Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 101
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Int J Legal Med ; 138(4): 1593-1602, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374288

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the association between drugs and alcohol intake and sexual abuse in adolescents, otherwise defined as Drug Facilitated Sexual Assault (DFSA). We considered the survivors who accessed care at the Centre "Soccorso Violenza Sessuale" (SVS - Sexual Violence Relief Centre) in Turin (Italy), between May 2003 and May 2022. We found that 973 patients aged 13-24 among which 228 were victims of DFSA. Epidemiological and anamnestic aspects of the episode of sexual violence were examined, with a specific focus on investigating the alcohol and/or drug intake as reported by the victim, along with the results of the toxicological analysis. the study further accounts for the variations caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on DFSA-related accesses. Our findings show that 23% of adolescents accessing care at SVS were subjected to DFSA. Six out ten adolescents knew their aggressor, at times a partner (10%) oran acquaintance (43%). In 12% of cases violence was perpetrated by a group of people (12%). Almost 90% of young victims described alcohol consumption, while 37% reported drug use at the time of the assault. Alcohol taken alone or in combination with other substances was the most detected drug in our sample throughout the period considered. Given the large use of psychoactive substances among adolescents, it is imperative to implement harm reduction strategies alongside educational activities aimed at fostering awareness about consent. Health personnel should be trained to manage the needs of victims of DFSA clinically and forensically.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , COVID-19 , Crime Victims , Sex Offenses , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Female , Male , Young Adult , Crime Victims/statistics & numerical data , Sex Offenses/statistics & numerical data , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
2.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 34(12): 3017-3024, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36053444

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic, progressive neurodegenerative condition that gradually worsens motor function and leads to postural instability and, eventually, falls. Several factors may influence the frequency of future falls, such as slowness, freezing of gait, loss of balance, and mobility problems, cognitive impairments, and the number of previous falls. The TED bracelet is an advanced technological wearable device able to predict falls. AIMS: This principal aim is to investigate the feasibility of a full-scale research project that uses the TED bracelet to identify whether individuals with PD are at risk of falling. METHODS: This study will involve a pilot prospective observational study design; the subjects will include 26 patients suffering from mild PD and 26 others with no PD and no gait problems. Data will be collected from the TED bracelet and then compared to a paper-based fall diary. The enrolled participants will have a scheduled outpatient evaluation to collect both clinical and instrumental data as well as biological samples. DISCUSSION: This pilot study could then be implemented in a larger form to further evaluate the effectiveness of the TED device. Finally, it will help further develop gait monitoring systems for people with Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases that can affect physical function and mobility, such as dementia and Alzheimer's. CONCLUSIONS: Preventing falls and their complications could lead to major advancements in the quality of home care for patients with PD, which would significantly impact the quality of life of both these patients and their caregivers.


Subject(s)
Gait Disorders, Neurologic , Parkinson Disease , Wearable Electronic Devices , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/etiology , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Exercise Therapy/methods , Wearable Electronic Devices/adverse effects , Postural Balance , Observational Studies as Topic
3.
Lancet Oncol ; 22(12): 1669-1680, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34741822

