Is a minimum duration of 5 days of unfractionated heparin infusion necessary before transition to oral anticoagulation in cerebral venous thrombosis? a retrospective chart review.

In managing cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT), the standard approach has been administering parenteral anticoagulation for at least five days, despite limited supporting evidence. This study aimed to determine the optimal duration of parenteral anticoagulation for CVT patients and its potential impact on their functional outcomes upon discharge. This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted across multiple healthcare centers and included adult CVT patients who received varying durations of parenteral anticoagulation: less than 5 days (n = 25) or 5 days or more (n = 16). The primary focus was on the duration of acute anticoagulation treatment, with secondary endpoints including hospital stay length and functional outcomes. The study found that a shorter duration of anticoagulation treatment (< 5 days) was linked to more favorable outcomes, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (68% vs. 25%, RR = 0.37, CI 0.15-0.90, p = 0.007). However, regression analysis showed non statistically significant associations for all variables except gender. Female patients were significantly more likely to receive a shorter duration of anticoagulation (Odds Ratio: 2.6, 95% CI: 2.2-3.1, P-Value: <0.001). These findings suggest a potential connection between shorter anticoagulation duration (< 5 days) and improved CVT patient outcomes, as indicated by their mRS scores at discharge. The observed relationship between female gender and shorter anticoagulation duration warrants further exploration. Nevertheless, caution is necessary when interpreting these findings due to the small sample size and specific patient characteristics. Further research in a larger and more diverse cohort is essential to validate these results and understand their implications fully.

Timing of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism after recent traumatic and vascular brain Injury.

Currently, there is no consensus guideline for initiating anticoagulation in patients with a traumatic or vascular brain injury. Initiating anticoagulation for management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) can vary significantly from 72 hours to 30 weeks due to the risk of hemorrhagic complications. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes using modified Rankin Score (mRS) in a patient population with early (≤ 3 days) versus late (> 3 days) initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation from the time VTE was diagnosed. This retrospective study included patients with a traumatic or vascular brain injury who developed either deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Use of anticoagulation prior to admission, diagnosis with VTE on admission, or patients with a non-brain injury were exclusion criteria. Secondary outcomes measured were all-cause mortality, length of stay, and reasons for early interruption of anticoagulation. Therapeutic anticoagulation was started early in 76 (74%) patients compared to late initiation in 27 (26%) patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The mRS score 0-3 versus 4-6 was similar in patients who received early anticoagulation versus those who received it later. However, there was a trend favoring better outcomes in the early group [mRS 4-6; 78% vs. 93%; p = 0.085] and in subgroup analysis of patients with VTE diagnosed 4-7 days [mRS 4-6; 26% vs. 56%; p = 0.006] compared to the late group. In univariate and multivariable logistic regression, only age was associated with a significant worse outcome (median, IQR) 36 years (24-50) vs. 58 years (44-65) OR 1.07 (1.03-1.12); p < 0.001. In this study, early initiation of anticoagulation did not worsen clinical outcomes.

Enoxaparin may be associated with lower rates of mortality than unfractionated heparin in neurocritical and surgical patients.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are often administered to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in critically ill patients. However, the preferred prophylactic agent (UFH or LMWH) is not known. We compared the all-cause mortality rate in patients receiving UFH to LMWH for VTE prophylaxis. We conducted a retrospective propensity score adjusted analysis of patients admitted to neuro-critical, surgical, or medical intensive care units. Patients were included if they were screened with venous duplex ultrasonography or computed tomography angiography for detection of VTE. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Initially 2228 patients in the cohort were included for analysis, 1836 (82%) patients received UFH, and 392 (18%) patients received enoxaparin. After propensity score matching, a well-balanced cohort of 618 patients remained in the study (309 patients receiving UFH; 309 patients receiving enoxaparin). The use of UFH for VTE prophylaxis in ICU patients was associated with similar rates of all-cause mortality compared with enoxaparin [RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.43-1.24, p = 0.310]. There were no differences in the prevalence of DVT, prevalence of PE or hospital LOS between the two groups, DVT [RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.56-1.53, p = 0.889], PE [RR 1.50; 95% CI 0.78-2.90, p = 0.296] and LOS [9 ± 9 days vs 9 ± 8; p = 0.857]. A trend toward mortality benefit was observed in NICU [RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.13-1.07, p = 0.062] and surgical patients [RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.17-1.02, p = 0.075] favoring the enoxaparin group. The use of UFH for VTE prophylaxis in ICU patients was associated with similar rates of VTE, all-cause mortality and LOS compared to enoxaparin. In subgroup analysis, neuro-critical and surgical patients who received UFH had a higher rate of mortality than those who received enoxaparin.

Unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in intensive care units: a propensity score adjusted analysis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in hospitalized patients. Pharmacologic prophylaxis is used in order to reduce the risk of VTE events. The main purpose of this study is to compare the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who received unfractionated heparin (UFH) versus enoxaparin as VTE prophylaxis. Mortality was evaluated as a secondary outcome. This was a Propensity Score Adjusted Analysis. Patients admitted to neurology, surgical, or medical ICUs and screened with venous doppler ultrasonography or computed tomography angiography for detection of VTE were included in the analysis. We identified 2228 patients in the cohort, 1836 (82.4%) patients received UFH and 392 (17.6%) patients received enoxaparin. Propensity score matching yielded a well-balanced cohort of 950 (74% UFH, 26% enoxaparin) patients. After matching, there was no difference in prevalence of DVT (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.67-1.64, p = 0.85) and PE (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.44-1.30, p = 0.31). No significant differences in location and severity of DVT and PE between the two groups were detected. Hospital and intensive care unit stay was similar between the two groups. Unfractionated heparin was associated with a higher rate of mortality, (HR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.13-3.70; p = 0.019). The use of UFH as VTE prophylaxis in ICU patients was associated with a similar prevalence of DVT and PE compared with enoxaparin, and the site and degree of occlusion were similar. However, a higher mortality rate was seen in the UFH group.

Reflections of mental health professionals on working with and in the climate crisis.

The aim of this paper is to share our experiences of engaging with the climate crisis as citizens and mental health professionals (MHPs). We hope the outputs will usefully validate the experiences of fellow MHPs and support them to reflect on their role in this crisis. We came together as eight MHPs, participating in group discussions and one-one interviews with the first author to reflect on our experiences. The collaboratively generated themes reflect how engagement with the crisis has: (i) disrupted our personal and professional experiences; (ii) helped us adapt and grow; and (iii) enabled us to live, work and act in more accordance with our values. A key reflection was that these experiences are not linear and we continue to wrestle with our responses to the climate crisis. Discussions also elicited visions of how mental health paradigms could be better adapted to meeting the escalating public health need that this crisis is generating. We conclude by advocating for MHPs to process and respond to the climate crisis and recognize that their skills can make a vital contribution to this global challenge.

The role of mental health professionals in the climate crisis: an urgent call to action.

The climate and ecological crisis will constitute the defining public health challenge of the twenty-first century, posing an unprecedented global threat to all determinants of health, and to healthcare delivery systems. We believe that mental health professionals have a crucial role to play in responding to this crisis. Whilst responding to the mental health consequences of the climate crisis will remain a key role for us as mental health professionals, we argue that our remit goes beyond this, and should include advancing public understanding of the climate crisis, highlighting its impact on physical and mental wellbeing, and advocating for systemic changes to limit its impending harms. This paper is an urgent call to action for all mental health professionals to take up a role in the context of the climate and ecological crisis. This paper will describe the relationship between mental health and climate change, and frame it within wider systemic and conceptual frameworks. It will demonstrate that as mental health professionals we are well placed to act as leaders of change-arguing that we have a duty to do so-and suggest actions that can be implemented depending on interests, skill sets and opportunities.

Routine surveillance of pelvic and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a potential conduit for paradoxical embolization to the systemic atrial circulation of a thrombus originating in the venous system. In a selected group of subjects, the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was assessed. Subjects were identified if they underwent magnetic resonance venography (MRV) pelvis and lower extremity doppler (LE-VDU) for assessment of DVT with PFO. The primary outcome measure was to report the number of patients with paradoxical embolization as their suspected etiology of stroke due to the presence of DVT, which then will be considered as determined stroke. Others with determined stroke diagnosis were reported using Treatment of Acute Stroke Trial (TOAST) criteria. At discharge, those without etiology of their stroke were grouped under embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). We further analyzed the prevalence of DVT by age group, ≤ 60 years vs > 60 years to describe if the prevalence is higher with younger age and to evaluate if higher Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (ROPE) score will have higher number of DVTs compared to lower ROPE scores. Of the 293, 19 (7%) were strokes due to paradoxical embolism. At discharge, determined stroke were 54% vs ESUS were 46%. The overall prevalence of DVT was 19 (7%); MRV-pelvis 13 (4%), and LE-VDU was 9 (3%). No significant difference was noted using both modalities. However, in multivariable regression analysis, a trend suggested an association between pelvic thrombi and high ROPE score as the etiology of stroke; OR 3.56 (0.98, 12.93); p = 0.054. Detection of DVT was not associated with PFO, high ROPE scores or young age. Our data indicate an over-reliance of testing for DVT, particularly MRV pelvis with contrast, in patients with PFO. Clinical studies are needed to identify other factors predictive of DVT in patients with ischemic stroke and PFO.

Algorithms for the Testing of Tissue Donors for Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B Virus, and Hepatitis C Virus.

BACKGROUND: Although transmission of pathogenic viruses through human tissue grafts is rare, it is still one of the most serious dreaded risks of transplantation. Therefore, in addition to the detailed medical and social history, a comprehensive serologic and molecular screening of the tissue donors for relevant viral markers for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is necessary. In the case of reactive results in particular, clear decisions regarding follow-up testing and the criteria for tissue release must be made. METHODS: Based on the clinical relevance of the specific virus markers, the sensitivity of the serological and molecular biological methods used and the application of inactivation methods, algorithms for tissue release are suggested. RESULTS: Compliance with the preanalytical requirements and assessment of a possible hemodilution are mandatory requirements before testing the blood samples. While HIV testing follows defined algorithms, the procedures for HBV and HCV diagnostics are under discussion. Screening and decisions for HBV are often not as simple, e.g., due to cases of occult HBV infection, false-positive anti-HBc results, or early window period positive HBV NAT results. In the case of HCV diagnostics, modern therapies with direct-acting antivirals, which are often associated with successful treatment of the infection, should be included in the decision. CONCLUSION: In HBV and HCV testing, a high-sensitivity virus genome test should play a central role in diagnostics, especially in the case of equivocal serology, and it should be the basis for the decision to release the tissue. The proposed test algorithms and decisions are also based on current European recommendations and standards for safety and quality assurance in tissue and cell banking.

Comparison of polyspecific versus IgG specific ELISA in predominately cardiac patients with suspected heparin induced thrombocytopenia.

A diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) must often be made based on clinical and laboratory evidence. This was a quasi-experimental study of patients admitted from June 2016 to October 2017. The primary endpoint was the incidence of false positive results in polyspecific and IgG specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); then we compared the sensitivity and specificity of each assays in predominately cardiac patients with suspected HIT. A sensitivity/specificity analysis was conducted using serotonin release assay (SRA) as the 'gold standard'. The secondary outcome measures included length of hospital stay. We identified a total of 155 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Confirmatory tests with SRA on both groups were completed; false positive result was higher in the polyspecific group when compared to the IgG group [60% vs. 5%]. The IgG specific ELISA test yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95% however, the polyspecific ELISA had a low yield for specificity of 24% but maintained 100% sensitivity. In the IgG specific group with HIT-, their median length of stay was halved compared to those who were HIT + ; hospital LOS in days, IQR [30 (27-81) vs. 15 (7-33) p = 0.023] and a shorter median LOS in the ICU, IQR [24 (5-47) vs. 6 (2-14); p = 0.079]. Hospital or ICU LOS was the same in both (HIT+ and HIT-) groups managed with polyspecific ELISA. The IgG specific test had few false positive results and a high sensitivity score. Ensuring appropriate testing can bring a substantial decrease in drug expenditure, reduced length of stay and prevent unnecessary anticoagulation.

