Universal suicide screening in emergency departments across a large healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: Suicidal ideation is a common complaint in Emergency Departments (EDs) across the United States (US) and is an important preventable cause of death. Consequently, current Joint Commission guidelines require screening high-risk patients and those with behavioral health needs for suicide. Accordingly, we implemented universal suicide screening for all patients presenting to EDs in our healthcare system and sought to describe the characteristics of the identified "high-risk" patients. We also sought to determine whether universal suicide screening was feasible and what its impact was on ED length of stay (LOS). METHODS: All ED encounters in the healthcare system were assessed. Data were collected from February 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. All patients aged 18 and over were screened using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and categorized as no risk, low risk, moderate risk, and high risk. Encounters were then grouped into 'high risk" and "not high risk," defined as no, low, and moderate risk patients. Data collected included gender, discharge disposition, LOS, and insurance status. RESULTS: A total of 1,058,735 patient encounter records were analyzed. The "high risk" group (n = 11,359; 10.7%) was found to have a higher proportion of male patients (50.9 vs 43.7%) and government payors (71.6 vs. 67.1%) and a higher ED LOS [medians 380 min vs. 198 min] than the not high-risk group (p ≤0.001). Those with suicidal ideation comprised 0.73-1.58% of ED encounters in a given month. A secondary analysis of 2,255,616 ED encounter records from January 2019 - June 30, 2022, revealed that 40,854 (1.81%) encounters required 1:1 observation. The proportion of 1:1 observations in 2019, the year before implementation, was 1.91%. Using a non-inferiority margin of 25%, we found that the proportion of 1:1 patients in 2020, the year following implementation, was non-inferior to (no worse than) the previous year at 2.09% and decreased from 2021 to 2022 (1.69% and 1.57% respectively). CONCLUSION: Implementing universal suicide screening in all EDs within a healthcare system is feasible. The percentage of patients who screened high risk was under 5% of the overall ED population. While the median LOS was longer for "high-risk" patients than for the general ED population, it was not excessively so. Adequate staffing to properly maintain the safety of these patients is paramount.

Patients utilizing emergency medical services - Does facility type matter?

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) play a critical role in the US healthcare system. As freestanding EDs (FSEDs) are integrated into the acute care landscape, local EMS providers are transporting to these facilities, which may be closer in proximity and provide faster turnaround times. We hypothesized that patients transported via EMS to a freestanding ED required fewer tests and are admitted less frequently than those transported to a HBED. Our objective was to compare testing frequency and admission rates between patients transported via EMS to a FSED vs. HBED. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who presented within a large integrated hospital system via EMS to one of 10 HBEDs or one of 6 FSEDs between April 1, 2020 - May 1, 2021. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages and comparisons between groups were obtained using chi squared tests. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation and p-values comparing groups were obtained using t-tests. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of ED type on admission status, labs ordered, and testing performed. RESULTS: A total of 123,120 encounters were included in our study. Mean age at the FSEDs was 59.9 vs. 61.3 at the HBEDs. At the FSEDs 55.6% (n = 4675) were female vs. 53.0% (n = 60,809) at the HBEDs. At the FSEDs 82.0% (n = 6805) were White vs. 60.7% (n = 68,430) at the HBEDs. We found 50.0% (n = 3974) had Medicare at the FSEDs vs 50.9% (n = 55,372) at the FSEDs. At the FSEDs, 69.5% (n = 5846) had bloodwork vs. 82.4% (n = 94,512) at the HBEDs; 68.3% (n = 5745) had an x-ray at the FSEDs vs. 70.7% (n = 81,089) at the HBEDs; 40.1% (n = 3370) had a CT scan at the FSEDs vs. 44.9% (n = 51,503) at the HBEDs; and 40.6% (n = 3412) were admitted at the FSEDs vs. 56.1% (n = 64,355) at the HBEDs. After controlling for Charlson Comorbidity Index, acuity, age, gender, sex, insurance and race, patients in FSEDs were 35% less likely to be admitted as compared to HBEDs. CONCLUSION: Patients brought in via EMS to a FSED were less likely to have blood work, x-ray, or CT scan, and were less likely to be admitted to the hospital than those transported to a HBED.

Computed Tomography Utilization for Patients Presenting with Chest Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) is routinely used in the emergency department (ED) due to its ease of access and its ability to rapidly rule in or out many serious conditions. Freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) have become increasingly used as an alternative to hospital-based emergency departments (HBEDs). The objective of this study was to investigate if the utilization rate of CT differs between FSEDs and HBEDs for chest pain. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients presenting to 17 EDs within a large integrated healthcare system between May 1, 2019 - April 30, 2021 with a chief complaint chest pain. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of facility on CT utilization for chest pain. RESULTS: There were 67,084 patient encounters included in the study. Patients were predominately female (55%), white (61%), and insured through Medicare/Medicaid (59%). After controlling for predictive variables which included Charlson Comorbidity Index, ESI, age, sex, and race, patients who presented to FSEDs with chest pain were less likely to have a CT than those who presented to a HBED (AOR = 0.85, CI (0.81-0.90). CONCLUSION: CT scans of the chest are utilized less frequently at FSEDs compared to HBEDs for patient presenting with chest pain.

Right heart failure: A narrative review for emergency clinicians.

INTRODUCTION: Right heart failure (RHF) is a clinical syndrome with impaired right ventricular cardiac output due to a variety of etiologies including ischemia, elevated pulmonary arterial pressure, or volume overload. Emergency department (ED) patients with an acute RHF exacerbation can be diagnostically and therapeutically challenging to manage. OBJECTIVE: This narrative review describes the pathophysiology of right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension, the methods to diagnose RHF in the ED, and management strategies. DISCUSSION: Right ventricular contraction normally occurs against a low pressure, highly compliant pulmonary vascular system. This physiology makes the right ventricle susceptible to acute changes in afterload, which can lead to RHF. Patients with acute RHF may present with an acute illness and have underlying chronic pulmonary hypertension due to left ventricular failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension, chronic lung conditions, thromboemboli, or idiopathic conditions. Patients can present with a variety of symptoms resulting from systemic edema and hemodynamic compromise. Evaluation with electrocardiogram, laboratory analysis, and imaging is necessary to evaluate cardiac function and end organ injury. Management focuses on treating the underlying condition, optimizing oxygenation and ventilation, treating arrhythmias, and understanding the patient's hemodynamics with bedside ultrasound. As RHF patients are preload dependent they may require fluid resuscitation or diuresis. Hypotension should be rapidly addressed with vasopressors. Cardiac contractility can be augmented with inotropes. Efforts should be made to support oxygenation while trying to avoid intubation if possible. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency clinician understanding of this condition is important to diagnose and treat this life-threatening cardiopulmonary disorder.

Improved hospital mortality rates after the implementation of emergency department sepsis teams.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality with more than 700,000 hospitalizations and 200,000 deaths annually in the United States. Early recognition of sepsis is critical for timely initiation of treatment and improved outcomes. We sought to evaluate. in-hospital mortality rates of patients diagnosed with sepsis before and after implementation of emergency department (ED) sepsis teams. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients seen at a tertiary care ED diagnosed with sepsis and severe sepsis. Pre-implementation study time frame was 5/1/2018-4/30/2019 and post-implementation was 11/1/2019-9/30/2020. A six-month washout period was utilized after implementation of ED-based sepsis teams. Indications for sepsis team activation were: two systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria with suspected infection or two SIRS with confirmed infection during workup. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation or median and quartiles depending on distribution. Multiple logistic regression compared mortality rates pre- and post-implementation while controlling for Charlson comorbidity index. Secondary objectives included comparing time metrics pre- and post-implementation. Student t-tests compared normally distributed variables and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared non-normally distributed variables. RESULTS: There were 1188 participants included in the study; 553 before implementation of sepsis teams and 635 after implementation. Mean age of participants was 64 years. Patients were 74.7% white and 22.6% black. Medicare was the most common health insurance (59%). Mortality rates were significantly lower post-implementation of sepsis teams compared to pre-implementation with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.472, (95%CI, 0.352-0.632). ED LOS (95%CI (-67.2--11.3), hospital LOS (95%CI, -1.0--0.002) and time to lactic acid (95%CI, -10.0- -3.0) and antibiotics (95%CI, -29.0--11.0) were all significantly lower after implementation. CONCLUSION: Implementation of ED sepsis teams decreased inpatient hospital mortality rates, ED length of stay and hospital length of stay.

Reduced mortality and faster treatment in sepsis seen at freestanding vs. hospital-based emergency departments.