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The medium-term and long-term impact of COVID-19 in patients with cancer is not yet known. In this study, we aimed to describe the prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae and their impact on the survival of patients with cancer. We also aimed to describe patterns of resumption and modifications of systemic anti-cancer therapy following recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: OnCovid is an active European registry study enrolling consecutive patients aged 18 years or older with a history of solid or haematological malignancy and who had a diagnosis of RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this retrospective study, patients were enrolled from 35 institutions across Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between Feb 27, 2020, and Feb 14, 2021, and entered into the registry at the point of data lock (March 1, 2021), were eligible for analysis. The present analysis was focused on COVID-19 survivors who underwent clinical reassessment at each participating institution. We documented prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae and described factors associated with their development and their association with post-COVID-19 survival, which was defined as the interval from post-COVID-19 reassessment to the patients' death or last follow-up. We also evaluated resumption of systemic anti-cancer therapy in patients treated within 4 weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis. The OnCovid study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974. FINDINGS: 2795 patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between Feb 27, 2020, and Feb 14, 2021, were entered into the study by the time of the data lock on March 1, 2021. After the exclusion of ineligible patients, the final study population consisted of 2634 patients. 1557 COVID-19 survivors underwent a formal clinical reassessment after a median of 22·1 months (IQR 8·4-57·8) from cancer diagnosis and 44 days (28-329) from COVID-19 diagnosis. 234 (15·0%) patients reported COVID-19 sequelae, including respiratory symptoms (116 [49·6%]) and residual fatigue (96 [41·0%]). Sequelae were more common in men (vs women; p=0·041), patients aged 65 years or older (vs other age groups; p=0·048), patients with two or more comorbidities (vs one or none; p=0·0006), and patients with a history of smoking (vs no smoking history; p=0·0004). Sequelae were associated with hospitalisation for COVID-19 (p<0·0001), complicated COVID-19 (p<0·0001), and COVID-19 therapy (p=0·0002). With a median post-COVID-19 follow-up of 128 days (95% CI 113-148), COVID-19 sequelae were associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1·80 [95% CI 1·18-2·75]) after adjusting for time to post-COVID-19 reassessment, sex, age, comorbidity burden, tumour characteristics, anticancer therapy, and COVID-19 severity. Among 466 patients on systemic anti-cancer therapy, 70 (15·0%) permanently discontinued therapy, and 178 (38·2%) resumed treatment with a dose or regimen adjustment. Permanent treatment discontinuations were independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 3·53 [95% CI 1·45-8·59]), but dose or regimen adjustments were not (0·84 [0·35-2·02]). INTERPRETATION: Sequelae post-COVID-19 affect up to 15% of patients with cancer and adversely affect survival and oncological outcomes after recovery. Adjustments to systemic anti-cancer therapy can be safely pursued in treatment-eligible patients. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Belgium , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Disease Progression , Female , France , Germany , Hospitalization , Humans , Italy , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prevalence , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Spain , United Kingdom , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
4.
Pharmacol Res ; 166: 105515, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33636351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of all RAAS inhibitors, ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on dementia onset (any dementia, Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia) using a meta-analytic approach. METHODS: A systematic MEDLINE search was carried out to identify all observational studies published up to the 30th September 2020 evaluating the association between RAAS inhibitors and risk of dementia. Studies were included if original investigations considering incident dementia cases, with ACEIs and/or ARBs as exposure and other antihypertensives (AHs) use as reference, and if reporting association estimates and relative variability measures. Random effect pooled relative risks (pRR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated according to DerSimonian and Laird's (DL) or to Hartung Knapp Sidik Jonkman (HKSJ) method depending on the number of studies and between-studies heterogeneity. A linear mixed meta-regression model (MM) was applied to take into account correlation among association estimates from the same study. RESULTS: 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. ARBs but not ACEIs' use led to a significant reduction of the risk of any dementia (pRR 0.78, 95%CIMM 0.70-0.87) and Alzheimer's disease (pRR 0.73, 95%CIMM 0.60-0.90). Moreover, when compared to ACEIs, ARBs reduced of 14% the risk of any dementia (pRR 0.86, 95%CIDL 0.79-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: ARBs but not ACEIs led to a reduction in the risk of any dementia. The difference between ARBs and ACEIs in terms of preventive effectiveness could be due to distinct profiles of antagonism towards independent receptor pathways or to differential influences on amyloid metabolism.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dementia/etiology , Renin-Angiotensin System/drug effects , Alzheimer Disease/etiology , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Alzheimer Disease/prevention & control , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Dementia/metabolism , Dementia/prevention & control , Humans , Protective Factors , Risk
5.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 40(2): 112-121, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134848

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the possible relation between use of antidepressant (AD) drugs, that is, tricyclic ADs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and atypical ADs (AAs), and the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular (CV) events among older patients with previous CV diseases. METHODS: A nested case-control study was carried out among patients aged 65 years and older from 5 Italian health care territorial units who were discharged for CV disease during 2008 to 2010. The cohort was composed by 344,747 individuals, and of these, 97,739 (28%) experienced hospital admission for CV events (myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, stroke, heart failure) during follow-up (until 2014) and were included as cases. Up to 5 controls were randomly selected and matched to each. A conditional logistic regression was fitted to estimate the risk of CV events associated with ADs past or current use. A within-patient comparison was performed by the case-crossover design to account the effect of depression. FINDINGS: Current users of SSRIs and AAs were at increased risk of CV events with odds ratios of 1.25 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.29) and 1.31 (1.25-1.37), respectively. An increased risk of arrhythmia and stroke was associated with current use of SSRIs and AAs, whereas an increased risk of heart failure was detected with current use of any ADs. The results were confirmed by the case-crossover approach. IMPLICATIONS: Evidence that AD use is associated with an increased risk of CV events in accordance with specific mechanisms of action among older people with CV disease was added by this study.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Female , Heart Failure/chemically induced , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/chemically induced , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Stroke/chemically induced , Stroke/epidemiology
6.
Vet Surg ; 48(4): 546-555, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30828854

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of visualization of canine carpal ligaments by using computed tomography (CT), MRI, CT arthrography (CTA), and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study. STUDY POPULATION: Cadavers from dogs weighing more than 20 kg. METHODS: A 16-slice CT scanner and a 3 Tesla MRI were used for the investigation. A dilute contrast medium was injected into the middle carpal and radiocarpal joints under fluoroscopic control, and CTA and MRA images were acquired. To evaluate the difference between imaging modalities, 3 observers graded carpal ligaments of clinical interest using a scale from 0 to 4 for their quality of visualization. Data were analyzed by using a random-effect ordinal logistic regression with Bonferroni adjustment. The interobserver agreement was calculated by using the weighted Cohen's κ. RESULTS: Normal carpal joints (n = 9) were investigated. Magnetic resonance arthrography improved visualization of the majority of carpal ligaments compared with MRI (P < .05) and offered the best visualization overall. Magnetic resonance imaging and MRA offered better visualization compared with both CT and CTA (P < .05). There was no difference between CT and CTA. Interobserver agreement was discrete (0.2 < κ ≤ 0.4) for all observers. CONCLUSION: Arthrography improved the capabilities of MRI but not of CT for visualization of the canine carpal ligaments. Magnetic resonance arthrography was particularly useful for evaluation of the stabilizers of the antebrachiocarpal joint. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 3 Tesla MRA and MRI allow excellent visualization of the ligamentous morphology and may be helpful in the diagnostic process of carpal sprains in dogs.


Subject(s)
Arthrography/veterinary , Carpus, Animal/diagnostic imaging , Dogs/anatomy & histology , Ligaments, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/veterinary , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/veterinary , Animals , Arthrography/methods , Cadaver , Carpal Joints/anatomy & histology , Contrast Media , Ligaments, Articular/anatomy & histology , Prospective Studies
7.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 72(2): 227-34, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26563188

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of an informative intervention on general practitioners aimed at improving patients' adherence to statin therapy. METHODS: In the local health unit (LHU) of Bergamo, Lombardy (Italy), each general practitioner received a synthetic scientific document on dyslipidaemia and statins and aggregated data on adherence in 2006 for his/her patients compared to the means in the LHU and in his/her working district. Furthermore, a sample of seven districts received also a table of adherence levels for single patients. Patient's level data were retrieved from the health care utilisation databases of the LHU. Adherence parameters (proportion of patients with only one prescription, medication possession ratio [MPR] and proportion of non-persistent patients) were assessed after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 5833 and 4788 new statin users were enrolled before and after the intervention, respectively. The percentage of patients with only one prescription decreased from 28.0 to 23.9 % (p < 0.001). MPR increased from 70.3 to 76.0 % (p < 0.001), and proportion of patients with MPR ≥ 80 % increased from 45.4 to 56.4 % (p < 0.001). The persistence also showed an improvement, both in terms of decreasing proportion of non-persistent (from 51.9 to 41.4 %, p < 0.001) and of increasing duration of continued therapy (from 235 to 264 mean days of persistent therapy, p < 0.001). There were not significant differences between the two types of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention resulted in an overall improvement of the short-term adherence to therapy. This tool can be replicated in other local contexts and with other chronic therapies.