Guidelines for the Acute Treatment of Cerebral Edema in Neurocritical Care Patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute treatment of cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure is a common issue in patients with neurological injury. Practical recommendations regarding selection and monitoring of therapies for initial management of cerebral edema for optimal efficacy and safety are generally lacking. This guideline evaluates the role of hyperosmolar agents (mannitol, HTS), corticosteroids, and selected non-pharmacologic therapies in the acute treatment of cerebral edema. Clinicians must be able to select appropriate therapies for initial cerebral edema management based on available evidence while balancing efficacy and safety. METHODS: The Neurocritical Care Society recruited experts in neurocritical care, nursing, and pharmacy to create a panel in 2017. The group generated 16 clinical questions related to initial management of cerebral edema in various neurological insults using the PICO format. A research librarian executed a comprehensive literature search through July 2018. The panel screened the identified articles for inclusion related to each specific PICO question and abstracted necessary information for pertinent publications. The panel used GRADE methodology to categorize the quality of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low based on their confidence that the findings of each publication approximate the true effect of the therapy. RESULTS: The panel generated recommendations regarding initial management of cerebral edema in neurocritical care patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, bacterial meningitis, and hepatic encephalopathy. CONCLUSION: The available evidence suggests hyperosmolar therapy may be helpful in reducing ICP elevations or cerebral edema in patients with SAH, TBI, AIS, ICH, and HE, although neurological outcomes do not appear to be affected. Corticosteroids appear to be helpful in reducing cerebral edema in patients with bacterial meningitis, but not ICH. Differences in therapeutic response and safety may exist between HTS and mannitol. The use of these agents in these critical clinical situations merits close monitoring for adverse effects. There is a dire need for high-quality research to better inform clinicians of the best options for individualized care of patients with cerebral edema.

Analysis of venous thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients undergoing standard versus routine ultrasonography.

Routine screening of high-risk asymptomatic trauma or surgical patients for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. Studies suggest against screening while others recognize that some patients at high risk may benefit. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the benefit of routine screening using doppler ultrasonography for the early detection of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in post-operative neurosurgical patients. This was a quasi-experimental study at a major academic tertiary care medical center. A total of 157 adults underwent cranial or spinal surgical interventions from March through August 2017 and received either standard screening (n = 104) versus routine ultrasonography screening (n = 53). There was no significant difference in incidence of DVT between the two groups: 11 (11%) in the standard screening group versus 5 (9%) in the routine screening group, p = 0.823. Upper and lower extremity ultrasonography was performed in 43 (41%) of the standard screening group versus 53 (100%) in the routine screening group, p < 0.001. DVT was identified in nearly one of every 6 ultrasonography screenings in the standard screening group versus 27 ultrasonography screenings required to identify one DVT in the routine screening group. There were the same number of screenings for upper extremity ultrasonography, but they did not yield or detect DVT; instead only superficial, untreatable, DVTs were reported. Total cost to diagnose one DVT, including screening and labor, averaged $13,664 in the standard group versus $56,525 in the routine group. Routine screening in neurosurgical patients who received VTE prophylaxis was not associated with lower incidence of VTE and mortality attributed to PE. Thus, routine screening may not be cost effective to prevent complications from DVT incidence.

Incidence of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity following traumatic brain injury using assessment tools.

INTRODUCTION: A consensus statement proposed a diagnostic framework to systematise the identification of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) using the PSH-Assessment Measure (PSH-AM). METHODS: This retrospective study identified adult patients with a primary diagnosis of traumatic brain injury and a hospital length of stay >14 days. Based on PSH-AM scores, patients were grouped into 'unlikely', 'possible', or 'probable' PSH. For this study, 'possible' and 'probable' PSH patients were collapsed into a single group (PSH+), and resultant data were compared with 'unlikely' diagnoses (PSH-). PSH-AM data were assessed against clinical diagnoses to establish sensitivity and specificity data. RESULTS: Sixty five patients met inclusion criteria, with 45/65 (69%) categorised as either 'possible' or 'probable' PSH on the PSH-AM. Only 16 of these patients were diagnosed by clinicians. The most common symptoms triggering clinical diagnosis were tachycardia, fever and posturing. Increased respiratory rate, blood pressure or the presence of diaphoresis were not used in diagnosing PSH if the PSH-AM was not utilised. Assuming clinical assessment as the current gold standard, the PSH-AM yielded a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 35% when used retrospectively. Patients clinically diagnosed with PSH were discharged 5 days earlier compared to those identified by the PSH-AM. CONCLUSIONS: The recently proposed diagnostic framework may reduce misdiagnosis, length of stay and hospitalisation costs.

Impact of practice change in reducing venous thromboembolism in neurocritical overweight patients: 2008-2014.

Publications regarding early initiating venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis have been available since the early 1990s. These recommendations became available in current guidelines on and after 2012. The purpose of this study is to review the practice change in reducing the incidence of VTE in brain injury patients from 2008 to 2014. This was a single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study. Data was extracted from our data base that included patients over 100 kg from January 2008 to August 2014. Included were all patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute brain and spinal injury to neurocritical care unit. Clinical endpoints examined were incidence of bleeding and VTE. A total of 509 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: The previous group (n = 212) included patients from 2008 to 2010, and the recent group (n = 297) included patients from 2011 to 2014. The time for initiating VTE prophylaxis from admission was (median, IQR) 73 h (37-140) vs. 34 h (20-46); p < 0.01. There were no differences in major and minor bleeding complications. Discontinuation of VTE prophylaxis for association with progressive bleeding was not documented in any of the study patients. The incidence of VTE was 10 % (22/212) vs. 5 % (15/297); p = 0.02. In hospital LOS in days was 16 (10-26) vs. 7 (4-15); P < 0.01. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, only the time of the initiation VTE prophylaxis after admission was significantly associated with the occurrence of VTE (median, IQR) 70 h (37-158) vs. 36 h (20-63); OR 1.004, 95 % CI 1.001-1.007; P < 0.01. In this 6-year review of data, early initiation of VTE prophylaxis has decreased the incidence of VTE without clinically documented bleeding complications.

The sexually dimorphic impact of maltreatment on cortical thickness, surface area and gyrification.

An extensive literature has detailed how maltreatment experience impacts brain structure in children and adolescents. However, there is a dearth of studies on the influence of maltreatment on surface based indices, and to date no study has investigated how sex influences the impact of maltreatment on cortical thickness, surface area and local gyrification. We investigated sex differences in these measures of cortical structure in a large community sample of children aged 10-14 years (n = 122) comprising 62 children with verified maltreatment experience and 60 matched non-maltreated controls. The maltreated group relative to the controls presented with a pattern of decreased cortical thickness within a region of right anterior cingulate, orbitofrontal cortex and superior frontal gyrus; decreased surface area within the right inferior parietal cortex; and increased local gyrification within left superior parietal cortex. This atypical pattern of cortical structure was similar across males and females. An interaction between maltreatment exposure and sex was found only in local gyrification, within two clusters: the right tempo-parietal junction and the left precentral gyrus. These findings suggest that maltreatment impacts cortical structure in brain areas associated with emotional regulation and theory of mind, with few differences between the sexes.

High dose subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in overweight neurocritical care patients.

Timing and dosing of chemical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in brain injury is controversial. Risk of bleeding while using high dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) in overweight patients to prevent VTE is also unknown. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of subcutaneous heparin 7500 units for VTE prophylaxis in overweight patients. This was a retrospective study comparing patients over 100 kg who received either 7500 units Q8 h (n = 141) (high dose group, HDG), or 5000 units Q8 h (n = 257) (traditional dose group, TDG), of UFH subcutaneously. Both groups had similar rates of bleeding complications. The incidence of drop in hemoglobin by two points in any 24 h was 14 % (20/141) HDG versus 11 % (28/257) TDG; P = 0.33. Hemoglobin drop by two points from baseline was 57 % (81/141) HDG versus 51 % (132/257) TDG; P = 0.24. The need for pRBC transfusion was 26 % (36/141) HDG versus 20 % (52/257) TDG; P = 0.22. An increase in aPTT from baseline by two times was 4 % (5/141) HDG versus 4 % (9/257) TDG, P = 0.59. Discontinuation of heparin therapy for association with progressive bleeding was not documented in any patients. No differences in minor bleeding complications were observed. There was no difference in the incidence of VTE: 5.7 % (8/141) HDG versus 9.3 % (24/257) TDG; P = 0.2. In univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis, only the time of the initiation of heparin after admission was associated with the occurrence of VTE (median, IQR) 46 h (17-86) HDG versus 105 h (56-167) TDG; OR 1.2 (1.1-1.3); P < 0.001. High dose subcutaneous UFH was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding, nor did it decrease the incidence of VTE in overweight patients.

Sex differences in socioemotional functioning, attentional bias, and gray matter volume in maltreated children: A multilevel investigation.

While maltreatment is known to impact social and emotional functioning, threat processing, and neural structure, the potentially dimorphic influence of sex on these outcomes remains relatively understudied. We investigated sex differences across these domains in a large community sample of children aged 10 to 14 years (n = 122) comprising 62 children with verified maltreatment experience and 60 well-matched nonmaltreated peers. The maltreated group relative to the nonmaltreated comparison group exhibited poorer social and emotional functioning (more peer problems and heightened emotional reactivity). Cognitively, they displayed a pattern of attentional avoidance of threat in a visual dot-probe task. Similar patterns were observed in males and females in these domains. Reduced gray matter volume was found to characterize the maltreated group in the medial orbitofrontal cortex, bilateral middle temporal lobes, and bilateral supramarginal gyrus; sex differences were observed only in the supramarginal gyrus. In addition, a disordinal interaction between maltreatment exposure and sex was found in the postcentral gyrus. Finally, attentional avoidance to threat mediated the relationship between maltreatment and emotional reactivity, and medial orbitofrontal cortex gray matter volume mediated the relationship between maltreatment and peer functioning. Similar mediation patterns were observed across sexes. This study highlights the utility of combining multiple levels of analysis when studying the "latent vulnerability" engendered by childhood maltreatment and yields tentative findings regarding a neural basis of sex differences in long-term outcomes for maltreated children.

Overview of the Regulatory Oversight Implemented by the French Regulatory Authorities for the Clinical Investigation of Gene Therapy and Cell Therapy Products.

Advanced therapy medicinal products, a new class of products with promising therapeutic effects, have been classified as medicinal products and as such should be developed according to a well-structured development plan, to establish their quality, safety and efficacy profile and conclude, at the time of the marketing authorisation evaluation, on a positive risk/benefit balance for patients. An important part of this development plan is achieved through clinical trials, which have also to be approved according to a well-established regulatory process, prior any initiation. This chapter is dedicated to describe the regulatory pathway to be followed in France, before initiating any clinical trial with those investigational advanced therapy medicinal products. In France, to get the final authorisation to initiate a clinical trial, the legislation imposes to run in parallel two independent but complementary authorisation procedures. The first procedure is aimed at assessing the ethical aspect of the biomedical research, while the second has to review the safety and regulatory aspects. A third procedure has to be envisaged where in case the investigational product consists or contains a genetically modified organism. The French system herein described is in line with the EU regulation on clinical trial and follows the respective deadlines for granting the final approval. The complexity of the procedure is in fact more due to the complexity of the products and protocols to be assessed than to the procedure itself which is now very close to the well-known procedure applied routinely for more conventional chemical or biological candidate medicinal products.

Plasmapheresis may be an option in urgent management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the setting of acute intracerebral hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: We report a case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) that was complicated by acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and bilateral adrenal hemorrhage. In the setting of worsening thrombocytopenia, the risk of expansion of ICH and additional thrombotic events is concerning; hence, we employed plasmapheresis to reduce thrombotic risk. METHODS: We followed serial daily heparin antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) optical density measurements as well as heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) assays on both pre- and post-pheresis samples in order to objectively determine when thrombotic risk was sufficiently decreased. RESULTS: After four cycles of plasmapheresis, both heparin antibody ELISA and HIPA assays became negative. CONCLUSION: This case helps illustrate the utility of plasmapheresis in management of HIT when anticoagulation is contraindicated.

Reviving Decades-Old Wisdom: Longitudinal Analysis of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Its Effects on Acute Ischemic Stroke to Improve Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: While renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors have a longstanding history in blood pressure control, their suitability as first-line in-patient treatment may be limited due to prolonged half-life and kidney failure concerns. METHODS: Using a cohort design, we assessed the impact of RAS inhibitors, either alone or in combination with beta-blockers, on mortality, while exploring interactions, including those related to end-stage renal disease and serum creatinine levels. Eligible subjects were Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) patients aged 18 or older with specific subtypes who received in-patient antihypertensive treatment. The primary outcome was mortality rates. Statistical analyses included cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches, employing generalized linear models, G-computation, and discrete-time survival analysis over a 20-day follow-up period. RESULTS: In our study of 3,058 AIS patients, those using RAS inhibitors had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (2.2%) compared to non-users (12.1%), resulting in a relative risk (RR) of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.12-0.26). Further analysis using G-computation revealed a marked reduction in mortality risk associated with RAS inhibitors (0.0281 vs. 0.0913, risk difference [RD] of 6.31% or 0.0631, 95% CI: 0.046-0.079). Subgroup analysis demonstrated notable benefits, with individuals having creatinine levels below and above 1.3 mg/dl exhibiting statistically significant RD (RD -0.0510 vs. -0.0895), and a significant difference in paired comparison (-0.0385 or 3.85%, CI 0.023-0.054). Additionally, longitudinal analysis confirmed a consistent daily reduction of 0.93% in mortality risk associated with the intake of RAS inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: RAS inhibitors are associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality in AIS patients, suggesting potential clinical benefits in improving patient outcomes.