Sequential neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by curative surgery vs. primary surgery alone for resectable, non-metastasized pancreatic adenocarcinoma: NEOPA- a randomized multicenter phase III study (NCT01900327, DRKS00003893, ISRCTN82191749).

BACKGROUND: Median OS after surgery in curative intent for non-metastasized pancreas cancer ranges under study conditions from 17.9 months to 23.6 months. Tumor recurrence occurs locally, at distant sites (liver, peritoneum, lungs), or both. Observational and autopsy series report local recurrence rates of up to 87% even after potentially "curative" R0 resection. To achieve better local control, neoadjuvant CRT has been suggested for preoperative tumour downsizing, to elevate the likelihood of curative, margin-negative R0 resection and to increase the OS rate. However, controlled, randomized trials addressing the impact of neoadjuvant CRT survival do not exist. METHODS/DESIGN: The underlying hypothesis of this randomized, two-armed, open-label, multicenter, phase III trial is that neoadjuvant CRT increases the three-year overall survival by 12% compared to patients undergoing upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer. A rigorous, standardized technique of histopathologically handling Whipple specimens will be applied at all participating centers. Overall, 410 patients (n=205 in each study arm) will be enrolled in the trial, taking into regard an expected drop out rate of 7% and allocated either to receive neoadjuvant CRT prior to surgery or to undergo surgery alone. Circumferential resection margin status, i.e. R0 and R1 rates, respectively, surgical resectability rate, local and distant disease-free and global survival, and first site of tumor recurrence constitute further essential endpoints of the trial. DISCUSSION: For the first time, the NEOPA study investigates the impact of neoadjuvant CRT on survival of resectable pancreas head cancer in a prospectively randomized manner. The results of the study have the potential to change substantially the treatment regimen of pancreas cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial gov: NCT01900327, DRKS00003893, ISRCTN82191749.

Management of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma with intracerebral invasion: Clinical experience at a single institution and review of the literature.

Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) represents less than 1% of all malignancies. Most of the tumors are diagnosed at an advanced stage, when they have already invaded neighboring tissue structures. We describe the cases of 2 patients with a substantial intracerebral extension of SNUC who were treated at our institution. One was treated with surgery followed by chemoradiotherapy. The other was primarily treated with induction chemotherapy with a combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemo- and radiotherapy. In view of the rarity of SNUC, no prospective clinical trials have been performed and a gold standard for treatment has not yet been established. Therefore, treatment recommendations are based on level IV evidence. These recommendations are diverse and controversial. In our 2 cases, the patient who was treated with induction chemotherapy had a better outcome. In cases of intracerebral extension, radical surgery is necessary and induction chemotherapy should be considered.

Expression, epigenetic regulation, and humoral immunogenicity of cancer-testis antigens in chronic myeloid leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer-testis (CT) antigens represent attractive targets for tumor immunotherapy based on their tumor-restricted expression and immunogenicity. However, a broad picture of the expression of CT antigens and associated humoral immune responses in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is still missing. METHODS: We screened CML cell lines and bone marrow (BM) samples from healthy donors by RT-PCR for the expression of 31 CT antigens before and after treatment with epigenetic agents. Expression of tumor-restricted antigens was further examined in 60 CML patients and humoral immune responses against 15 CT antigens were screened by ELISA. RESULTS: In untreated cell lines we detected the expression of 17 CT antigens that were absent from normal BM. Expression of most antigens increased following demethylating treatment with 5'-Aza-2'-Deoxycytidine. In these samples, only PRAME was repeatedly detected and expression correlated with several clinicopathological parameters and decreased overall survival. We further show that a lower frequency of PRAME-positive samples during imatinib treatment was not caused by gene-specific downregulation. Analyzing the patients' antibody responses we found that the vast majority of patients lacked spontaneous immunity against CT antigens including PRAME. CONCLUSIONS: CT antigen expression can be increased by the application of epigenetic agents and the expression of PRAME correlates with clinicopathological parameters and overall survival in patients with CML, but does not lead to humoral immune responses. PRAME-specific immunotherapy might represent a promising approach for the eradication of residual therapy-resistant leukemic cells due to its frequent expression and stability under imatinib treatment.