Subject(s)
Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care
8.
Gastroenterology ; 147(4): 784-792.e9; quiz e13-4, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24937265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Concomitant use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose aspirin increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Guidelines suggest avoiding certain drug combinations, yet little is known about the magnitude of their interactions. We estimated the risk of UGIB during concomitant use of nonselective (ns)NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase -2 selective inhibitors (COX-2 inhibitors), and low-dose aspirin with other drugs. METHODS: We performed a case series analysis of data from 114,835 patients with UGIB (930,888 person-years of follow-up) identified from 7 population-based health care databases (approximately 20 million subjects). Each patient served as his or her own control. Drug exposure was determined based on prescriptions of nsNSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin, alone and in combination with other drugs that affect the risk of UGIB. We measured relative risk (incidence rate ratio [IRR] during drug exposure vs nonexposure) and excess risk due to concomitant drug exposure (relative excess risk due to interaction [RERI]). RESULTS: Monotherapy with nsNSAIDs increased the risk of diagnosis of UGIB (IRR, 4.3) to a greater extent than monotherapy with COX-2 inhibitors (IRR, 2.9) or low-dose aspirin (IRR, 3.1). Combination therapy generally increased the risk of UGIB; concomitant nsNSAID and corticosteroid therapies increased the IRR to the greatest extent (12.8) and also produced the greatest excess risk (RERI, 5.5). Concomitant use of nsNSAIDs and aldosterone antagonists produced an IRR for UGIB of 11.0 (RERI, 4.5). Excess risk from concomitant use of nsNSAIDs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was 1.6, whereas that from use of COX-2 inhibitors with SSRIs was 1.9 and that for use of low-dose aspirin with SSRIs was 0.5. Excess risk of concomitant use of nsNSAIDs with anticoagulants was 2.4, of COX-2 inhibitors with anticoagulants was 0.1, and of low-dose aspirin with anticoagulants was 1.9. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a case series analysis, concomitant use of nsNSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin with SSRIs significantly increases the risk of UGIB. Concomitant use of nsNSAIDs or low-dose aspirin, but not COX-2 inhibitors, with corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants produces significant excess risk of UGIB.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Interactions , Europe , Humans , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
9.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 14: 5, 2014 Jan 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24397769

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on the effect of oral bisphosphonates (BPs) on risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC) are conflicting. We conducted a large population-based study from a network of Italian healthcare utilization databases aimed to assess the UGIC risk associated with use of BPs in the setting of secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. METHODS: A nested case-control study was carried out within a cohort of 68,970 patients aged 45 years or older, who have been hospitalized for osteoporotic fracture from 2003 until 2005. Cases were the 804 patients who experienced hospitalization for UGIC until 2007. Up to 20 controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) associated with current and past use of BPs (i.e. for drug dispensation within 30 days and over 31 days prior the outcome onset, respectively) after adjusting for several covariates. RESULTS: Compared with patients who did not use BPs, current and past users had OR (and 95% confidence interval) of 0.86 (0.60 to 1.22) and 1.07 (0.80 to 1.44) respectively. There was no difference in the ORs estimated according with BPs type (alendronate or risedronate) and regimen (daily or weekly), nor with co-therapies and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Further evidence that BPs dispensed for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures are not associated with increased risk of severe gastrointestinal complications is supplied from this study. Further research is required to clarify the role BPs and other drugs of co-medication in inducing UGIC.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention
10.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 70(9): 1129-37, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24951915

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of the bone, whose incidence increases progressively with aging. The main consequences of osteoporosis are fragility fractures, which have considerable medical, social, and economic implications. Adequate treatment of osteoporosis must be considered as a compelling public health intervention. Bisphosphonates (BPs) represent the most significant advance in this field in the past decade, and they are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. However, evidence for their effectiveness is limited to secondary prevention, whereas their effect in primary prevention is uncertain and needs further investigation. METHODS: Using administrative data collected in the "Biphosphonates Efficacy-Safety Tradeoff" (BEST) study, a nested case-control study was conducted by including 56,058 participants, aged 55 years who were started on oral BPs from 2003 to 2005. Cases were the 1,710 participants who were hospitalized for osteoporotic fractures until 2007. Up to 20 controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio of fracture associated with categories of treatment duration. RESULTS: Compared with participants assuming BPs for less than 1 year, those who remained on therapy for at least 2 years had a 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7 to 33%) fracture risk reduction. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that BPs, dispensed for primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a reduced risk of osteoporotic fractures after at least 2 years of treatment.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Primary Prevention , Treatment Outcome
11.
Nutrients ; 16(11)2024 Jun 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892678

ABSTRACT

The Mediterranean diet (MD) and Western diet (WD) are poles apart as dietary patterns. Despite the availability of epidemiological tools to estimate the adherence to MD, to date, there is a lack of combined scores. We developed MEDOC, a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) designed to calculate a combined adherence score for both diets and validated it on 213 subjects. The test-retest reliability revealed all frequency questions falling within the acceptable range of 0.5 to 0.7 (Pearson correlation coefficient) in younger (<30 years old) subjects, while 1 question out of 39 fell below the range in older (>30 years old) participants. The reproducibility for portion size was less satisfying, with, respectively, 38.2% and 70.5% of questions falling below 0.5 (Cohen's Kappa index) for younger and older subjects. The good correlation (R = 0.63, p < 0.0001 for subjects younger than 30 years and R = 0.54, p < 0.0001 for subjects older than 30 years, Pearson's correlation coefficient) between the MEDOC score and the MediDietScore (MDS) confirmed the validity of the MEDOC score in identifying patients who adhere to the MD. Harnessing the capabilities of this innovative tool, we aim to broaden the existing perspective to study complex dietary patterns in nutritional epidemiology studies.


Subject(s)
Diet Surveys , Diet, Mediterranean , Diet, Western , Humans , Adult , Reproducibility of Results , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Diet Surveys/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Feeding Behavior , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Portion Size
12.
Nutrients ; 16(11)2024 Jun 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892680

ABSTRACT

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a debilitating autoimmune condition primarily affecting young adults, and its rise is evident globally. Despite this, its precise etiology remains elusive. Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to MS susceptibility; however, the link between diet and MS lacks substantial evidence due to limited large-scale studies. We exploited the UK Biobank resources to explore the nexus between diet, lifestyle, and MS risk. The dietary and lifestyle habits of MS incident cases, derived from a general food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) completed by all participants at study enrollment, were compared to those of subjects who did not develop MS during the follow-up. Our findings suggest the protective role of moderate oily fish consumption and weekly alcohol intake. Furthermore, by analyzing food intake data obtained through 24 h recall, completed by a subset of participants, we found a protective, though non-significant, trend of an increased adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD). These findings, derived from the analysis of the UK Biobank and representing an unprecedented approach for this inquiry, warrant further exploration and integration in future research.


