Different but Equal: Outcomes of Prolonged Postanesthesia Care Unit Stay After Trauma Laparotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital overcrowding is common and can lead to delays in intensive care unit (ICU) admission, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality in medical and surgical patients. Data on delayed ICU admission are limited in the postsurgical trauma cohort. Damage control laparotomy with temporary abdominal closure (DCL-TAC) for severely injured patients is often followed by an aggressive early resuscitation phase, usually occurring in the ICU. We hypothesized that patients who underwent DCL-TAC with initial postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay would have worse outcomes than those directly admitted to ICU. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified all trauma patients who underwent DCL-TAC at a level 1 trauma center over a 5 y period. Demographics, injuries, and resuscitation markers at 12 and 24 h were collected. Patients were stratified by location after index laparotomy (PACU versus ICU) and compared. Outcomes included composite morbidity and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Of the 561 patients undergoing DCL-TAC, 134 (24%) patients required PACU stay due to ICU bed shortage, and 427 (76%) patients were admitted directly to ICU. There was no difference in demographics, injury severity score, time to resuscitation, complications, or mortality between PACU and ICU groups. Only 46% of patients were resuscitated at 24 h; 76% underwent eventual primary fascial closure. Under-resuscitation at 24 h (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.95, P = 0.03), increased age (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-10.55, P < 0.0001), and increased injury severity score (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.07, P < 0.0001) were associated with mortality on multivariable logistic regression. The median time in PACU was 3 h. CONCLUSIONS: PACU hold is not associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing DCL-TAC. While ICU was designed for the resuscitation of critically ill patients, PACU is an appropriate alternative when an ICU bed is unavailable.

Synchronous tracheostomy and gastrostomy placement results in shorter length of stay in traumatic brain injury patients.

BACKGROUND: American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) guidelines recommend gastrostomy for patients suspected to require enteral access device for 4-6 weeks. Our hypothesis was that traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients undergoing synchronous tracheostomy/gastrostomy (SYNC) compared to tracheostomy first (DELAY) have shorter length of stay (LOS) but higher rates of unnecessary gastrostomy. METHODS: Retrospective review of TBI patients requiring tracheostomy in 2017-2022 â€‹at a Level 1 trauma center was conducted. SYNC and DELAY patients were compared, and CoxPH analysis was performed for LOS. RESULTS: 394 patients were included [mean age: 42 (SD:18); mortality: 9 â€‹%]. The DELAY group had longer LOS (39 vs 32 days, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). There was no significant difference in unnecessary gastrostomy rate between groups (p â€‹= â€‹0.1331). In adjusted hazard analysis, SYNC predicted shorter LOS (HR:1.54; 95 â€‹% CI:1.20-1.98, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous gastrostomy was associated with shorter length of stay and similar rates of unnecessary gastrostomy in TBI patients.

Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics in Penetrating Neck Aerodigestive Injuries Are Not Associated with Improved Outcomes.

Background: Literature currently supports the limited use of prophylactic antibiotics within the trauma population. However, data supporting limited (≤24 h) or extended (>24 h) use in penetrating aerodigestive neck injuries is lacking. We sought to describe the role of prophylactic antibiotics in this population and hypothesized there was no reduction in complications for patients on extended prophylactic antibiotics. Methods: Using a single-center trauma registry, patients with penetrating aerodigestive neck injuries were identified over a 5-year period. Demographics, injuries, management, and prophylactic antibiotic utilization were collected. Patients were stratified by the utilization of extended prophylactic antibiotics. Outcomes included infection, leak, reinterventions, and mortality. Results: Of 436 patients with penetrating neck injuries, 72 (17%) patients were identified with aerodigestive injuries. Forty-one (57%) patients received extended (>24 h) prophylactic antibiotics, whereas 31 (43%) received limited (≤24 h) prophylactic antibiotics. There was no difference in the patient demographics or injury severity score between the two groups. Extended prophylactic antibiotic use was associated with higher rates of infection (22% vs. 3%, p = 0.036) and leak (15% vs. 0%, p = 0.034) and no difference in reintervention (20% vs. 3%, p = 0.068) or mortality (10% vs. 13%, p = 0.719) compared with limited prophylactic antibiotics. Median duration of extended antibiotic use was 7 days. Operative intervention was equivalent across extended prophylactic antibiotics and limited antibiotics groups (59% vs. 58%, p = 0.968). Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to support the extended (>24 h) use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with penetrating neck aerodigestive injuries.