Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 134
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 21(1): 12-20, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36634606

ABSTRACT

The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of the following adult CNS cancers: glioma (WHO grade 1, WHO grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma [1p19q codeleted, IDH-mutant], WHO grade 2-4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 4 glioblastoma), intracranial and spinal ependymomas, medulloblastoma, limited and extensive brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, non-AIDS-related primary CNS lymphomas, metastatic spine tumors, meningiomas, and primary spinal cord tumors. The information contained in the algorithms and principles of management sections in the NCCN Guidelines for CNS Cancers are designed to help clinicians navigate through the complex management of patients with CNS tumors. Several important principles guide surgical management and treatment with radiotherapy and systemic therapy for adults with brain tumors. The NCCN CNS Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding molecular profiling of gliomas.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Central Nervous System , Mutation
2.
J Neurooncol ; 165(1): 63-77, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37889444

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Approximately 80% of brain metastases originate from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are frequently utilized in this setting. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) when SRS and ICI are administered concurrently. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted through the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Logistic regression models and competing risks analyses were utilized to identify predictors of any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN). RESULTS: The study included 395 patients with 2,540 brain metastases treated with single fraction SRS and ICI across 11 institutions in four countries with a median follow-up of 14.2 months. The median age was 67 years. The median margin SRS dose was 19 Gy; 36.5% of patients had a V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3. On multivariable analysis, V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3 was a significant predictor of developing any grade RN (OR: 2.18) and SRN (OR: 3.95). At 1-year, the cumulative incidence of any grade and SRN for all patients was 4.8% and 3.8%, respectively. For concurrent and non-concurrent groups, the cumulative incidence of any grade RN was 3.8% versus 5.3%, respectively (p = 0.35); and for SRN was 3.8% vs. 3.6%, respectively (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: The risk of any grade RN and symptomatic RN following single fraction SRS and ICI for NSCLC brain metastases increases as V12 Gy exceeds 10 cm3. Concurrent ICI and SRS do not appear to increase this risk. Radiosurgical planning techniques should aim to minimize V12 Gy.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Humans , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/secondary , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/methods , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Retrospective Studies , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/pathology
3.
Cancer ; 128(7): 1429-1438, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35077586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastases are frequently treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, data reporting on the risk of developing radiation necrosis (RN) are limited. METHODS: RN rates were compared for concurrent therapy (ICI/SRS administration within 4 weeks of one another) and nonconcurrent therapy with the χ2 test. Univariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with developing RN. RESULTS: Fifty patients (23 concurrent and 27 nonconcurrent) with 395 brain metastases were analyzed. The median follow-up was 12.1 months; the median age was 65 years. The median margin dose was 20 Gy, and 4% underwent prior whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The median treated tumor volume was 3.32 cm3 (range, 0.06-42.38 cm3 ); the median volume of normal brain tissue receiving a dose of 12 Gy or higher (V12 Gy) was 8.42 cm3 (range, 0.27-111.22 cm3 ). Any-grade RN occurred in 17.4% and 22.2% in the concurrent and nonconcurrent groups, respectively (P = .67). Symptomatic RN occurred in 4.3% and 14.8% in the concurrent and nonconcurrent groups, respectively (P = .23). Increased tumor volume during SRS (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.19; P = .04) was associated with developing RN, although V12 Gy (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06; P = .06), concurrent therapy (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.17-2.30; P = .76), prior WBRT, and ICI agents were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic RN occurs in a minority of patients with RCC brain metastases treated with ICI/SRS. The majority of events were grade 1 to 3 and were managed medically. Concurrent ICI/SRS does not appear to increase this risk. Attempts to improve dose conformality (reduce V12) may be the most successful mitigation strategy in single-fraction SRS.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/radiotherapy , Cranial Irradiation , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/etiology , Kidney Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Necrosis/etiology , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(12): 1441-1464, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902832

ABSTRACT

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Medical Oncology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/diagnosis , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/therapy
5.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 163(10): 2861-2869, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34427769

