is diagnosed incidentally. Therefore, imaging of PC will gain further importance. Recent studies show better response rates of PC/PGL after radioreceptor therapy with somatostatin analogues (177Lu-DOTATATE) than with MIBG. Therefore, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT gains further importance-for diagnostic imaging and therapy planning.

Radioablation of adrenal gland malignomas with interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy : Efficacy and outcome.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and outcome of image-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with adrenal gland metastases (AGM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2007 to April 2014, 37 patients (7 female, 30 male; mean age 66.8 years, range 41.5-82.5 years) with AGM from different primary tumors were treated with CT-guided HDR interstitial brachytherapy (iBT). Primary endpoint was local tumor control (LTC). Secondary endpoints were time to untreatable progression (TTUP), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. In a secondary analysis, risk factors with an influence on survival were identified. RESULTS: The median biological equivalent dose (BED) was 37.4 Gy. Mean LTC after 12 months was 88%; after 24 months this was 74%. According to CTCAE criteria, one grade 3 adverse event occurred. Median OS after first diagnosis of AGM was 18.3 months. Median OS, TTUP, and TTP after iBT treatment were 11.4, 6.6, and 3.5 months, respectively. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed significant influences of synchronous disease, tumor diameter, and the total number of lesions on OS or TTUP or both. CONCLUSION: Image-guided HDR-iBT is safe and effective. Treatment- and primary tumor-independent features influenced survival of patients with AGM after HDR-iBR treatment.

[Prostate gland - what would urologists like to know from radiologists?] / Die Vorsteherdrüse ­ was möchte der Urologe vom Radiologen wissen?

A more than 100-year period, where the prostate was only seen and treated as a whole is coming to an end right now. Finally, high resolution imaging is providing deep insights and detailed information so that new therapeutic procedures can aim for the smallest targets within the gland. The long-standing wish of patients for individual noninvasive diagnostics and treatment of prostate diseases can now be fulfilled by providing new tailored concepts; however, in order to transfer the enormous amount of new information into the specific clinical patient situation, a closely knit interdisciplinary approach is required. In this setting, the traditional outpatient consultation service is overstretched in every aspect. It is now the time for new innovative constructs. The current one-sided service concept for urologists, radiologists and radiation therapists is therefore behind the times and the development of a "prostate management team" with equally cooperating partners from each specialty is the task for the future.

ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Western countries. Over the last 20 years, and the last decade in particular, the clinical outcome for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has improved greatly due not only to an increase in the number of patients being referred for and undergoing surgical resection of their localised metastatic disease but also to a more strategic approach to the delivery of systemic therapy and an expansion in the use of ablative techniques. This reflects the increase in the number of patients that are being managed within a multidisciplinary team environment and specialist cancer centres, and the emergence over the same time period not only of improved imaging techniques but also prognostic and predictive molecular markers. Treatment decisions for patients with mCRC must be evidence-based. Thus, these ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.

Assessment and monitoring of liver function by ¹³C-aminopyrine breath test after selective transarterial chemoembolisation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Liver function and tumor staging are essential parameters for selection of treatment modalities in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is associated with a risk of deterioration of liver function. In clinical routine hepatic function in patients with liver cirrhosis is assessed by the Child-Pugh-classification. Dynamic breath tests allow the assessment of the hepatic functional mass and have the potential to give more accurate information on hepatic function periinterventionally. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective clinical study was performed in 13 patients receiving a total of 18 TACE sessions. (13)C-aminopyrine breath test was performed the day before TACE, 2 days and 30 days after TACE and correlated with standard laboratory work-up of the patients. RESULTS: Fourteen TACE sessions were performed in Child A liver cirrhosis, 4 in Child B cirrhosis. All patients presented with impaired aminopyrine metabolism at baseline. No significant changes in the (13)C aminopyrine breath test following TACE were observed. Two patients treated in Child A cirrhosis decompensated to Child B, one of them recovered. No further decompensation was observed in patients treated in Child B cirrhosis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Liver function assessment with (13)C-aminopyrine breath test and Child-Pugh-classification following TACE was discordant in a large proportion of patients. Whether a quantification of mitochondrial liver function in patients planned to undergo locoregional treatment of HCC in liver cirrhosis is helpful in the prediction of postprocedural liver decompensation needs to be addressed in larger prospective clinical trials.

[Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract : Value of (hybrid) imaging diagnostics in radiology]. / Bildgebung von neuroendokrinen Tumoren des Gastrointestinaltrakts : Bedeutung der (hybriden) bildgebenden Diagnostik in der Radiologie.

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors that predominantly arise in the gastrointestinal tract. At the time of initial diagnosis, the NET has already spread locoregionally in about half of the patients, and 27% of patients have already developed distant metastases. Since this plays a crucial role in therapy planning, accurate diagnostic imaging is important. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Due to its high temporal and spatial resolution (multiphasic including arterial phase), computed tomography (CT) plays a decisive role in primary staging and follow-up care, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with its excellent soft tissue contrast offers advantages in the assessment of parenchymal organs in the upper abdomen. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography (PET) provides additional functional information that not only helps to detect the primary tumor and distant metastases, but also has a significant influence on therapeutic management in a theranostic approach. PERFORMANCE: Hybrid imaging using SSR-PET/CT has proven to be particularly effective in the detection of NET. Compared to conventional imaging, it provides additional information in 68% of patients, which has a significant impact on clinical management. ACHIEVEMENTS: Imaging of NET requires the combined use of various methods such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, and PET/CT to enable accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: SSR-PET/CT is a valuable tool for the accurate staging of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, especially with small metastases, while MRI with hepatocyte-specific contrast agent and diffusion-weighted imaging is useful for the specific assessment of liver metastases.

Hepatic arterial infusion with oxaliplatin and 5-FU/folinic acid for advanced biliary tract cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Effective and tolerable chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has been established recently. However, overall prognosis is still poor, and additional therapeutic approaches are needed for patients with locally advanced, irresectable and/or pretreated tumors. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy represents a safe and well-established treatment modality, but data on its use in patients with BTC are still sparse. METHODS: Patients with irresectable BTC predominant to the liver were included in a prospective, open phase II study investigating HAI provided through interventionally implanted port catheters. Intraarterial chemotherapy consisted of biweekly oxaliplatin (O) 85 mg/m(2) and folinic acid (F) 170 mg/m(2) with 5-FU (F) 600 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2010, 37 patients were enrolled. A total of 432 cycles of HAI were applied with a median of 9 (range 1-46) cycles. Objective response rate was 16 %, and tumor control was achieved in 24 of 37 (65 %) patients. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range 0.5-26.0; 95 % CI 4.3-8.7), median overall survival was 13.5 (range 0.9-50.7; 95 % CI 11.1-15.9) months. The most frequent adverse event was sensory neuropathy grade 1/2 in 10/14 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using a minimal invasive technique, repetitive HAI with OFF is feasible and results in clinically relevant tumor control with low toxicity in patients with liver predominant advanced BTC.

[Percutaneous interventions in an open MR system: technical background and clinical indications]. / Perkutane Interventionen in einem offenen MR-System: Technischer Hintergrund und klinische Indikationen.

The latest and therefore more efficient open magnetic resonance (MR) scanners with a field strength of 1 T allow freehand fluoroscopic interventions with excellent image quality. Specifically designed interactive software simplifies examination planning and performance. Guidance in two imaging planes allows fast and accurate device positioning and interventional procedures during free breathing. The diagnostic and therapeutic spectrum includes a wide variety of interstitial percutaneous interventions. The most important are periradicular therapy (PRT), intra-abdominal drainage and nephrostoma placement, biopsies, especially in the breasts and liver and focal ablation therapy of malignant hepatic or renal lesions. As the approach is fast and robotic devices are not needed the method is increasingly being carried out in the clinical routine. A drawback of MR-guided interventions is the limitation in verbal communication during image acquisition. Furthermore, the portfolio of MR compatible instruments needs to be extended.

[Interventional radiological procedures in the therapy for colorectal liver metastases]. / Radiologisch-interventionelle Verfahren zur Therapie von kolorektalen Lebermetastasen.

Microtherapeutic procedures performed by interventional radiologists pose a viable alternative or additive to systemic chemotherapy for local tumour control in cases of non-operable (for technical, functional, and comorbidity reasons or at the patient's wish) liver metastases. A main focus includes local therapies such as radiofrequency ablation and interstitial brachytherapy which are performed under ultrasound, CT or MRI guidance to achieve a thermal or radiogenic ablation of the malignancy. Although highly effective, these procedures are limited to oligonodular manifestations. For disseminated metastases, locoregional techniques like the yttrium-90 radioembolisation have become established. Here, the active principle in the form of radioactively labelled microspheres is introduced into the liver through an arterial catheter under angiographic guidance. The present article focuses on metastases of colorectal cancer as the most frequent tumour entity encountered in interventional radiotherapy.

[Adequate supportive treatment in therapeutic use of "biologicals" for GI tumours in oncosurgery--what does the surgeon need to know?]. / Adäquate Supportivtherapie im therapeutischen Einsatz von "Biologicals" bei gastrointestinalen(GI) Tumoren in der Onkochirurgie--Was muss der Chirurg wissen?

BACKGROUND: Along with the increasing use and inauguration of novel antineoplastic substances (inhibitors, antibodies [Ab]) at various levels of the tumour cell-specific intracellular signalling (transduction cascade) on the cell surface and within the cell as well as messengers ["biologicals", "targeted therapy"]), a new quality, intensity and complexity of adverse effects was simultaneously developed, which have become more and more relevant even to oncosurgeons. AIM: A summary is given of clinically obtained expertise including recommendations for a competent approach, management and use of biologicals for targeted therapy in case of abnormal or adverse effects as well as toxic reactions, which are compared with available data from the literature and provided as systematic short review on the clinically used substances and drugs in GI tumour lesions. METHODS: The compact overview is based on the authors' daily clinical experiences including a selective and comparative literature search in PubMed (searching strategy using the following terms: "supportive treatment/therapy", "biological[s]"). RESULTS: The discussed profile of biologicals comprises: Herceptin®/Trastuzumab (Her2 neu-AK), Erbitux®/Cetuximab (EGFR-AK), Glivec®/Imatinib, Sutent®/Sunitinib and Nexavar®/Sorafenib (multikinase inhibitors)--reference to haematological and oncological literature for MabThera®/Rituximab and Sprycel®/Dasatinib; Tasigna®/Nilotinib. All of them induce more or less severe, partially single or combined, known (haematological, gastroenterological, neurological and dermatological [according to the WHO classification]) or completely novel (GI perforation in case of Avastin®; apparent predominance of neurological and dermatological) adverse effects, which show (in the majority of cases) substance- and/or drug-specific properties in the spectrum of adverse effects, which can be sufficiently managed. These circumstances increase the requirements for the expertise of today's responsible oncologists/oncosurgeons. DISCUSSION: The management of "biologicals"-associated adverse effects can be considered a novel aspect in the overall concept of oncological care, which shows a partially known as well as novel phenomenology and, thus, requires adapted therapeutic approaches.