Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Cell ; 149(3): 618-29, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22541432

ABSTRACT

The homeodomain (HD) protein Bicoid (Bcd) is thought to function as a gradient morphogen that positions boundaries of target genes via threshold-dependent activation mechanisms. Here, we analyze 66 Bcd-dependent regulatory elements and show that their boundaries are positioned primarily by repressive gradients that antagonize Bcd-mediated activation. A major repressor is the pair-rule protein Runt (Run), which is expressed in an opposing gradient and is necessary and sufficient for limiting Bcd-dependent activation. Evidence is presented that Run functions with the maternal repressor Capicua and the gap protein Kruppel as the principal components of a repression system that correctly orders boundaries throughout the anterior half of the embryo. These results put conceptual limits on the Bcd morphogen hypothesis and demonstrate how the Bcd gradient functions within the gene network that patterns the embryo.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Animals , Body Patterning , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism
2.
Mol Cell ; 75(6): 1178-1187.e4, 2019 09 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31402096

ABSTRACT

In complex genetic loci, individual enhancers interact most often with specific basal promoters. Here we investigate the activation of the Bicoid target gene hunchback (hb), which contains two basal promoters (P1 and P2). Early in embryogenesis, P1 is silent, while P2 is strongly activated. In vivo deletion of P2 does not cause activation of P1, suggesting that P2 contains intrinsic sequence motifs required for activation. We show that a two-motif code (a Zelda binding site plus TATA) is required and sufficient for P2 activation. Zelda sites are present in the promoters of many embryonically expressed genes, but the combination of Zelda plus TATA does not seem to be a general code for early activation or Bicoid-specific activation per se. Because Zelda sites are also found in Bicoid-dependent enhancers, we propose that simultaneous binding to both enhancers and promoters independently synchronizes chromatin accessibility and facilitates correct enhancer-promoter interactions.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/biosynthesis , Drosophila Proteins/biosynthesis , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Nucleotide Motifs , Response Elements , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Transcription Factors/biosynthesis , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
3.
Development ; 150(23)2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934130

ABSTRACT

The zinc-finger protein Zelda (Zld) is a key activator of zygotic transcription in early Drosophila embryos. Here, we study Zld-dependent regulation of the seven-striped pattern of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve). Individual stripes are regulated by discrete enhancers that respond to broadly distributed activators; stripe boundaries are formed by localized repressors encoded by the gap genes. The strongest effects of Zld are on stripes 2, 3 and 7, which are regulated by two enhancers in a 3.8 kb genomic fragment that includes the eve basal promoter. We show that Zld facilitates binding of the activator Bicoid and the gap repressors to this fragment, consistent with its proposed role as a pioneer protein. To test whether the effects of Zld are direct, we mutated all canonical Zld sites in the 3.8 kb fragment, which reduced expression but failed to phenocopy the abolishment of stripes caused by removing Zld in trans. We show that Zld also indirectly regulates the eve stripes by establishing specific gap gene expression boundaries, which provides the embryonic spacing required for proper stripe activation.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Animals , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
4.
Genes Dev ; 32(9-10): 723-736, 2018 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29764918

ABSTRACT

The K50 (lysine at amino acid position 50) homeodomain (HD) protein Orthodenticle (Otd) is critical for anterior patterning and brain and eye development in most metazoans. In Drosophila melanogaster, another K50HD protein, Bicoid (Bcd), has evolved to replace Otd's ancestral function in embryo patterning. Bcd is distributed as a long-range maternal gradient and activates transcription of a large number of target genes, including otd Otd and Bcd bind similar DNA sequences in vitro, but how their transcriptional activities are integrated to pattern anterior regions of the embryo is unknown. Here we define three major classes of enhancers that are differentially sensitive to binding and transcriptional activation by Bcd and Otd. Class 1 enhancers are initially activated by Bcd, and activation is transferred to Otd via a feed-forward relay (FFR) that involves sequential binding of the two proteins to the same DNA motif. Class 2 enhancers are activated by Bcd and maintained by an Otd-independent mechanism. Class 3 enhancers are never bound by Bcd, but Otd binds and activates them in a second wave of zygotic transcription. The specific activities of enhancers in each class are mediated by DNA motif variants preferentially bound by Bcd or Otd and the presence or absence of sites for cofactors that interact with these proteins. Our results define specific patterning roles for Bcd and Otd and provide mechanisms for coordinating the precise timing of gene expression patterns during embryonic development.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/genetics , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Amino Acid Motifs , Animals , Body Patterning/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Embryonic Development/drug effects , Embryonic Development/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Protein Binding
5.
Mol Biol Evol ; 38(6): 2179-2190, 2021 05 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33599280