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Resection of clinoid meningiomas can be associated with significant morbidity. Experience with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for clinoid meningiomas remains limited. We studied the safety and effectiveness of SRS for clinoid meningiomas. METHODS: From twelve institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, we pooled patients treated with SRS for radiologically suspected or histologically confirmed WHO grade I clinoid meningiomas. RESULTS: Two hundred seven patients (median age: 56 years) underwent SRS for clinoid meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.02 cm3, and 87% of tumors were immediately adjacent to the optic apparatus. The median tumor prescription dose was 12 Gy, and the median maximal dose to the anterior optic apparatus was 8.5 Gy. During a median post-SRS imaging follow-up of 51.1 months, 7% of patients experienced tumor progression. Greater margin SRS dose (HR = 0.700, p = 0.007) and pre-SRS radiotherapy (HR = 0.004, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of better tumor control. During median visual follow-up of 48 months, visual function declined in 8% of patients. Pre-SRS visual deficit (HR = 2.938, p = 0.048) and maximal radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy (HR = 11.297, p = 0.02) independently predicted greater risk of post-SRS visual decline. Four patients experienced new post-SRS cranial nerve V neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: SRS allows durable control of clinoid meningiomas and visual preservation in the majority of patients. Greater radiosurgical prescription dose is associated with better tumor control. Radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy and visual impairment before the SRS increase risk of visual deterioration.


Subject(s)
Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Radiosurgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Meningeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Meningioma/radiotherapy , Meningioma/surgery , Middle Aged , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 18(11): 1537-1570, 2020 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33152694

ABSTRACT

The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of adult CNS cancers ranging from noninvasive and surgically curable pilocytic astrocytomas to metastatic brain disease. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team, including neurosurgeons, radiation therapists, oncologists, neurologists, and neuroradiologists, is a key factor in the appropriate management of CNS cancers. Integrated histopathologic and molecular characterization of brain tumors such as gliomas should be standard practice. This article describes NCCN Guidelines recommendations for WHO grade I, II, III, and IV gliomas. Treatment of brain metastases, the most common intracranial tumors in adults, is also described.


Subject(s)
Astrocytoma , Brain Neoplasms , Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Glioma , Adult , Astrocytoma/diagnosis , Astrocytoma/therapy , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Central Nervous System , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Glioma/diagnosis , Glioma/therapy , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
7.
Acta Oncol ; 58(8): 1095-1101, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30958075

ABSTRACT

Background: Early mortality is a major deterrent to oncologic management, often preventing delivery of therapy or leading to administration of treatment that offers limited benefit from aggressive interventions. Due to more recent progress in therapeutic options for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, identifying those at high risk of early mortality (within 30 days) could have implications for treatment selection. Because early mortality following diagnosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not well-characterized, this investigation evaluated national trends and predictors thereof. Material and methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for cases of pathologically confirmed metastatic NSCLC with complete vital status and clinical information, diagnosed between 2006 and 2014. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with 30-day mortality. Results: Of 346,681 patients, 45,861 (13%) experienced early mortality over the past decade, which remained relatively constant over time. Predictors of early mortality included advancing age (>65 years), male gender, Caucasian race, non-private insurance, lower income, greater comorbidities, residence in metropolitan and/or lesser-educated areas, treatment at community centers, patients with no prior history of cancer and regional differences (p < .01 for all). Early mortality was highest in patients older than 80 years with multiple comorbidities (29%). The majority of patients (71%) who died within 30 days did not receive any therapy. Conclusions: A fair proportion of NSCLC patients experience early mortality, which has not decreased over time. The majority of patients with early mortality do not receive treatment. Prognostic factors for early mortality should be considered during initial evaluation and subsequent follow-up of these patients. Doing so may impact systemic treatment selection by medical oncologists, management of (oligo)metastatic disease by radiation and surgical oncologists and cost-effective administration of these therapies in the stage IV NSCLC population.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Mortality/trends , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Selection , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
8.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(7): 2018-2026, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29721724

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study of a large, contemporary national database evaluated management patterns, outcomes, and prognostic factors of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) in the USA. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly diagnosed nonmetastatic MPM. Patients were divided into five cohorts: observation, chemotherapy alone, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) alone, CRS/chemo [referring to any non-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) chemotherapy], and CRS/HIPEC. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of 1514 patients, 379 (25%) underwent observation, 370 (24%) received chemotherapy only, 197 (13%) CRS alone, 352 (23%) CRS/chemo, and 216 (14%) CRS/HIPEC. No major temporal trends in management were noted. Factors predictive of CRS administration included younger age, female gender, insurance status, residence in educated areas, living farther from treating institutions, and treatment at academic centers (p < 0.05 for all). Compared with epithelioid histology, those with sarcomatoid and biphasic histology were less and more likely to undergo CRS, respectively (p < 0.05 for both). In all CRS patients, 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0.8 and 1.2%, respectively. At median follow-up of 50 months, median OS in the respective groups was 6, 17, 21, 52, and 61 months (p < 0.001). Poor prognostic factors included advanced age, male gender, uninsured/Medicaid insurance, and sarcomatoid/biphasic histology (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In the USA, MPM is treated using a wide variety of strategies. Many factors impact the type of treatment delivered, including age, sociodemographics, geography, histology, and facility type. Although these data do not imply causation, combined-modality management seems associated with the longest OS.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion/mortality , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/mortality , Hyperthermia, Induced/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Mesothelioma/mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Peritoneal Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Mesothelioma/pathology , Mesothelioma/therapy , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Middle Aged , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young Adult
9.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 194(5): 365-374, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29362835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Improved survival of patients with spinal bone metastases has resulted in an increased number of referrals for retreatment and repeat reirradiation. METHODS: A consortium of expert radiation oncologists (RO) has been established with the aim of providing treatment recommendations for challenging clinical scenarios for which there are no established guidelines. In this case, a patient developed local progression of a T5 vertebral lesion after two prior courses of palliative radiotherapy (time interval >12 months, assumed cumulative biologically equivalent dose in 2­Gy fractions [EQD2] for spinal cord [alpha/beta 2 Gy] 75 Gy). Expert recommendations were tabulated with the aim of providing guidance. RESULTS: Five of seven RO would offer a third course of radiotherapy, preferably with advanced techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. However, the dose-fractionation concepts were heterogeneous (3-20 fractions) and sometimes adjusted to different options for systemic treatment. All five RO would compromise target volume coverage to reduce the dose to the spinal cord. Definition of the spinal cord planning-organ-at-risk volume was heterogeneous. All five RO limited the EQD2 for spinal cord. Two were willing to accept more than 12.5 Gy and the highest EQD2 was 19 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing body of literature about bone metastases and spinal cord reirradiation has encouraged some expert RO to offer palliative reirradiation with cumulative cord doses above 75 Gy EQD2; however, no consensus was achieved. Strategies for harmonization of clinical practice and development of evidence-based dose constraints are discussed.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/radiotherapy , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Kidney Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Professional Competence , Re-Irradiation , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Disease Progression , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care , Radiotherapy Dosage , Spinal Cord/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Cord/radiation effects , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Neoplasms/mortality , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Survival Rate , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/radiation effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
10.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 16(10): 1171-1182, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30323087
11.
J Neurooncol ; 140(1): 55-62, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29909499

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases are common in metastatic melanoma and radiosurgery is often utilized for local control. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) play a central role in contemporary melanoma management; however, there is limited data exploring outcomes and potential toxicities for patients treated with CPIs and radiosurgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all consecutive cases of newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery at a single institution between 2012 and 2017, and included only patients that initiated CPIs within 8 weeks before or after radiosurgery. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included with a median follow-up of 31.6 months. Two-year local control was 92%. Median time to out-of-field CNS and extra-CNS progression were 8.4 and 7.9 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR). Twenty-five patients (66%) received anti-CTLA4 and 13 patients (34%) received anti-PD-1+/-anti-CTLA4. Compared with anti-CTLA4, patients that received anti-PD-1+/-anti-CTLA4 had significant improvements in time to out-of-field CNS progression (p = 0.049), extra-CNS progression (p = 0.015), and PFS (p = 0.043), with median time to out-of-field CNS progression of NR vs. 3.1 months, median time to extra-CNS progression of NR vs. 4.4 months, and median PFS of 20.3 vs. 2.4 months. Six patients (16%) developed grade ≥ 2 CNS toxicities (grade 2: 3, grade 3: 3, grade 4/5: 0). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcomes were observed in patients that initiated CPIs within 8 weeks of undergoing radiosurgery for newly diagnosed MBM. There appears to be an advantage to anti-PD-1 or combination therapy compared to anti-CTLA4.


Subject(s)
Antibodies/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms , CTLA-4 Antigen/immunology , Melanoma/pathology , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Radiosurgery/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
12.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 28(8): 1560-1568, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30247249

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we analyzed patterns of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer to identify predictors for upfront surgery compared with definitive chemoradiation (CRT). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients aged 18 years or older with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IB2-IIB cervical cancer. All patients underwent either upfront hysterectomy with or without postoperative radiation therapy versus definitive CRT. Logistic regression was used to assess variables associated with modality of treatment (surgery vs CRT). RESULTS: Of the 9494 patients included, 2151 (22.7%) underwent upfront surgery. Of those undergoing surgery, 380 (17.7%) had positive margins, 478 (22.2%) had positive nodes, and 458 (21.3%) had pathologic involvement of the parametrium. Under multiple logistic regression, rates of surgery significantly increased from 2004 (12.2%) to 2012 (31.2%) (odds ratio [OR] per year increase, 1.15; confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.17; P < 0.001). Upfront surgery was more commonly performed in urban (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.41; P = 0.018) and rural counties (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.24-2.58; P = 0.002), for adenocarcinoma (OR, 2.14; 1.88-2.44; P < 0.001) and adenosquamous (OR, 2.69; 2.11-3.43; P < 0.001) histologies, and in patients from higher median income communities (ORs, 1.19-1.37). Upfront surgery was less common at academic centers (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of upfront surgery relative to definitive CRT have increased significantly over the past decade. In the setting of level 1 evidence supporting the use of definitive CRT alone for these women, the rising rates of upfront surgery raises concern for both unnecessary surgical procedures with higher rates of treatment-related morbidity and greater health care costs.


Subject(s)
Hysterectomy/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemoradiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Staging , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Registries , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Young Adult
13.
Cancer ; 123(2): 273-282, 2017 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27649421

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, the patterns of care for the radiotherapy-based treatment of patients with stage III to IVB oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) are poorly defined. The objective of the current study was to characterize the use and predictors of chemotherapy with radiotherapy for this population using the National Cancer Database. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database with AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage III to IV OPSCC who were treated with radiotherapy between 2003 and 2012 were eligible for analysis. Treatment was defined as radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or induction chemotherapy (IC). Multivariable regression with multilevel modeling was used to determine predictors of any chemotherapy use and, among patients receiving chemotherapy, the predictors of IC. RESULTS: The majority (90%) of the 30,875 eligible patients received chemotherapy, the majority of whom (71% of the total) were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy; a sizeable percentage of patients received IC (19% of total). On multivariable regression, younger age, favorable comorbidity status, and more advanced tumor and lymph node disease were found to be independent predictors of any chemotherapy and IC use. Nonwhite patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; P<.0001), women (OR, 0.74; P<.0001), and individuals without private insurance were found to be significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy. Patients treated at higher-volume institutions were significantly less likely to receive IC (OR, 0.69; P = .0006). Human papillomavirus status did not appear to independently influence treatment choice. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients with stage III to IVB OPSCC who were treated with definitive radiotherapy received chemotherapy, which is consistent with high-level data and national recommendations. However, disparities with regard to race, sex, and insurance status emerged thereby requiring additional investigation. The frequent use of IC despite limited supportive evidence warrants research on physician and patient decision making and presents an opportunity to improve evidence-based treatment delivery. Cancer 2017;123:273-282. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Female , Humans , Lymph Nodes/drug effects , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology
14.
Cancer ; 123(17): 3402-3409, 2017 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28513823

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma, perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are considered standard options. In the current study, the authors used the National Cancer Data Base to compare overall survival (OS) between these regimens. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy for nonmetastatic gastric adenocarcinoma from 2004 through 2012 were divided into those treated with perioperative chemotherapy without RT versus those treated with adjuvant CRT. Survival was estimated and compared using univariate and multivariate models adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics, surgical margin status, and the number of lymph nodes examined. Subset analyses were performed for factors chosen a priori, and potential interactions between treatment and covariates were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 3656 eligible patients were identified, 52% of whom underwent perioperative chemotherapy and 48% of whom received postoperative CRT. The median follow-up was 47 months, and the median age of the patients was 62 years. Analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated improved OS with adjuvant RT on both univariate (median of 51 months vs 42 months; P = .013) and multivariate (hazard ratio, 0.874; 95% confidence interval, 0.790-0.967 [P = .009]) analyses. Propensity score-matched analysis also demonstrated improved OS with adjuvant RT (median of 49 months vs 39 months; P = .033). On subset analysis, a significant interaction was observed between the survival impact of adjuvant RT and surgical margins, with a greater benefit of RT noted among patients with surgical margin-positive disease (hazard ratio with RT: 0.650 vs 0.952; P for interaction <.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this National Cancer Data Base analysis, the use of adjuvant RT in addition to chemotherapy was associated with a significant OS advantage for patients with resected gastric cancer. The survival advantage observed with adjuvant CRT was most pronounced among patients with positive surgical margins. Cancer 2017;123:3402-9. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Databases, Factual , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Gastrectomy/methods , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Preoperative Care , Prognosis , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
15.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 15(11): 1331-1345, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29118226

ABSTRACT

For many years, the diagnosis and classification of gliomas have been based on histology. Although studies including large populations of patients demonstrated the prognostic value of histologic phenotype, variability in outcomes within histologic groups limited the utility of this system. Nonetheless, histology was the only proven and widely accessible tool available at the time, thus it was used for clinical trial entry criteria, and therefore determined the recommended treatment options. Research to identify molecular changes that underlie glioma progression has led to the discovery of molecular features that have greater diagnostic and prognostic value than histology. Analyses of these molecular markers across populations from randomized clinical trials have shown that some of these markers are also predictive of response to specific types of treatment, which has prompted significant changes to the recommended treatment options for grade III (anaplastic) gliomas.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Glioma/diagnosis , Nervous System/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/standards , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/classification , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/pathology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Glioma/classification , Glioma/pathology , Glioma/therapy , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy/standards , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/standards
16.
J Neurooncol ; 135(3): 529-534, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836140

ABSTRACT

The relation between hospital volume and outcomes for patients with glioblastoma is unknown. We undertook this study to determine the effect of hospital volume on treatment received and its effect on survival in patients with glioblastoma. We included patients from the National Cancer Database diagnosed with a glioblastoma from 2006 to 2013. Hospital volume was calculated by examining the treating facilities average number of cases per year and grouping them into tertiles: (low < 9.25, medium 9.26-23.88, and high ≥ 23.39). Treatment was defined as receiving any type of therapeutic surgery, radiation or chemotherapy. Using regression models we examined the relation between hospital volume to treatment received and survival with adjustment for clinical, socioeconomic and institutional factors. The study included 68,726 patients of which 91.8% received treatment. Among patients diagnosed at low volume facilities, 90.1% received treatment versus 94.2% in high volume facilities (p < 0.0001). Compared to low volume centers, the odds ratio of receiving any treatment was 1.01 (CI 95% CI: 0.95-1.09) and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.31-1.55) for medium volume and high volume facilities, respectively. On multivariate analysis for survival among those who received treatment, the hazard of mortality was decreased at high volume (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.94) facilities compared to low volume facilities. Patients diagnosed with glioblastoma at a high volume facility (≥23.39 cases per year) have an increased likelihood of receiving treatment. Furthermore, glioblastoma patients may significantly improve their survival by choosing to receive care at a high-volume hospital.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Glioblastoma/mortality , Glioblastoma/therapy , Hospitals, High-Volume , Hospitals, Low-Volume , Aged , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Regression Analysis , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , United States
17.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 18(3): 144-152, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28436107

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: 4DCT-ventilation is an exciting new imaging modality that uses 4DCT data to calculate lung-function maps. Because 4DCTs are acquired as standard of care for lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, 4DCT-ventiltation provides functional information at no extra dosimetric or monetary cost to the patient. The development of clinical trials is underway to use 4DCT-ventilation imaging to spare functional lung in patients undergoing radiotherapy. The purpose of this work was to perform a virtual trial using retrospective data to develop the practical aspects of a 4DCT-ventilation functional avoidance clinical trial. METHODS: The study included 96 stage III lung cancer patients. A 4DCT-ventilation map was calculated using the patient's 4DCT-imaging, deformable registration, and a density-change-based algorithm. Clinical trial inclusion assessment used quantitative and qualitative metrics based on the patient's spatial ventilation profile. Clinical and functional plans were generated for 25 patients. The functional plan aimed to reduce dose to functional lung while meeting standard target and critical structure constraints. Standard and dose-function metrics were compared between the clinical and functional plans. RESULTS: Our data showed that 69% and 59% of stage III patients have regional variability in function based on qualitative and quantitative metrics, respectively. Functional planning demonstrated an average reduction of 2.8 Gy (maximum 8.2 Gy) in the mean dose to functional lung. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrated that 60-70% of stage III patients would be eligible for functional planning and that a typical functional lung mean dose reduction of 2.8 Gy can be expected relative to standard clinical plans. These findings provide salient data for the development of functional clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography , Lung Neoplasms/physiopathology , Pulmonary Ventilation , Algorithms , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Respiration , Retrospective Studies
18.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 22(6): 495-501, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29123457

ABSTRACT

AIM/BACKGROUND: Papillary meningioma represents a rare subset of World Health Organization (WHO) Grade III meningioma that portends an overall poor prognosis. There is relatively limited data regarding the benefit of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). We used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to compare overall survival (OS) outcomes of surgically resected papillary meningioma cases undergoing PORT compared to post-operative observation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NCDB was queried for patients with papillary meningioma, diagnosed between 2004 and 2013, who underwent upfront surgery with or without PORT. Overall survival (OS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 190 patients were identified; 89 patients underwent PORT, 101 patients were observed. Eleven patients received chemotherapy (6 with PORT, 5 without). 2-Year OS was significantly improved with PORT vs. no PORT (93.0% vs. 74.4%), as was 5-year OS (78.5% vs. 62.5%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.85; p = 0.01). On MVA, patients receiving PORT had improved OS compared to observation (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76; p = 0.005). On subset analysis by age group, the benefit of PORT vs. no PORT was significant in patients ≤18 years (n = 13), with 2-year OS of 85.7% vs. 50.0% (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.80; p = 0.032) and for patients >18 years (n = 184), with 2-year OS of 94.7% vs. 76.1% (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-1.00; p = 0.049), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary analysis, PORT was associated with improved survival for both adult and pediatric patients with papillary meningioma. PORT should be considered in those who present with this rare, aggressive tumor.

19.
Am J Hematol ; 91(5): 476-80, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26852276

ABSTRACT

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon lymphoma for which existing data is limited. We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate PMBCL and the impact of radiotherapy (RT) on outcomes in the years following FDA approval of rituximab. We queried the NCDB for patients with PMBCL diagnosed from 2006 to 2011 and treated with multiagent chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) estimates, univariate (UVA), and multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. Propensity score matched analysis (PSMA) was performed to account for indication bias and mitigate heterogeneity between treatment groups. 465 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 36 months. Median age was 36 years; 43% received RT. 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 87%, and for the no-RT and RT groups, 83% versus 93%, respectively. On UVA, OS was improved with RT (HR 0.34, P = 0.002). On MVA, RT remained significantly associated with improved OS (HR 0.44, P = 0.028) while Medicaid insurance status and increasing stage remained significantly associated with OS decrement. PSMA confirmed the OS benefit associated with RT. This analysis is the largest PMBCL dataset to date and demonstrates a significant survival benefit associated with RT in patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy in the rituximab era. More than half of patients treated in the United States during this time period did not receive RT. In the absence of phase III data to support omission, combined modality therapy with its associated survival benefit should be the benchmark against which other therapies are compared.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, B-Cell/radiotherapy , Mediastinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Datasets as Topic , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunotherapy , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphoma, B-Cell/drug therapy , Male , Mediastinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Risk Factors , Rituximab/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
20.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 74(2): 309-16, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670715

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating insurance status and melanoma outcomes are limited. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether health insurance correlates with more advanced disease, receipt of treatment, and survival in melanoma. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 61,650 patients with cutaneous melanoma using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. RESULTS: Under multivariate analysis, patients with either Medicaid insurance (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.04; P < .001) or uninsured status (hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.44-1.85; P < .001) were more likely to die of any cause, including melanoma. Uninsured compared with non-Medicaid insured cases more often presented with increasing tumor thickness (odds ratio [OR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.76-2.73; P < .001) and presence of ulceration (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.40-1.92; P < .001), and less often received treatment (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.60-2.19; P < .001). Compared with non-Medicaid insured, Medicaid cases more often had increasing tumor thickness (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.91-2.91; P < .001), advanced stage (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37-1.85; P < .001), and presence of ulceration (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19-1.63; P < .001), and less often received treatment (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.37-1.89; P < .001). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Patients with melanoma and Medicaid or uninsured status were more likely to present with advanced disease and were less likely to receive treatment, likely contributing to an overall and cause-specific survival detriment. Addressing access to care may help improve these outcomes.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Melanoma/therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , SEER Program , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Skin Ulcer/epidemiology , Skin Ulcer/etiology , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL