Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
BJOG ; 130(13): 1620-1628, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37280664

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, diagnostic management strategies and clinical outcomes of women with spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) and reassess the definition of SHiP. DESIGN: A population-based cohort study using the Netherlands Obstetric Surveillance System (NethOSS). SETTING: Nationwide, the Netherlands. POPULATION: All pregnant women between April 2016 and April 2018. METHODS: This is a case study of SHiP using the monthly registry reports of NethOSS. Complete anonymised case files were obtained. A newly introduced online Delphi audit system (DAS) was used to evaluate each case, to make recommendations on improving the management of SHiP and to propose a new definition of SHiP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and outcomes, lessons learned about clinical management and the critical appraisal of the current definition of SHiP. RESULTS: In total, 24 cases were reported. After a Delphi procedure, 14 cases were classified as SHiP. The nationwide incidence was 4.9 per 100 000 births. Endometriosis and conceiving after artificial reproductive techniques were identified as risk factors. No maternal and three perinatal deaths occurred. Based on the DAS, adequate imaging of free intra-abdominal fluid, and identifying and treating women with signs of hypovolemic shock could improve the early detection and management of SHiP. A revised definition of SHiP was proposed, excluding the need for surgical or radiological intervention. CONCLUSIONS: SHiP is a rare and easily misdiagnosed condition that is associated with high perinatal mortality. To improve care, better awareness among healthcare workers is needed. The DAS is a sufficient tool to audit maternal morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Hemoperitoneum , Perinatal Death , Pregnancy Complications , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Cohort Studies , Hemoperitoneum/diagnosis , Hemoperitoneum/epidemiology , Hemoperitoneum/etiology , Parturition , Perinatal Mortality , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Infant, Newborn
2.
Birth ; 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38037756

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Globally, cesarean birth rates are rising, and while it can be a lifesaving procedure, cesarean birth is also associated with increased maternal and perinatal risks. This study aims to describe changes over time about the mode of birth and perinatal outcomes in second-pregnancy women with one previous cesarean birth in the Netherlands over the past 20 years. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, population-based study using the Dutch perinatal registry. The mode of birth (intended vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) compared with planned cesarean birth) was assessed in all women with one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth who gave birth to a term singleton in cephalic presentation between 2000 and 2019 in the Netherlands (n = 143,146). The reported outcomes include the trend of intended VBAC, VBAC success rate, and adverse perinatal outcomes (perinatal mortality up to 7 days, low Apgar score at 5 min, asphyxia, and neonatal intensive care unit admission ≥24 h). RESULTS: Intended VBAC decreased by 21.5% in women with one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth, from 77.2% in 2000 to 55.7% in 2019, with a marked deceleration from 2009 onwards. The VBAC success rate dropped gradually, from 71.0% to 65.3%, across the same time period. Overall, the cesarean birth rate (planned and unplanned) increased from 45.2% to 63.6%. Adverse perinatal outcomes were higher in women intending VBAC compared with those planning a cesarean birth. Perinatal mortality initially decreased but remained stable from 2009 onwards, with only minimal differences between both modes of birth. CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, the proportion of women intending VBAC after one previous cesarean birth and no prior vaginal birth has decreased markedly. Particularly from 2009 onwards, this decrease was not accompanied by a synchronous reduction in perinatal mortality.

3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 60, 2019 Jan 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preconception care has been acknowledged as an intervention to reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity. However, utilization of preconception care is low because of low awareness of availability and benefits of the service. An outreach strategy was employed to promote uptake of preconception care consultations. Its effect on the uptake of preconception care consultations was evaluated within the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study. METHODS: We conducted a community-based intervention study. The outreach strategy for preconception care consultations included four approaches: (1) letters from municipal health services; (2) letters from general practitioners; (3) information leaflets by preventive child healthcare services and (4) encouragement by peer health educators. The target population was set as women aged 18 to 41 years in 14 Dutch municipalities with relatively high perinatal morbidity and mortality rates. We evaluated the effect of the outreach strategy by analyzing uptake of preconception care consultations between February 2013 and December 2014. Registration data of applications for preconception care as well as participant questionnaires were obtained for analysis. RESULTS: The outreach strategy led to 587 applications for preconception care consultations. The majority of applications (n = 424; 72%) were prompted by the invitation letters (132,129) from the municipalities and general practitioners. The effect of the municipal letter seemed to fade out after 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Outreach strategies amongst the general population promote uptake of preconception care consultations, although on a small scale and with a temporary effect.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Preconception Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Facilities and Services Utilization , Female , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Netherlands/ethnology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/ethnology , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Pregnancy Outcome/ethnology , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
4.
Reprod Health ; 15(1): 192, 2018 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30470239