Subject(s)
Biological Specimen Banks , Diet, Mediterranean , Diet , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Multiple Sclerosis/etiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Diet, Mediterranean/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Life Style , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Feeding Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires , UK Biobank
13.
Biomolecules ; 14(6)2024 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38927130

ABSTRACT

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder lacking reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis and disease progression monitoring. This study aimed to identify the novel biomarkers in plasmatic extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from ALS patients and healthy controls (HCs). A total of 61 ALS patients and 30 age-matched HCs were enrolled in the study and the protein content of circulating EVs was analyzed by shotgun proteomics. The study was divided into a discovery phase (involving 12 ALS and 12 HC patients) and a validation one (involving 49 ALS and 20 HC patients). In the discovery phase, more than 300 proteins were identified, with 32 proteins showing differential regulation in ALS patients compared to HCs. In the validation phase, over 400 proteins were identified, with 20 demonstrating differential regulation in ALS patients compared to HCs. Notably, seven proteins were found to be common to both phases, all of which were significantly upregulated in EVs from ALS patients. Most of them have previously been linked to ALS since they have been detected in the serum or cerebrospinal fluid of ALS patients. Among them, proteoglycan (PRG)-4, also known as lubricin, was of particular interest since it was significantly increased in ALS patients with normal cognitive and motor functions. This study highlights the significance of EVs as a promising avenue for biomarker discovery in ALS. Moreover, it sheds light on the unexpected role of PRG-4 in relation to cognitive status in ALS patients.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Biomarkers , Extracellular Vesicles , Proteomics , Humans , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/metabolism , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/blood , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , Proteomics/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/metabolism , Aged , Proteoglycans/metabolism , Cognition , Case-Control Studies , Adult
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Around 40% of stroke survivor develop spasticity. Plantar flexors (PF) muscles are often affected, with severe functional impairment. The treatment of choice is botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) combined with adjuvant treatments. The temporary pharmacological effect implies periodic reassessment and reinjection. These long-term chronic programs require monitoring the functional impact of each cycle and the clinical evolution in relation to aging and repeated interventions. AIM: Evaluating changes of functional level in patients with post-stroke spasticity treated with BoNT-A by assessing the long-term maintenance of the therapeutic efficacy. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal observational study. SETTING: Outpatients. POPULATION: Chronic stroke survivors undergoing BoNT-A treatment and subsequent intensive rehabilitation (10 sessions in a day-hospital regime). METHODS: Medical records of the enrolled patients were consulted. The primary endpoint was the change in PF spasticity by at least 1 point on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at each cycle. Secondary endpoints were the assessment of possible trends in gait parameters (Six Minute Walking Test [6MWT]; Timed Up and Go [TUG], and 10 Meters Walking Test [10mWT]) pre- and post-injection and at each cycle. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled. A reduction of at least one MAS point for PF was recorded after each cycle in all subjects. A time-dependent reduction in the proportion of patients reporting an improvement higher than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in 6MWT and 10mWT was observed. In the case of TUG, this data kept stable at all cycles. A one-point increase in the basal functional ambulation classification (FAC) score resulted in a reduction in the probability of having a TUG improvement greater than the MCID. The opposite correlation was found for 6MWT and 10mWT. CONCLUSIONS: With the proposed treatment, the clinical significance TUG improvement remains constant throughout repeated cycles and the proportion of patients with improvement in 6MWT and 10mWT tends to decline over time. The predictive value of basal FAC on the functional variables expected improvement may provide a potential treatment targeting tool. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: These results may deliver prognostic indication allowing an optimized integration of different post-BoNT-A rehabilitation approaches, agreeing with current evidence. Adequate monitoring and treatment protocols are crucial for the stability of functional level and may prevent excessive fluctuations.

15.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 24(5): 632-9, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23622036

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of catheter-based radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of resistant hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with essential hypertension unresponsive to at least three antihypertensive agents underwent renal denervation (RDN). Three patients had variant renal anatomy. Comorbidities included diabetes (n = 11), renal failure (n = 4), and obstructive sleep apnea (n = 2). The effect on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) was assessed at 6 months. Patients with a decrease in systolic BP of at least 10mm Hg were considered responders. RESULTS: RDN was bilateral in 19 patients and single-sided in five. The 19 patients with bilateral RDN showed mean reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP of 20.7/8.7mm Hg±18.1/9.9 (systolic/diastolic; P = .0001/P = .0012). Sixteen bilaterally treated patients (84.2%) showed a systolic BP reduction of at least 10mm Hg and were considered responders, whereas only one of the five patients with single-sided RDN showed a response. Two responders with sleep apnea showed improvement in polysomnography indices, and one with left concentric ventricular hypertrophy showed complete cardiac remodeling 11 months after the RDN procedure. Renal function remained unchanged in all patients, including those with renal failure. Optical coherence tomography of the renal arteries in one patient showed sporadic endothelial scarring. Renal angiograms at 9 months (one patient) and 12 months (two patients) had normal findings. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter-based RDN was carried out safely, even in patients with comorbidities, abnormal renal arteries, or anatomic variants. The response rate for bilateral RDN (84.2%) was comparable to previous reports.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/methods , Hypertension, Renal/diagnosis , Hypertension, Renal/surgery , Kidney/innervation , Kidney/surgery , Sympathectomy/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
16.
Value Health ; 16(2): 318-24, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23538184

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of enhancing adherence to blood pressure (BP)-lowering drug therapy in a large population without signs of preexisting cardiovascular (CV) disease. METHODS: A cohort of 209,650 patients aged 40 to 79 years resident in the Italian Region of Lombardia and newly treated with BP-lowering drugs during 2000 to 2001 was followed from index prescription to 2007. During the follow-up, the 10,688 patients who experienced a hospitalization for a coronary or cerebrovascular event were identified (outcome). Adherence was measured by the proportion of days covered by the therapy with BP-lowering drugs. The cost-effectiveness of enhancing adherence was measured through the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: Enhancing adherence from 52% (baseline) to 60% and 80% led to a reduced rate for CV outcomes (from 85 to 83 and 77 events every 10,000 person-year, respectively) and increased the cost for drug therapy (from €1,325k to €1,507k and €1,934k every 10,000 person-year, respectively). The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio decreased from €76k (95% confidence interval €74k-€77k) to €74k (95% confidence interval €72k-€75k) for each CV event avoided by enhancing adherence from baseline to 60% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing adherence to BP-lowering medications in the setting of primary CV prevention might offer important benefits in reducing the risk of CV outcome, but at a substantial cost.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Cerebrovascular Disorders/economics , Coronary Disease/economics , Hypertension/economics , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Primary Prevention/economics , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cerebrovascular Disorders/etiology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Coronary Disease/etiology , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Primary Prevention/methods , Proportional Hazards Models
17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36767394

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Child abuse is an endemic phenomenon that refers to any form of violence aimed at children and adolescents. The Emergency Room is often the entry point to healthcare for the abused child. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including minors, aged 0-18 years, of all genders, who experienced any form of violence examined at the Paediatric Emergency Department of the 'Maggiore della Carità' Hospital in Novara (North-West Italy) between 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Data were extrapolated by looking at the diagnosis at discharge. A comparison of the different variables collected was made between the pre-COVID-19 period and the COVID era. RESULTS: 120 minors presented to the paediatric emergency room seeking help for violence. The average age was 10 years, 55% of the victims were male and 75% of them were Italian. In the pre-COVID period, the number of presentations for abuse was 62, while in the COVID period it was 58 with an increase of peer violence (from 38.71% to 62.07%) and with a statistically significant impact of the pandemic on the phenomenon (p-value < 0.00001). In general, peer violence accounts for 50% of the cases reviewed and resulted in fewer reports to the judicial authority and requests for forensic advice. CONCLUSION: The SARS-CoV-2-related pandemic has had an impact on total emergency room admissions and the types of abuse perpetrated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Child Abuse , Adolescent , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Emergency Service, Hospital , Italy/epidemiology
18.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 2018, 2023 02 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36737460

ABSTRACT

The objective of our study was to determine the joint protective effect of a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination on the risk of a new infection and hospitalization. Two case-control studies nested in a cohort of COVID-19 patients cared for by the Local Health Unit (LHU) of Vercelli, Italy, were performed, one to estimate the risk of infection and the second to estimate the risk of hospitalization. Each new infection and hospitalization was matched with up to 4 disease-free subjects who were the same age, sex and index date (i.e., controls). Study subjects were followed up from cohort entry date to disease outcome, end of follow-up or emigration. Vaccination was associated with a 36% (OR 0.64; 95%CI 0.62-0.66) and 90% (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.07-0.14) reduction in the risk of infection and hospitalization, respectively. Prior infection was associated with a 65% (OR 0.35; 95%CI 0.30-0.40) and 90% (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.07-0.14) reduction in the risk of infection and hospitalization, respectively. Vaccinated and recovered subjects showed a 63% (OR 0.37; 95%CI 0.34-0.14) and 98% (OR 0.02; 95%CI 0-0.13) reduction in the risk of infection and hospitalization, respectively. Vaccination remains an essential public health tool for preventing severe forms of COVID-19. Our study shows that vaccination or previous infection has a strong protective effect against Sars-CoV-2 hospitalization. The protective role against infection appears to be present although with a lower efficacy rate than that presented in the RCTs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Case-Control Studies , Emigration and Immigration , Hospitalization , Vaccination
19.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(18)2023 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37760587

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the association of venetoclax (VEN) with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) significantly improved the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy and became the standard of care after the publication of the pivotal RCT VIALE-A. However, it is still not clear to what extent the results observed in the VIALE-A apply to a real-world setting. For this reason, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies on newly diagnosed patients with AML, ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, receiving first-line VEN+HMA. We then compared their results in term of survival with those from the VIALE-A. Kaplan-Meier curves were extracted from all included studies and individual survival data was reconstructed. We then estimated a pooled survival curve and compared it with the results of the VIALE-A using the log-rank test. We also conducted a secondary analysis including only studies considering VEN plus azacytidine (AZA) as treatment, as this was the schedule originally used in the VIALE-A. Nineteen real-world studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Most of them reported a worse survival than the VIALE-A. The pooled survival curve was similar to that reported in the VIALE-A during the first three months of treatment but diverged thereafter (p-value = 0.0001). The pooled median survival among the real-world studies was 9.37 months (95%CI 8.81-10.5), substantially lower than that reported in the VIALE-A (14.7 months; 95%CI 11.9-18.7). Results slightly increased when the analysis was restricted to the studies using VEN+AZA as treatment (median survival: 11.5 months; 95%CI 10.2-14.8). Survival of newly diagnosed AML patients treated with VEN+HMAs in a real-world setting seems to be lower than previously reported in the VIALE-A, while the effect of VEN+AZA is more in line with expected results. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether this apparent discrepancy is due to the different characteristics of enrolled patients or to a non-optimal adherence to therapy, and whether alternative regimens can provide better results in terms of safety and effectiveness.

20.
Nutrients ; 15(11)2023 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37299417

ABSTRACT

Lifelong adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the cornerstone of management of celiac disease (CD), but adhering to a GFD can be hard. Although several factors are positively associated with adherence of pediatric CD patients to a GFD, it is unknown whether these are influenced by variability caused by the specific tool used to assess adherence to a GFD. Here, we aimed to evaluate how individual patient characteristics and dietary counselling by a trained dietitian influence adherence to a GFD in children with CD, as assessed by two validated questionnaires: the Biagi questionnaire and the Leffler short questionnaire adapted for pediatric patients. Some 139 children and adolescents were recruited in a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Concordance between the two questionnaires in defining adherence was fair (weighted Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.39, 95%CI 0.19-0.60). Upon regression analysis, having a cohabiting family member with CD, being of Italian origin, and receiving specialized dietary counselling during follow-up were found to positively influence stricter adherence to a GFD for children with CD. Neither questionnaire detected a significant relationship between adherence to a GFD and the presence of symptoms after gluten ingestion. This study provides important new data on the factors influencing GFD adherence in the pediatric population, and highlights the importance of dietician input and overcoming language and cultural barriers when educating patients.


Subject(s)
Celiac Disease , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Diet, Gluten-Free , Cross-Sectional Studies , Patient Compliance , Glutens
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL