ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess if illness perception, mood state and coping strategies differ according to allergic rhinitis (AR) persistence and severity. METHODS: Illness perception, mood profiles, coping behaviors and rhinitis symptoms were assessed by means of validated tools inpatients classified according to the Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-one patients underwent data analysis. No difference in age, sex, socio-economic status, smoking habits was detected comparing patients according to AR severity, duration or 4 ARIA classes. Patients with intermittent AR reported higher scores than those with persistent AR in confusion-bewilderment of Profile of Mood States (POMS); patients with moderate/severe rhinitis had significantly higher scores than those with mild rhinitis in TSSS, Identity and Consequences. No differences were detected in all assessed outcomes in the 4 ARIA classes. CONCLUSIONS: The patient's perspective about AR is independent of persistence and severity of symptoms. This may explain why AR remains under-diagnosed and under-treated, even in its most severe forms. Self-management plans should consider the patient's perspective.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Asthma/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic/immunology , Rhinitis/immunology , Allergens/chemistry , Asthma/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Rhinitis/physiopathology , Rhinitis, Allergic/physiopathology , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
We performed a survey, based on a questionnaire including 20 items, submitted anonymously to Italian trainees in Allergology and Clinical Immunology, in order to obtain information about their specific allergen immunotherapy (AIT) practices. The questionnaire was sent to 40 trainees, who had attended the last two years of the training course. Thirty-four subjects (mean age: 27 years, 65% females) adequately completed the survey. The answers to the questionnaire showed that only 60% of the training programs included lectures on AIT. Among the trainees using AIT, only 40% declared being able to prescribe it independently, while 60% were guided by a tutor. Of the trainees who were able to prescribe AIT autonomously, 60% were familiar with both routes of administration, i.e. subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), while 25% of these used only SLIT. In 80% of the training institutions involved, the trainees could attend a dedicated AIT outpatient ward for SCIT administration; only 40% administered AIT personally, and in half of these cases, they were guided by a tutor. Only 70% of trainees had experience in the follow-up of patients still under treatment and of patients who had completed treatment. Analysis of the answers obtained for questions on venom immunotherapy (VIT) showed that, in 90% of cases, the trainees attended a dedicated outpatients ward where VIT is administered, but with a role limited to observation/cooperation. Only 30% were involved in the follow-up of patients who were under treatment or who had completed VIT. Only 20% of the trainees felt confident enough about VIT to prescribe this treatment independently, 80% knew there were several administration protocols, and the majority prescribed products from three different manufacturers. These findings suggest that there is significant room for improving the instructions provided regarding allergology and clinical immunology to trainees in Italy with respect to AIT.
Subject(s)
Allergy and Immunology/education , Desensitization, Immunologic , Humans , Italy , Venoms/immunologyABSTRACT
The evidence of efficacy of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for respiratory allergy has been demonstrated by a number of meta-analyses. However, the daily practice of AIT is quite different from controlled trials, facing challenges in terms of selection of patients, practical performance, and, of particular importance, use of allergen extracts of inadequate quality. We here performed a survey, named the Allergen Immunotherapy Decision Analysis (AIDA), to evaluate which criteria are used by specialists to choose a product for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with respiratory allergy. A questionnaire composed of 14 items to be ranked by each participant according to the importance attributed when choosing SLIT products was submitted to 444 Italian specialists. The responses of the 169 (38.1%) physicians, who answered all questions, were analysed. Most of the respondents were allergists (79%), followed by pulmonologists (10.8%), both allergists and pulmonologists (4.8%), and otorhinolaryngologists (3%); 59.8% of the respondents were males and 40.2% were females. The age distribution showed that 89.9% of the respondents were aged between 35 and 64 years. All respondents usually prescribed AIT products in their clinical practice: 31.4% used only SLIT, whereas 69.2% used both subcutaneous and sublingual administration. The rankings, expressed as means, attributed by physicians for each of the 14 items were as follows: level of evidence-based medicine (EBM ) validation of efficacy (3.44), level of EBM validation of safety (4.30), standardization of the product (5.37), efficacy based on personal experience (5.82), defined content(s) of the major allergen(s) in micrograms (5.96), scientific evidence for each single allergen (6.17), safety based on personal experience (6.32), ease of administration protocol (8.08), cost and terms of payment (e.g. instalments) (9.17), dose personalization (9.24), patient preference (9.25), ease of product storage (9.93), reimbursement (10.12), and availability of a helpline or on-line assistance from the manufacturer (11.89). These attitudes need to be taken into consideration by regulatory agencies as well as by producers.
Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic , Prescriptions , Adult , Aged , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sublingual Immunotherapy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to develop a short validated patient-completed questionnaire, the RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP), to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with asthma and comorbid allergic rhinitis in clinical practice. METHODS: A provisional RAPP questionnaire was formed from candidate items identified through retrospective analysis of 333 RHINASTHMA questionnaires. This was then tested on 150 asthma patients with allergic rhinitis. RESULTS: Psychometric analyses identified eight items fitting a unidimensional model to form RAPP. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient > 0.8) and agreement with RHINASTHMA (r = -0.31, P = 0.0001) were excellent. Criterion, discriminant, and convergent validity were good. Reliability in 47 stable patients was very good (intra-class and concordance correlation coefficients were 0.90 and 0.89, respectively). Responsiveness in 103 patients with health improvement or deterioration was significantly associated with changes in Global Rating Scale (r = -0.4965, P < 0.01), Rhinitis Visual Analogue Scale (r = 0.5722, P < 0.01) and asthma control test (r = -0.6483, P < 0.01). Minimal clinical difference in the analyzed population was 2. CONCLUSION: RhinAsthma Patient Perspective is a simple eight-question questionnaire with good measurement properties and sensitivity to health changes, which will provide a valid, reliable and standardized HRQoL measurement in patients with asthma and comorbid allergic rhinitis in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Asthma/psychology , Quality of Life , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Rhinitis, AllergicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Shrimp is a frequent cause of food allergy worldwide. Besides tropomyosin, several allergens have been described recently. OBJECTIVE: We investigated which allergens are involved in Italian shrimp-allergic adults. METHODS: Sera from 116 shrimp-allergic patients selected in 14 Italian allergy centers were studied. Skin prick tests with house dust mite (HDM) as well as measurements of IgE to Pen a 1 (shrimp tropomyosin) and whole shrimp extract were performed. All sera underwent shrimp immunoblot analysis, and inhibition experiments using HDM extract as inhibitor were carried out on some Pen a 1-negative sera. RESULTS: Immunoblots showed much variability. IgE reactivity at about 30 kDa (tropomyosin) was found in <50% of cases, and reactivity at about 67 kDa and >90 kDa was frequent. Further reactivities at 14-18, 25, 43-50, about 60 and about 80 kDa were detected. Most subjects had a history of shrimp-induced systemic symptoms irrespective of the relevant allergen protein. IgE to Pen a 1 were detected in sera from 46 (41%) patients. Skin reactivity to HDM was found in 43/61 (70%) Pen 1-negative subjects and inhibition studies showed that pre-adsorption of sera with HDM extract induced a marked weakening of the signal at >67 kDa. CONCLUSIONS: Several allergens other than tropomyosin are involved in shrimp allergy in adult Italian patients. Some hitherto not described high molecular weight allergens seem particularly relevant in this population and their cross-reactivity with HDM allergens makes them novel potential panallergens of invertebrates.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Arthropod Proteins/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Child , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Weight , Prevalence , Skin Tests , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Extra-European immigrants are increasingly seen in allergy clinics. In view of their different genetic background they represent an opportunity to investigate the dynamics of sensitization to airborne allergens. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the pattern of airborne sensitization among allergic extra-European immigrants living in two areas of northern Italy. METHODS: Extra-European immigrants living in Milan and Verona were compared with age- and sex-matched or allergen-matched allergic Italians. Based on number of sensitizations to airborne allergens, patients and controls were divided into mono-/oligo-sensitized or multi-sensitized (1-3 or > 3, respectively). RESULTS: In Milan grass pollen allergy was more frequent among immigrants than in controls (75% vs 49%; p < 0.01), whereas ragweed allergy prevailed among Italians (56% vs 20%; p < 0.001). In Verona, immigrants were rarely multi-sensitized (21% vs 43%; p < 0.01), more frequently sensitized to grass and birch. In both areas immigrants became allergic at a significantly older age than Italian controls (p < 0.0001), particularly to grass and mites. Allergy to HDM and ragweed was rare in Central & South Americans, whereas Africans showed the lowest proportion of multi-sensitizations. On average, immigrants became allergic after 2-4 years of stay in Italy. CONCLUSION: Subjects genetically prone to become allergic to a particular allergen get eventually sensitized irrespective of their age when they are exposed to the "right" allergen for a sufficiently long time. The higher proportion of mono-/oligo-sensitized immigrants might reflect a shorter exposure to airborne allergen load in this group.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Particulate Matter/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Allergens/adverse effects , Child , Emigrants and Immigrants , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
The aim of this Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN) consensus report is to provide recommendations and suggestions for assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including health-related quality of life in patients with urticaria. We recommend that PROs should be used both in clinical trials and routine practice for the evaluation of urticaria patients. We suggest that PROs should be considered as the primary outcome of future clinical trials. Two validated and disease-specific instruments for assessing PROs are available, the urticaria activity score (for symptoms) and the chronic urticaria questionnaire on quality of life CU-Q(2)oL. This latter tool, CU-Q(2)oL, is available in many languages and should be preferred, where available, over more generic instruments for assessing urticaria-specific effects on quality of life. CU-Q(2)oL is only suited for the investigation of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Similar instruments for other forms of urticaria have yet to be developed and validated. Also, tools for assessing other chronic spontaneous urticaria PROs besides quality of life and symptoms are needed.
Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality of Life , Urticaria/physiopathology , Urticaria/therapy , Chronic Disease , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Urticaria/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lipid transfer protein (LTP), the most frequent cause of primary food allergy in Italy, is a cross-reacting plant pan-allergen. Markers able to predict whether a patient sensitized to a certain food but not yet clinically allergic will develop allergy would be extremely helpful. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to investigate the relevance of IgE levels to some plant foods other than Rosaceae as predictors of either local or systemic allergic reaction in LTP-allergic subjects. METHODS: One hundred (40 males, 60 females , mean age 29 years) peach-allergic patients monosensitized to LTP seen at 14 Italian centres in 2009 were studied. Walnut, hazelnut, peanut, tomato, rice and/or maize allergy was ascertained by interview and confirmed by positive skin prick test. IgE levels to these foods and to rPru p 3 were measured. RESULTS: Higher levels of IgE to Pru p 3 were associated with a higher prevalence of allergy to hazelnut, peanut and walnut. For all study foods, except rice, median IgE levels in allergic subjects significantly exceeded those in tolerant subjects, though within single allergic groups, the differences between patients reporting systemic or local (oral) symptoms were not significant. Ninety-five percent cut-off IgE levels predictive of clinical allergy were established for study foods although the marked overlaps between allergic and tolerant subjects made them of limited usefulness. CONCLUSION: Specific IgE levels are only partially predictive of clinical allergy. The reasons why some individuals showing low specific IgE levels develop clinical allergy whereas others showing high IgE levels do not, despite similar exposure to the allergen, remain unclear.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Cross Reactions , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Adult , Antigens, Plant , Carrier Proteins/immunology , Female , Food/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Humans , Italy , Male , Plant Proteins , Prognosis , Rosaceae/immunology , Skin Tests , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Horses play a significant role in people's leisure time in Italy and other countries, but few data are available on IgE-mediated sensitization to horse allergens in patients without occupational exposure. We assessed, in a multicentric survey, the prevalence of horse sensitization in atopic subjects and its clinical characteristics. METHODS: Allergists from the whole Italian territory were required to collect the results of skin prick tests from at least 100 consecutive subjects. Those patients with a positive skin test to horse dander underwent a detailed interview concerning clinical history, pet ownership and possible exposure. RESULTS: Data from 3,235 outpatients were collected and 2,097 had at least 1 skin positivity. Among them, 113 (5.38%) were sensitized to horse dander (9 monosensitized). Thirty patients reported direct horse contact (4 owners and 26 for riding or occasional contact), 23 patients were sometimes in contact with horse owners and 60 subjects denied any direct or indirect exposure. Among 9 horse monosensitized patients, 6 had intermittent and mild rhinitis and 3 persistent moderate/severe rhinitis plus asthma. Three of them were horse owners or riders and the remaining had no contact with the animal. CONCLUSIONS: Our data evidence that the rate of sensitization to horse dander is not negligible and probably underestimated. In susceptible, not occupationally exposed individuals, horse contact, but also indirect or no apparent exposure, may induce sensitization. We recommend inclusion of horse allergen in the routine panel for the diagnosis of respiratory allergy.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Horses/immunology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Environmental Exposure , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/etiology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/etiology , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/immunology , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Rhinitis/immunology , Skin Tests , Young AdultABSTRACT
Allergen subcutaneous immunotherapy is a long lasting treatment which can modify the natural history of allergic respiratory diseases. Recommended administration is required for a minimum of three years. During this long term therapy the daily management is based on two crucial points, discussed in this review, such as the prevention and the treatment of side effects and the improvement and follow-up of patient adherence. This review specifically focuses on subcutaneous immunotherapy.
Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Desensitization, Immunologic/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Patient Compliance , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/immunology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
A 3-year prospective post marketing survey on the safety of the recently developed ultrashort pre-seasonal subcutaneous immunotherapy (uSCIT-MPL4) with pollen allergoids adjuvanted with monophosphoryl lipid A was performed. A total of 510 patients received uSCIT-MPL4, 61% for grass, 35.7% for birch, 13.2% for parietaria and 3% for other pollens (ragweed, mugwort, and olive). A total of 3308 injections were given and the mean duration of uSCIT-MPL-4 was 2.3 years. Overall, only 7 slight systemic reactions (SR) were observed in 510 patients (1.37%) and 2.11/1000 injections suggesting that this treatment is even safer than traditional depot injection SIT.
Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Lipid A/analogs & derivatives , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Adult , Allergoids , Female , Humans , Italy , Lipid A/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
The GA(2)LEN taskforce on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) published in 2009 a position paper concerning PROS and HRQoL assessment in clinical trials on allergy. Because of the specificity of this topic in asthma and rhinitis, specific recommendations are needed. The aim of this position paper is to define PROs and their meaning in asthma and rhinitis research, explore the available tools to provide criteria for a proper choice, identify patient-related factor which could influence PROs assessment, define specific recommendations for assessment, analysis and results spreading, underline the unexplored areas and unmet needs. PROs assessment is gaining increasing importance, and it must be performed with a rigorous methodological procedure and using validated tools. This approach enables to better understand patient-related factors influencing clinical trials and real-life management outcomes, identify patients subgroups that can benefit from specific treatment and management plan and tailor treatment to address PROs (not only physician-defined targets) to improve asthma and rhinitis management.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality of Life , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/psychology , Health Planning Guidelines , Humans , Research Design , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/psychology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The aim of this Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN) consensus report is to provide recommendations for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) evaluation in clinical trials for allergic diseases, which constitute a global health problem in terms of physical, psychological economic and social impact. During the last 40 years, PROs have gained large consideration and use in the scientific community, to gain a better understanding of patients' subjective assessment with respect to elements concerning their health condition. They include all health-related reports coming from the patient, without involvement or interpretation by physician or others. PROs assessment should be performed by validated tools (disease-specific tools when available or generic ones) selected taking into account the aim of the study, the expected intervention effects and the determinant and confounding factors or patient-related factors which could influence PROs. Moreover, each tool should be used exclusively in the patient population following the authors' indications without modification and performing a cross-cultural validation if the tool must be used in a language that differs from the original. The result analysis also suggests that the relevance of PROs results in any interventional study should include a pre-post assessment providing information concerning statistical differences within or among groups, rates of response for the PROs and a minimal important difference for the population. The report underlines the importance of further investigation on some topics, such as the quality assessment of existing PROs tools, the definition of inclusion and exclusion criteria and a more extensive evaluation of the correlation between PROs, besides health-related quality of life, and clinical data.
Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Data Collection/methods , Humans , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a frequent cause of hypersensitivity reactions, therefore, in clinical practice, it's important to find safe and effective substances. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerability of etoricoxib and its subsequent actual use and safety at home. METHODS: Etoricoxib tolerance was assessed by single-blind-placebo-controlled oral challenges and its subsequent use was checked by a standardized telephone call. The test was performed in 139 subjects (83 single NSAID reactors and 56 multiple NSAID reactors). RESULTS: The drug was not tolerated in 4 cases (2.8%) causing wheals on the face area in 3 single reactors and a severe generalised reaction occurring three hours after the intake of a therapeutic dose in a multiple reactor. The phone calls showed that 64 (52.8%) patients did not take etoricoxib, mostly due to the fear of adverse effects; in 5 cases (4.2%), the practitioner prescribed a different NSAIDs. Only 52 (43%) subjects took etoricoxib after oral challenges; all tolerated the drug but 2 single reactors, who reported a very mild labial oedema. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the good long-term tolerability of etoricoxib in patients with a history of hypersensitivity to other NSAIDs without differences between single and multiple reactors. Nonetheless, in NSAID-intolerant subjects this drug should be first challenged in specialised centres due to the risk ofsevere reactions.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Pyridines/adverse effects , Sulfones/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Etoricoxib , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Single-Blind MethodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is the treatment of choice for acute food-allergic reactions but existing guidelines state that it should be prescribed uniquely to patients who already experienced at least one food-induced anaphylactic episode. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether in Italy epinephrine auto-injector is prescribed uniquely following the existing guidelines only, or is allergen-informed as well (i.e., based on the potential risk associated with sensitization to certain food allergens), and hence preventive. METHODS: 1110 adult patients (mean age 31 years; M/F 391/719) with food allergy seen at 19 allergy outpatient clinics were studied. Patients with a history of probable anaphylaxis were identified. Subjects were classified as having primary (type 1) and/or secondary (type 2) food allergy and were divided into several subgroups based on the offending allergen/food. Epinephrine prescriptions were recorded and analyzed both as a whole and by sensitizing allergen. RESULTS: Epinephrine was prescribed to 138/1100 (13%) patients with a significant difference between subjects with type-1 and type-2 food allergy (132/522 [25%] vs. 6/629 [1%]; p < 0.001). The epinephrine group included most patients with a history of anaphylaxis (55/62 [89%]) or emergency department visits 106/138 (77%). In some specific subsets, namely fish-, tree nuts-, and lipid trasfer protein (LTP)-allergic patients, epinephrine was prescribed to patients without a history of systemic allergic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Italian allergy specialists prescribe epinephrine auto-injectors both on the basis of clinical history of severe reactions and on a critical analysis of the hazard associated with the relevant protein allergens, which suggests a good knowledge of allergens as well as acquaintance with the guidelines for prescription of emergency medication.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Food Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anaphylaxis/complications , Anaphylaxis/physiopathology , Child , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prescriptions , Self AdministrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies of the prevalence of different types of food allergy in adults are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To define the prevalence of IgE-mediated food allergies in Italian adults attending allergy clinics and to assess possible differences associated with geographical position and/or dietary habits. METHODS: Seventeen allergy outpatient clinics scattered throughout Italy participated to a multi-centre study in 2007. The number of atopic subjects and of food allergic patients along with clinical features were recorded by pre-defined criteria. Patients with unequivocal history of food allergy confirmed by positive skin prick test were included as cases. RESULTS: Twenty five thousand six hundred and one subjects were screened; 12,739 (50%) were atopic, and 1079 (8,5%) had IgE-mediated food allergy. Sixty four percent of patients were females. Overall, the most frequent food allergy was the pollen-food allergy syndrome (55%), which was associated with oral allergy syndrome in 95% of cases and whose frequency decreased southbound. Forty-five percent of patients had a type 1 food allergy, in most cases (72%) caused by fruits and vegetables, and generally associated with a history of systemic symptoms. Type 1 food allergies represented 96% of food allergies in the South. Lipid transfer protein (LTP) accounted for 60% of sensitizations and caused most primary food allergies in all areas. CONCLUSION: Plant-derived foods cause most food allergies in Italian adults. The pollen-food allergy syndrome is the most frequent type of food allergy followed by allergy to LTP whose frequency increases southbound. The pattern of allergy to certain foods is clearly influenced by specific geographic features such as pollen exposure and dietary habits.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Diet/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/classification , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Italy/epidemiology , Male , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Data about food-induced anaphylaxis in Italy are missing. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to detect the main foods/food allergens causing anaphylaxis in Italy. METHODS: The frequency of anaphylaxis and the relative importance of many offending foods were assessed in 1,110 adult patients with food allergy diagnosed by common criteria at 19 allergy centres scattered throughout Italy from 1 January to 31 December 2007. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 1,110 (5%) food-allergic patients experienced at least 1 episode of anaphylaxis. On average, they were older than other food-allergic patients (34 vs. 31 years; p < 0.05). The majority of anaphylactic episodes occurred in patients sensitized to lipid transfer protein (LTP; n = 19), followed by shrimp (n = 10), tree nuts (n = 9), legumes other than peanut (n = 4), and seeds (n = 2); peanut, spinach, celery, buckwheat, wheat, avocado, tomato, fish, meat, and Anisakis caused an anaphylactic reaction in single patients. Among LTP-hypersensitive patients, peach caused 13/19 anaphylactic episodes. Shrimp-allergic patients were significantly older than other patients with food-induced anaphylaxis (p < 0.05), whereas patients allergic to LTP experienced their anaphylactic episodes at a younger age (p < 0.001). The frequency of anaphylaxis among patients sensitized to LTP, shrimp or tree nuts did not differ between northern and central/southern Italy. CONCLUSION: LTP is the most important allergen causing food-induced anaphylaxis in Italy, peach being the most frequently offending food. Peanut-induced anaphylaxis seems very uncommon. Geographic and environmental differences both between Italy and other countries and within Italy seem to play a relevant role in the pattern of sensitization to foods.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Carrier Proteins/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Nuts/adverse effects , Seafood/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Aged , Animals , Child , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Humans , Incidence , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Vegetables/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Platinum salts can cause allergic sensitization. Recently, hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin, the most recent platinum coordination complex introduced into clinical practice, have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To validate and standardize skin tests to diagnose and possibly prevent hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin. The secondary aims were to confirm IgE-mediated pathogenesis of the clinical manifestations and to evaluate skin tests to predict patients at risk of hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin. METHODS: We performed skin tests at increasing concentrations of oxaliplatin on 15 patients never exposed to platinum salts, on 10 patients treated with oxaliplatin without any adverse reactions, and on 4 patients who had shown hypersensitivity reactions to the drug. Moreover we performed skin tests on 8 additional patients starting before the 5th dose and following a course of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A positive skin reaction to the prick test at a concentration of 1 mg/ml was seen in 1 patient with hypersensitivity reactions. The intradermal test was positive in all the patients with hypersensitivity reactions at a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml. It was negative in the 15 nonexposed subjects, and in the 10 patients who had been exposed to oxaliplatin without hypersensitivity reactions. The skin test administered to patients before chemotherapy was positive in one case. CONCLUSION: A skin prick test at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and, in the case of a negative response, an intradermal test at the optimal concentration of 0.1 mg/ml should be used, starting from the 5th course of therapy, to diagnose and prevent hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Neoplasms/immunology , Organoplatinum Compounds/immunology , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/chemically induced , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/therapeutic use , Oxaliplatin , Skin Tests/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It has been known for some time now that reactions to allergens, not only those inhaled but also those in food, varies with age in atopical patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the specific IgE positivity percentage in order to improve laboratory diagnosis in subjects with suspected food allergy. METHODS: The positivity percentages of specific IgE were analysed (UniCAP100-Pharmacia) taking into consideration the two age brackets of below and above 12 years. The below 12 years age bracket was then further divided into pre-school age (3-5 years) and school age (6-12 years). RESULTS: By measuring the simple positivity percentage for specific IgE to food allergens, there is a clear decrease as the child matures in reactions to milk and eggs and an increase towards food IgEs that cross-react with grass and tree pollens or other inhaled allergens like moulds and mites. CONCLUSION: It will be necessary in the future to have the diagnostic means to identify this cross-reaction problem by using recombinant allergens that can demonstrate the combined reaction between inhaled and food allergens.