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Women from lower socioeconomic groups tend to be at greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, but are less likely to participate in preconception counselling compared to higher socioeconomic groups. This could be partly because of their limited skills to assess, understand and use health related information in ways that promote and maintain good health (health literacy skills). In this study we explored determinants of participation in preconception counselling among women with low health literacy in The Netherlands. METHODS: Potential determinants of participation in preconception counselling were derived from the literature, and mapped onto a theoretical framework, which was tested for perceived relevance and completeness in an expert review (n = 20). The framework was used to prepare face-to-face interviews with women with low health literacy and a wish to conceive (n = 139). In the interviews we explored preconception counselling awareness, knowledge, considerations, subjective norms, self-efficacy, attitude, and intention. Linear regression analyses were used to test associations with intention to participate in preconception counselling. RESULTS: Most women (75%) were unaware of the concept of preconception counselling and the provision of counselling, even if they lived in areas where written invitations had been disseminated. Common considerations for participation were: preparation for pregnancy; perceived lack of information; and problems in a previous pregnancy. Considerations not to participate were mostly related to perceived sufficient knowledge and perceived low risk of perinatal problems. Respondents generally had a positive attitude towards participation in preconception counselling for themselves, and 41% reported that they would participate in preconception counselling. CONCLUSION: Women with low health literacy were generally unaware of the concept and provision of preconception counselling, but seemed to be interested in participation. Further research should investigate how to effectively reach and inform this group about preconception counselling. This knowledge is essential for evidence-based development of interventions to increase the accessibility and understanding of preconception counselling.


Subject(s)
Family Planning Services , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Literacy/methods , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Preconception Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Counseling , Female , Humans , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Self Efficacy , Women's Health , Young Adult
5.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 17(1): 254, 2017 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28764640

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Geographical inequalities in perinatal health and child welfare require attention. To improve the identification, and care, of mothers and young children at risk of adverse health outcomes, the HP4All-2 program was developed. The program consists of three studies, focusing on creating a continuum for risk selection and tailored care pathways from preconception and antenatal care towards 1) postpartum care, 2) early childhood care, as well as 3) interconception care. The program has been implemented in ten municipalities in the Netherlands, aiming to target communities with a relatively disadvantageous position with regard to perinatal and child health outcomes. To delineate the position of the ten participating municipalities, we present municipal and regional differences in the prevalence of perinatal mortality, perinatal morbidity, children living in deprived neighbourhoods, and children living in families on welfare. METHODS: Data on all singleton births in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2014 were analysed for the prevalence of perinatal mortality and morbidity. In addition, national data on children living in deprived neighbourhoods and children living in families on welfare between 2009 and 2012 were analysed. The prevalence of these outcomes were calculated and ranked for 62 geographical areas, the 50 largest municipalities and the 12 provinces, to determine the position of the municipalities that participate in HP4All-2. RESULTS: Considerable geographical differences were present for all four outcomes. The municipalities that participate in HP4All-2 are among the 25 municipalities with the highest prevalence of perinatal mortality, perinatal morbidity, children living in deprived neighbourhoods, or children in families on welfare. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates geographical differences in perinatal health and/or child welfare outcomes and demonstrates that the HP4All-2 program targets municipalities with a relative unfavourable position. By targeting these municipalities, the program is expected to contribute most to improving the care for young children and their mothers at risk, and hence to reducing their risks and health inequalities.


Subject(s)
Child Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Cities/epidemiology , Health Promotion/methods , Health Status Disparities , Prenatal Care/methods , Child , Female , Geography, Medical , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Perinatal Mortality , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors
6.
Matern Child Health J ; 20(Suppl 1): 117-124, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27385150

