Severe hyperlactatemia in unselected surgical patients: retrospective analysis of prognostic outcome factors.

BACKGROUND: Etiology of hyperlactatemia in ICU patients is heterogeneous-septic, cardiogenic or hemorrhagic shock seem to be predominant reasons. Multiple studies show hyperlactatemia as an independent predictor for ICU mortality. Only limited data exists about the etiology of hyperlactatemia and lactate clearance and their influence on mortality. The goal of this single-center retrospective study, was to evaluate the effect of severe hyperlactatemia and reduced lactate clearance rate on the outcome of unselected ICU surgical patients. METHODS: Overall, 239 surgical patients with severe hyperlactatemia (> 10 mmol/L) who were treated in the surgical ICU at the University Medical Center Freiburg between June 2011 and August 2017, were included in this study. The cause of the hyperlactatemia as well as the postoperative course and the patient morbidity and mortality were retrospectively analyzed. Lactate clearance was calculated by comparing lactate level 12 h after first measurement of > 10 mmol/L. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate in our cohort was 82.4%. Severe hyperlactatemia was associated with death in the ICU (p < 0.001). The main etiologic factor was sepsis (51.9%), followed by mesenteric ischemia (15.1%), hemorrhagic shock (13.8%) and liver failure (9.6%). Higher lactate levels at ICU admission were associated with increased mortality (p < 0.001). Lactate clearance after 12 h was found to predict ICU mortality (ANOVA p < 0.001) with an overall clearance of under 50% within 12 h. The median percentage of clearance was 60.3% within 12 h for the survivor and 29.1% for the non-survivor group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Lactate levels appropriately reflect disease severity and are associated with short-term mortality in critically ill patients. The main etiologic factor for surgical patients is sepsis. When elevated lactate levels persist more than 12 h, survival chances are low and the benefit of continued maximum therapy should be evaluated.

Ligamentum teres augmentation (LTA) for hiatal hernia repair after minimally invasive esophageal resection: a new use for an old structure.

PURPOSE: Hiatal hernias with intrathoracic migration of the intestines are serious complications after minimally invasive esophageal resection with gastric sleeve conduit. High recurrence rates have been reported for standard suture hiatoplasties. Additional mesh reinforcement is not generally recommended due to the serious risk of endangering the gastric sleeve. We propose a safe, simple, and effective method to close the hiatal defect with the ligamentum teres. METHODS: After laparoscopic repositioning the migrated intestines, the ligamentum teres is dissected from the ligamentum falciforme and the anterior abdominal wall. It is then positioned behind the left lobe of the liver and swung toward the hiatal orifice. Across the anterior aspect of the hiatal defect it is semi-circularly fixated with non-absorbable sutures. Care should be taken not to endanger the blood supply of the gastric sleeve. RESULTS: We have used this technique for a total of 6 patients with hiatal hernias after hybrid minimally invasive esophageal resection in the elective (n = 4) and emergency setting (n = 2). No intraoperative or postoperative complications have been observed. No recurrence has been reported for 3 patients after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Primary suture hiatoplasties for hiatal hernias after minimally invasive esophageal resection can be technically challenging, and high postoperative recurrence rates are reported. An alternative, safe method is needed to close the hiatal defect. Our promising preliminary experience should stimulate further studies regarding the durability and efficacy of using the ligamentum teres hepatis to cover the hiatal defect.

Perioperative FLOT chemotherapy plus surgery for oligometastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: surgical outcome and overall survival.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines do not recommend surgery for patients with oligometastatic disease from esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGAC), although some studies suggest a more favorable survival. We analyzed the outcome of oligometastatic EGAC receiving FLOT chemotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS: The data of patients with either pre-therapeutic, post-neoadjuvant or intraoperative clinical diagnosis of oligometastatic EGAC were extracted from a prospective database of the 2009-2018 treatment period. 48 consecutive patients were identified with oligometastatic disease, who underwent perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery. We retrospectively analyzed surgical outcome and overall survival. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival was 18%. 12 patients (25%) with pre-therapeutic oligometastatic EGAC, who had no histologic vital tumor evidence of metastases after surgery had a survival rate of 48% compared to an 11% 5-year survival rate of 36 patients (75%), who had histologic vital tumor metastatic evidence after FLOT chemotherapy and surgical resection (p = 0.012). The survival rates after R0, R1 and R2 (non-resected metastases) resection were 21% (n = 33), 0% (n = 4) and 17% (n = 11), respectively (p = 0.273). CONCLUSION: Oligometastatic EGAC is associated with poor overall survival even after complete resection of all tumor manifestations. The subgroup of patients with a complete histologic response of metastatic lesions to neoadjuvant FLOT shows 5-year survival rates similar to non-metastatic EGAC. Trial registration Not applicable.

Banded Versus Nonbanded Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 3 Years of Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare silicone-banded sleeve gastrectomy (BSG) to nonbanded sleeve gastrectomy (SG) regarding weight loss, obesity-related comorbidities, and complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: As a primary bariatric procedure, SG leads to excellent weight loss, yet weight regain is a relevant issue in mid- to long-term follow-up. Retrospective analyses suggest that banding a sleeve using a silicone ring may decrease weight regain and improve weight loss. METHODS: The banded versus nonbanded sleeve gastrectomy single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted from January 2015 to August 2019. The primary endpoint was defined as excess weight loss 3 years after surgery. Secondary endpoints included the surgery's impact on obesity-related comorbidities, quality of life, and complications. The study was registered under DRKS00007729. RESULTS: Among 94 patients randomized, 97% completed 3-year follow-up. Mean initial body mass index was 50.9 kg/m [95% confidence interval (CI), 49.6-52.2]. Mean adjusted excess weight loss 3 years after SG amounted to 62.3% (95% CI, 56.2-68.5) and 73.9% ( 95% CI, 67.8-80.0) after BSG (difference 11.6%, P = 0.0073). Remission of type 2 diabetes occurred in 66.7% (4/6) after SG and in 91.0% (10/11) following BSG (P = 0.21). Three years after surgery, ring implantation correlated with decreased frequency of symptomatic reflux episodes (P = 0.01) but increased frequency of regurgitation (P = 0.03). The rate of major complications was not different between the study groups (BSG, n = 3; SG, n = 2; P = 0.63). Quality of life was better following BSG (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BSG provided better weight loss than nonbanded SG 3 years after surgery. Regurgitation was the main clinically relevant negative effect after BSG.

Esophago-Gastric Cancer after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is a bariatric technique that combines a long tube-like gastric conduit with a wide end-to-side gastro-jejunostomy. It is a non-complex operation with a low frequency of intestinal obstructions and an excellent long-term weight loss, however, there is a fear of esophagogastric cancer. This narrative review explores the risk of cancer development after OAGB. Five gastric cancers were published after loop gastric bypass (an early version of OAGB, n=4) and after modern OAGB (n=1), four of which occurred in the remnant stomach and one in the gastric stump. Jejuno-gastric reflux is normal after OAGB, but there is little or no evidence to suggest bile-induced malignant degeneration in the stomach. On the contrary, gastro-esophageal reflux is a clear cause of metaplasia and AEG, although gastro-esophageal reflux is rare after OAGB with only two cases of AEG in the literature. Postoperative gastroscopic surveillance should be considered in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux and/or hiatal hernia. When reflux becomes symptomatic, diversion of the OAGB into a Roux-en-Y construction should be recommended.

The DECON pilot project investigates predictive markers for successful bariatric surgery.

Obesity is a chronic, multifactorial disease which is linked to a number of adverse endocrinological and metabolic conditions. Currently, bariatric surgery is one of the most effective treatments for individuals diagnosed with severe obesity. However, the current indications for bariatric surgery are based on inadequate metrics (i.e., BMI) which do not account for the complexity of the disease, nor the heterogeneity among the patient population. Moreover, there is a lack of understanding with respect to the biological underpinnings that influence successful and sustained weight loss post-bariatric surgery. Studies have implicated age and pre-surgery body weight as two factors that are associated with favorable patient outcomes. Still, there is an urgent medical need to identify other potential factors that could improve the specificity of candidate selection and better inform the treatment plan of patients with obesity. In this report, we present and describe the cohort of the DECON pilot project, a multicenter study which aims to identify predictive biomarkers of successful weight loss after bariatric surgery.

Comparison of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens for treatment of peritoneal-metastasized colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves patient survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Commonly used cytotoxic agents include mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin. Studies have reported varying results, and the evidence for the choice of the HIPEC agent and uniform procedure protocols is limited. AIM: To evaluate therapeutic benefits and complications of CRS + MMC vs oxaliplatin HIPEC in patients with peritoneal metastasized CRC as well as prognostic factors. METHODS: One hundred and two consecutive patients who had undergone CRS and HIPEC for CRC PC between 2007 and 2019 at the Medical Center of the University Freiburg regarding interdisciplinary cancer conference decision were retrospectively analysed. Oxaliplatin and MMC were used in 68 and 34 patients, respectively. Each patient's demographics and tumour characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications and survival were noted. Complications were stratified and graded using Clavien/Dindo analysis. Prognostic outcome factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis of survival. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly regarding baseline characteristics. We found no difference in median overall survival between MMC and oxaliplatin HIPEC. Regarding postoperative complications, patients treated with oxaliplatin HIPEC suffered increased complications (66.2% vs 35.3%; P = 0.003), particularly intestinal atony, intraabdominal infections and urinary tract infection, and had a prolonged intensive care unit stay compared to the MMC group (7.2 d vs 4.4 d; P = 0.035). Regarding univariate analysis of survival, we found primary tumour factors, nodal positivity and resection margins to be of prognostic value as well as peritoneal cancer index (PCI)-score and the completeness of cytoreduction regarding peritoneal carcinomatosis. Multivariate analysis of survival confirmed primary distant metastasis and primary tumour resection status to have a significant impact on survival and likewise peritoneal cancer index-scoring regarding peritoneal carcinomatosis. CONCLUSION: In this single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing CRS with either oxaliplatin or MMC HIPEC, overall survival was not different, though oxaliplatin was associated with a higher postoperative complication rate, indicating treatment favourably with MMC. Further studies comparing HIPEC regimens would improve evidence-based decision-making.

Downgrading of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after obesity surgery: duration and severity matter.

BACKGROUND: There is overwhelming evidence for the antidiabetic effect of obesity surgery, but few reports involve objective longitudinal measurements of severity of type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study applies a grading scheme and analyses the prognostic impact of routine clinical factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study includes 77 obese diabetic patients with a preoperative BMI of 48.9 ± 7.8 kg/m(2) who underwent gastric banding (n = 4), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 57), or sleeve gastrectomy (n = 16) between 2007 and 2013. A 6-point scoring system graded the level of antidiabetic therapy. Downgrading was calculated from the difference between pre- and postoperative grades. RESULTS: Downgrading reached its maximum at 3 months well before maximal weight loss: one grade in 6 (8 %) patients, two grades in 36 (47 %) patients, and three or more grades in 20 (26 %) patients. Age, gender, and preoperative weight had no impact on downgrading. There were no significant differences between gastric banding (median 1; 0-2), gastric bypass (median 2; 0-5), and sleeve gastrectomy (median 2; 0-4). Preoperative duration of T2DM and its severity grade were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. The rate of patients who could discontinue insulin was more than 80 % when the duration of preexisting T2DM was less than 5 years as compared to 62 % when the duration was more than 5 years. CONCLUSION: The severity of T2DM downgrades in most patients within the initial period of postoperative weight loss. Downgrading increases with shorter duration and lower severity grade of pre-existing T2DM.