ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Nexobrid®, a bromelain-based type of enzymatic debridement, has become more prevalent in recent years. We present the recommendations on enzymatic debridement (Nexobrid®)'s role based on the practice knowledge of expert Italian users. METHODS: The Italian recommendations, endorsed by SIUST (Italian Society of Burn Surgery), on using enzymatic debridement to remove eschars for burn treatment were defined. The definition followed a process to evaluate the level of agreement (a measure of consensus) among selected experts, representing Italian burn centers, concerning defined clinical aspects of enzymatic debridement. The consensus involved a multi-phase process based on the Delphi method. RESULTS: The consensus panel included experts from Italy with a combined experience of 1068 burn patients treated with enzymatic debridement. At the end of round 3 of the Delphi method, the panel reached 100% consensus on 26 out of 27 statements. The panel achieved full, strong consensus (all respondents strongly agreed on the statement) on 24 out of 27 statements. DISCUSSION: The statements provided by the Italian consensus panel represent a "ready to use" set of recommendations for enzymatic debridement in burn surgery that both draw from and complete the existing scientific literature on the topic. These recommendations are specific to the Italian experience and are neither static nor definitive. As such, they will be updated periodically as further quality evidence becomes available.
Subject(s)
Burns , Administration, Topical , Burn Units , Burns/surgery , Debridement , Humans , ItalyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are associated with high mortality. A relevant concern is the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in burn patients in whom pathophysiological changes strongly influence pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. This study aimed to describe the PK parameters of meropenem in a population of burn patients. METHODS: Blood samples were collected immediately before and 2 h and 5 h after the start of intravenous drug administration. Plasma meropenem concentrations were determined using an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array method. RESULTS: Seventeen burn patients were enrolled in the study. Thirteen patients (76%) were treated with meropenem for infections byPseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from blood or wounds. Mean Cmax, Cmin, AUC0-24, half-life, drug clearance and volume of distribution were 28.9 mg/L, 3.7 mg/L, 280.2 mg h/L, 2.0 h, 19.0 L/h and 44.4 L, respectively. Six patients (35%) achieved a Cmin ≥3.3 mg/L and seven patients (41%) achieved a Cmax ≥ 28.4 mg/L, whilst nine patients (53%) achieved an AUC0-24 of >226 mg h/L. Given a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.5 mg/L, all patients satisfied the target AUC/MIC of >125, but when the MIC rises to 2 mg/L (the ECOFF), only five patients reached the desired AUC/MIC. Regarding fT>MIC at an MIC of 2 mg/L with a 2-h infusion time, 13 patients (76%) achieved the PK target (>75%). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a combined 2-h infusion with a higher dosage of meropenem, including a loading dose, may be successful to achieve effective PK parameters.