INTRODUCTION: Freestanding Emergency Departments (FEDs) have grown in number and understanding their impact on the healthcare system is important. Sepsis causes significant morbidity and mortality and identifying how FEDs impact sepsis morbidity and mortality has not been studied. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a difference in in-hospital mortality for sepsis patients who present initially to FEDs compared to a hospital-based ED. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of adult patients seen at a hospital-based ED or one of three FEDs within a large hospital system from 1/1/2018-10/31/2020. We included those who were diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock and evaluated ED throughput measures, in-hospital mortality, and hospital length of stay. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviations or median and quartiles depending on distribution. Multiple logistic regression was fit to compare in-hospital mortality rates between the two groups. Variables controlled for included Charlson Comorbidity Index, race, gender, insurance, and sepsis severity. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the time metrics. RESULTS: There were 1955 patients included in the study. Mean age of participants was 61.9 at the FEDs vs 63.7 at the HBED. Majority of the participants were white; 88.2% at the FED vs. 77.3% at the HBED; and male 49.0% at the FED vs. 51.1% at the HBED. Most patients had Medicare; 45.4% at the FED vs. 58.3% at the HBED. In-patient mortality rate was significantly lower for patients that presented to FEDs compared to HBED (95%CI 0.13-0.46) adjusted odds ratio 0.24. Time to IV fluids, time to lactate, time to blood cultures, time to ED disposition, ED LOS, time to arrival on the inpatient unit were all significantly lower for FEDs vs HBED (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients presenting to FEDs for sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock had lower inpatient mortality, quicker treatment times, and were transferred and admitted to the hospital faster than patients seen at a HBED.

Risk Factors for Trimethoprim and Sulfamethoxazole-Resistant Escherichia Coli in ED Patients with Urinary Tract Infections.

BACKGROUND: While trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is recommended as one of the first-line empiric therapies for treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis, institutions that observe resistance rates exceeding 20% for Escherichia coli (E. coli) should utilize alternative empiric antibiotic therapy per the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Identifying risk factors associated with TMP-SMX resistance in E. coli may help guide empiric antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections (UTIs). METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included adult patients who were discharged from 12 emergency departments (EDs) with a urine culture positive for E. coli between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between potential risk factors and TMP-SMX resistance. The overall institutional antimicrobial resistance rates for E. coli were compared to the rates seen in the study population of ED urinary isolates. RESULTS: Among 427 patients included from a randomized sample of 500 with a urine culture positive for E. coli, 107 (25.1%) were resistant to TMP-SMX. Three predictors of TMP-SMX resistance were identified: recurrent UTI (OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.27-3.99]), genitourinary abnormalities (OR 2.31 [95% CI 1.17-4.49]), and TMP-SMX use within 90 days (OR 8.77 [95% CI 3.19-28.12]). When the antibiotic susceptibilities for this ED cohort were compared to the institutional antibiogram, the TMP-SMX resistance rate was found to be higher in the ED population (25.1% vs 20%). CONCLUSIONS: TMP-SMX should likely be avoided as first-line therapy for UTI in patients who have recurrent UTIs, genitourinary abnormalities, or have previously received TMP-SMX within the past 90 days. The use of an ED-specific antibiogram should be considered for assessing local resistance rates in this population.

A Pilot Study to Reduce Computed Tomography Utilization for Pediatric Mild Head Injury in the Emergency Department Using a Clinical Decision Support Tool and a Structured Parent Discussion Tool.

INTRODUCTION: The American College of Emergency Physicians embarked on the "Choosing Wisely" campaign to avoid computed tomographic (CT) scans in patients with minor head injury who are at low risk based on validated decision rules. We hypothesized that a Pediatric Mild Head Injury Care Path could be developed and implemented to reduce inappropriate CT utilization with support of a clinical decision support tool (CDST) and a structured parent discussion tool. METHODS: A quality improvement project was initiated for 9 weeks to reduce inappropriate CT utilization through 5 interventions: (1) engagement of leadership, (2) provider education, (3) incorporation of a parent discussion tool to guide discussion during the emergency department (ED) visit between the parent and the provider, (4) CDST embedded in the electronic medical record, and (5) importation of data into the note to drive compliance. Patients prospectively were enrolled when providers at a pediatric and a freestanding ED entered data into the CDST for decision making. Rate of care path utilization and head CT reduction was determined for all patients with minor head injury based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Targets for care path utilization and head CT reduction were established a priori. Results were compared with baseline data collected from 2013. RESULTS: The CDST was used in 176 (77.5%) of 227 eligible patients. Twelve patients were excluded based on a priori criteria. Adherence to recommendations occurred in 162 (99%) of 164 patients. Head CT utilization was reduced from 62.7% to 22% (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.24) where CDST was used by the provider. There were no missed traumatic brain injuries in our study group. CONCLUSION: A Pediatric Mild Head Injury Care Path can be implemented in a pediatric and freestanding ED, resulting in reduced head CT utilization and high levels of adherence to CDST recommendations.

Exposure to point-of-care ultrasound in PA programs before employment.

OBJECTIVES: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is integral to bedside evaluation of ED patients. This study examines POCUS exposure for physician assistants (PAs) before ED employment. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to PAs employed in 13 EDs across a healthcare system. Participants were queried on POCUS education during PA training. Findings were reported as percentages of total respondents, using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The response rate was 70.1%. Only 14.9% of respondents received POCUS exposure in PA school. Of those who received training, most (66.7%) received 5 or fewer hours and 94.1% strongly agree or agree that POCUS education should be integrated into PA education. CONCLUSION: In this survey, most PAs practicing in the ED did not receive POCUS education during training. Practice location and year of graduation may contribute to this finding. Healthcare systems should consider additional training for PAs working in EDs to bridge gaps in knowledge.

Same provider, different location: Variation in patient satisfaction scores between freestanding and hospital-based emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction scores have become quality benchmarks for hospitals, are publicly reported, and are often tied to financial incentives. We determined whether patient satisfaction scores for individual emergency medicine providers varied according to the clinical setting. METHODS: We obtained patient satisfaction survey results from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 for patients treated at 6 freestanding (FED) and 11 hospital-based emergency departments (HBED). Differences in mean score by ED facility were tested for significance. Mean score differences with 95% confidence intervals are presented. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict the odds of receiving different scores by type of ED facility and adjusted for patient and provider demographics and ED length of stay. RESULTS: Sixty-six providers with 3743 total surveys were analyzed: FED (n = 1974) and HBED (n = 1769). Overall satisfaction scores were higher for FED compared to HBED surveys 1.13 [95% CI, 1.0-1.3]. In multivariable logistic regression, we found patients seen at the FEDs were 42% more likely to rate providers courtesy as "very good" compared to patients seen at a HBED [OR: 1.42, 95% CI (0.94-2.15)]. Similarly, patients from FEDs showed increased likelihood to rate providers as "very good" for keeping patients informed about treatment [OR: 1.70, 95% CI (1.21-2.39)], took time to listen to patients [OR: 1.66, 95% CI (0.72-1.60)] and concerned for patient's comfort [OR: 1.54, 95% CI (1.12-2.12)]. CONCLUSION: Individual providers, who practice at both types of facilities, consistently received higher satisfaction ratings from patients at FEDs compared to HBEDs.

Electronic medical record-based interventions to encourage opioid prescribing best practices in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Overdose from opioids has reached epidemic proportions. Large healthcare systems can utilize existing technology to encourage responsible opioid prescribing practices. Our study measured the effects of using the electronic medical record (EMR) with direct clinician feedback to standardize opioid prescribing practices within a large healthcare system. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study compared a 12 month pre- and post-intervention in 14 emergency departments after four interventions utilizing the EMR were implemented: (1) deleting clinician preference lists, (2) defaulting dose, frequency, and quantity, (3) standardizing formulary to encourage best practices, and (4) creating dashboards for clinician review with current opioid prescribing practices. Outlying clinicians received feedback through email and direct counseling. Total number of opioid prescriptions per 100 discharges pre- and post-intervention were recorded as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included number of prescriptions per 100 discharges/clinician exceeding 3-day supply (defined as 12 tablets), number exceeding 30 morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD)/day, and number of non-formulary prescriptions. RESULTS: There were >700,000 discharges during pre- and post-intervention periods. Percentage of total number opioid prescriptions per 100 discharges decreased from 14.4% to 7.4%, a 7.0% absolute reduction, (95% CI,6.9%-7.2%). There was a 5.9% to 0.7% reduction in prescriptions exceeding 3-days, (95% CI, 5.1%-5.3%), a 4.3% to 0.3% reduction in prescriptions exceeding 30 MEDD, (95% CI, 3.9%-4.0%), and a 0.3% to 0.1% reduction in non-formulary prescriptions, (95% CI, 0.2%-0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: A multi modal approach using EMR interventions which provide real time data and direct feedback to clinicians can facilitate appropriate opioid prescribing.

Impact of an individual plan of care for frequent and high utilizers in a large healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION: "Frequent or High Utilizers" are significant stressors to Emergency Departments (EDs) and Inpatient Units across the United States (US). These patients incur higher healthcare costs with ED visits and inpatient admissions. Our aims were to determine whether implementation of individualized care plans (ICPs) could 1) reduce costs, 2) reduce inpatient length of stay (LOS), and 3) reduce ED encounters throughout a large healthcare system. METHODS: 13 EDs were included including academic, community, Free-standing and pediatric EDs. Data was collected from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2017. ICPs were created for high ED utilizers, as recommended by staff input through multidisciplinary care committees at each site. The ICP consisted of 1) specific symptom-related information with approaches in management, 2) recent assessment from specialists, 3) social work summary, and 4) psychiatry summary. A Best Practice Alert was placed in the electronic medical record that could be seen at all hospitals within the system. ICP's were updated annually. RESULTS: 626 ICPs were written; 452 initial ICPs and 174 updates. The 452 ICP patients accounted for 23,705 encounters during the four-year period; on average, an ICP patient visited the ED 52 times (14.75 encounters/year). Overall indirect and direct costs decreased 42% over first 6 months, inpatient LOS improved from 1.9 to 0.97 days/month, and ED encounters decreased from 1.96 to 1.14. All cost and LOS data significantly improved at 24 months post-ICP inception. CONCLUSION: Implementation of individualized care plan can reduce cost, inpatient LOS, and ED encounters for high utilizers.

Comparison of critically ill patients from three freestanding ED's compared to a tertiary care hospital based ED.

BACKGROUND: Freestanding emergency departments (FEDs) care for all patients, including critically ill, 24/7/365. We characterized patients from three FEDs transferred to intensive care units (ICU) at a tertiary care hospital, and compared hospital length of stay(LOS) between patients admitted to ICUs from FEDs versus a hospital-based ED (HBED). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study from January 2014 to December 2016. Demographic and clinical information was compared between FED and HBED patients with chi-square and fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables. The main outcome of interest was hospital LOS. Multi-variable linear regression was performed to estimate association between LOS and emergency facility type, while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: We included 500 critically ill patients (FED = 250 and HBED = 250). Patients did not differ by age, gender, or BMI. FED patients were more likely to be white (89.6% vs. 70.8%, p < 0.001) and have higher Charlson Co-morbidity Index scores (3.5 vs. 2.4, p < 0.001). Average LOS for FED patients was 5 days, compared to 7 days for HBED patients (p < 0.001). After adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders, there was significant correlation between ED facility type and LOS in hospital (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients transferred from FEDs to an ICU were similar in age and gender, but more likely to be white with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score. FED patients experienced shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients admitted from a HBED.

Number of Weeks Rotating in the Emergency Department Has a Greater Effect on Ultrasound Milestone Competency Than a Dedicated Ultrasound Rotation.

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound (US) is vital to modern emergency medicine (EM). Across residencies, there is marked variability in US training. The "goal-directed focused US" part of the Milestones Project states that trainees must correctly acquire and interpret images to achieve a level 3 milestone. Standardized methods by which programs teach these skills have not been established. Our goal was to determine whether residents could achieve level 3 with or without a dedicated US rotation. METHODS: Thirty-three first- and second-year residents were assigned to control (no rotation) and intervention (US rotation) groups. The intervention group underwent a 2-week curriculum in vascular access, the aorta, echocardiography, focused assessment with sonography for trauma, and pregnancy. To test acquisition, US-trained emergency medicine physicians administered an objective structured clinical examination. To test interpretation, residents had to identify normal versus abnormal findings. Mixed-model logistic regression tested the association of a US rotation while controlling for confounders: weeks in the emergency department (ED) as a resident, medical school US rotation, and postgraduate years. RESULTS: For image acquisition, medical school US rotation and weeks in the ED as a resident were significant (P = .03; P = .04) whereas completion of a US rotation and postgraduate years were not significant. For image interpretation, weeks in the ED as a resident was the only significant predictor of performance (P = .002) whereas completion of a US rotation and medical school US rotation were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve a level 3 milestone, weeks in the ED as a resident were significant for mastering image acquisition and interpretation. A dedicated US rotation did not have a significant effect. A medical school US rotation had a significant effect on image acquisition but not interpretation. Further studies are needed to best assess methods to meet US milestones.