Ascending aorta dilatation is associated to hard cardiovascular events, follow-up from multicentric ARGO-Perspective project.

Aortic root dilatation has been proposed as hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD). Nevertheless, the role of the aortic root dilatation as a possible additional HMOD is still unclear since studies conducted so far are quite heterogeneous regarding the type of population analyzed, the aortic tract considered, and the type of outcomes accounted for. The aim of the present study is to assess whether the presence of aortic dilatation is associated with strong cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE: heart failure, CV death, stroke, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial revascularization) in a population of patients affected by essential hypertension. Four hundred forty-five hypertensive patients from six Italian hospitals were recruited as part of ARGO-SIIA study1. For all centers, follow-up was obtained by re-contacting all patients by telephone and through the hospital's computer system. Aortic dilatation (AAD) was defined through absolute sex-specific thresholds as in previous studies (41 mm for males, 36 mm for females). Median follow-up was 60 months. AAD was found to be associated with the occurrence of MACE (HR = 4.07 [1.81-9.17], p < 0.001). This result was confirmed after correction for main demographic characteristics such as age, sex and BSA (HR = 2.91 [1.18-7.17], p = 0.020). At penalized Cox regression, age, left atrial dilatation, left ventricular hypertrophy and AAD were identified as best predictor of MACEs and AAD resulted a significant predictor of MACEs even after correction for these confounders (HR = 2.43 [1.02-5.78], p = 0.045). The presence of AAD was found to be associated with an increased risk of MACE independently of for major confounders, including established HMODs. AAD ascending aorta dilatation, LAe left atrial enlargement, LVH left ventricular hypertrophy, MACEs major adverse cardiovascular events, SIIA Società Italiana dell'Ipertensione Arteriosa (Italian Society for Arterial Hypertension).

Safety implications of combining ACE inhibitors with thiazides for the treatment of hypertensive patients.

INTRODUCTION: ACE-inhibitors (ACEI) and diuretics are the typical first-line antihypertensive drugs with complementary mechanisms of action. The present paper is summarizing the evidence supporting the efficacy of their combination in a broad range of hypertensive patients. AREAS COVERED: This source of data is different trials investigating the use of ACEI and diuretics in different populations of patients. The available evidence supports some advantage for thiazide-type compounds (chlortalidone-CHT and indapamide-IND) in the prevention of major CV complications. In terms of safety, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and indapamide are associated with a lesser rate of hypokalemia and abnormalities of metabolic profile (glucose control, uric acid levels, serum potassium levels). As far as the results of clinical trials, the most relevant studies are involving the combination of benazepril or perindopril with HCTZ (benazepril) or IND (Perindopril) respectively. All these studies have resulted in a favorable clinical outcome. In terms of safety profile, the combination of ACEi and diuretic is safe and comparable with that of ACEi and calcium channel blockers with no differences in the rate of major adverse events (cough or angioedema) and a lower rate of ankle edema. EXPERT OPINION: The combination of ACEi and diuretic is safe and well-tolerated and should be considered among the first-line treatments in most of the patients with hypertension.