Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Microbiol ; 126(1): 58-67, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30199131

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Quantitative data on the doses needed to inactivate micro-organisms on fomites are not available for ultraviolet applications. The goal of this study was to determine the doses of UV light needed to reduce bacteria and murine norovirus (MNV) on hard surface fomites through experimentation and to identify appropriate models for predicting targeted levels of reduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Stainless steel and Formica laminate coupons were selected as they are common surfaces found in healthcare settings. Test organisms included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), Clostridium difficile and MNV. The fomites were inoculated with 105 -107 bacteria or virus and exposed to a range of UV doses. The order of resistance to UV irradiation was virus, bacterial spore and vegetative cell. The best fitting inactivation curves suggested nonlinear responses to increasing doses after a 3-4 log reduction in the test organisms. The average UV doses required for a 3 log reduction in the C. difficile, MRSA and VRE were 16 000, 6164 and 11 228 (mJ-s cm-2 ) for stainless steel, respectively, and 16 000, 11 727 and 12 441 (mJ-s cm-2 ) for Formica laminate, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Higher UV light doses are required to inactivate bacteria and viruses on hard surfaces than in suspension. Greater doses are needed to inactivate bacterial spores and MNV compared to vegetative bacteria. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Quantitative data and models on UV light doses needed to inactivate bacteria and MNV on hard surfaces are now available. The generalizable results of this study can be used to estimate required UV dosages to achieve targeted levels of inactivation based on estimated levels of contamination or to support quantitative microbial risk assessments.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/radiation effects , Disinfection/methods , Enterococcus/radiation effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/radiation effects , Norovirus/radiation effects , Animals , Clostridioides difficile/chemistry , Clostridioides difficile/growth & development , Disinfection/instrumentation , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterococcus/chemistry , Enterococcus/drug effects , Enterococcus/growth & development , Fomites/microbiology , Fomites/virology , Humans , Kinetics , Methicillin/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/chemistry , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Mice , Models, Biological , Norovirus/chemistry , Norovirus/growth & development , Spores, Bacterial/chemistry , Spores, Bacterial/growth & development , Spores, Bacterial/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Rays , Vancomycin/pharmacology
2.
J Appl Microbiol ; 119(1): 245-52, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25939813

ABSTRACT

AIMS: In the present study, we conducted a quantitative microbial risk assessment forecasting the exposure to Campylobacter jejuni contaminated surfaces during preparation of chicken fillets and how using a disinfectant-wipe intervention to clean a contaminated work area decreases the risk of infection following the preparation of raw chicken fillet in a domestic kitchen. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a Monte Carlo simulation of the risk of transferring Camp. jejuni strain A3249, from various surfaces to hands and subsequently transferring it to the mouth was forecasted. The use of a disinfectant-wipe intervention to disinfect contaminated surface area was also assessed. Several assumptions were used as input parameters in the classical Beta-Poisson model to determine the risk of infection. The disinfectant-wipe intervention reduced the risk of Camp. jejuni infection by 2-3 orders on all fomites. CONCLUSIONS: The use of disinfectant wipes after the preparation of raw chicken meat reduces the risk of Camp. jejuni infections. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This risk assessment shows that the use of disinfectant wipes to decontaminate surface areas after chicken preparation reduces the annual risk of Camp. jejuni infections up to 99·2%, reducing the risk from 2 : 10 to 2 : 1000.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections/microbiology , Campylobacter jejuni/drug effects , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Food Handling , Animals , Campylobacter jejuni/growth & development , Chickens , Disinfection/instrumentation , Food Handling/methods , Hand/microbiology , Humans , Meat/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL