Gender Differences in Hospital Outcomes among COVID-19 Hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVES: Many epidemiological studies have shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disproportionately affects males, compared with females, although other studies show that there were no such differences. The aim of the present study was to assess differences in the prevalence of hospitalizations and in-hospital outcomes between the sexes, using a larger administrative database. METHODS: We used the 2020 California State Inpatient Database for this retrospective analysis. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code U07.1 was used to identify COVID-19 hospitalizations. These hospitalizations were subsequently stratified by male and female sex. Diagnosis and procedures were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The primary outcome of the study was hospitalization rate, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: There were 95,180 COVID-19 hospitalizations among patients 18 years and older, 52,465 (55.1%) of which were among men and 42,715 (44.9%) were among women. In-hospital mortality (12.4% vs 10.1%), prolonged length of hospital stays (30.6% vs 25.8%), vasopressor use (2.6% vs 1.6%), mechanical ventilation (11.8% vs 8.0%), and ICU admission rates (11.4% versus 7.8%) were significantly higher among male compared with female hospitalizations. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-1.44), hospital lengths of stay (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39), vasopressor use (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.51-1.66), mechanical ventilation (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.47-1.78), and ICU admission rates (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.51-1.66) were significantly higher among male hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that male sex is an independent and strong risk factor associated with COVID-19 severity.

Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalizations for Amyloid-Related Heart Failure.

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is being increasingly recognized as an important cause of heart failure (HF). In this study, we looked at adverse outcomes in hospitalizations with amyloid-related HF. This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample data, collected from 2016 to 2019. Patients ≥41 years of age and admitted for HF were included in the study. In these hospitalizations, amyloid-related HF was identified through the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for amyloidosis. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality, whereas secondary outcomes were prolonged length of stay, mechanical ventilation, mechanical circulatory support, vasopressors use, and dispositions other than home. From 2016 to 2019, there were 4,705,274 HF hospitalizations, of which 16,955 (0.4%) had amyloid cardiomyopathy. In all HF hospitalizations, amyloid-related increased from 0.26% in 2016 to 0.46% in 2019 (relative increase, 76.9%, P for trend <0.001). Amyloid-related HF hospitalizations were more common in older, male, and Black patients. The odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 1.38), prolonged hospital length (OR, 1.61; 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.73) and vasopressors use (OR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.05) were significantly higher for amyloid-related hospitalizations. Amyloid-related HF hospitalizations are increasing substantially and are associated with adverse hospital outcomes. These hospitalizations were disproportionately higher for older, male, and Black patients. Amyloid-related HF is rare and underdiagnosed yet has several adverse outcomes. Hence, healthcare providers should be watchful of this condition for early identification and prompt management.

The impact of the Coronavirus disease 2019 on hospitalizations for coronary artery revascularization: results from California State Inpatient Database.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has negatively impacted routine cardiovascular care. In this study, we assessed the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) hospitalizations and outcomes using a large database. METHODS: The current study was a retrospective analysis of California State Inpatient Database (SID) during March-December of 2019 and 2020. All adult hospitalizations for coronary artery revascularization were included for the analysis. ICD-10-CM diagnosis and procedure codes were used for identifying hospitalizations and procedures. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, stroke, acute kidney injury, and mechanical ventilation. Propensity score match analysis was done to compare adverse clinical outcomes. RESULTS: PCI hospitalizations (relative decrease, 15.0%, P for trend <0.001) and CABG hospitalizations (relative decrease, 16.4%, P for trend <0.001) decreased from 2019 to 2020, while viral pneumonia hospitalizations increased (relative increase, 1751.6%, P for trend <0.001). Monthly PCI and CABG hospitalization showed decreasing trends from January 2019 to December 2020. Propensity score match analysis showed that the odds of inhospital mortality (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24), acute kidney injury (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17), and ARDS (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.18-3.01) were higher among patients who received PCI in 2020. CONCLUSION: Results of our study indicate that initiatives such as encouraging patients to receive treatments and controlling the spread of COVID-19 should be instituted to improve PCI and CABG hospitalizations.

Hospital Outcomes Among COVID-19 Hospitalizations With Myocarditis from the California State Inpatient Database.

Many case reports have indicated that myocarditis could be a prognostic factor for predicting morbidity and mortality among patients with COVID-19. In this study, using a large database we examined the association between myocarditis among COVID-19 hospitalizations and in-hospital mortality and other adverse hospital outcomes. The present study was a retrospective analysis of data collected in the California State Inpatient Database during 2020. All hospitalizations for COVID-19 were included in the analysis and grouped into those with and without myocarditis. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, mechanical ventilation, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Propensity score matching, followed by conditional logistic regression, was performed to find the association between myocarditis and outcomes. Among 164,417 COVID-19 hospitalizations, 578 (0.4%) were with myocarditis. After propensity score matching, the rate of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher among COVID-19 hospitalizations with myocarditis (30.0% vs 17.5%, p <0.001). Survival analysis with log-rank test showed that 30-day survival rates were significantly lower among those with myocarditis (39.5% vs 46.3%, p <0.001). Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of cardiac arrest (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 to 3.14), cardiogenic shock (OR 4.13, 95% CI 2.14 to 7.99), mechanical ventilation (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.47 to 4.41), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.70 to 3.66) were significantly higher among those with myocarditis. Myocarditis was associated with greater rates of in-hospital mortality and adverse hospital outcomes among patients with COVID-19, and early suspicion is important for prompt diagnosis and management.

First Time Cannabis Use and Sexual Debut in U.S. High School Adolescents.

PURPOSE: Use of illicit drugs by adolescents might facilitate or trigger other risky behaviors, including early sexual initiation (ESI), multiple partners, and unprotected sex. This study examines whether the age at which adolescents initiate cannabis use is associated with the age of their first sexual intercourse in the U.S. in 2015. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from the 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey, a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey, was conducted (n = 7,664). Exposure of interest was age of initiation of cannabis use (never used cannabis, age 12 or younger, 13-14 years of age, and age 15 or older) and outcome was ESI (14 years old or younger). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals were computed. RESULTS: Prevalence of ESI was 15.3%. The proportion of cannabis use was 39.9%. Adolescents starting cannabis use before the age of 15 had higher adjusted odds of ESI (OR ranged 4.2-6.7). This association is modified by sex: while in boys using cannabis before 13 years, the OR is 9 (95% CI 5.2-15.6); in girls, it is 2.8 (95% CI 1.7-4.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that there should be sex and drug education programs instituted before the age of 12 ideally, and no later than by age 15 since this time represents a critical period of initiating both behaviors.

Resistance to implementing Kangaroo Mother Care in developing countries, and proposed solutions.

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials have shown that Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) can decrease morbidity and mortality due to low birthweight. Between 1994 and 2004, 44 teams in 25 developing countries were trained in KMC in Bogotá, Colombia; however, not all the teams were successful in initiating their own programmes and, of those that started, not all replicated the validated model. AIM: To identify factors involved in unsuccessful KMC implementation and find solutions. METHODS: A study was conducted in which 17 open-ended questionnaires were sent by e-mail to the coordinators of functioning KMC programmes in 15 countries, and 15 site visits were made to institutes that reported problems in starting programmes. The information was classified according to the perceived obstacle and the KMC model component involved. RESULTS: The early-discharge component (including ambulatory follow-up) was that found most difficult to implement. Resistance from health professionals, mothers and families was often related to local cultural practices. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance for and appropriate identification of obstacles usually indicated the appropriate solution. Some of the obstacles were common to many second-generation KMC programmes, making this information valuable for the implementation of programmes.