ABSTRACT

Changes in regulatory networks generate materials for evolution to create phenotypic diversity. For transcription networks, multiple studies have shown that alterations in binding sites of cis-regulatory elements correlate well with the gain or loss of specific features of the body plan. Less is known about alterations in the amino acid sequences of the transcription factors (TFs) that bind these elements. Here we study the evolution of Bicoid (Bcd), a homeodomain (HD) protein that is critical for anterior embryo patterning in Drosophila. The ancestor of Bcd (AncBcd) emerged after a duplication of a Zerknullt (Zen)-like ancestral protein (AncZB) in a suborder of flies. AncBcd diverged from AncZB, gaining novel transcriptional and translational activities. We focus on the evolution of the HD of AncBcd, which binds to DNA and RNA, and is comprised of four subdomains: an N-terminal arm (NT) and three helices; H1, H2, and Recognition Helix (RH). Using chimeras of subdomains and gene rescue assays in Drosophila, we show that robust patterning activity of the Bcd HD (high frequency rescue to adulthood) is achieved only when amino acid substitutions in three separate subdomains (NT, H1, and RH) are combined. Other combinations of subdomains also yield full rescue, but with lower penetrance, suggesting alternative suboptimal activities. Our results suggest a multistep pathway for the evolution of the Bcd HD that involved intermediate HD sequences with suboptimal activities, which constrained and enabled further evolutionary changes. They also demonstrate critical epistatic forces that contribute to the robust function of a DNA-binding domain.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/embryology , Evolution, Molecular , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Animals , Drosophila/genetics , Epistasis, Genetic , Female , Phenotype
6.
Genes Dev ; 28(6): 608-21, 2014 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24637116

ABSTRACT

In vivo cross-linking studies suggest that the Drosophila transcription factor Bicoid (Bcd) binds to several thousand sites during early embryogenesis, but it is not clear how many of these binding events are functionally important. In contrast, reporter gene studies have identified >60 Bcd-dependent enhancers, all of which contain clusters of the consensus binding sequence TAATCC. These studies also identified clusters of TAATCC motifs (inactive fragments) that failed to drive Bcd-dependent activation. In general, active fragments showed higher levels of Bcd binding in vivo and were enriched in predicted binding sites for the ubiquitous maternal protein Zelda (Zld). Here we tested the role of Zld in Bcd-mediated binding and transcription. Removal of Zld function and mutations in Zld sites caused significant reductions in Bcd binding to known enhancers and variable effects on the activation and spatial positioning of Bcd-dependent expression patterns. Also, insertion of Zld sites converted one of six inactive fragments into a Bcd-responsive enhancer. Genome-wide binding experiments in zld mutants showed variable effects on Bcd-binding peaks, ranging from strong reductions to significantly enhanced levels of binding. Increases in Bcd binding caused the precocious Bcd-dependent activation of genes that are normally not expressed in early embryos, suggesting that Zld controls the genome-wide binding profile of Bcd at the qualitative level and is critical for selecting target genes for activation in the early embryo. These results underscore the importance of combinatorial binding in enhancer function and provide data that will help predict regulatory activities based on DNA sequence.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Amino Acid Motifs , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Nuclear Proteins , Protein Binding , Trans-Activators/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics
7.
Development ; 144(5): 844-855, 2017 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28126841

ABSTRACT

How differential levels of gene expression are controlled in post-mitotic neurons is poorly understood. In the Drosophila retina, expression of the transcription factor Defective Proventriculus (Dve) at distinct cell type-specific levels is required for terminal differentiation of color- and motion-detecting photoreceptors. Here, we find that the activities of two cis-regulatory enhancers are coordinated to drive dve expression in the fly eye. Three transcription factors act on these enhancers to determine cell-type specificity. Negative autoregulation by Dve maintains expression from each enhancer at distinct homeostatic levels. One enhancer acts as an inducible backup ('dark' shadow enhancer) that is normally repressed but becomes active in the absence of the other enhancer. Thus, two enhancers integrate combinatorial transcription factor input, feedback and redundancy to generate cell type-specific levels of dve expression and stable photoreceptor fate. This regulatory logic may represent a general paradigm for how precise levels of gene expression are established and maintained in post-mitotic neurons.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/metabolism , Proventriculus/embryology , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Homeostasis , Mitosis , Neurons/metabolism , Retina/embryology , Retina/metabolism , Rhodopsin/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism
8.
Genome Res ; 26(7): 1000-9, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27197210

ABSTRACT

Early embryogenesis is characterized by the maternal to zygotic transition (MZT), in which maternally deposited messenger RNAs are degraded while zygotic transcription begins. Before the MZT, post-transcriptional gene regulation by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) is the dominant force in embryo patterning. We used two mRNA interactome capture methods to identify RBPs bound to polyadenylated transcripts within the first 2 h of Drosophila melanogaster embryogenesis. We identified a high-confidence set of 476 putative RBPs and confirmed RNA-binding activities for most of 24 tested candidates. Most proteins in the interactome are known RBPs or harbor canonical RBP features, but 99 exhibited previously uncharacterized RNA-binding activity. mRNA-bound RBPs and TFs exhibit distinct expression dynamics, in which the newly identified RBPs dominate the first 2 h of embryonic development. Integrating our resource with in situ hybridization data from existing databases showed that mRNAs encoding RBPs are enriched in posterior regions of the early embryo, suggesting their general importance in posterior patterning and germ cell maturation.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Proteome/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Embryonic Development , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Male , Protein Binding
9.
Development ; 142(23): 3996-4009, 2015 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26628090

ABSTRACT

The Drosophila blastoderm and the vertebrate neural tube are archetypal examples of morphogen-patterned tissues that create precise spatial patterns of different cell types. In both tissues, pattern formation is dependent on molecular gradients that emanate from opposite poles. Despite distinct evolutionary origins and differences in time scales, cell biology and molecular players, both tissues exhibit striking similarities in the regulatory systems that establish gene expression patterns that foreshadow the arrangement of cell types. First, signaling gradients establish initial conditions that polarize the tissue, but there is no strict correspondence between specific morphogen thresholds and boundary positions. Second, gradients initiate transcriptional networks that integrate broadly distributed activators and localized repressors to generate patterns of gene expression. Third, the correct positioning of boundaries depends on the temporal and spatial dynamics of the transcriptional networks. These similarities reveal design principles that are likely to be broadly applicable to morphogen-patterned tissues.


Subject(s)
Body Patterning , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Embryo, Nonmammalian/physiology , Animals , Blastoderm/physiology , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Regulatory Networks , Models, Theoretical , Neural Tube/embryology , Signal Transduction , Time Factors , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic
10.
Development ; 138(19): 4291-9, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21865322

ABSTRACT

Despite years of study, the precise mechanisms that control position-specific gene expression during development are not understood. Here, we analyze an enhancer element from the even skipped (eve) gene, which activates and positions two stripes of expression (stripes 3 and 7) in blastoderm stage Drosophila embryos. Previous genetic studies showed that the JAK-STAT pathway is required for full activation of the enhancer, whereas the gap genes hunchback (hb) and knirps (kni) are required for placement of the boundaries of both stripes. We show that the maternal zinc-finger protein Zelda (Zld) is absolutely required for activation, and present evidence that Zld binds to multiple non-canonical sites. We also use a combination of in vitro binding experiments and bioinformatics analysis to redefine the Kni-binding motif, and mutational analysis and in vivo tests to show that Kni and Hb are dedicated repressors that function by direct DNA binding. These experiments significantly extend our understanding of how the eve enhancer integrates positive and negative transcriptional activities to generate sharp boundaries in the early embryo.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Animals , Base Sequence , Crosses, Genetic , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Genes, Reporter , Homeodomain Proteins/physiology , Models, Biological , Molecular Sequence Data , Nuclear Proteins , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription Factors/physiology , Transgenes , Two-Hybrid System Techniques
11.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 106(10): 3823-8, 2009 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19237583

ABSTRACT

The Bicoid (Bcd) transcription factor is distributed as a long-range concentration gradient along the anterior posterior (AP) axis of the Drosophila embryo. Bcd is required for the activation of a series of target genes, which are expressed at specific positions within the gradient. Here we directly tested whether different concentration thresholds within the Bcd gradient establish the relative positions of its target genes by flattening the gradient and systematically varying expression levels. Genome-wide expression profiles were used to estimate the total number of Bcd target genes, and a general correlation was found between the Bcd concentration required for activation and the positions where target genes are expressed in wild-type embryos. However, concentrations required for target gene activation in embryos with flattened Bcd were consistently lower than those present at each target gene's position in the wild-type gradient, suggesting that Bcd is in excess at every position along the AP axis. Also, several Bcd target genes were positioned in correctly ordered stripes in embryos with flattened Bcd, and we suggest that these stripes are normally regulated by interactions between Bcd and the terminal patterning system. Our findings argue strongly against the strict interpretation of the Bcd morphogen hypothesis, and support the idea that target gene positioning involves combinatorial interactions that are mediated by the binding site architecture of each gene's cis-regulatory elements.


Subject(s)
Body Patterning , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Animals , Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Genome, Insect/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Models, Biological , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Trans-Activators/genetics
12.
Elife ; 112022 12 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36503705

ABSTRACT

A challenge in quantitative biology is to predict output patterns of gene expression from knowledge of input transcription factor patterns and from the arrangement of binding sites for these transcription factors on regulatory DNA. We tested whether widespread thermodynamic models could be used to infer parameters describing simple regulatory architectures that inform parameter-free predictions of more complex enhancers in the context of transcriptional repression by Runt in the early fruit fly embryo. By modulating the number and placement of Runt binding sites within an enhancer, and quantifying the resulting transcriptional activity using live imaging, we discovered that thermodynamic models call for higher-order cooperativity between multiple molecular players. This higher-order cooperativity captures the combinatorial complexity underlying eukaryotic transcriptional regulation and cannot be determined from simpler regulatory architectures, highlighting the challenges in reaching a predictive understanding of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes and calling for approaches that quantitatively dissect their molecular nature.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Gene Expression
13.
Curr Biol ; 18(12): 868-76, 2008 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18571415

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Morphogen gradients are thought to create concentration thresholds that differentially position the expression boundaries of multiple target genes. Despite intensive study, it is still unclear how the concentration profiles within gradients are spatially related to the critical patterning thresholds they generate. RESULTS: Here we use a combination of quantitative measurements and ectopic-misexpression experiments to examine the transcriptional-repression activities of the Hunchback (Hb) protein gradient in Drosophila embryos. Our results define five expression boundaries that are set primarily by differences in Hb concentration and two boundaries that are set by combinatorial mechanisms involving Hb and at least one other repressor. CONCLUSIONS: Hb functions as a repressive morphogen, but only within a specific range of concentrations ( approximately 40% to approximately 4.4% of maximum Hb concentration), within which there are at least four distinct concentration thresholds. The lower limit of the range reflects a position where the slope of the gradient becomes too shallow for resolution by specific target genes. Concentrations above the upper limit do not contribute directly to differential-repression mechanisms, but they provide a robust source that permits proper functioning of the gradient in heterozygous embryos that contain only one functional hb gene.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/embryology , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Morphogenesis/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila/ultrastructure , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Microscopy, Confocal , Morphogenesis/physiology , Transcription Factors/genetics
14.
Curr Opin Genet Dev ; 16(2): 165-70, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16503128

ABSTRACT

Complex networks of transcriptional interactions control the processes of animal development. These networks begin with broad positional information that patterns the cells of the early embryo, and end with precise expression profiles that provide the functions of fully differentiated cells. At the heart of these networks are cis-regulatory modules (CRMs), which contain binding sites for regulatory proteins and control the spatial and temporal expression of genes within the network. Recent studies in several model systems have begun to decipher the 'cis-regulatory codes' of CRMs involved in various developmental processes. These studies suggest that CRMs involved in regulating co-expressed genes share sequence characteristics that can be identified by in silico approaches. They also suggest that CRMs involved in specific types of developmental events have common binding site architectures, which can be linked to their specific functions.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid/genetics , Animals , Binding Sites , Body Patterning , Models, Genetic , Transcription, Genetic
15.
Nature ; 426(6968): 849-53, 2003 Dec 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14685241

ABSTRACT

Gradients of regulatory factors are essential for establishing precise patterns of gene expression during development; however, it is not clear how patterning information in multiple gradients is integrated to generate complex body plans. Here we show that opposing gradients of two Drosophila transcriptional repressors, Hunchback (Hb) and Knirps (Kni), position several segments by differentially repressing two distinct regulatory regions (enhancers) of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve). Computational and in vivo analyses suggest that enhancer sensitivity to repression is controlled by the number and affinity of repressor-binding sites. Because the kni expression domain is positioned between two gradients of Hb, each enhancer directs expression of a pair of symmetrical stripes, one on each side of the kni domain. Thus, only two enhancers are required for the precise positioning of eight stripe borders (four stripes), or more than half of the whole eve pattern. Our results show that complex developmental expression patterns can be generated by simple repressor gradients. They also support the utility of computational analyses for defining and deciphering regulatory information contained in genomic DNA.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Body Patterning , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Response Elements/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
16.
Genetics ; 216(1): 1-26, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32878914

ABSTRACT

Key discoveries in Drosophila have shaped our understanding of cellular "enhancers." With a special focus on the fly, this chapter surveys properties of these adaptable cis-regulatory elements, whose actions are critical for the complex spatial/temporal transcriptional regulation of gene expression in metazoa. The powerful combination of genetics, molecular biology, and genomics available in Drosophila has provided an arena in which the developmental role of enhancers can be explored. Enhancers are characterized by diverse low- or high-throughput assays, which are challenging to interpret, as not all of these methods of identifying enhancers produce concordant results. As a model metazoan, the fly offers important advantages to comprehensive analysis of the central functions that enhancers play in gene expression, and their critical role in mediating the production of phenotypes from genotype and environmental inputs. A major challenge moving forward will be obtaining a quantitative understanding of how these cis-regulatory elements operate in development and disease.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Transcriptional Activation , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/chemistry , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Genetic Techniques , Transcription Factors/chemistry , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
17.
Curr Biol ; 16(1): R29-31, 2006 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16401416

ABSTRACT

The morphogen gradient as a source of embryonic patterning is one of the best accepted concepts in developmental biology. Morphogens can be transcription factors or extracellular signals, but in both cases, they are thought to provide concentration thresholds that position different cell fates within the developing embryo. Several recent papers examine the patterning activities of Drosophila Bicoid, the first known molecular morphogen and reach different conclusions about the patterning power of a single morphogen gradient.


Subject(s)
Body Patterning , Drosophila/embryology , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Animals , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
18.
J Theor Biol ; 256(2): 180-6, 2009 Jan 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18926832

ABSTRACT

We construct and implement a stochastic model of convergent extension, using a minimal set of assumptions on cell behavior. In addition to the basic assumptions of volume conservation, random cell motion, and cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesion, and a non-standard assumption that cytoskeletal polymerization generates an internal pressure tending to keep cells convex, we find that we need only two conditions for convergent extension. (1) Each cell type has a particular aspect ratio towards which it regulates its geometry. We do not require that cells align in a specific orientation, e.g. to be oriented mediolaterally. (2) The elongating tissue is composed of cells that prefer to be elongated, and these cells must be accompanied by cells which prefer to be round. The latter effectively provide a boundary to capture. In simulations, our model tissue extends and converges to a stacked arrangement of elongated cells one cell wide, an arrangement which is seen in ascidian notochords, but which has not been observed in other models. This arrangement is achieved without any direct mediolateral bias other than that which is provided by the physical edge of the adjacent tissue.


Subject(s)
Cell Movement/physiology , Models, Biological , Morphogenesis/physiology , Animals , Cell Adhesion/physiology , Cell Shape/physiology , Stochastic Processes
20.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 24(2): 160-165, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31019410

ABSTRACT

Cornelia de Lange Syndrome is a rare genetic disorder that results in distinctive craniofacial deformities, developmental delay, hirsutism, and other physical abnormalities. Case reports suggest some of these patients exhibit sensitivity and paradoxical reactions to certain psychoactive drugs. This report of a 16-year-old male with Cornelia de Lange is the first to describe dystonia from a first-generation antipsychotic that did not respond to conventional treatment with diphenhydramine. The patient initially presented to the Emergency Department for agitation, which progressively worsened after administration of diphenhydramine, olanzapine, and intramuscular haloperidol. The patient returned to the Emergency Department the following day because of altered mental status and lethargy that progressed to periodic lip-smacking movements and contraction of his upper extremities. His symptoms continued despite administration of diphenhydramine and loading doses of 3 antiepileptic drugs. His abnormal labs included an elevated creatine kinase and a prolonged QTc interval on his electrocardiogram. His symptoms were later deemed a probable drug-induced dystonic reaction to haloperidol once seizures were excluded by an unremarkable electroencephalogram. This case supports previous reports suggesting an association between Cornelia de Lange and paradoxical drug reactions, and it is recommended that clinicians strongly weigh the risks of prescribing first-generation antipsychotics for this patient population. These medications should be carefully titrated, with close patient monitoring to prevent adverse drug effects and other iatrogenic complications because antidotes may be rendered ineffective by this condition.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL