Benefits of Blastocyst Transfer With at Least Three Good-Quality Cleavage-stage Embryos in Women of Advanced Maternal Age: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Limited studies on the benefits of blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age (AMA) (≥40 years) have been reported. Our objective was to find whether blastocyst-stage embryo transfer improves pregnancy and live birth rates in women ≥40 years who have 3 or more good-quality cleavage-stage embryos. METHODS: All fresh in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles performed from January 2020 to December 2021 in AMA women that progressed to transfer were considered for analysis. We compared fresh and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates in AMA women of those who had a cleavage-stage transfer, while meeting the criteria for extended culture (≥3 high-quality embryos, group 1), and those who underwent blastocyst transfer (group 2). Demographic parameters, stimulation, embryology, fresh and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates, and clinical miscarriage rates were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 255 cycles were analyzed including group 1 (n = 99) and group 2 (n = 156). Group 1 participants were older and had a greater number of embryos for transfer. Fresh and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer were higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (23.4% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.04; 25.5% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.03), while overall miscarriage rates were higher in group 1 than group 2 (51.7% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Blastocyst culture provides a benefit to AMA women who have at least 3 good-quality embryos on day 3 resulting in significantly higher fresh and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates and lower miscarriage compared to cleavage-stage transfers.

Combining early pregnancy bleeding with ultrasound measurements to assess spontaneous abortion risk among infertile patients.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of all clinically recognized pregnancies in patients with infertility result in spontaneous abortion. However, despite its potential to have a profound and lasting effect on physical and emotional well-being, the natural history of spontaneous abortion in women with infertility has not been described. Although vaginal bleeding is a common symptom in pregnancies conceived via reproductive technologies, its prognostic value is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the combination of early pregnancy bleeding and first-trimester ultrasound measurements to determine spontaneous abortion risk. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with infertility who underwent autologous embryo transfer resulting in singleton intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Early pregnancy symptoms of bleeding occurring before gestational week 8 and measurements of crown-rump length and fetal heart rate from ultrasounds performed during gestational week 6 (6 0/7 to 6 6/7 weeks of gestation) and gestational week 7 (7 0/7 to 7 6/7 weeks of gestation) were recorded. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance was adjusted a priori for patient age, embryo transfer day, and transfer of a preimplantation genetic-tested embryo to estimate the relative risk and 95% confidence interval of spontaneous abortion for dichotomous variables. The relative risks and positive predictive values for early pregnancy bleeding combined with ultrasound measurements on the occurrence of spontaneous abortion were calculated for patients who had an ultrasound performed during gestational week 6 and separately for patients who had an ultrasound performed during gestational week 7. The primary outcome was spontaneous abortion in the setting of vaginal bleeding with normal ultrasound parameters. The secondary outcomes were spontaneous abortion with vaginal bleeding and (1) abnormal crown-rump length, (2) abnormal fetal heart rate, and (3) both abnormal crown-rump length and abnormal fetal heart rate. RESULTS: Of the 1858 patients who were included (359 cases resulted in abortions and 1499 resulted in live births), 315 patients (17.0%) reported vaginal bleeding. When combined with ultrasound measurements from gestational week 6, bleeding was significantly associated with increased spontaneous abortion only when accompanied by absent fetal heart rate (relative risk, 5.36; 95% confidence interval, 3.36-8.55) or both absent fetal heart rate and absent fetal pole (relative risk, 9.67; 95% confidence interval, 7.45-12.56). Similarly, when combined with ultrasound measurements from gestational week 7, bleeding was significantly associated with increased spontaneous abortion only when accompanied by an abnormal assessment of fetal heart rate or crown-rump length (relative risk, 5.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.83-14.19) or both fetal heart rate and crown-rump length (relative risk, 14.82; 95% confidence interval, 10.54-20.83). With normal ultrasound measurements, bleeding was not associated with increased spontaneous abortion risk (relative risk: 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.78] in gestational week 6 and 0.80 [95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.74] in gestational week 7), and the live birth rate was comparable with that in patients with normal ultrasound measurements and no bleeding. CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of infertility who present after embryo transfer with symptoms of vaginal bleeding should be evaluated with a pregnancy ultrasound to accurately assess spontaneous abortion risk. In the setting of normal ultrasound measurements, patients can be reassured that their risk of spontaneous abortion is not increased and that their live birth rate is not decreased.

Age-specific blastocyst conversion rates in embryo cryopreservation cycles.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the blastocyst conversion rate in embryo cryopreservation cycles, per year of female age? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study including patients undergoing their first ovarian stimulation cycle at our center with planned freeze-all strategy January 1st, 2014-June 30th, 2020. Primary outcome was blastocyst conversion rate. Secondary outcomes included mature oocyte and fertilization rates. Patients were stratified by year of age to assess oocyte yield and embryo development outcomes. RESULTS: 3,362 patients were included. The median blastocyst conversion rate in patients ≤30 was 66.7% (interquartile range 50.0-86.6) and remained statistically comparable through age 40 with a significant decline among ages ≥41 (41-years: marginal effect (ME) -5.2% (-9.7 to -0.7); 42-years: ME -9.6% (-14.3 to -4.8); 43-years: ME -7.7% (-12.8 to -2.6); ≥44-years: ME -20.8% (-26.5 to -15.1)). For the entire cohort, the median mature oocyte rate was 81.8% and the median fertilization rate was 81.8%. The mature oocyte and fertilization rates remained statistically comparable for each year of age except age ≥44 which had a statistically significantly increased mature oocyte rate (ME 4.4% (1.3 to 7.5)) and statistically significantly decreased fertilization rate (ME -5.8% (-9.8 to -1.9)) CONCLUSIONS: In embryo cryopreservation cycles, the blastocyst conversion rate remained statistically comparable through age 40 followed by a statistically significant decline for patients ≥41; however, the mature oocyte and fertilization rates were not impacted by increasing age until age ≥44. Even in women ≥44, over 40% of fertilized oocytes developed to blastocyst. Overall, this information is useful when counseling patients during the embryo culture stage regarding predicted blastocyst yield.

Live birth outcomes are not associated with household income and insurance disparities following ART treatment.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is household income or IVF insurance coverage associated with live birth outcomes in infertile women undertaking IVF? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study in an academic hospital, including patients residing in New York State undergoing a frozen single embryo transfer at the study IVF centre between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018. Only the first embryo transfer per patient was included. Patients were stratified by tertiles of estimated income using home zip code census data: <$85,888 (n = 348), $85,888-122,628 (n = 348) and >$122,628 (n = 350). A second analysis stratified patients by IVF insurance coverage or no coverage. The primary outcome was live birth. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance adjusted a priori for age, preimplantation genetic testing and previous fresh embryo transfer estimated the relative risk of outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A total of 1046 patients were included. Live birth rate was similar among all three income tertiles. Secondarily, the pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate were also similar among all three tertiles. In the IVF insurance coverage analysis, live birth rate was similar between patients with and without IVF insurance coverage. Secondarily, the pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate were also similar among these two groups. CONCLUSION: Overall, neither median household income nor IVF insurance coverage of patients undergoing single frozen embryo transfer was associated with pregnancy, pregnancy loss or live birth outcomes. Lower income, relative to the patient cohort, and lack of insurance coverage are well-described barriers to accessing infertility evaluation and treatment. However, once treatment is initiated, the current results suggest that these variables do not influence pregnancy and live birth outcomes in infertile patients.

