Effect of Physical Therapy on Circumference Measurement and Extremity Volume in Patients Suffering from Lipedema with Secondary Lymphedema.

Background: Lipedema is a chronic and progressive disease. Many complications can occur if the disease is not treated. The most important of these complications is lipedema with secondary lymphedema. There are very few publications about lipedema with secondary lymphedema. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of physical therapy on lower extremity circumference and volume in patients suffering from lipedema with secondary lymphedema. Methods and Results: All patients received pneumatic compression and complex decongestive therapy (CDT). Perometer measurement was made at five distinct points. Fifteen patients were included in the study. It was seen that significant reduction was found in the circumference of three of the five points of measurements performed in the left leg, whereas significant reduction was found in the circumference of four of the five points of measurements performed in the right leg. Also, there was a decrease in the extremity volume in both legs. Conclusion: Combined application of CDT and pneumatic compression in patients suffering from lipedema with secondary lymphedema is an effective treatment method in reducing lower extremity volume and circumference measurement.

Can Physical Therapy Techniques Slow Down the Progression of Lipedema?

Background: Lipedema is a disease characterized by an increase in extracellular fluid. In these patients, the increase in the amount of extracellular fluid may accelerate the progression of the disease. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) on intracellular/extracellular fluid balance. Methods and Results: Twenty-two female patients diagnosed with lipedema by a specialist lymphologist were included in the study. Patients were subjected to complex decongestive therapy and pneumatic compression therapy 6 days a week for 1 month. Extracellular and intracellular fluid volumes were assessed using bioimpedance spectroscopy before and after the treatment. A decrease in intracellular (p = 0.010) and extracellular (p = 0.002) fluid volumes was observed after the treatment. Conclusion: There is no completely curative treatment method for lipedema. Current treatments aim to slow down the progression of the disease. CDT is considered effective in reducing intracellular and extracellular fluid volume in lipedema patients. Therefore, it is thought to be effective in slowing down the progression of the disease.

Intracellular and Extracellular Water Balance in Patients with Lipedema.

Background: The presence of edema in patients with lipedema has been investigated in many studies. However, no study has been found that examines the amount of intracellular (ICF) and extracellular fluid (ECF) in these patients together. The aim of this study is to examine the amount of ICF and ECF in patients with stage 2 lipedema. Methods and Results: Twenty-four patients diagnosed with stage 2 lipedema were included in the study. Bioimpedance spectroscopy was applied to measure extracellular and intracellular water levels. The mean age of the participants was 44.58 ± 2.95 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the participants was 33.9 ± 1.84 kg/m2. It was observed that the amount of ECF in the patients was above the normal values (p < 0.001), whereas the amount of ICF was within the normal range (p = 0.801). In addition, it was observed that there was a moderate relationship between BMI and the amount of ECF. Conclusion: Although the amount of ICF is within the normal range in patients with lipedema, an increase in ECF is observed. The reason why edema is not observed in these patients despite the increase in ECF may be the increase in glycosaminoglycan and proteoglycan synthesis. In addition, the attention of these patients to weight control may contribute to slowing the course of the disease by preventing the increase in the amount of ECF. For a better diagnosis of lipedema, it is considered important to evaluate the amount of ECF in addition to routine evaluations.

Investigation of the Less Known Effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage: A Narrative Review.

Background: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), one of the components of complex decongestive physiotherapy, which is accepted as the gold standard in the treatment of lymphedema, is used for therapeutic purposes in many diseases. The most well-known feature of MLD is that it helps to reduce edema. In addition to reducing edema, MLD has many effects, such as increasing venous flow, reducing fatigue, and raising the pain threshold. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study examining the effects of MLD other than its effects on edema in detail. The aim of this study is to compile effects of MLD and to provide a better understanding of the effects of MLD. Methods and Results: A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in July 2019, to identify different effects of MLD. The articles were chosen by, first, reading the abstract and subsequently data were analyzed by reading the entire text through full-text resources. To undertake the study, we have collected information published about different effects of MLD over the last 30 years (1989-2019). According to our results, 20 studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusions: This study suggests that MLD can be used in symptomatic treatment of various diseases (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease) considering the effects of MLD on the systems.

Selenium Deficiency in Lymphedema and Lipedema-A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study from a Specialized Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Selenium is a trace element, which is utilized by the human body in selenoproteins. Their main function is to reduce oxidative stress, which plays an important role in lymphedema and lipedema. In addition, selenium deficiency is associated with an impaired immune function. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of selenium deficiency in these conditions, and if it is associated with disease severity and an associated medical condition such as obesity. METHODS: This cross-sectional study is an anonymized, retrospective analysis of clinical data that was routinely recorded in a clinic specialized in lymphology. The data was comprised from 791 patients during 2012-2019, in which the selenium status was determined as part of their treatment. RESULTS: Selenium deficiency proved common in patients with lymphedema, lipedema, and lipo-lymphedema affecting 47.5% of the study population. Selenium levels were significantly lower in patients with obesity-related lymphedema compared to patients with cancer-related lymphedema (96.6 ± 18.0 µg/L vs. 105.1 ± 20.2 µg/L; p < 0.0001). Obesity was a risk factor for selenium deficiency in lymphedema (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.49 to 3.21), but not in lipedema. CONCLUSIONS: In countries with low selenium supply, selenium deficiency is common, especially in lymphedema patients. Therefore, it would be sensible to check the selenium status in lymphedema patients, especially those with obesity, as the infection risk of lymphedema is already increased.

Sodium selenite and cancer related lymphedema: Biological and pharmacological effects.

A significant percentage of cancer patients develop secondary lymphedema after surgery or radiotherapy. The preferred treatment of secondary lymphedema is complex physical therapy. Pharmacotherapy, for example with diuretics, has received little attention, because they were not effective and only offered short-term solutions. Sodium selenite showed promise as a cost-effective, nontoxic anti-inflammatory agent. Treatment with sodium selenite lowers reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, causes a spontaneous reduction in lymphedema volume, increases the efficacy of physical therapy for lymphedema, and reduces the incidence of erysipelas infections in patients with chronic lymphedema. Besides biological effects in reducing excessive production of ROS, sodium selenite also displays various pharmacological effects. So far the exact mechanisms of these pharmacological effects are mostly unknown, but probably include inhibition of adhesion protein expression.