ABSTRACT

Objectives Successful implementation of preconception and interconception care contributes to optimizing pregnancy outcomes. While interconception care to new mothers could potentially be provided by Preventive Child Health Care services, this care is currently not routinely available in the Netherlands. The purpose of this study was to identify facilitators and barriers for implementation of interconception care in Preventive Child Health Care services. Methods We organized four focus groups in which Preventive Child Health Care physicians and nurses, related health care professionals and policymakers participated. A semi-structured interview approach was used to guide the discussion. The transcribed discussions were analyzed. Results All four groups agreed that several facilitators are present, such as the unique position to reach women and the expertise in preventive health care. Identified barriers include unfamiliarity with interconception care among patients and health care providers, as well as lack of consensus about the concept of interconception care and how it should be organized. A broad educational campaign, local adaptation, and general agreement or a guideline for standard procedures were recognized as important for future implementation. Conclusions for practice This study identifies potentially important facilitators and barriers for the implementation of interconception care in Preventive Child Health Care services or comparable pediatric settings. These factors should be considered and strategies developed to achieve successful implementation of interconception care.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Maternal Welfare , Maternal-Child Health Centers/organization & administration , Preconception Care , Pregnancy Outcome , Adult , Child Health , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Preventive Health Services/standards , Qualitative Research
7.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 94(5): 518-26, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25682778

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a client or care-provider strategy to improve the implementation of external cephalic version. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty-five clusters; hospitals and their referring midwifery practices randomly selected in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Singleton breech presentation from 32 weeks of gestation onwards. METHODS: We randomized clusters to a client strategy (written information leaflets and decision aid), a care-provider strategy (1-day counseling course focused on knowledge and counseling skills), a combined client and care-provider strategy and care-as-usual strategy. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of external cephalic version in various strategies. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of women counseled and opting for a version attempt. RESULTS: The overall implementation rate of external cephalic version was 72% (1169 of 1613 eligible clients) with a range between clusters of 8-95%. Neither the client strategy (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.5) nor the care-provider strategy (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.3) showed significant improvements. Results were comparable when we limited the analysis to those women who were actually offered intervention (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.4 and OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-4.5). CONCLUSIONS: Neither a client nor a care-provider strategy improved the external cephalic version implementation rate for breech presentation, neither with regard to the number of version attempts offered nor the number of women accepting the procedure.


Subject(s)
Breech Presentation/therapy , Version, Fetal , Adolescent , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Directive Counseling , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Education as Topic , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 93(9): 888-96, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25113411

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the increased cesarean rate for term breech presentation on neonatal outcome. We also investigated whether the clinical case selection for vaginal delivery applied by Dutch obstetricians led to an optimization of neonatal outcome, or whether there is still room for improvement in terms of perinatal outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: The Netherlands. POPULATION: Singleton term breech deliveries from 37+0 to 41+6 weeks, excluding fetuses with congenital malformations or antenatal death. METHOD: We used data from the Dutch national perinatal registry from 1999 up to 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: We studied 58,320 women with a term breech delivery. There was an increase in the elective cesarean rate (from 24 to 60%). As a consequence, overall perinatal mortality decreased [1.3 0/00 vs. 0.7 0/00;odds ratio 0.51 (95% confidence interval 0.28­0.93)], whereas it remained stable in the planned vaginal birth group [1.7 0/00 vs. 1.6 0/00; odds ratio 0.96(95% confidence interval 0.52­1.76)]. The number of cesareans done to prevent one perinatal death was 338. CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment of the national guidelines after publication of the Term Breech Trial resulted in a shift towards elective cesarean and a decrease of perinatal mortality and morbidity among women delivering a child in breech at term. Still, 40% of these women attempt vaginal birth. The relative safety of an elective cesarean should be weighed against the consequences of a scarred uterus in future pregnancies.


Subject(s)
Breech Presentation , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies
9.
Birth ; 41(4): 323-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25288341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) reduces the rate of elective cesarean sections as a result of breech presentation. Several studies have shown that not all eligible women undergo an ECV attempt. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of ECV in the Netherlands and to explain variation in implementation rates with hospital characteristics and individual factors. METHODS: We invited 40 hospitals to participate in this retrospective cohort study. We reviewed hospital charts for all singleton breech deliveries from 36 weeks' gestation and onwards between January 2008 and December 2009. We documented whether an ECV attempt was performed, reasons for not performing an attempt, mode of delivery, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: We included 4,770 women from 36 hospitals. ECV was performed in 2,443 women (62.2% of eligible women, range 8.2-83.6% in different hospitals). Implementation rates were higher in teaching hospitals, hospitals with special office hours for ECV, larger obstetric units, and hospitals located in larger cities. Suboptimal implementation was mainly caused by health care providers who did not offer ECV. CONCLUSION: ECV implementation rates vary widely among hospitals. Suboptimal implementation is mostly caused by the care provider not offering the treatment and secondly due to women not opting for the offered attempt. A prerequisite for designing a proper implementation strategy is a detailed understanding of the exact reasons for not offering and not opting for ECV.


Subject(s)
Breech Presentation/therapy , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Version, Fetal/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
10.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 92(2): 137-42, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22994660

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe and effective intervention that can prevent breech delivery, thus reducing the need for cesarean delivery. It is recommended in national guidelines. These guidelines also mention contraindications for ECV, and thereby restrict the application of ECV. We assessed whether the formulation of these contraindications in guidelines are based on empiric data. DESIGN: Systematic review. POPULATION: Pregnant women with a singleton breech presentation from 34 weeks. METHODS: We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1953-2009), EMBASE (1980-2009), TRIP database (until 2011), NHS (National Health Services, until 2011), Diseases database (until 2011) and NICE guidelines (until 2011) for existing guidelines on ECV and studied the reproducibility of the contraindications stated in the guidelines. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed the literature for contraindications and evidence on these contraindications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contraindications of ECV. RESULTS: We found five guidelines mentioning 18 contraindications, varying from five to 13 per guideline. The contraindications were not reproducible between the guidelines with oligohydramnios as the only contraindication mentioned in all guidelines. The literature search yielded 60 studies reporting on 39 different contraindications, of which we could only assess evidence of six of them. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that there is no general consensus on the eligibility of patients for ECV. Therefore we propose to limit contraindications for ECV to clear empirical evidence or to those with a clear pathophysiological relevance.


Subject(s)
Breech Presentation/therapy , Version, Fetal , Breech Presentation/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Contraindications , Female , Humans , Oligohydramnios/epidemiology , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third
11.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X ; 17: 100179, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36824398

ABSTRACT

Objective: Assess improvable care factors in late preterm mortality, defined as death of a child during labour or in the first 28 days thereafter between 32 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks gestation, in the Netherlands. Design: Perinatal audit has been coordinated and supported at the national level, with selection of nationwide audit themes, and audit sessions are performed at the local level across the country as multidisciplinary meetings with primary and secondary level health care professionals, organised in local perinatal cooperation units. In 2017-2019, late preterm mortality was such a theme. We compiled and systematically categorised all improvable care factors formulated during local audit meetings in a national perinatal audit database. Results: In total, 27 cases were discussed in local perinatal audits and analysed locally and at the national level. Altogether, 52 improvable care factors were identified. Most identified improvable care factors concerned inadequate foetal monitoring by cardiotocography during labour, factors related to care organisation, particularly unclarity around local assigning of responsibilities and work procedures, and poor communication between involved health care professionals especially in transfer of care. Conclusion: Several critical improvable care factors were identified through nationwide perinatal audit of late preterm deaths in the Netherlands.

12.
Midwifery ; 118: 103572, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36587471

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into perinatal outcomes in women with chronic medical conditions, in order to contribute to the optimization of personalized perinatal care. We hypothesize that women with a chronic medical condition have poorer perinatal outcomes than women without a known chronic medical condition. DESIGN: Population-based study using data of the Netherlands Perinatal Registry between 2010-2019. SETTING: Nationwide study in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnancies of women who were diagnosed with chronic medical conditions by a medical specialist before pregnancy (n=36,835), divided into seven sub-groups and a reference group of pregnancies of women without known chronic medical conditions (n=1,084,623). MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: The primary outcome measure was mode of birth. Secondary outcomes measures were onset of labour, preterm birth, asphyxia, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission, and perinatal mortality. Spontaneous birth ranged from 45.0% (orthopaedic conditions) to 71.3% (neurological conditions) to 82.6% in the reference group. Assisted vaginal birth, planned caesarean birth, and emergency caesarean birth occurred significantly more in all groups compared to the reference group (p<0.001). Preterm birth was significantly more likely in the studied groups as well as perinatal asphyxia and NICU admission (all p<0.001). Adjusting for mode of birth, parity, age and ethnicity did not change the outcomes for the group of women with chronic medical conditions. Perinatal mortality was seen in all groups but in none of the separate groups significantly more than in the reference group. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Women with chronic medical conditions are more likely to experience preterm birth, caesarean births and NICU admission of the new-born. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Knowledge about perinatal outcomes of women with chronic medical conditions is a first step for obstetrics care providers in order to optimize personalized care.


Subject(s)
Perinatal Death , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Delivery, Obstetric , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Asphyxia , Parturition , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology
13.
Health Sci Rep ; 5(5): e664, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35949672

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: To analyze outcomes of nationwide local audits of uterine rupture to draw lessons for clinical care. Methods: Descriptive cohort study. Critical incident audit sessions within all local perinatal cooperation groups in the Netherlands. Women who sustained uterine rupture between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2019. Main Outcome Measures: Improvable factors, recommendations, and lessons learned for clinical care. Women's case histories were discussed in multidisciplinary perinatal audit sessions. Participants evaluated care against national and local clinical guidelines and common professional standards to identify improvable factors. Cases and outcomes were registered in a nationwide database. Results: One hundred and fourteen women who sustained uterine rupture were discussed in local perinatal audit sessions by 40-60 participants on average: A total of 111 (97%) were multiparous of whom 107 (94%) had given birth by cesarean section in a previous pregnancy. The audit revealed 178 improvable factors and 200 recommendations. Six percent (N = 11) of the improvable factors were identified as very likely and 18% (N = 32) as likely to have a relationship with the outcome or occurrence of uterine rupture. Improvable factors were related to inadequate communication, absent, or unclear documentation, delay in diagnosing the rupture, and suboptimal management of labor. Speak up in case a suspicion arises, escalating care by involving specialist obstetricians, addressing the importance of accurate documentation, and improving training related to fetal monitoring were the most frequent recommendations and should be topics for team (skills and drills) training. Conclusions: Through a nationwide incident audit of uterine rupture, we identified improvable factors related to communication, documentation, and organization of care. Lessons learned include "speaking up," improving the transfer of information and team training are crucial to reduce the incidence of uterine rupture.

14.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 107(5): 527-532, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35091450

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe characteristics of neonates with severe neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia (SNH) and to gain more insight in improvable factors that may have contributed to the development of SNH. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive study, based on national Dutch perinatal audit data on SNH from 2017 to 2019. PATIENTS: Neonates, born ≥35 weeks of gestation and without antenatally known severe blood group incompatibility, who developed hyperbilirubinaemia above the exchange transfusion threshold. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of neonates having SNH and corresponding improvable factors. RESULTS: During the 3-year period, 109 neonates met the eligibility criteria. ABO antagonism was the most frequent cause (43%). All neonates received intensive phototherapy and 30 neonates (28%) received an exchange transfusion. Improvable factors were mainly related to lack of knowledge, poor adherence to the national hyperbilirubinaemia guideline, and to incomplete documentation and insufficient communication of the a priori hyperbilirubinaemia risk assessment among healthcare providers. A priori risk assessment, a key recommendation in the national hyperbilirubinaemia guideline, was documented in only six neonates (6%). CONCLUSIONS: SNH remains a serious threat to neonatal health in the Netherlands. ABO antagonism frequently underlies SNH. Lack of compliance to the national guideline including insufficient a priori hyperbilirubinaemia risk assessment, and communication among healthcare providers are important improvable factors. Implementation of universal bilirubin screening and better documentation of the risk of hyperbilirubinaemia may enhance early recognition of potentially dangerous neonatal jaundice.


Subject(s)
Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal , Jaundice, Neonatal , Bilirubin , Ethnicity , Humans , Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal/diagnosis , Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal/epidemiology , Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal/therapy , Infant, Newborn , Jaundice, Neonatal/etiology , Phototherapy/adverse effects
15.
Am J Health Promot ; 35(1): 116-120, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32431156

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of preconception care (PCC) consultations by change in lifestyle behaviors. SETTING AND INTERVENTION: Women in deprived neighborhoods of 14 Dutch municipalities were encouraged to visit a general practitioner or midwife for PCC. SAMPLE: The study included women aged 18 to 41 years who had a PCC consultation. DESIGN: In this community-based prospective cohort study, we assessed initiation of folic acid supplementation, cessation of smoking, alcohol consumption, and illicit drug use. MEASURES: Self-reported and biomarker data on behavioral changes were obtained at baseline and 3 months later. ANALYSIS: The changes in prevalence were assessed with the McNemar test. RESULTS: Of the 259 included participants, paired analyses were available in 177 participants for self-reported outcomes and in 82 for biomarker outcomes. Baseline self-reported prevalence of no folic acid use was 36%, smoking 12%, weekly alcohol use 22%, and binge drinking 17%. Significant changes in prevalence toward better lifestyle during follow-up were seen for folic acid use (both self-reported, P < .001; and biomarker-confirmed, P = .008) and for self-reported binge drinking (P = .007). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that PCC contributes to initiation of folic acid supplementation and cessation of binge drinking in women who intend to become pregnant. Although based on a small sample, the study adds to the limited body of evidence regarding the benefits of PCC in improving periconception health.


Subject(s)
Life Style , Preconception Care , Female , Folic Acid , Health Behavior , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
16.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 10: 20, 2010 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20459717

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breech presentation occurs in 3 to 4% of all term pregnancies. External cephalic version (ECV) is proven effective to prevent vaginal breech deliveries and therefore it is recommended by clinical guidelines of the Royal Dutch Organisation for Midwives (KNOV) and the Dutch Society for Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG). Implementation of ECV does not exceed 50 to 60% and probably less.We aim to improve the implementation of ECV to decrease maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality due to breech presentations. This will be done by defining barriers and facilitators of implementation of ECV in the Netherlands. An innovative implementation strategy will be developed based on improved patient counselling and thorough instructions of health care providers for counselling. METHOD/DESIGN: The ultimate purpose of this implementation study is to improve counselling of pregnant women and information of clinicians to realize a better implementation of ECV.The first phase of the project is to detect the barriers and facilitators of ECV. The next step is to develop an implementation strategy to inform and counsel pregnant women with a breech presentation, and to inform and educate care providers. In the third phase, the effectiveness of the developed implementation strategy will be evaluated in a randomised trial. The study population is a random selection of midwives and gynaecologists from 60 to 100 hospitals and practices. Primary endpoints are number of counselled women. Secondary endpoints are process indicators, the amount of fetes in cephalic presentation at birth, complications due to ECV, the number of caesarean sections and perinatal condition of mother and child. Cost effectiveness of the implementation strategy will be measured. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence for the cost effectiveness of a structural implementation of external cephalic versions to reduce the number of breech presentations at term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NTR): 1878.


Subject(s)
Breech Presentation/therapy , Diffusion of Innovation , Guideline Adherence/organization & administration , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Version, Fetal , Breech Presentation/epidemiology , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Nurse Midwives/education , Nurse Midwives/organization & administration , Obstetrics/education , Obstetrics/organization & administration , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/organization & administration , Pregnancy , Research Design , Version, Fetal/education , Version, Fetal/statistics & numerical data
17.
JMIR Form Res ; 4(5): e16202, 2020 May 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32452805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the turbulent postpartum period, there is an urgent need by parents for support and information regarding the care for their infant. In the Netherlands, professional support is provided during the first 8 days postpartum and for a maximum of 8 hours a day. This care is delivered by maternity care assistants (MCAs). Despite the availability of this extensive care, a majority of women prefer to make use of a lesser amount of postpartum care. After this period, access to care is less obvious. Where parents are automatically offered care in the first 8 days after birth, they must request care in the period thereafter. To compensate for a possible gap in information transfer, electronic health (eHealth) can be a valuable, easily accessible addition to regular care. OBJECTIVE: We explored the needs and preferred content by new parents and health care professionals of a web-based platform dedicated to the postpartum period and identified barriers and facilitators for using such a platform. METHODS: We conducted 3 semistructured focus groups among (1) parents of newborns, (2) MCAs, and (3) clinicians and administrators in maternity care. A topic list based on a framework designed for innovation processes was used. Thematic content analysis was applied. RESULTS: In the focus group for parents, 5 mothers and 1 male partner participated. A total of 6 MCAs participated in the second focus group. A total of 5 clinicians and 2 administrators-a member of a stakeholder party and a manager of a maternity care organization-participated in the third focus group. All user groups underlined that a platform focusing on the postpartum period was missing in current care, especially by parents experiencing a gap following the intensive care ending after the first week of childbirth. Parents indicated that they would perceive a postpartum platform as a proper source of reliable information on topics regarding breastfeeding, growth, and developmental milestones, but also as a tool to support them in seeking care with appropriate professionals. They also emphasized the need to receive personalized information and the opportunity to ask questions via the platform. MCAs acknowledged added value of providing additional information on topics that they address during the early postpartum period. MCAs as well as clinicians and administrators would guide parents to such a platform for additional support. All user groups experienced disadvantages of using an authentication procedure and filling out extra questionnaires to receive tailored information. CONCLUSIONS: Our research shows that parents of newborns, MCAs, and clinicians and administrators foresee the additional value of a web-based postpartum platform for at least the whole postpartum period. The platform should be easily accessible and personalized. Content on the platform should contain information regarding breastfeeding, growth, and developmental milestones. A chat function with professionals could be considered as an option.

18.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 33(13): 2232-2240, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30606078

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The potential value of preconception care and interconception care is increasingly acknowledged, but delivery is generally uncommon. Reaching women for interconception care is potentially easier than for preconception care, however the concept is still unfamiliar. Expert consensus could facilitate guidelines, policies and subsequent implementation. A national and subsequent international expert meeting were organized to discuss the term, definition, content, relevant target groups, and ways to reach target groups for interconception care.Methods: We performed a literature study to develop propositions for discussion in a national expert meeting in the Netherlands in October 2015. The outcomes of this meeting were discussed during an international congress on preconception care in Sweden in February 2016. Both meetings were recorded, transcribed and subsequently reviewed by participants.Results: The experts argued that the term, definition, and content for interconception care should be in line with preconception care. They discussed that the target group for interconception care should be "all women who have been pregnant and could be pregnant in the future and their (possible) partners". In addition, they opted that any healthcare provider having contact with the target group should reach out and make every encounter a potential opportunity to promote interconception care.Discussion: Expert discussions led to a description of the term, definition, content, and relevant target groups for interconception care. Opportunities to reach the target group were identified, but should be further developed and evaluated in policies and guidelines to determine the optimal way to deliver interconception care.


Subject(s)
Preconception Care/standards , Consensus , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Female , Humans , Netherlands , Parents/education , Preconception Care/methods , Pregnancy
19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31683516

ABSTRACT

In this study we aimed to systematically analyze problems in the recruitment of women with low health literacy for preconception counseling and to adapt and evaluate written invitations for this group. In a problem analysis (stage 1) we used structured interviews (n = 72) to assess comprehension of the initial invitations, perception of perinatal risks, attitude and intention to participate in preconception counseling. These outcomes were used to adapt the invitation. The adapted flyer was pretested in interviews (n = 16) (stage 2) and evaluated in structured interviews among a new group of women (n = 67) (stage 3). Differences between women in stages 1 and 3 regarding comprehension, risk perception, attitude and intention to participate in counseling were analyzed by linear regression analysis and chi-square tests. Women in stage 3 (who read the adapted flyer) had a more positive attitude towards participation in preconception counselling and a better understanding of how to apply for a consultation than women in stage 1 (who read the initial invitations). No differences were found in intention to participate in preconception counseling and risk perception. Systematic adaptation of written invitations can improve the recruitment of low health-literate women for preconception counselling. Further research should gain insight into additional strategies to reach and inform this group.


Subject(s)
Counseling , Health Literacy , Preconception Care , Women's Health , Adult , Family Planning Services , Female , Humans , Intention , Pregnancy
20.
PLoS One ; 14(11): e0224427, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31693703

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most parents with young children pay routine visits to Well-Baby Clinics, or so-called Preventive Child Health Care (PCHC) services. This offers a unique opportunity to promote and deliver interconception care. This study aimed to integrate such care and perform an implementation evaluation. METHODS: In seven Dutch municipalities, PCHC professionals were instructed to discuss the possibility of an interconception care consultation during each routine six-months well-baby visit. The primary outcome of this study was coverage of the intervention, quantified as the proportion of visits during which women were informed about interconception care. Secondary outcomes included adoption, fidelity, feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability and effectiveness of the intervention, studied by surveying PCHC professionals and women considering becoming pregnant. RESULTS: The possibility of interconception care was discussed during 29% (n = 1,849) of all visits, and 60% of the PCHC physicians adopted the promotion of interconception care by regularly informing women. About half of the PCHC professionals and most women judged integration of interconception care in PCHC appropriate and acceptable. Estimated feasibility was poor, since 13% of the professionals judged future integration in daily practice as probable. The uptake of interconception care consultations was low (n = 4 consultations). CONCLUSIONS: Promotion of interconception care was achieved in approximately one-third of the routine PCHC consultations and appeared promising with regards to adoption, appropriateness and acceptability. However, concerns on feasibility and uptake of interconception care consultations in daily practice remain. Suggestions for improvement may include further integration of interconception care health promotion in routine PCHC consultations, while allocating sufficient resources.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/organization & administration , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Preconception Care/organization & administration , Prenatal Care/organization & administration , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child Health , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Plan Implementation , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Middle Aged , Preconception Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL