Efficacy and Safety of Acoramidis in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is characterized by the deposition of misfolded monomeric transthyretin (TTR) in the heart. Acoramidis is a high-affinity TTR stabilizer that acts to inhibit dissociation of tetrameric TTR and leads to more than 90% stabilization across the dosing interval as measured ex vivo. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy in a 2:1 ratio to receive acoramidis hydrochloride at a dose of 800 mg twice daily or matching placebo for 30 months. Efficacy was assessed in the patients who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area. The four-step primary hierarchical analysis included death from any cause, cardiovascular-related hospitalization, the change from baseline in the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, and the change from baseline in the 6-minute walk distance. We used the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method to compare all potential pairs of patients within strata to generate a P value. Key secondary outcomes were death from any cause, the 6-minute walk distance, the score on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary, and the serum TTR level. RESULTS: A total of 632 patients underwent randomization. The primary analysis favored acoramidis over placebo (P<0.001); the corresponding win ratio was 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 2.2), with 63.7% of pairwise comparisons favoring acoramidis and 35.9% favoring placebo. Together, death from any cause and cardiovascular-related hospitalization contributed more than half the wins and losses to the win ratio (58% of all pairwise comparisons); NT-proBNP pairwise comparisons yielded the highest ratio of wins to losses (23.3% vs. 7.0%). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in the acoramidis group and the placebo group (98.1% and 97.6%, respectively); serious adverse events were reported in 54.6% and 64.9% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, the receipt of acoramidis resulted in a significantly better four-step primary hierarchical outcome containing components of mortality, morbidity, and function than placebo. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. (Funded by BridgeBio Pharma; ATTRibute-CM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03860935.).

Rationale and design of the RAPID-WATER-FLOW trial: Radiolabeled perfusion to identify coronary artery disease using water to evaluate responses of myocardial FLOW.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging to detect coronary artery disease (CAD) using the truth-standard of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) or coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA). BACKGROUND: 15O-water has a very high first-pass extraction that allows accurate quantification of myocardial blood flow and detection of flow-limiting CAD. However, the need for an on-site cyclotron and lack of automated production at the point of care and relatively complex image analysis protocol has limited its clinical use to date. METHODS: The RAPID WATER FLOW study is an open-label, multicenter, prospective investigation of the accuracy of 15O-water PET to detect obstructive angiographic and physiologically significant stenosis in patients with suspected CAD. The study will include the use of an automated system for producing, dosing, and injecting 15O-water and enrolling approximately 215 individuals with suspected CAD at approximately 10 study sites in North America and Europe. The primary endpoint of the study is the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the 15O-water PET study using the truth-standard of ICA with FFR or iFR to determine flow-limiting stenosis, or CCTA to rule out CAD and incorporating a quantitative analytic platform developed for the 15O-water PET acquisitions. Sensitivity and specificity are to be considered positive if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval is superior to the threshold of 60% for both, consistent with prior registration studies. Subgroup analyses include assessments of diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in female, obese, and diabetic individuals, as well as in those with multivessel disease. All enrolled individuals will be followed for adverse and serious adverse events for up to 32 hours after the index PET scan. The study will have >90% power (one-sided test, α = 0.025) to test the hypothesis that sensitivity and specificity of 15O-water PET are both >60%. CONCLUSIONS: The RAPID WATER FLOW study is a prospective, multicenter study to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 15O-water PET as compared to ICA with FFR/iFR or CCTA. This study will introduce several novel aspects to imaging registration studies, including a more relevant truth standard incorporating invasive physiologic indexes, coronary CTA to qualify normal individuals for eligibility, and a more quantitative approach to image analysis than has been done in prior pivotal studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Clinical-Trials.gov (#NCT05134012).

Echocardiographic indices of left ventricular function and filling pressure are not related to blood pool activity on pyrophosphate scintigraphy.

BACKGROUND: Pyrophosphate (PYP) imaging has a high diagnostic accuracy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA). Indeterminate findings are often reported due to persistent blood pool activity, presumed to be from low cardiac output. We evaluated the relationship between blood pool activity on PYP imaging and echocardiographic indices of cardiac function. METHODS: Clinical and imaging data of 189 patients referred for PYP scintigraphy were evaluated. All patients underwent planar imaging and SPECT (diagnostic standard). Among those with a negative PYP SPECT, persistent left ventricular blood pool activity on planar images was inferred by a visual score ≥2 or a heart-to-contralateral (HCL) ratio ≥ 1.5. Absence of blood pool activity was inferred when both visual score was < 2 and HCL was < 1.5. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), stroke volume index (SVi), and left atrial pressure (LAP) were calculated from standard transthoracic echocardiograms. RESULTS: ATTR-CA was present in 43 (23%) patients. Among those with a negative PYP SPECT, 11 patients had significant blood pool activity. Patients with ATTR-CA had a lower LVEF, SVi, and GLS, with a higher LAP, compared to those without ATTR-CA. Among those without ATTR-CA, there were no significant differences in these parameters. CONCLUSION: Approximately 8% of patients with a negative PYP SPECT have significant blood pool activity. Measures of cardiac function are not different among those with and without blood pool activity. PYP SPECT should be routinely performed in all patients to avoid false image interpretation.

Multi-center study of inter-rater reproducibility, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy of CZT versus conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

BACKGROUND: Cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-based detectors exhibit higher diagnostic sensitivity in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) than conventional Anger-MPI for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD); however, reduced specificity and diagnostic accuracy of CZT-MPI were observed. This study aims to compare these different camera systems and to examine the degree of inter-rater reproducibility among readers with varying experience in MPI. METHODS: 83 patients who underwent double stress/rest examinations using both a CZT and conventional SPECT cameras within one visit were included. Anonymized and randomized MPI-images were distributed to 15 international readers using a standardized questionnaire. Subsequent coronary angiography findings of ten patients served as a reference for analysis of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Image quality was significantly better in CZT-MPI with significantly lower breast attenuation (P < 0.05). CZT-MPI exhibited higher sensitivity than Anger-MPI (87.5% vs. 62.5%) and significantly reduced specificity (40% vs. 100%). Readers experienced with both camera systems had the highest inter-rater agreement indicating higher reproducibility (CZT 0.54 vs. conv. 0.49, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Higher diagnostic sensitivity of CZT-MPI offers advantages in detection of CAD yet potentially of at the cost of reduced specificity, therefore it requires special training and a differentiated evaluation approach, especially for non-experienced readers with such camera systems.

DSPECT-specific normative limits for left ventricular size and function.

BACKGROUND: Differences in spatial resolution and image filtering between the solid-state DSPECT and traditional Anger SPECT (ASPECT) cameras are likely to result in differences in LV measurements. However, DSPECT-specific normal values are not available. The traditional approach of using patients deemed to have a low (< 5%) probability of coronary artery disease for the derivation of normative values has a number of limitations. We used healthy organ-donor subjects without known disease or medication use for derivation of normal values. METHODS: Subjects were 92 consecutive kidney or liver donors who underwent single-day rest (5 mCi)-stress (15 mCi) Tc-99m sestamibi-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) on the DSPECT camera for pre-operative evaluation and had normal perfusion and LV function. Exclusion criteria included any known cardiac disease or medications. LV measurements were made on the post-stress supine stress images using QGS®. RESULTS: Of 92 subjects (mean age 54.4 ± 15.0 and 39% men), mean EF ± 2SD for women and men was 77.2% ± 14.1% and 70.0 % ± 14.7%, respectively. Mean end-diastolic volume ± 2SD for women and men was 67.0 ± 32.2 mL and 99.6 ± 51.6 mL (indexed 38.3 ± 17.2 mL/m2 and 48.1 ± 25.9 mL/m2), respectively. Mean end-systolic volume ± 2SD for women and men was 16.1 ± 15.7 mL and 31.2 ± 29.2 mL (indexed 9.2 ± 8.8 mL/m2 and 15.0 ± 14.2 mL/m2), respectively. Mean LV wall volume ± 2SD for women and men was 95.9 ± 26.0 mL and 112.0 ± 48.8 mL (indexed 55.0 ± 13.8 mL/m2 and 54.1 ± 24.6 mL/m2), respectively. CONCLUSION: We report DSPECT-specific LV measurements from normal subjects from which limits of normality can be derived for clinic use. Organ donors who undergo pre-operative MPI are a suitable cohort for the derivation of normal values.

Mechanisms of left ventricular dyssynchrony: A multinational SPECT study of patients with bundle branch block.

BACKGROUND: To better understand the mechanisms of left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD), we explored the relative contributions of QRS duration (QRSd), LV ejection fraction (EF), volumes and scar to LVMD measured by gated single-photon emission tomography in a population of consecutive patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB) compared to controls. METHODS: Myocardial perfusion imaging studies of 275 LBBB and 83 RBBB patients from three centers were analyzed. LVMD was defined as an abnormal phase bandwidth or phase standard deviation. Hospital and gender-specific normal values were obtained from 172 controls. RESULTS: The prevalence of LVMD was 85 and 40% in LBBB and RBBB, respectively. Ejection fraction, scar severity, and LBBB morphology independently explained 70% of variance seen in PhaseBW. Ejection fraction had the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.918) in the receiver operating characteristics analysis of LVMD with an optimal cut-off of 47% (sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). Notably, QRSd was not predictive. CONCLUSION: LV mechanical dysfunction plays a greater role than conduction abnormality in the genesis of LVMD, a finding that is intriguing in the context of contemporary literature which suggests that QRSd is the parameter that is most predictive of CRT response.

Screening coronary angiography in patients with long-standing diabetes mellitus undergoing kidney transplant evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The utility of coronary angiography in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing kidney transplant evaluation is unclear. Predictors of critical angiography lesions in these patients will aid in appropriate use of angiography. METHODS: Single-center study of 80 patients with ≥15 years of diabetes mellitus who underwent a screening coronary angiography despite a negative cardiac stress test. Risk factors for needing coronary intervention (CI) (percutaneous or bypass grafting) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (23%) had a ≥70% occlusion in one or more major coronary vessel(s), with right coronary artery being the most commonly involved (71%). Fifteen patients (19%) underwent coronary intervention: ten percutaneously and five with bypass surgery. Risk factors for needing CI were not being on statin (OR 3.54, P = 0.047) and history of stroke or peripheral vascular disease (PVD; OR 3.5, P = 0.034). A model that included statin use, stroke/PVD history, and glycosylated hemoglobin had a receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve of 0.8 to predict CI. CONCLUSION: Despite a negative stress test, the prevalence of critical coronary lesions was high among kidney transplant candidates with long-standing diabetes. Risk factors for needing coronary intervention were absence of statin use and a history of stroke or peripheral vascular disease.

ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease : A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

This document is the second of 2 companion appropriate use criteria (AUC) documents developed by the American College of Cardiology, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The first document (J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1647-1672) addresses the evaluation and use of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, whereas this document addresses this topic with regard to structural (nonvalvular) heart disease. While dealing with different subjects, the 2 documents do share a common structure and feature some clinical overlap. The goal of the companion AUC documents is to provide a comprehensive resource for multimodality imaging in the context of structural and valvular heart disease, encompassing multiple imaging modalities.Using standardized methodology, the clinical scenarios (indications) were developed by a diverse writing group to represent patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included common applications and anticipated uses. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Practice Guidelines.A separate, independent rating panel scored the 102 clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario.The primary objective of the AUC is to provide a framework for the assessment of these scenarios by practices that will improve and standardize physician decision making. AUC publications reflect an ongoing effort by the American College of Cardiology to critically and systematically create, review, and categorize clinical situations in which diagnostic tests and procedures are utilized by physicians caring for patients with cardiovascular diseases. The process is based on the current understanding of the technical capabilities of the imaging modalities examined.

The association of imaging equipment age with other quality metrics and successful laboratory accreditation by the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission.

BACKGROUND: Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) accreditation is granted or delayed depending on the fulfillment of several quality metrics. Investing in up-to-date equipment might reflect a commitment to quality. METHODS: Data from echocardiography (n = 3079) and nuclear cardiology (n = 1835) accreditation applications submitted between 2012 and 2014 were evaluated to determine the mean age of laboratory equipment. Laboratory quality was assessed by the number of missing quality metrics, and a composite quality score was calculated as the sum of missing quality metrics. A lower score thus represented better laboratory quality. The relationship between equipment age and quality was explored as an interaction term between equipment age and the composite quality score and was incorporated into regression models for prediction of accreditation status. RESULTS: During the study period, 49% of echocardiography and 42% of nuclear laboratories were granted accreditation without delay. For both echocardiography and nuclear laboratories, there was a statistically significant trend toward an increasing number of missing quality metrics with increasing quartiles of equipment age. The interaction between equipment age and the composite quality score was a significant predictor of delay of accreditation for both echocardiography and nuclear cardiology laboratories, with a stronger association for 1st-time applicants. Among sites applying for accreditation in both modalities simultaneously, accreditation in one modality predicted the accreditation decision for the other. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory quality is an important determinant of IAC accreditation, and equipment age is an effect modifier of this relationship. Contemporary equipment likely reflects a commitment to quality, for both echocardiography and nuclear laboratories.

Pulmonary vascular resistance determines mortality in end-stage renal disease patients with pulmonary hypertension.

The multifactorial etiology of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) includes patients with and without elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). We explored the prognostic implication of this distinction by evaluating pretransplant ESRD patients who underwent right heart catheterization and echocardiography. Demographics, clinical data, and test results were analyzed. All-cause mortality data were obtained. Median follow-up was 4 years. Of the 150 patients evaluated, echocardiography identified 99 patients (66%) with estimated pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure > 36 mm Hg, which correlated poorly with mortality (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.72-2.27, P = .387). Right heart catheterization identified 88 (59%) patients with mean PA pressure ≥ 25 mm Hg. Of these, 70 had PVR ≤ 3 Wood units and 18 had PVR > 3 Wood units. Survival analysis demonstrated a significant prognostic effect of an elevated PVR in patients with high mean PA pressures (HR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.07-4.77, P = .03), while patients with high mean PA pressure and normal PVR had equivalent survival to those with normal PA pressure. Despite the high prevalence of PH in ESRD patients, elevated PVR is uncommon and is a determinant of prognosis in patients with PH. Patients with normal PVR had survival equivalent to those with normal PA pressures.

Relationship between left ventricular dyssynchrony and scar burden in the genesis of ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) has poor predictive value for ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT). Other parameters such as LV dyssynchrony (LVD), and LV scar burden have also been individually associated with VT, but the interplay of these factors in the genesis of VT has not been explored. This retrospective study sought to evaluate the relationship between LVD and imaging characteristics of the myocardial substrate in predicting VT. METHODS: We identified 183 patients (150 men; mean age: 64 ± 14 years and mean LVEF: 23% ± 7%), who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention and who underwent a gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion scan prior to ICD implantation. LVD was determined by phase analysis of the GSPECT images. Occurrence of VTs was established through routine ICD interrogations and review of electronic medical records. RESULTS: LVD was present in 136 (74%) patients. VT occurred in 48 (26%) patients. Ninety-eight percent of patient who experienced VT had LVD. Patients without LVD had a significantly better survival free of both sustained and non-sustained VT (HR, 95% CI 4.90, 2.12-11.20; P < 0.0001). The combination of LVD and myocardial scar occupying > 6% of LV myocardium accounted for 83% of all VT events. CONCLUSIONS: LVD assessment by GSPECT is strongly associated with incident VT in patients with low LVEF. The combination of LVD and scar burden predicted the majority of VT events.

Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

This information statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology highlights advances in cardiac SPECT imaging and supports the incorporation of new technology and techniques in laboratories performing nuclear cardiology procedures. The document focuses on the application of the latest imaging protocols and the utilization of newer hardware and software options to perform high quality, state-of-the-art SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures. Recommendations for best practices of cardiac SPECT imaging are discussed, highlighting what imaging laboratories should be doing as the standard of care in 2018 to achieve optimal results (based on the ASNC 2018 SPECT guideline [Dorbala et al., J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y ]).

Myocardial perfusion imaging: Lessons learned and work to be done-update.

As the second term of our commitment to Journal begins, we, the editors, would like to reflect on a few topics that have relevance today. These include prognostication and paradigm shifts; Serial testing: How to handle data? Is the change in perfusion predictive of outcome and which one? Ischemia-guided therapy: fractional flow reserve vs perfusion vs myocardial blood flow; positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using Rubidium-82 vs N-13 ammonia vs F-18 Flurpiridaz; How to differentiate microvascular disease from 3-vessel disease by PET? The imaging scene outside the United States, what are the differences and similarities? Radiation exposure; Special issues with the new cameras? Is attenuation correction needed? Are there normal databases and are these specific to each camera system? And finally, hybrid imaging with single-photon emission tomography or PET combined with computed tomography angiography or coronary calcium score. We hope these topics are of interest to our readers.

Correction to: Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.

The above position statement originally published containing errors in the author metadata; specifically, the Expert Content Reviewers-Andrew Einstein, Raymond Russell and James R. Corbett-were tagged as full authors of the paper. The article metadata has now been corrected to remove Drs. Einstein, Russell and Corbett from the author line, and the PubMed record has been updated accordingly.

Cardiac amyloidosis is prevalent in older patients with aortic stenosis and carries worse prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive cardiac imaging allows detection of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of clinically suspected CA in patients with moderate and severe AS referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in age and gender categories, and assess associations between AS-CA and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively identified consecutive AS patients defined by echocardiography referred for further CMR assessment of valvular, myocardial, and aortic disease. CMR identified CA based on typical late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) patterns, and ancillary clinical evaluation identified suspected CA. Survival analysis with the Log rank test and Cox regression compared associations between CA and mortality. RESULTS: There were 113 patients (median age 74 years, Q1-Q3: 62-82 years), 96 (85%) with severe AS. Suspected CA was present in 9 patients (8%) all > 80 years. Among those over the median age of 74 years, the prevalence of CA was 9/57 (16%), and excluding women, the prevalence was 8/25 (32%). Low-flow, low-gradient physiology was very common in CA (7/9 patients or 78%). Over a median follow-up of 18 months, 40 deaths (35%) occurred. Mortality in AS + CA patients was higher than AS alone (56% vs. 20% at 1-year, log rank 15.0, P < 0.0001). Adjusting for aortic valve replacement modeled as a time-dependent covariate, Society of Thoracic Surgery predicted risk of mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction, CA remained associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 2.92, 95% CI = 1.09-7.86, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Suspected CA appears prevalent among older male patients with AS, especially with low flow, low gradient AS, and associates with all-cause mortality. The importance of screening for CA in older AS patients and optimal treatment strategies in those with CA warrant further investigation, especially in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in Valvular Heart Disease : A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

This document is 1 of 2 companion appropriate use criteria (AUC) documents developed by the American College of Cardiology, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. This document addresses the evaluation and use of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, whereas the second, companion document addresses this topic with regard to structural heart disease. Although there is clinical overlap, the documents addressing valvular and structural heart disease are published separately, albeit with a common structure. The goal of the companion AUC documents is to provide a comprehensive resource for multimodality imaging in the context of valvular and structural heart disease, encompassing multiple imaging modalities.Using standardized methodology, the clinical scenarios (indications) were developed by a diverse writing group to represent patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included common applications and anticipated uses. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.A separate, independent rating panel scored the 92 clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario.The primary objective of the AUC is to provide a framework for the assessment of these scenarios by practices that will improve and standardize physician decision making. AUC publications reflect an ongoing effort by the American College of Cardiology to critically and systematically create, review, and categorize clinical situations where diagnostic tests and procedures are utilized by physicians caring for patients with cardiovascular diseases. The process is based on the current understanding of the technical capabilities of the imaging modalities examined.