Advancing paternal age does not negatively impact fresh embryo transfer cycle outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the impact of advancing paternal age, stratifying for maternal age, on fresh embryo transfer cycle outcomes? DESIGN: All first autologous fresh embryo transfer cycles between 2013 and 2019 at a single high-volume academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. Female age was dichotomized along the cohort median of (37 years) (Female-Young [F-Y]: <37 years; Female-Old [F-O]: ≥37 years). Male age was stratified along the cohort median (38 years) and 90th centile (48 years) (Male-Young [M-Y]: <38 years; Male-Intermediate [M-I]: ≤38 and >48 years; Male-Old [M-O]: ≥48 years). The primary outcome of interest was the odds of live birth using logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included odds of implantation, clinical intrauterine pregnancy and pregnancy loss. All models were adjusted for continuous female age, use of surgically retrieved testicular spermatozoa, severe oligozoospermia and cleavage- versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. RESULTS: A total of 6704 couples were included and were divided into six groups based on paternal/maternal age groups (F-Y/M-Y: 2288; F-Y/M-I: 750; F-Y/M-O: 97; F-O/M-Y: 679; F-O/M-I: 2310; F-O/M-O: 580). While some associations were seen on univariable logistic regression, none of the groups with increasing paternal age showed any statistically significant differences on multivariable logistic regression with respect to implantation, clinical intrauterine pregnancy, pregnancy loss or live birth. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced paternal age does not impact clinical outcomes in fresh transfer cycles. The authors postulate that IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection is able to overcome the deleterious effects of advancing paternal age on sperm quality and subsequent embryo performance.

The use of fresh compared to frozen ejaculated sperm has no impact on fresh embryo transfer cycle reproductive outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare the reproductive outcomes of fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles utilizing fresh versus frozen ejaculated sperm. METHODS: First autologous fresh embryo transfer cycles at a single high-volume academic institution between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. IVF cycles using ejaculated sperm were included, and cycles using donor or surgically retrieved sperm were excluded. Sperm concentration was stratified as ≥ 5 and < 5 million/ml. The primary outcome was live birth, and the secondary outcomes were clinical intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and miscarriage. A multivariable logistic regression model for the aforementioned outcomes was adjusted a priori for sperm concentration as well as maternal and paternal age. RESULTS: A total of 6128 couples were included. Of these, 5780 (94.3%) utilized fresh sperm, and 348 (5.7%) frozen sperm. A total of 5716 (93.2%) had sperm concentrations ≥ 5 million/ml and 412 (6.7%) had sperm concentrations < 5 million/ml. On multivariable logistic regression, the use of freshly ejaculated sperm was not associated with significantly different odds of clinical IUP, miscarriage, or live birth when compared to cycles using frozen sperm. CONCLUSION: For couples conceiving via fresh ET, the use of fresh versus frozen ejaculated sperm is not associated with reproductive outcomes.

Length of estradiol exposure >100 pg/ml in the follicular phase affects pregnancy outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Do the length of follicular phase estradiol exposure and the total length of the follicular phase affect pregnancy and live birth outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: An estradiol level >100 pg/ml for ≤4 days including the LH surge day is associated with worse pregnancy and live birth outcomes; however, the total length of the follicular phase is not associated with pregnancy and live birth outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: An estradiol level that increases above 100 pg/ml and continues to increase is indicative of the selection and development of a dominant follicle. In programmed FET cycles, a limited duration of follicular phase estradiol of <9 days results in worse pregnancy rates, but a prolonged exposure to follicular phase estradiol for up to 4 weeks does not affect pregnancy outcomes. It is unknown how follicular phase characteristics affect pregnancy outcomes in natural FET cycles. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort study included infertile patients in an academic hospital setting who underwent their first natural frozen autologous Day-5 embryo transfer cycle in our IVF clinic between 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. Donor oocyte and gestational carrier cycles were excluded. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The primary outcomes of this study were pregnancy and live birth rates. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the cohorts' median number of days from the estradiol level of >100 pg/ml before the LH surge: Group 1 (≤4 days; n = 1052 patients) and Group 2 (>4 days; n = 839 patients). Additionally, patients were stratified into two groups based on the cohorts' median cycle day of LH surge: Group 1 (follicular length ≤15 days; n = 1287 patients) and Group 2 (follicular length >15 days; n = 1071 patients). A subgroup analysis of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) embryo transfer cycles was performed. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted a priori for patient age, number of embryos transferred, and use of PGT-A, was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In the length of elevated estradiol analysis, the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was statistically significantly lower in patients with an elevated estradiol to surge of ≤4 days (65.6%) compared to patients with an elevated estradiol to surge of >4 days (70.9%; OR 1.30 (95% CI 1.06-1.58)). The live birth rate per embryo transfer was also statistically significantly lower in patients with an elevated estradiol to surge of ≤4 days (46.6%) compared to patients with an elevated estradiol to surge of >4 days (52.0%; OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.02-1.48)). In the follicular phase length analysis, the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was similar between patients with a follicular length of ≤15 days (65.4%) and patients with a follicular length of >15 days (69.0%; OR 1.12 (95% CI 0.94-1.33)): the live birth rate was also similar between groups (45.5% vs 51.5%, respectively; OR 1.14 (95% CI 0.97-1.35)). In all analyses, once a pregnancy was achieved, the length of the follicular phase or the length of elevated oestradiol >100 pg/ml no longer affected the pregnancy outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective design of this study is subject to possible selection bias in regard to which patients at our clinic were recommended to undergo a natural FET compared to a fresh embryo transfer or programmed FET. To decrease the heterogeneity of our study population, we only included patients who had blastocyst embryo transfers; therefore, it is unknown whether similar results would be observed in patients with cleavage-stage embryo transfers. The retrospective nature of the study design did not allow randomized to a specific ovarian stimulation or ovulation trigger protocol. However, all patients were managed with the standardized protocols at a single center, which strengthens the external validity of our results when compared to a study that only evaluates one specific stimulation protocol. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our observations provide cycle-level characteristics that can be applied during a natural FET cycle to help optimize embryo transfer success rates. Physicians should consider the parameter of number of days that oestradiol is >100 pg/ml prior to the LH surge when determining whether to proceed with embryo transfer in a natural cycle. This cycle-specific characteristic may also help to provide an explanation for some failed transfer cycles. Importantly, our findings should not be used to determine whether to recommend a natural or a programmed FET cycle for a patient, but rather, to identify natural FET cycles that are not optimal to proceed with embryo transfer. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No financial support, funding, or services were obtained for this study. The authors do not report any potential conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women of racial minorities aged 40 years and older undergoing IVF.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do women of racial minorities aged 40 years or older have similar reproductive and obstetric outcomes as white women undergoing IVF? DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a single academic university-affiliated centre. The study population included women aged 40 years or older undergoing their first IVF cycle with fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfer stratified by racial minority status: minority (black or Asian) versus white. Clinical intrauterine pregnancy and live birth rate were the primary outcomes. Preterm delivery (<37 weeks) and small for gestational age were the secondary outcomes. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 2050 cycles in women over the age of 40 years were analysed, 561 (27.4%) of which were undertaken by minority women and 1489 (72.6%) by white women. Minority women were 30% less likely to achieve a pregnancy compared with their white (non-Hispanic) counterparts (adjusted OR 0.68, CI 0.54 to 0.87). Once pregnant, however, the odds of live birth were similar (adjusted OR 1.23, CI 0.91 to 1.67). Minority women were significantly more likely to have lower gestational ages at time of delivery (38.5 versus 39.2 weeks, P = 0.009) and were more likely to have extreme preterm birth delivery 24-28 weeks (5.5 versus 1.0%, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Minority women of advanced reproductive age are less likely to achieve a pregnancy compared with white (non-Hispanic) women. Once pregnancy is achieved, however, live birth rates are similar albeit with minority women experiencing higher rates of preterm delivery.

Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in mildly and significantly underweight women undergoing IVF.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the impact of low body mass index (BMI) on live birth rates and obstetric outcomes in infertile women treated with IVF and fresh embryo transfer? DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of infertile patients in an academic hospital setting who underwent their first oocyte retrieval with planned autologous fresh embryo transfer between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018. The primary study outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were IVF treatment and delivery outcomes. Underweight patients were stratified into a significantly underweight group (body mass index [BMI] <17.5 kg/m2) and a mildly underweight group (BMI 17.5-18.49 kg/m2), and were compared with a normal-weight group (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2). RESULTS: A total of 5229 patients were included (significantly underweight, 76; mildly underweight, 231; normal weight, 4922), resulting in 4798 embryo transfers. After oocyte retrieval, there were no significant differences between groups for total oocytes, mature oocyte yield and number of supernumerary blastocysts cryopreserved. Among women who had an embryo transfer, there were no significant differences in the live birth rates in significantly (31.0%, odds ratio [OR] 0.67, confidence interval [0.95, CI] 0.40-1.13) and mildly (37.7%, OR 0.95, CI 0.73-1.33) underweight patients compared with normal-weight patients (35.9%). Additionally, there were no statistically significant increased risks of preterm delivery, Caesarean delivery or a low birthweight (<2500 g) neonate. CONCLUSIONS: Mildly and significantly underweight infertile women have similar pregnancy and live birth rates to normal-weight patients after IVF treatment. In addition, underweight patients do not have an increased risk of preterm delivery (<37 weeks), Caesarean delivery or a low birthweight neonate.

Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy with Undetectable Initial Serum ß-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Level.

We present a case of a tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) in a patient with an initially undetectable serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) level. A 33-year-old woman in a same-sex relationship underwent timed donor intrauterine insemination. Her serum ß-hCG level was <5 mIU/mL 14 days after the intrauterine insemination. She reported menstrual bleeding 3 days after her negative pregnancy test and returned to the office 10 days later to begin a new treatment cycle. Her serum levels of estradiol, progesterone, and ß-hCG were 119 pg/mL, 6.1 ng/mL and 1157 mIU/mL, respectively. Transvaginal ultrasonography did not show an intrauterine pregnancy. Her ß-hCG level increased to 1420 mIU/mL the next day. She was diagnosed with a pregnancy of unknown location and treated with methotrexate. Her ß-hCG levels continued to increase despite 3 methotrexate doses, necessitating laparoscopy. The diagnostic laparoscopy demonstrated approximately 100 mL of hemoperitoneum in the posterior cul-de-sac with an intact right fallopian tube that was dilated at its distal end by the EP. A total right salpingectomy was performed. Her ß-hCG level was <5 mIU/mL 3 weeks later. The current case supports that although rare, an undetectable serum ß-hCG level does not completely rule out the diagnosis of an EP.

Electronic whiteboard implementation as a quality management tool optimizes IVF laboratory standardization and improves clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To test whether an electronic whiteboard in the IVF laboratory increases the likelihood that critical evaluation procedures are performed within optimum pre-set time ranges. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of oocyte retrievals in our IVF clinic between 06/01/2012 and 05/31/2018 was included. The electronic whiteboard was introduced on 04/06/2014. Prior to implementation, embryologists strived to adhere to the set evaluation times without a formal guide. The primary outcomes were the proportion of embryologist evaluations performed in optimum time ranges and the proportion of usable embryos per patient. RESULTS: A total of 4645 retrievals met inclusion criteria. Implementation of the whiteboard was associated with (1) an increase in the proportion of fertilization checks performed within the optimum time range for ICSI cycles (+ 5.1%, RR = 1.06, CI = 1.02-1.10); (2) an increase in the proportion of day 3 evaluations performed within the optimum time range, whether assisted hatching was performed (+ 23.6%, RR = 1.48, CI = 1.36-1.60) or not (+ 13.8%, RR = 1.23, CI = 1.12-1.35); and (3) an increase in the proportion of day 5 evaluations within the optimum time range (+ 15.5%, RR = 1.23, CI = 1.12-1.35). Additionally, the mean number of usable embryos per patient increased from 2.8 to 4.5 after the whiteboard was implemented (RR = 1.25, CI = 1.19-1.31). CONCLUSION: The use of an electronic whiteboard that posts optimum times for performing critical procedures significantly increases the proportion of evaluations that occur within these ranges. Such improved standardization led to positive downstream effects on the number of usable embryos per patient. We suggest that electronic whiteboard implementation driven by real-time data collection should be considered in all IVF laboratories.

Live birth outcomes in infertile patients with class III and class IV obesity following fresh embryo transfer.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the effect of class III (body mass index [BMI, kg/m2] 40-49.9) and class IV obesity (≥ 50) on clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes after first oocyte retrieval and fresh embryo transfer cycle. DESIGN: Cohort study SETTING: Academic center PATIENTS: Patients undergoing their first oocyte retrieval with planned fresh embryo transfer in our clinic between 01/01/2012 and 12/31/2018. Patients were stratified by BMI: 18.5-24.9 (n = 4913), 25-29.9 (n = 1566) 30-34.9 (n = 559), 35-39.9 (n = 218), and ≥ 40 (n = 114). INTERVENTION: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Live birth rate RESULTS: Following embryo transfer, there were no differences in pregnancy rates across all BMI groups (p value, linear trend = 0.86). However among pregnant patients, as BMI increased, a significant trend of a decreased live birth rate was observed (p value, test for linear trend = 0.004). Additionally, as BMI increased, a significant trend of an increased miscarriage rate was observed (p value, linear trend = < 0.001). Compared to the normal-weight cohort, women with a BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly higher rate of cancelled fresh transfers after retrieval (18.4% vs. 8.2%, OR 2.51; 95%CI 1.55-4.08). Among singleton deliveries, a significant trend of an increased c-section rate was identified as the BMI increased (p value, linear trend = <0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, patients with a BMI > 40 have worse IVF treatment outcomes compared to normal-weight patients. After embryo transfer, their pregnancy rate is comparable to normal-weight women; however, their miscarriage rate is higher, leading to a lower live birth rate for pregnant women in this population. Patients with a BMI > 40 have a c-section rate that is 50% higher than normal-weight patients.

Delay in IVF treatment up to 180 days does not affect pregnancy outcomes in women with diminished ovarian reserve.

STUDY QUESTION: Will a delay in initiating IVF treatment affect pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve? SUMMARY ANSWER: A delay in IVF treatment up to 180 days does not affect the live birth rate for women with diminished ovarian reserve when compared to women who initiate IVF treatment within 90 days of presentation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In clinical practice, treatment delays can occur due to medical, logistical or financial reasons. Over a period of years, a gradual decline in ovarian reserve occurs which can result in declining outcomes in response to IVF treatment over time. There is disagreement among reproductive endocrinologists about whether delaying IVF treatment for a few months can negatively affect patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective cohort study of infertile patients in an academic hospital setting with diminished ovarian reserve who started an IVF cycle within 180 days of their initial consultation and underwent an oocyte retrieval with planned fresh embryo transfer between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Diminished ovarian reserve was defined as an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) <1.1 ng/ml. In total, 1790 patients met inclusion criteria (1115 immediate and 675 delayed treatment). Each patient had one included cycle and no subsequent data from additional frozen embryo transfer cycles were included. Since all cycle outcomes evaluated were from fresh embryo transfers, no genetically tested embryos were included. Patients were grouped by whether their cycle started 1-90 days after presentation (immediate) or 91-180 days (delayed). The primary outcome was live birth (≥24 weeks of gestation). A subgroup analysis of more severe forms of diminished ovarian reserve was performed to evaluate outcomes for patients with an AMH <0.5 and for patients >40 years old with an AMH <1.1 ng/ml (Bologna criteria for diminished ovarian reserve). Logistic regression analysis, adjusted a priori for patient age, was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI. All pregnancy outcomes were additionally adjusted for the number of embryos transferred. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The mean ± SD number of days from presentation to IVF start was 50.5 ± 21.9 (immediate) and 128.8 ± 25.9 (delayed). After embryo transfer, the live birth rate was similar between groups (immediate: 23.9%; delayed: 25.6%; OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85-1.38). Additionally, a similar live birth rate was observed in a subgroup analysis of patients with an AMH <0.5 ng/ml (immediate: 18.8%; delayed: 19.1%; OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.65-1.51) and in patients >40 years old with an AMH <1.1 ng/ml (immediate: 12.3%; delayed: 14.7%; OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.77-1.91). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There is the potential for selection bias with regard to the patients who started their IVF cycle within 90 days compared to 91-180 days after initial consultation. In addition, we did not include patients who were seen for initial evaluation but did not progress to IVF treatment with oocyte retrieval; therefore, our results should only be applied to patients with diminished ovarian reserve who complete an IVF cycle. Finally, since we excluded patients who started their IVF cycle greater than 180 days from their first visit, it is not known how such a delay in treatment affects pregnancy outcomes in IVF cycles. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: A delay in initiating IVF treatment in patients with diminished ovarian reserve up to 180 days from the initial visit does not affect pregnancy outcomes. This observation remains true for patients who are in the high-risk categories for poor response to ovarian stimulation. Providers and patients should be reassured that when a short-term treatment delay is deemed necessary for medical, logistic or financial reasons, treatment outcomes will not be affected. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No financial support, funding or services were obtained for this study. The authors do not report any potential conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Women's health providers' perspectives on preimplantation genetic testing.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the perspectives of women's health providers on the use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for common medical disorders? DESIGN: A cross-sectional 15-question online anonymous survey was conducted of women's health providers specializing in general obstetrics/gynaecology, gynaecologic oncology and infertility at a tertiary care academic institution in Massachusetts, USA. Respondents could answer 'yes', 'no' or 'unsure' to each thematic question. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 1060 providers and 240 providers responded (response rate 22.6%). Overall, 93% of respondents supported the use of PGT for the identification of genetic mutations which lead to childhood-onset disease, 83% supported the use of PGT for chromosomal aneuploidy screening, and 76% supported the use of PGT for cancer-related genetic disorders. Only 1.7% of respondents supported the use of PGT for non-disease-related indications, including sex selection and physical traits. Compared with general obstetrics/gynaecology providers, infertility specialists were more supportive of PGT. In total, 22.5% of respondents reported no prior knowledge of PGT. CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of women's health providers across multiple different obstetrics/gynaecology specialties, there was overall support for the use of PGT for a variety of common indications. Infertility specialists were the most supportive, which may reflect the familiarity that these providers have with this procedure. There was an overwhelmingly non-supportive response for the use of PGT for non-disease-related indications. The percentage of medical professionals working in women's health without prior knowledge of PGT (22.5%) was higher than expected, identifying the need for more education regarding the availability and potential indications for this procedure.

The effect of endometriosis on the antimüllerian hormone level in the infertile population.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the presence of endometriosis in infertile women without prior ovarian surgery influences markers of ovarian reserve, AMH and FSH. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included three groups of women who presented for IVF treatment at our tertiary care center from 04/27/2015 to 05/31/2017: women with endometriosis and prior ovarian surgery (EnSx), women with endometriosis without prior ovarian surgery (En), and women with a primary diagnosis of male factor infertility (MF; reference group). RESULTS: There were 671 patients that met inclusion criteria (78 EnSx, 60 En, and 533 MF). Compared to the MF group (3.6 ± 3.0), a lower mean AMH level (ng/mL) was observed in the EnSx group (2.5 ± 2.5; aß - 1.21; 95% CI [- 1.79, -0.62]) and in the En group (2.5 ± 2.2; aß - 1.11; 95% CI [- 1.68, - 0.54]). Both endometriosis groups had a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients with an AMH < 1 (EnSx, 24.4%; OR, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.31, 4.36]; En, 28.3%; OR, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.41, 5.08]) compared to the MF group (13.9%). The mean baseline FSH level (lU/L) was statistically significantly higher in both endometriosis groups (EnSx, 8.6 ± 4.3; ß, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.39, 2.34]; En, 8.4 ± 3.7; ß, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.04, 1.87]) compared to the MF group (7.3 ± 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Among infertility patients with endometriosis, with and without a history of ovarian surgery, ovarian reserve markers were worse (lower AMH and higher FSH) and a higher proportion had decreased ovarian reserve as measured by AMH compared to women with MF.

Association between blastocyst morphology and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes following fresh and cryopreserved embryo transfer.

PURPOSE: To assess the importance of each blastocyst morphological criteria with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included blastocyst single embryo transfers (SET) performed between 1/2012-2/2018. Poisson regression was used to evaluate pregnancy outcomes following fresh and cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) for association with blastocyst expansion, inner cell mass (ICM) quality, and trophectoderm (TE) quality. Among cycles resulting in live birth, associations with preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA), were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1023 fresh and 1222 CET cycles were included, of which 465 (45.1%) fresh and 600 (48.5%) CET cycles resulted in singleton live birth. Clinical pregnancy rates increased with increasing expansion among fresh transfers (p for trend = 0.001) but not CET (p = 0.221), and with TE quality for both fresh and CET cycles (p = 0.005 and < 0.0001, respectively). Live birth rates increased with increasing expansion (fresh p = 0.005, CET p = 0.018) and TE quality (fresh p = 0.028, CET p = 0.023). ICM grade was not associated with pregnancy outcomes; however, higher ICM quality among CET cycles was associated with increased chance of preterm birth (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In blastocyst SET, blastocyst expansion and TE quality were each associated with clinical pregnancy and live birth. While higher ICM quality was associated with increased chance of preterm birth among CET, no other associations with perinatal outcomes were identified. Clinicians can be reassured that pregnancies from blastocysts with lower expansion, ICM, or TE qualities are not more likely to result in adverse perinatal outcomes.

The association between quality of supernumerary embryos in a cohort and implantation potential of the transferred blastocyst.

PURPOSE: Despite studies focused on the association between embryo morphology and implantation potential, it is unknown how the collective quality of the supernumerary embryos in a cohort is associated with the implantation rate (IR) of the transferred embryo. This study tested the hypothesis that a relationship exists between the quality of the supernumerary cohort and IR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of first fresh autologous IVF cycles from 05/2012 to 09/2016, with ≥ 3 blastocysts, resulting in a single blastocyst transfer (n = 819) was performed. Cohorts were grouped in two ways: by mean priority score (PS; 1 being best) of supernumerary embryos and by percent supernumerary embryos with low implantation potential. The relationship between cohort quality and IR was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: As mean cohort PS increased, IR of the transferred embryo decreased (test for linear trend, p = 0.05). When ≥ 75% of the supernumerary cohort was predicted to have low implantation potential, IR of the transferred embryo was significantly lower compared to when < 75% of the cohort was predicted to have low implantation potential (OR 0.71; 95% CI (0.53-0.94)). All associations were attenuated when adjusting for PS of the transferred embryo. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that quality of supernumerary embryos is associated with IR of the transferred embryo, among patients with ≥ 3 blastocysts available on day 5. As cohort quality declines and the proportion of low implantation potential embryos increases, the IR of the transferred embryo declines. These associations are attenuated when controlling for quality of the transferred embryo, suggesting that the relationship between embryo cohort quality and implantation is not independent of the transferred embryo quality.